View Item 

Show simple item record

A Critical Appraisal of Guidelines for Antenatal Care: Components of Care and Priorities in Prenatal Education
dc.contributor.authorHanson, Lisa
dc.contributor.authorVandeVusse, Leona
dc.contributor.authorRoberts, Joyce
dc.contributor.authorForristal, Amanda
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-07T18:25:33Z
dc.date.available2018-03-07T18:25:33Z
dc.date.issued2009-11-12
dc.identifier.citationHanson, Lisa; VandeVusse, Leona; Roberts, Joyce; Forristal, Amanda (2009). "A Critical Appraisal of Guidelines for Antenatal Care: Components of Care and Priorities in Prenatal Education." Journal of Midwifery & Women’s Health 54(6).
dc.identifier.issn1526-9523
dc.identifier.issn1542-2011
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/142521
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltd
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.subject.otherprenatal education
dc.subject.otherprenatal care
dc.subject.otherpregnancy
dc.subject.otherantepartum
dc.subject.otherantenatal guidelines
dc.subject.otherantenatal testing
dc.titleA Critical Appraisal of Guidelines for Antenatal Care: Components of Care and Priorities in Prenatal Education
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelNursing
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.contributor.affiliationumJoyce Roberts, CNM, PhD, FACNM, FAAN, is Professor of Nursing and Director of the Nursing Midwifery Program at the University of Michigan and member of the faculty in the School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ann Arbor, MI.
dc.contributor.affiliationotherLisa Hanson, CNM, PhD, FACNM, is an Associate Professor at Marquette University, College of Nursing, Midwifery Program, Milwaukee, WI. She has practiced at Aurora Sinai Midwifery and Wellness Center in Milwaukee for 22 years.
dc.contributor.affiliationotherLeona Vande Vusse, CNM, PhD, FACNM, is an Associate Professor and Program Director at Marquette University, College of Nursing, Midwifery Program, Milwaukee, WI.
dc.contributor.affiliationotherAmanda Forristal, CNM, MS, Maj, AN, is a staff nurse‐midwife at Carl R. Darnall Amy Medical Center, Fort Hood, TX.
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/142521/1/j.jmwh.2009.08.002.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jmwh.2009.08.002
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Midwifery & Women’s Health
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSakala C, Corry MP. Evidence‐based maternity care: What it is and what it can achieve. New York: The Milbank Memorial Fund, 2008.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStrong TH. Expecting trouble: The myth of prenatal care in America. New York: New York University Press, 2000.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNovick G. Women’s experience of prenatal care: An integrative review. J Midwifery Womens Health 2009; 54: 226 – 37.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCamiletti YA, Alder R. Learning needs as perceived by women less than or equal to 16 weeks pregnant. Can J Public Health 1999; 90: 229 – 32.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceArmstrong TM, Pooley JA. Being pregnant: A qualitative study of women’s lived experience of pregnancy. J Prenat Perinat Psychol Health 2005; 20: 4 – 24.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVonderheid SC, Norr KF, Handler AS. Prenatal health promotion content and health behaviors. West J Nurs Res 2007; 3: 258 – 76.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSable MR, Herman AA. The relationship between prenatal health behavior advice and low birth weight. Public Health Rep 1997; 112: 332 – 9.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEnkin M, Keirse MJNC, Neilson J, Crowther C, Duley L, Hodnett E, et al. A guide to effective care in pregnancy and childbirth, 3rd ed. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2000.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJordan RG, Murphy PA. Risk assessment and risk distortion: Finding the balance. J Midwifery Womens Health 2009; 54: 191 – 200.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLu MC, Kotelchuck M, Culhane JF, Hobel CJ, Klerman LV, Thorp JM. Preconception care between pregnancies: The content of internatal care. Matern Child Health J 2006; 10 ( 5 suppl ): S107 – 22.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKleinveld JH, Timmermans DR, de Smit DJ, Adér HJ, vad der Wal G, tenKate LP. Does prenatal screening influence anxiety levels of pregnant women? A longitudinal randomised controlled trial. Prenat Diagn 2006; 26: 354 – 61.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOhman SG, Saltvedt S, Waldenstrom U, Grunewald C. Pregnant women’s responses to information about an increased risk of carrying a baby with Down syndrome. Birth 2006; 33: 64 – 73.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNeilson JP. Ultrasound for fetal assessment in early pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009; 3: 00075320 – 100000000‐00059.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKing T. Prenatal care for the 21st century: Outside the 20th century box. J Midwifery Womens Health 2009; 54: 167.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRoberts JE. Priorities in prenatal education. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 1976; 5: 17 – 20.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKnowles MS. The modern practice of adult education. Andragogy vs. pedagogy. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall/Cambridge, 1980.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGagnon AJ, Sandall J. Individual or group antenatal education for childbirth or parenthood, or both. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007; 3: CD002869.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDeclercq ER, Sakala C, Corry MP, Applebaum S. Listening to Mothers II: Report of the second national U.S. survey of women’s childbearing experiences. New York: Childbirth Connection, 2006.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDeclerq ER, Sakala C, Corry MP, Appelbaum S, Risher P. Listening to Mothers: Report of the first national US survey of women’s childbearing experiences. New York: Maternity Center Association, 2002.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBurns E. U.S. search engine rankings, April 2007. Available from: http:searchenginewatch.com3626021 [Accessed April 14, 2009].
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFerguson B. Health literacy and health disparities: The role they play in maternal and child health. Nurs Womens Health 2008; 12: 286 – 98.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHesse BW, Nelson DE, Kreps GL, Croyle RT, Arora NK, Rimer BK, et al. Trust and sources of health information: The impact of the internet and its implications for health care providers‐findings from the First Health Information National Trends Survey. Arch Intern Med 2005; 165: 2618 – 24.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceYbarra ML, Suman M. Help seeking behavior and the Internet: A national survey. Int J Med Inform 2006; 75: 29 – 41.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSmith R. Editorial: The future of healthcare systems. Br Med J 1997; 314: 1495.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAmerican College of Nurse‐Midwives. Code of ethics, October 2008. Available from: http:midwife.orgsiteFilesdescriptivecode_of_ethics_2008.pdf [Accessed May 15, 2009].
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAmerican College of Nurse‐Midwives. Core competencies for basic midwifery practice, January, 2008. Available from: http:midwife.orgsiteFilesdescriptiveCore_Competencies_6_07.pdf [Accessed May 15, 2009].
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAmerican College of Nurse‐Midwives. Philosophy of the American College of Nurse‐Midwives, September 2004. Available from: http:midwife.orgphilosophy.cfm [Accessed May 15, 2009].
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAmerican College of Nurse‐Midwives. Standards for the practice of midwifery, March 2003. Available from: http:midwife.orgsiteFilesdescriptiveStandards_for_Practice_of_Midwifery_2003.pdf [Accessed May 15, 2009].
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSepers C, terMulen R. Regulating health care: The development of guidelines in medical practice and health policy. In terMulen R, Biller‐Andorno N, Lenk C, Lie RK, editors. Evidence‐based practice in medicine and health care: A discussion of ethical issues. Berlin: Springer‐Verlag, 2005: 9 – 16.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTillett J. Developing guidelines and maintaining quality in antenatal care. J Midwifery Womens Health 2009; 54: 238 – 40.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceIngersoll GL. Evidence‐based nursing: What it is and what it isn’t. Nurs Outlook 2000; 48: 151 – 2.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKennedy HP, Farrell T, Paden R, Hill S, Jolivet R, Willetts J, et al. “I wasn’t alone”—A study of group prenatal care in the military. J Midwifery Womens Health 2009; 54: 176 – 83.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSackett DL, Rosenberg WM, Gray JA, Haynes RB, Richardson WS. Evidence based medicine: What it is and what it isn’t. Br Med J 1996; 312: 71 – 2.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceUS Department of Veterans Affairs and the Department of Defense. VA/DoD clinical practice guideline: Management of pregnancy 2009. Available from: http:www.healthquality.va.govpregnancy.asp [Accessed September 10, 2009].
dc.identifier.citedreferenceInstitute for Clinical Systems Improvement Web site. Knowledge resources. Routine prenatal care, 12th ed. Available from: http:www.icsi.orgprenatal_care_4prenatal_care_routine_full_version_2.html [Accessed September 10, 2009].
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAmerican Academy of Pediatrics and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Guidelines for perinatal care, 6th ed. Washington, DC: American Academy of Pediatrics, 2007.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKirkham C, Harris S, Grzybowski S. Evidence‐based prenatal care: Part I. General prenatal care and counseling issues. Am Fam Physician 2005; 71: 1307 – 16.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKirkham C, Harris S, Grzybowski S. Evidence‐based prenatal care: Part II. Third‐trimester care and prevention of infectious diseases. Am Fam Physician 2005; 71: 1555 – 60.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceUnited States Department of Health and Human Services Expert Panel on the Content of Prenatal Care. Caring for our future: The content of prenatal care. Washington, DC: United States Public Health Service, 1989.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGregory KD, Johnson CT, Johnson TR, Entman SS. The content of prenatal care. Update 2005. Womens Health Issues 2006; 16: 198 – 215.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcDorman MF, Mathews TJ. Recent trends in infant mortality in the US NCHS Data Brief, no. 9. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics, 2008.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLu MC, Halfon N. Racial and ethnic disparities in birth outcomes: A life‐course perspective. Matern Child Health J 2003; 7: 13 – 30.
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
j.jmwh.2009.08.002.pdf
Size:
122.7KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.