Show simple item record

The Knowledge Object Reference Ontology (KORO): A formalism to support management and sharing of computable biomedical knowledge for learning health systems

dc.contributor.authorFlynn, Allen J.
dc.contributor.authorFriedman, Charles P.
dc.contributor.authorBoisvert, Peter
dc.contributor.authorLandis‐lewis, Zachary
dc.contributor.authorLagoze, Carl
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-15T20:12:17Z
dc.date.available2019-06-03T15:24:19Zen
dc.date.issued2018-04
dc.identifier.citationFlynn, Allen J.; Friedman, Charles P.; Boisvert, Peter; Landis‐lewis, Zachary ; Lagoze, Carl (2018). "The Knowledge Object Reference Ontology (KORO): A formalism to support management and sharing of computable biomedical knowledge for learning health systems." Learning Health Systems 2(2): n/a-n/a.
dc.identifier.issn2379-6146
dc.identifier.issn2379-6146
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/143591
dc.description.abstractIntroductionHealth systems are challenged by care underutilization, overutilization, disparities, and related harms. One problem is a multiyear latency between discovery of new best practice knowledge and its widespread adoption. Decreasing this latency requires new capabilities to better manage and more rapidly share biomedical knowledge in computable forms. Knowledge objects package machineâ executable knowledge resources in a way that easily enables knowledge as a service. To help improve knowledge management and accelerate knowledge sharing, the Knowledge Object Reference Ontology (KORO) defines what knowledge objects are in a formal way.MethodsDevelopment of KORO began with identification of terms for classes of entities and for properties. Next, we established a taxonomical hierarchy of classes for knowledge objects and their parts. Development continued by relating these parts via formally defined properties. We evaluated the logical consistency of KORO and used it to answer several competency questions about parthood. We also applied it to guide knowledge object implementation.ResultsAs a realist ontology, KORO defines what knowledge objects are and provides details about the parts they have and the roles they play. KORO provides sufficient logic to answer several basic but important questions about knowledge objects competently. KORO directly supports creators of knowledge objects by providing a formal model for these objects.ConclusionKORO provides a formal, logically consistent ontology about knowledge objects and their parts. It exists to help make computable biomedical knowledge findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable. KORO is currently being used to further develop and improve computable knowledge infrastructure for learning health systems.
dc.publisherAsakura Publishing
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.subject.otherontology
dc.subject.otherBFO
dc.subject.otherIAO
dc.subject.otherknowledge management
dc.subject.otherknowledge object
dc.subject.otherKORO
dc.titleThe Knowledge Object Reference Ontology (KORO): A formalism to support management and sharing of computable biomedical knowledge for learning health systems
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelBiomedical Health Sciences
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/143591/1/lrh210054_am.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/143591/2/lrh210054.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/lrh2.10054
dc.identifier.sourceLearning Health Systems
dc.identifier.citedreferenceInformation Artifact Ontology. Available at: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/informationâ artifactâ ontology/IAO/master/releases/2017â 03â 24/iaoâ merged.owl Accessed on: December 10, 2017.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLaqua S, Sasse MA, Greenspan S, Gates C. Do you know dis?: a user study of a knowledge discovery tool for organizations. In proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems 2011 may 7 (pp. 2887â 2896). ACM
dc.identifier.citedreferencePolsani PR. Use and abuse of reusable learning objects. J Digit Inform. 2006 Feb 27; 3 ( 4 ).
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrügger N. Website history and the website as an object of study. New Media Soc. 2009 Feb; 11 ( 1â 2 ): 115 â 132.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSinclair J, Joy M, Yau JY, Hagan S. A practiceâ oriented review of learning objects. IEEE Trans Learn Technol. 2013 Apr; 6 ( 2 ): 177 â 192.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePoltrack J, Hruska N, Johnson A, Haag J. The next generation of SCORM: innovation for the global force. In The Interservice/Industry Training, Simulation & Education Conference (I/ITSEC) 2012 (Vol. 2012, No. 1). Orlando: National Training System Association
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBechhofer S, De Roure D, Gamble M, Goble C, Buchan I. Research objects: towards exchange and reuse of digital knowledge, 2010.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSmith B, Ashburner M, Rosse C, et al. The OBO foundry: coordinated evolution of ontologies to support biomedical data integration. Nat Biotechnol. 2007 Nov 1; 25 ( 11 ): 1251 â 1255.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSoilandâ Reyes, S., Bechhofer S., Eds., Research object ontology, Release 2016 â 01â 28 Available at: http://wf4ever.github.io/ro/2016â 01â 28/ Accessed on: December 10, 2017.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMalone J, Brown A, Lister AL, et al. The Software Ontology (SWO): a resource for reproducibility in biomedical data analysis, curation and digital preservation. J Biomed Semant. 2014 Jun 2; 5 ( 1 ): 25.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSmith B, Kumar A, Bittner T. Basic formal ontology (BFO) for bioinformatics. J Inform Syst. 2005; 1 â 6.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceArp R, Smith B, Spear AD. Building ontologies with basic formal ontology. MIT Press; 2015 Jul 31.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSmith B, Ceusters W. Aboutness: towards foundations for the information artifact ontology. In International Conference on Biomedical Ontology, Lisbon, Portugal 2015 Jul (pp. 47 â 51 ).
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCourtot M, Gibson F, Lister AL, et al. MIREOT: the minimum information to reference an external ontology term. Appl Ontology. 2011 Jan 1; 6 ( 1 ): 23 â 33.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRen Y, Parvizi A, Mellish C, Pan JZ, Van Deemter K, Stevens R. Towards competency questionâ driven ontology authoring. In European Semantic Web Conference 2014 may 25 (pp. 752 â 767 ). Springer
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGennari JH, Musen MA, Fergerson RW, et al. The evolution of Protégé: an environment for knowledgeâ based systems development. Int J Hum Comput. 2003 Jan 31; 58 ( 1 ): 89 â 123.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSirin E, Parsia B, Grau BC, Kalyanpur A, Katz Y. Pellet: a practical OWLâ DL reasoner. Web Semantics: Sci, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web. 2007 Jun 30; 5 ( 2 ): 51 â 53.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFloridi L. Semantic information and the correctness theory of truth. Erkenntnis. 2011 Mar 1; 74 ( 2 ): 147 â 175.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFloridi L. Semantic information and the network theory of account. Synthese. 2012 Feb 1; 184 ( 3 ): 431 â 454.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWeinberger D. Too Big to Know: Rethinking Knowledge Now That the Facts Aren’t the Facts, Experts Are Everywhere, and the Smartest Person in the Room Is the Room. Basic Books; 2011.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTillett B. Functional requirements of bibliographic records (FRBR): final report. Int Federation of Library Assoc Instit (IFLA). 1998.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShotton D, Peroni S. FaBiO, the FRBRâ aligned bibliographic ontology. Available at: http://www.sparontologies.net/ontologies/fabio/source.html Accessed on: December 12, 2017.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKunze J. Towards electronic persistence using ARK identifiers. In Proceedings of the 3rd ECDL Workshop on Web Archives 2003 Aug 21.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWeibel S. The Dublin core: a simple content description model for electronic resources. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 1997 Oct 1; 24 ( 1 ): 9 â 11.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMissier P, Belhajjame K, Cheney J. The W3C PROV family of specifications for modelling provenance metadata. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Extending Database Technology 2013 Mar 18. ACM.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOlsen L, Aisner D, McGinnis JM. Institute of Medicine (US). Roundtable on evidenceâ based medicine. The learning healthcare system: workshop summary. 2007; doi: https://doi.org/10.17226/11903.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFriedman CP, Allee NJ, Delaney BC, et al. The science of learning health systems: foundations for a new journal. Learning Health Syst. 2017; 1: e10020. https://doi.org/10.1002/lrh2.10020
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFriedman CP, Rubin J, Brown J, et al. Toward a science of learning systems: a research agenda for the highâ functioning learning health system. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1136/amiajnl2014â 002977
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFriedman CP, Rubin JC, Sullivan KJ. Toward an information infrastructure for global health improvement. IMIA Yearbook. 2017. https://www.thiemeâ connect.com/products/ejournals/pdf/10.1055/sâ 0037â 1606475.pdf
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFlynn AJ, Bahulekar N, Boisvert P, et al. Architecture and initial development of a digital library platform for computable knowledge objects for health. In Informatics for Health: Connected Citizenâ Led Wellness and Population Health (Vol. 235, pp. 496-500). (Studies in Health Technology and Informatics; Vol. 235). IOS Press. https://doi.org/10.3233/978â 1â 61499â 753â 5â 496
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLagoze C, Payette S, Shin E, Wilper C. Fedora: an architecture for complex objects and their relationships. Int J on Digit Libr. 2006 Apr 1; 6 ( 2 ): 124 â 138.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFlynn AJ, Shi W, Fischer R, Friedman CP. Digital knowledge objects and digital knowledge object clusters: unit holdings in a learning health system knowledge repository. In system sciences (HICSS), 2016 49th Hawaii international conference on 2016 Jan 5 (pp. 3308 â 3317 ). IEEE
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRuttenberg A, Courtot M, Peters B, Rees J, Malone J. The information artifact ontology. 2008. Accessed 5 Jan 2017 at: http://www.obofoundry.org/ontology/iao.html
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAshburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, et al. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. Nat Genet. 2000 May; 25 ( 1 ): 25 â 29.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMenzel C. Reference ontologiesâ application ontologies: either/or or both/and?. In KI Workshop on Reference Ontologies and Application Ontologies. 2003 Sep 16; 16.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVan de Sompel H, Treloar A. A perspective on archiving the scholarly web. IPRES 2014 proceedings 2014: 194.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWilkinson MD, Dumontier M, Aalbersberg IJ, et al. The FAIR guiding principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Sci Data. 2016; 3: 160018.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTammemägi MC, Katki HA, Hocking WG, et al. Selection criteria for lungâ cancer screening. N Engl J Med. 2013 Feb 21; 368 ( 8 ): 728 â 736.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCarstensen PH, Schmidt K. Computer supported cooperative work: new challenges to systems design. In: Itoh K, ed. Handbook of Human Factors/Ergonomics. Tokyo: Asakura Publishing; 2003: 619 â 636.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAckerman MS, Dachtera J, Pipek V, Wulf V. Sharing knowledge and expertise: the CSCW view of knowledge management. Comput Support Coop Work. 2013 Aug 1; 22 ( 4â 6 ): 531 â 573.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFaden RR, Kass NE, Goodman SN, Pronovost P, Tunis S, Beauchamp TL. An ethics framework for a learning health care system: a departure from traditional research ethics and clinical ethics. Hastings Cent Rep. 2013 Jan; 43 ( s1 ): 1.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAckerman MS, McDonald DW. Answer Garden 2: merging organizational memory with collaborative help. In Proceedings of the 1996 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work 1996 Nov 16. ACM.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDourish P, Edwards WK, LaMarca A, et al. Extending document management systems with userâ specific active properties. ACM Trans Inf Syst. 2000 Apr 1; 18 ( 2 ): 140 â 170.
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.