Show simple item record

The Researcher Passport: Improving Data Access and Confidentiality Protection

dc.contributor.authorLevenstein, Margaret C.
dc.contributor.authorTyler, Allison R. B.
dc.contributor.authorDavidson Bleckman, Johanna
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-17T00:53:13Z
dc.date.available2018-05-17T00:53:13Z
dc.date.issued2018-05-16
dc.identifier.citationLevenstein, M.C., Tyler, A.R.B., Davidson Bleckman, J. 2018. The Researcher Passport: Improving Data Access and Confidentiality Protection: ICPSR’s Strategy for a Community-normed System of Digital Identities of Access. ICPSR White Paper Series No. 1. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/143808
dc.descriptionThe Researcher Passport: Improving Data Access and Confidentiality Protection ICPSR’s Strategy for a Community-normed System of Digital Identities of Accessen_US
dc.description.abstractResearch and evidence-building benefit from the increased availability of administrative datasets, linkage across datasets, detailed geospatial data, and other confidential data. Systems and policies for provisioning access to confidential data, however, have not kept pace and indeed restrict and unnecessarily encumber leading-edge science. One series of roadblocks can be smoothed or removed by establishing a common understanding of what constitutes different levels of data sensitivity and risk as well as minimum researcher criteria for data access within these levels. This report presents the results of a recently completed study of 23 data repositories. It describes the extant landscape of policies, procedures, practices, and norms for restricted data access and identifies the significant challenges faced by researchers interested in accessing and analyzing restricted use datasets. It identifies commonalities among these repositories to articulate shared community standards that can be the basis of a community-normed researcher passport: a credential that identifies a trusted researcher to multiple repositories and other data custodians. Three main developments are recommended. First, language harmonization: establishing a common set of terms and definitions – that will evolve over time through collaboration within the research community – will allow different repositories to understand and integrate shared standards and technologies into their own processes. Second: develop a researcher passport, a durable and transferable digital identifier issued by a central, community-recognized data steward. This passport will capture researcher attributes that emerged as common elements of user access requirements across repositories, including training, and verification of those attributes (e.g., academic degrees, institutional affiliation, citizenship status, and country of residence). Third: data custodians issue visas that grant a passport holder access to particular datasets for a particular project for a specific period of time. Like stamps on a passport, these visas provide a history of a researcher’s access to restricted data. This history is integrated into the researcher’s credential, establishing the researcher’s reputation as a trusted data steward.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis report was prepared with support from the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation and the Institute for Museum and Library Services (RE-01-15-0086-15). Support was also provided by the University of Michigan School of Information’s Research Experience for Master’s Students (REMS) program, funded by the National Science Foundation. We appreciate the participation of 23 repositories in the study.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesICPSR White Paper Series, No. 1en_US
dc.subjectData confidentiality, privacy, data access, repository policy, data enclaveen_US
dc.titleThe Researcher Passport: Improving Data Access and Confidentiality Protectionen_US
dc.title.alternativeICPSR Researcher Credentialing White Paperen_US
dc.typePlan or blueprinten_US
dc.typeProjecten_US
dc.typeTechnical Reporten_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelStatistics and Numeric Data
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciences
dc.contributor.affiliationumInstitute for Social Research, Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research, School of Information, Ross School of Businessen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/143808/1/ICPSR_ResearcherCredentialingWhitePaper_May2018.pdf
dc.description.mapping59en_US
dc.description.mapping129en_US
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-9641-2725en_US
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-0350-7267
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-0024-1512
dc.description.filedescriptionDescription of ICPSR_ResearcherCredentialingWhitePaper_May2018.pdf : White paper
dc.identifier.name-orcidDavidson Bleckman, Johanna; 0000-0002-0024-1512en_US
dc.identifier.name-orcidLevenstein, Margaret; 0000-0002-9641-2725en_US
dc.identifier.name-orcidTyler, Allison; 0000-0002-0350-7267en_US
dc.owningcollnameInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research (ICPSR)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.