Show simple item record

Trading volume and firm‐specific announcements: Implications for the market model

dc.contributor.authorHelmuth, John A.
dc.contributor.authorRobin, Ashok J.
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-05T16:49:55Z
dc.date.available2018-02-05T16:49:55Z
dc.date.issued1998
dc.identifier.citationHelmuth, John A.; Robin, Ashok J. (1998). "Trading volume and firm‐specific announcements: Implications for the market model." Review of Financial Economics 7(2): 183-195.
dc.identifier.issn1058-3300
dc.identifier.issn1873-5924
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/142312
dc.description.abstractThe market model is commonly used in finance to study events and to evaluate security performance. With daily data, it is not uncommon to find low R‐squares, in the range 0–10%. Prior studies have attempted to improve the fit of the model by excluding observations associated with high trading volume. In this study, we compare the results of the high‐volume‐exclusion approach with the more direct firm‐specific announcement exclusion approach. The announcement approach excludes observations associated with Wall Street Journal Index news items regarding the firm. By excluding the [−1,0] fays relative to such news in a sample of 68 firms, we find that R‐squares increase significantly by about 5%. By excluding the days relative to earnings announcements only, R‐squares increase by about 4%. These results are then compared to the high‐volume‐exclusion approach. It is found that this approach is more efficient as an 8% increase in R‐squares is produced.The results of this study provide valuable evidence to empiricists by comparing the two approaches to improving the fit of the market model. The high‐volume ‐exclusion approach provides higher R‐squares. However, the relative efficiency of the two approaches should be balanced against the arguments for the methodologically correct approach. The advantage of using the firm‐specific announcement exclusion approach is that there is more confidence of excluding only firm‐specific movements from the estimation of the market model. It also allows a researcher to quickly and unambiguously identify the announcements and delete the corresponding observations. Furthermore, we find that about 50% of the improved fit, relative to the volume approach, can be accomplished by excluding earnings announcements. The methodological disadvantage of using the high‐volume‐exclusion approach is that it is affected not only by firm‐specific announcements but also by other factors, such as the heterogeneity of investor expectations. These factors may influence the choice of using firm‐specific announcements rather than the high‐volume approach despite the lower increment in R‐squares.
dc.publisherMcGraw Hill
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.titleTrading volume and firm‐specific announcements: Implications for the market model
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEconomics
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michigan‐Dearborn USA
dc.contributor.affiliationotherRochester Institute of Technology USA
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/142312/1/rfe183.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/S1058-3300(99)80153-0
dc.identifier.sourceReview of Financial Economics
dc.identifier.citedreferenceL.S. Bamber. Unexpected Earnings, Firm Size and Trading Volume around Quarterly Earnings Announcements. Accounting Review. 1987; 63: 510 – 532.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceT. Berry, K. Howe. Public Information Arrival. Journal of Finance. 1994; XLIX (No. 4): 1331 – 1346.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceB. Cornell. Volume and R, ‐squares: A First Look. Journal of Financial Research. 1990; 13: 1 – 6.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceD. Denis, D. Denis, A. Sarin. The Information Content of Dividend Changes: Cash Flow Signaling, Overinvestment, and Dividend Clienteles. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis. 1994; 29: 567 – 587.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceP. Dodd, J. Warner. On Corporate Governance: A Study of Proxy Contests. Journal of Financial Economics. 1983; 11: 401 – 438.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceE. Fama, L. Fisher, M. Jensen, R. Roll. The Adjustment of Stock Prices to New Information. International Economic Review. 1969; 10: 1 – 21.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceS. Graham, W. Pirie, W. Powell. Detecting Abnormal Returns Using the Market Model with Pre‐tested Data. Journal of Financial Research. 1996; 19.1: 21 – 40.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJ. Johnston. Econometric Methods. New York: McGraw Hill. 1984.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJ.M. Karpoff. The Relation between Price Changes and Volume: A Survey. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis. 1987; 22: 109 – 126.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceS.P. Kothari. Price‐earnings Regressions in the Presence of Prices Leading Earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics. 1992; 15: 173 – 202.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJ. Lintner. The Valuation of Risk Assets and the Selection of Risky Investments in Stock Portfolios and Capital Budgets. Review of Economics and Statistics. 1965; 47: 13 – 37.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceO. Palmon, H. Sun, A. Tang. The Impact of Publication of Analysts’ Recommendations on Returns and Trading Volume. Financial Review. 1994; 29.3: 395 – 418.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceA. Robin. On Improving the Performance of the Market Model. Journal of Financial Research. 1993; 16.4: 367 – 376, (Winter).
dc.identifier.citedreferenceR. Roll. R, ‐squares. Journal of Finance. 1988; 43: 541 – 566.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceM. Scholes, J. Williams. Estimating Beta from Nonsynchronous Data. Journal of Financial Economics. 1977; 5: 309 – 327.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceW. Sharpe. Capital Asset Pricing: A Theory of Market Equilibrium Under Conditions of Risk. Journal of Finance. 1964; 19: 425 – 442.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceR. Thompson, C. Olsen, J. Dietrich. Attributes of News about Firms: An Analysis of Firmspecific News Reported in the Wall Street Journal Index. Journal of Accounting Research. 1987; 25: 245 – 274.
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.