Alternative Group Technologies and Their Influence on Group Technology Acceptance
dc.contributor.author | Ammari, Tawfiq | |
dc.contributor.author | You, Sangseok | |
dc.contributor.author | Robert, Lionel + "Jr" | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-07-06T11:18:11Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-07-06T11:18:11Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2018-07-06 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Tawfiq A., You, S. and Robert, L. P. (2018). Alternative Group Technologies and Their Influence on Group Technology Acceptance, American Journal of Information Systems, 6(2), 29-37. | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/144537 | |
dc.description.abstract | There is a long history of study to understand why work groups do or do not adopt new collaboration technologies. However, research has focused on only one technology. The underlying assumption is that work groups can adopt or not adopt that one technology based on that technology alone. In making this assumption, many researchers have failed to realize the importance of alternative technologies in the adoption process or the fact that groups can adopt more than one technology. To address this issue, we examined an attempt by a scientific research organization to have its work groups adopt a particular group-collaboration technology. Although the target technology was more than appropriate for the task and the organization provided all the resources needed for work groups to adopt the technology, i largely failed. This was in large part because of two alternative collaboration technologies that acted as substitutes. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.publisher | American Journal of Information Systems | en_US |
dc.subject | Teamwork | en_US |
dc.subject | technology acceptance | en_US |
dc.subject | Group technology acceptance | en_US |
dc.subject | technology appropriation | en_US |
dc.subject | team technology adoption | en_US |
dc.subject | technology adoption | en_US |
dc.subject | collaboration technology | en_US |
dc.subject | Group Technology Adoption | en_US |
dc.subject | scientific research organization | en_US |
dc.subject | alternative technologies | en_US |
dc.subject | appropriation | en_US |
dc.subject | team | en_US |
dc.subject | work team | en_US |
dc.subject | TAM | en_US |
dc.subject | UTAUT | en_US |
dc.subject | TAM 2 | en_US |
dc.subject | TAM 3 | en_US |
dc.subject | Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology | en_US |
dc.subject | technology acceptance model | en_US |
dc.subject | G-TAM | en_US |
dc.subject | alternative collaboration technologies | en_US |
dc.subject | technology substitutes | en_US |
dc.title | Alternative Group Technologies and Their Influence on Group Technology Acceptance | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Information and Library Science | |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Social Sciences | |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Peer Reviewed | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | Information, School of | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | Robotics Institute | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | HEC Paris | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampus | Ann Arbor | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/144537/1/AJIS_7000100087_20180619_1.pdf | |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/144537/4/Ammari et al. 2018.pdf | |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/144537/6/Ammari et al. 2018 (Published).pdf | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.12691/ajis-6-2-1 | |
dc.identifier.source | American Journal of Information Systems | en_US |
dc.identifier.orcid | 0000-0002-1410-2601 | en_US |
dc.description.filedescription | Description of Ammari et al. 2018.pdf : Forthcoming version | |
dc.description.filedescription | Description of Ammari et al. 2018 (Published).pdf : Final Version | |
dc.identifier.name-orcid | Robert, Lionel P.; 0000-0002-1410-2601 | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Information, School of (SI) |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.