View Item 

Show simple item record

Diagnostic accuracy of clinical parameters to monitor periâ implant conditions: A matched caseâ control study
dc.contributor.authorMonje, Alberto
dc.contributor.authorCaballé‐serrano, Jordi
dc.contributor.authorNart, Jose
dc.contributor.authorPeñarrocha, David
dc.contributor.authorWang, Hom‐lay
dc.contributor.authorRakic, Mia
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-15T20:14:05Z
dc.date.available2019-06-03T15:24:19Zen
dc.date.issued2018-04
dc.identifier.citationMonje, Alberto; Caballé‐serrano, Jordi ; Nart, Jose; Peñarrocha, David ; Wang, Hom‐lay ; Rakic, Mia (2018). "Diagnostic accuracy of clinical parameters to monitor periâ implant conditions: A matched caseâ control study." Journal of Periodontology 89(4): 407-417.
dc.identifier.issn0022-3492
dc.identifier.issn1943-3670
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/143680
dc.description.abstractBackgroundThe aim of this caseâ control study was to estimate the diagnostic accuracy of the standard clinical parameters in diagnosing healthy periâ implant tissues, periâ implant mucositis, and periâ implantitis.MethodsA caseâ control study was designed to compare the clinical parameters used in the diagnosis of periâ implant diseases such as: probingdepth (PD), bleeding on probing (BOP), mucosal redness (MR), suppuration (SUP), and plaque index (PI). Furthermore, the influence of patientâ (sex, age) and implantâ related variables (implant neck configuration, time in function after loading) were evaluated to investigate the association with the clinical findings. The inferential analysis consisted of estimation by generalized estimating equations (GEE) of multilevel logistic regression models.ResultsIn total, 1,572 sites were evaluated around 262 implants from 141 patients. Sites with implant mucositis showed significant levels of BOP (OR = 3.56), MR (OR = 7.66) and PD (OR = 1.48) compared to healthy sites. The specificity was 90.3% while the sensitivity was only 43.6%. Likewise, sites exhibiting periâ implantitis showed significant levels of BOP (OR = 2.32), MR (OR = 7.21), PD (OR = 2.43) and SUP (OR = 6.81) compared to healthy sites. Again, the multiple logistic regressions showed high specificity (92.1%) but modest sensitivity (52.5%). PD was the only diagnostic marker displaying significance comparing periâ implant mucositis and periâ implantitis sites (OR = 1.76). Moreover, tissueâ level compared to boneâ level implants were less associated with SUP+ (OR = 0.20), and PI (OR = 0.36) and demonstrated statistical significance. In addition, age, sex, and function time significantly influenced the tested clinical parameters.ConclusionsThe diagnosis of periâ implant diseases cannot rely solely upon individual clinical parameters but rather require a combination of criteria. The clinical parameters, particularly probing depth, might accurately discern between diagnoses among periâ implant conditions. Nevertheless, the specificity of the clinical parameters surpasses the sensitivity in the detection of periâ implant diseases, validating its potential use as a diagnostic tool.
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.subject.otherdiagnosis
dc.subject.otherprognosis
dc.subject.otherperiâ implant diseases
dc.subject.otherprobing pocket depth
dc.subject.otherperiodontal disease
dc.subject.otherperiâ implantitis
dc.subject.otherperiâ implant mucositis
dc.titleDiagnostic accuracy of clinical parameters to monitor periâ implant conditions: A matched caseâ control study
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelDentistry
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/143680/1/jper10066.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/143680/2/jper10066_am.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/JPER.17-0454
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Periodontology
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRoosâ Jansaker AM, Renvert H, Lindahl C, Renvert S. Nineâ to fourteenâ year followâ up of implant treatment. Part III: factors associated with periâ implant lesions. Journal of Clinical Periodontology. 2006; 33: 296 â 301.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLin GH, Chan HL, Wang HL. The significance of keratinized mucosa on implant health: a systematic review. Journal of Periodontology. 2013; 84: 1755 â 1767.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFransson C, Wennstrom J, Berglundh T. Clinical characteristics at implants with a history of progressive bone loss. Clinical oral Implants Research. 2008; 19: 142 â 147.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWilson TG, Jr, Valderrama P, Burbano M, et al. Foreign bodies associated with periâ implantitis human biopsies. Journal of Periodontology. 2015; 86: 9 â 15.
dc.identifier.citedreferencevan Velzen FJ, Lang NP, Schulten EA, Ten Bruggenkate CM. Dental floss as a possible risk for the development of periâ implant disease: an observational study of 10 cases. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2016; 27: 618 â 621.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAltman DG, Simera I, Hoey J, Moher D, Schulz K. EQUATOR: reporting guidelines for health research. Lancet. 2008; 371: 1149 â 1150.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMonje A, Wang HL, Nart J. Association of Preventive Maintenance Therapy Compliance and Periâ implant Diseases: a Crossâ Sectional Study. Journal of Periodontology. 2017 Oct; 88 ( 10 ): 1030 â 1041. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2017.170135.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDerks J, Schaller D, Hakansson J, Wennstrom JL, Tomasi C, Berglundh T. Effectiveness of Implant Therapy Analyzed in a Swedish Population: prevalence of Periâ implantitis. Journal of Dental Research. 2016; 95: 43 â 49.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFarina R, Filippi M, Brazzioli J, Tomasi C, Trombelli L. Bleeding on probing around dental implants: a retrospective study of associated factors. Journal of Clinical Periodontology. 2017; 44: 115 â 122.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFarina R, Scapoli C, Carrieri A, Guarnelli ME, Trombelli L. Prevalence of bleeding on probing: a cohort study in a specialist periodontal clinic. Quintessence International. 2011; 42: 57 â 68.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSalvi GE, Lang NP. Diagnostic parameters for monitoring periâ implant conditions. The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. 2004; 19: 116 â 127. Suppl.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceColi P, Christiaens V, Sennerby L, Bruyn H. Reliability of periodontal diagnostic tools for monitoring periâ implant health and disease. Periodontology 2000. 2017; 73: 203 â 217.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRoosâ Jansaker AM, Lindahl C, Renvert H, Renvert S. Nineâ to fourteenâ year followâ up of implant treatment. Part II: presence of periâ implant lesions. Journal of Clinical Periodontology. 2006; 33: 290 â 295.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFransson C, Tomasi C, Pikner SS, et al. Severity and pattern of periâ implantitisâ associated bone loss. Journal of Clinical Periodontology. 2010; 37: 442 â 448.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFransson C, Lekholm U, Jemt T, Berglundh T. Prevalence of subjects with progressive bone loss at implants. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2005; 16: 440 â 446.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCochran DL, Hermann JS, Schenk RK, Higginbottom FL, Buser D. Biologic width around titanium implants. A histometric analysis of the implantoâ gingival junction around unloaded and loaded nonsubmerged implants in the canine mandible. Journal of Periodontology. 1997; 68: 186 â 198.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHermann JS, Buser D, Schenk RK, Higginbottom FL, Cochran DL. Biologic width around titanium implants. A physiologically formed and stable dimension over time. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2000; 11: 1 â 11.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHermann JS, Buser D, Schenk RK, Schoolfield JD, Cochran DL. Biologic Width around oneâ and twoâ piece titanium implants. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2001; 12: 559 â 571.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSculean A, Gruber R, Bosshardt DD. Soft tissue wound healing around teeth and dental implants. Journal of Clinical Periodontology. 2014; 41 ( Suppl 15 ): S6 â S22.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMascarenhas P, Gapski R, Alâ Shammari K, Wang HL. Influence of sex hormones on the periodontium. Journal of Clinical Periodontology. 2003; 30: 671 â 681.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLang NP, Adler R, Joss A, Nyman S. Absence of bleeding on probing. An indicator of periodontal stability. Journal of Clinical Periodontology. 1990; 17: 714 â 721.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMerli M, Bernardelli F, Giulianelli E, Toselli I, Mariotti G, Nieri M. Periâ implant bleeding on probing: a crossâ sectional multilevel analysis of associated factors. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2017.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFrench D, Cochran DL, Ofec R. Retrospective Cohort Study of 4,591 Straumann Implants Placed in 2,060 Patients in Private Practice with up to 10â Year Followâ up: the Relationship Between Crestal Bone Level and Soft Tissue Condition. The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. 2016; 31: e168 â e178.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRather LJ. Disturbance of function (functio laesa): the legendary fifth cardinal sign of inflammation, added by Galen to the four cardinal signs of Celsus. Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine. 1971; 47: 303 â 322.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLoe H, Theilade E, Jensen SB. Experimental Gingivitis in Man. Journal of Periodontology. 1965; 36: 177 â 187.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSalvi GE, Aglietta M, Eick S, Sculean A, Lang NP, Ramseier CA. Reversibility of experimental periâ implant mucositis compared with experimental gingivitis in humans. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2012; 23: 182 â 190.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDerks J, Tomasi C. Periâ implant health and disease. A systematic review of current epidemiology. Journal of Clinical Periodontology. 2015; 42 ( Suppl 16 ): S158 â S171.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLevignac J. [Periimplantation osteolysisâ periimplantosis â periimplantitis]. Revue Francaise d’odontoâ stomatologie. 1965; 12: 1251 â 1260.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMombelli A, Lang NP. The diagnosis and treatment of periâ implantitis. Periodontology 2000. 1998; 17: 63 â 76.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHeitzâ Mayfield LJ, Lang NP. Comparative biology of chronic and aggressive periodontitis vs. periâ implantitis. Periodontology 2000. 2010; 53: 167 â 181.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHajishengallis G, Darveau RP, Curtis MA. The keystoneâ pathogen hypothesis. Nature Reviews Microbiology. 2012; 10: 717 â 725.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCarcuac O, Berglundh T. Composition of human periâ implantitis and periodontitis lesions. Journal of Dental Research. 2014; 93: 1083 â 1088.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEsposito M, Ardebili Y, Worthington HV. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: different types of dental implants. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2014: CD003815.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSalvi GE, Cosgarea R, Sculean A. Prevalence and Mechanisms of Periâ implant Diseases. Journal of Dental Research. 2017; 96: 31 â 37.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFiguero E, Graziani F, Sanz I, Herrera D, Sanz M. Management of periâ implant mucositis and periâ implantitis. Periodontology 2000. 2014; 66: 255 â 273.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSanz M, Chapple IL, Working Group 4 of the VEWoP. Clinical research on periâ implant diseases: consensus report of Working Group 4. Journal of Clinical Periodontology. 2012; 39 ( Suppl 12 ): 202 â 206.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePeriâ implant mucositis and periâ implantitis: a current understanding of their diagnoses and clinical implications. Journal of Periodontology 2013; 84: 436 â 443.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLang NP, Berglundh T, Working Group 4 of Seventh European Workshop on P. Periimplant diseases: where are we now?â Consensus of the Seventh European Workshop on Periodontology. Journal of Clinical Periodontology. 2011; 38 ( Suppl 11 ): 178 â 181.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLindhe J, Meyle J, Group DoEWoP. Periâ implant diseases: consensus Report of the Sixth European Workshop on Periodontology. Journal of Clinical Periodontology. 2008; 35: 282 â 285.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBerglundh T, Lindhe J. Dimension of the periimplant mucosa. Biological width revisited. Journal of Clinical Periodontology. 1996; 23: 971 â 973.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchou S, Holmstrup P, Stoltze K, Hjortingâ Hansen E, Fiehn NE, Skovgaard LT. Probing around implants and teeth with healthy or inflamed periâ implant mucosa/gingiva. A histologic comparison in cynomolgus monkeys (Macaca fascicularis). Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2002; 13: 113 â 126.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAbrahamsson I, Soldini C. Probe penetration in periodontal and periâ implant tissues. An experimental study in the beagle dog. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2006; 17: 601 â 605.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLang NP, Wetzel AC, Stich H, Caffesse RG. Histologic probe penetration in healthy and inflamed periâ implant tissues. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 1994; 5: 191 â 201.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJoss A, Adler R, Lang NP. Bleeding on probing. A parameter for monitoring periodontal conditions in clinical practice. Journal of Clinical Periodontology. 1994; 21: 402 â 408.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLang NP, Joss A, Orsanic T, Gusberti FA, Siegrist BE. Bleeding on probing. A predictor for the progression of periodontal disease?. Journal of Clinical Periodontology. 1986; 13: 590 â 596.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFarina R, Tomasi C, Trombelli L. The bleeding site: a multiâ level analysis of associated factors. Journal of Clinical Periodontology. 2013; 40: 735 â 742.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTrombelli L, Farina R. A review of factors influencing the incidence and severity of plaqueâ induced gingivitis. Minerva Stomatologica. 2013; 62: 207 â 234.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEricsson I, Lindhe J. Probing depth at implants and teeth. An experimental study in the dog. Journal of Clinical Periodontology. 1993; 20: 623 â 627.
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
jper10066.pdf
Size:
353.0KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open
Name:
jper10066_am.pdf
Size:
820.4KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.