Show simple item record

Three years in – changing plan features in the U.S. health insurance marketplace

dc.contributor.authorMcKillop, Caitlin N
dc.contributor.authorWaters, Teresa M
dc.contributor.authorKaplan, Cameron M
dc.contributor.authorKaplan, Erin K
dc.contributor.authorThompson, Michael P
dc.contributor.authorGraetz, Ilana
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-17T03:36:30Z
dc.date.available2018-06-17T03:36:30Z
dc.date.issued2018-06-15
dc.identifier.citationBMC Health Services Research. 2018 Jun 15;18(1):450
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3198-3
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/144501
dc.description.abstractAbstract Background A central objective of recent U.S. healthcare policy reform, most notably the Affordable Care Act’s (ACA) Health Insurance Marketplace, has been to increase access to stable, affordable health insurance. However, changing market dynamics (rising premiums, changes in issuer participation and plan availability) raise significant concerns about the marketplaces’ ability to provide a stable source of healthcare for Americans that rely on them. By looking at the effect of instability on changes in the consumer choice set, we can analyze potential incentives to switch plans among price-sensitive enrollees, which can then be used to inform policy going forward. Methods Data on health plan features for non-tobacco users in 2512 counties in 34 states participating in federally-facilitated exchanges from 2014 to 2016 was obtained from the Centers for Medicaid & Medicare Services. We examined how changes in individual plan features, including premiums, deductibles, issuers, and plan types, impact consumers who had purchased the lowest-cost silver or bronze plan in their county the previous year. We calculated the cost of staying in the same plan versus switching to another plan the following year, and analyzed how costs vary across geographic regions. Results In most counties in 2015 and 2016 (53.7 and 68.2%, respectively), the lowest-cost silver plan from the previous year was still available, but was no longer the cheapest plan. In these counties, consumers who switched to the new lowest-cost plan would pay less in monthly premiums on average, by $51.48 and $55.01, respectively, compared to staying in the same plan. Despite potential premium savings from switching, however, the majority would still pay higher average premiums compared to the previous year, and most would face higher deductibles and an increased probability of having to change provider networks. Conclusion While the ACA has shown promise in expanding healthcare access, continued changes in the availability and affordability of health plans are likely to result in churning and switching among enrollees, which may have negative ramifications for their health going forward. Future healthcare policy reform should aim to stabilize marketplace dynamics in order to encourage greater care continuity and limit churning.
dc.titleThree years in – changing plan features in the U.S. health insurance marketplace
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/144501/1/12913_2018_Article_3198.pdf
dc.language.rfc3066en
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s).
dc.date.updated2018-06-17T03:36:31Z
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.