View Item 

Show simple item record

Quantitative Flow Imaging in Human Umbilical Vessels In Utero Using Nongated 2D Phase Contrast MRI
dc.contributor.authorKrishnamurthy, Uday
dc.contributor.authorYadav, Brijesh K.
dc.contributor.authorJella, Pavan K.
dc.contributor.authorHaacke, Ewart Mark
dc.contributor.authorHernandez‐andrade, Edgar
dc.contributor.authorMody, Swati
dc.contributor.authorYeo, Lami
dc.contributor.authorHassan, Sonia S.
dc.contributor.authorRomero, Roberto
dc.contributor.authorNeelavalli, Jaladhar
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-13T15:48:04Z
dc.date.available2019-09-04T20:15:39Zen
dc.date.issued2018-07
dc.identifier.citationKrishnamurthy, Uday; Yadav, Brijesh K.; Jella, Pavan K.; Haacke, Ewart Mark; Hernandez‐andrade, Edgar ; Mody, Swati; Yeo, Lami; Hassan, Sonia S.; Romero, Roberto; Neelavalli, Jaladhar (2018). "Quantitative Flow Imaging in Human Umbilical Vessels In Utero Using Nongated 2D Phase Contrast MRI." Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 48(1): 283-289.
dc.identifier.issn1053-1807
dc.identifier.issn1522-2586
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/144673
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.subject.otherpulsatility
dc.subject.otherpartial volume effects
dc.subject.othernongated phase contrast MRI
dc.subject.otherMonte Carlo simulations
dc.subject.otherfetal umbilical vessels
dc.subject.othervolumetric umbilical flow
dc.titleQuantitative Flow Imaging in Human Umbilical Vessels In Utero Using Nongated 2D Phase Contrast MRI
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMedicine (General)
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/144673/1/jmri25917_am.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/144673/2/jmri25917.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/jmri.25917
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNeelavalli J, Krishnamurthy U, Jella PK, et al. Magnetic resonance angiography of fetal vasculature at 3.0 T. Eur Radiol 2016; 26: 4570 â 4576.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSwillens A, Van Canneyt K, Segers P, Lovstakken L. The accuracy of volume flow measurements derived from pulsed wave Doppler: a study in the complex setting of forearm vascular access for hemodialysis. InL 2012 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium. 2012. p. 1960 â 1963.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGill RW. Measurement of blood flow by ultrasound: accuracy and sources of error. Ultrasound Med Biol 1985; 11: 625 â 641.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBlanco P. Volumetric blood flow measurement using Doppler ultrasound: concerns about the technique. J Ultrasound 2015; 18: 201 â 204.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceQuinn TM, Hubbard AM, Adzick NS. Prenatal magnetic resonance imaging enhances fetal diagnosis. J Pediatr Surg 1998; 33: 553 â 558.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBreysem L, Bosmans H, Dymarkowski S, et al. The value of fast MR imaging as an adjunct to ultrasound in prenatal diagnosis. Eur Radiol 2003; 13: 1538 â 1548.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFrayne R, Steinman DA, Rutt BK, Ethier CR. Accuracy of MR phase contrast velocity measurements for unsteady flow. J Magn Reson Imaging 1995; 5: 428 â 431.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOktar S, Yücel C, Karaosmanoglu D, et al. Bloodâ flow volume quantification in internal carotid and vertebral arteries: comparison of 3 different ultrasound techniques with phaseâ contrast MR imaging. Am Neuroradiol 2006; 27: 363 â 369.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJiang J, Strother C, Johnson K, et al. Comparison of blood velocity measurements between ultrasound Doppler and accelerated phaseâ contrast MR angiography in small arteries with disturbed flow. Phys Med Biol 2011; 56: 1755.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZhu MY, Jaeggi E, Roy CW, Macgowan CK, Seed M. Reduced combined ventricular output and increased oxygen extraction fraction in a fetus with complete heart block demonstrated by MRI. HeartRhythm Case Rep 2016; 2: 164 â 168.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSeed M, van Amerom JF, Yoo Sâ J, et al. Feasibility of quantification of the distribution of blood flow in the normal human fetal circulation using CMR: a crossâ sectional study. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2012; 14: 1.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchoennagel BP, Remus CC, Yamamura J, et al. Fetal blood flow velocimetry by phaseâ contrast MRI using a new triggering method and comparison with Doppler ultrasound in a sheep model: a pilot study. Magn Reson Mater Phys Biol Med 2014; 27: 237 â 244.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKording F, Yamamura J, Lund G, et al. Doppler ultrasound triggering for cardiovascular MRI at 3T in a healthy volunteer study. Magn Reson Med Sci 2016 [Epub ahead of print].
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBakker C, Kouwenhoven M, Hartkamp M, Hoogeveen R, Mali W, et al. Accuracy and precision of timeâ averaged flow as measured by nontriggered 2D phaseâ contrast MR angiography, a phantom evaluation. Magn Reson Imaging 1995; 13: 959 â 965.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHangiandreou NJ, Rossman PJ, Riederer SJ. Analysis of MR phaseâ contrast measurements of pulsatile velocity waveforms. J Magn Reson Imaging 1993; 3: 387 â 394.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceYeh Sâ Y, Forsythe A, Hon EH. Quantification of fetal heart beatâ toâ beat interval differences. Obstet Gynecol 1973; 41: 355 â 363.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJiang J, Kokeny P, Ying W, Magnano C, Zivadinov R, Haacke EM. Quantifying errors in flow measurement using phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging: comparison of several boundary detection methods. Magn Reson Imaging 2015; 33: 185 â 193.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHadlock FP, Harrist R, Sharman RS, Deter RL, Park SK. Estimation of fetal weight with the use of head, body, and femur measurementsâ a prospective study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985; 151: 333 â 337.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFeng W, Utriainen D, Trifan G, et al. Characteristics of flow through the internal jugular veins at cervical C2/C3 and C5/C6 levels for multiple sclerosis patients using MR phase contrast imaging. Neurol Res 2012; 34: 802 â 809.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBakker CJ, Hoogeveen RM, Viergever MA. Construction of a protocol for measuring blood flow by twoâ dimensional phaseâ contrast MRA. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999; 9: 119 â 127.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLees C, Albaiges G, Deane C, Parra M, Nicolaides K. Assessment of umbilical arterial and venous flow using color Doppler. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1999; 14: 250 â 255.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSeed M, van Amerom JF, Yoo Sâ J, et al. Feasibility of quantification of the distribution of blood flow in the normal human fetal circulation using CMR: a crossâ sectional study. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2012; 14: 79.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGoldkrand J, Pettigrew C, Lentz S, Clements S, Bryant J, Hodges J. Volumetric umbilical artery blood flow: comparison of the normal versus the single umbilical artery cord. J Matern Fetal Med 2001; 10: 116 â 121.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDe Vis J, Hendrikse J, Groenendaal F, et al. Impact of neonate haematocrit variability on the longitudinal relaxation time of blood: Implications for arterial spin labelling MRI. NeuroImage Clin 2014; 4: 517 â 525.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePortnoy S, Osmond M, Zhu MY, Seed M, Sled JG, Macgowan CK. Relaxation properties of human umbilical cord blood at 1.5 Tesla. Magn Reson Med 2016 [Epub ahead of print].
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTsaiâ Goodman B, Zhu MY, Alâ Rujaib M, Seed M, Macgowan CK. Foetal blood flow measured using phase contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonanceâ preliminary data comparing 1.5 T with 3.0 T. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2015; 17: 30.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePrsa, M, Sun L, van Amerom J, et al. Reference ranges of blood flow in the major vessels of the normal human fetal circulation at term by phaseâ contrast magnetic resonance imaging: Clinical perspective. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2014; 7: 663 â 670.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEnzmann DR, Marks MP, Pelc NJ. Comparison of cerebral artery blood flow measurements with gated cine and ungated phaseâ contrast techniques. J Magn Reson Imaging 1993; 3: 705 â 712.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBhide A, Acharya G, Bilardo C, et al. ISUOG practice guidelines: use of Doppler ultrasonography in obstetrics. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013; 41: 233.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKypros N, Giuseppe R, Kurt H, Renato X. Doppler ultrasound â Diploma in fetal medicine & ISUOG educational series. In: Nicolaides K, ed. Doppler in Obstetrics, ISUOG educational Series. Campinas â SP Brazil; 2002.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLaurin J, Marsal K, Persson PH, Lingman G. Ultrasound measurement of fetal blood flow in predicting fetal outcome. BJOG: Int J Obstet Gynaecol 1987; 94: 940 â 948.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBaschat A, Gembruch U, Reiss I, Gortner L, Weiner C, Harman C. Relationship between arterial and venous Doppler and perinatal outcome in fetal growth restriction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000; 16: 407 â 413.
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
jmri25917_am.pdf
Size:
1.369MB
Format:
PDF
View/Open
Name:
jmri25917.pdf
Size:
359.6KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.