View Item 

Show simple item record

Multiple needle‐pass percutaneous testicular sperm aspiration as first‐line treatment in azoospermic men

dc.contributor.authorJensen, C. F. S.
dc.contributor.authorOhl, D. A.
dc.contributor.authorHiner, M. R.
dc.contributor.authorFode, M.
dc.contributor.authorShah, T.
dc.contributor.authorSmith, G. D.
dc.contributor.authorSonksen, J.
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-13T15:48:21Z
dc.date.available2018-07-13T15:48:21Z
dc.date.issued2016-03
dc.identifier.citationJensen, C. F. S.; Ohl, D. A.; Hiner, M. R.; Fode, M.; Shah, T.; Smith, G. D.; Sonksen, J. (2016). "Multiple needle‐pass percutaneous testicular sperm aspiration as first‐line treatment in azoospermic men." Andrology 4(2): 257-262.
dc.identifier.issn2047-2919
dc.identifier.issn2047-2927
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/144689
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.publisherWorld Health Organization
dc.subject.othersperm retrieval
dc.subject.otherinfertility
dc.subject.otherazoospermia
dc.subject.otherTESE/TESA
dc.titleMultiple needle‐pass percutaneous testicular sperm aspiration as first‐line treatment in azoospermic men
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelUrology
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/144689/1/andr12143_am.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/144689/2/andr12143.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/andr.12143
dc.identifier.sourceAndrology
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRamasamy R, Yagan N & Schlegel PN. ( 2005 ) Structural and functional changes to the testis after conventional versus microdissection testicular sperm extraction. Urology 65, 1190 – 1194.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEl‐Haggar S, Mostafa T, Abdel Nasser T, Hany R & Abdel Hadi A. ( 2008 ) Fine needle aspiration vs. mTESE in non‐obstructive azoospermia. Int J Androl 31, 595 – 601.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEzeh UI, Moore HD & Cooke ID. ( 1998 ) A prospective study of multiple needle biopsies versus a single open biopsy for testicular sperm extraction in men with non‐obstructive azoospermia. Hum Reprod 13, 3075 – 3080.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFriedler S, Raziel A, Strassburger D, Soffer Y, Komarovsky D & Ron‐El R. ( 1997 ) Testicular sperm retrieval by percutaneous fine needle sperm aspiration compared with testicular sperm extraction by open biopsy in men with non‐obstructive azoospermia. Hum Reprod 12, 1488 – 1493.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGhalayini IF, Al‐Ghazo MA, Hani OB, Al‐Azab R, Bani‐Hani I, Zayed F & Haddad Y. ( 2011 ) Clinical comparison of conventional testicular sperm extraction and microdissection techniques for non‐obstructive azoospermia. J Clin Med Res 3, 124 – 131.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGlina S & Vieira M. ( 2013 ) Prognostic factors for sperm retrieval in non‐obstructive azoospermia. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 68 ( Suppl 1 ), 121 – 124.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGudeloglu A & Parekattil SJ. ( 2013 ) Update in the evaluation of the azoospermic male. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 68 ( Suppl 1 ), 27 – 34.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHauser R, Yogev L, Paz G, Yavetz H, Azem F, Lessing JB & Botchan A. ( 2006 ) Comparison of efficacy of two techniques for testicular sperm retrieval in nonobstructive azoospermia: multifocal testicular sperm extraction versus multifocal testicular sperm aspiration. J Androl 27, 28 – 33.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHouwen J, Lundin K, Soderlund B, Bergh C, Kremer JA & Ekerhovd E. ( 2008 ) Efficacy of percutaneous needle aspiration and open biopsy for sperm retrieval in men with non‐obstructive azoospermia. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 87, 1033 – 1038.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJarow JP, Espeland MA & Lipshultz LI. ( 1989 ) Evaluation of the azoospermic patient. J Urol 142, 62 – 65.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKhadra AA, Abdulhadi I, Ghunain S & Kilani Z. ( 2003 ) Efficiency of percutaneous testicular sperm aspiration as a mode of sperm collection for intracytoplasmic sperm injection in nonobstructive azoospermia. J Urol 169, 603 – 605.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMorris DS, Dunn RL, Schuster TG, Ohl DA & Smith GD ( 2007 ) Ideal culture time for improvement in sperm motility from testicular sperm aspirates of men with azoospermia. J Urol 178, 2087 – 2091; discussion 2091.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOhlander S, Hotaling J, Kirshenbaum E, Niederberger C & Eisenberg ML. ( 2014 ) Impact of fresh versus cryopreserved testicular sperm upon intracytoplasmic sperm injection pregnancy outcomes in men with azoospermia due to spermatogenic dysfunction: a meta‐analysis. Fertil Steril 101, 344 – 349.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOkada H, Dobashi M, Yamazaki T, Hara I, Fujisawa M, Arakawa S & Kamidono S. ( 2002 ) Conventional versus microdissection testicular sperm extraction for nonobstructive azoospermia. J Urol 168, 1063 – 1067.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRamasamy R & Schlegel PN. ( 2007 ) Microdissection testicular sperm extraction: effect of prior biopsy on success of sperm retrieval. J Urol 177, 1447 – 1449.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRosenlund B, Kvist U, Ploen L, Rozell BL, Sjoblom P & Hillensjo T. ( 1998 ) A comparison between open and percutaneous needle biopsies in men with azoospermia. Hum Reprod 13, 1266 – 1271.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchlegel PN. ( 1999 ) Testicular sperm extraction: microdissection improves sperm yield with minimal tissue excision. Hum Reprod 14, 131 – 135.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchlegel PN. ( 2009 ) Nonobstructive azoospermia: a revolutionary surgical approach and results. Semin Reprod Med 27, 165 – 170.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTsujimura A, Matsumiya K, Miyagawa Y, Tohda A, Miura H, Nishimura K, Koga M, Takeyama M, Fujioka H & Okuyama A. ( 2002 ) Conventional multiple or microdissection testicular sperm extraction: a comparative study. Hum Reprod 17, 2924 – 2929.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTurek PJ, Cha I & Ljung BM. ( 1997 ) Systematic fine‐needle aspiration of the testis: correlation to biopsy and results of organ “mapping” for mature sperm in azoospermic men. Urology 49, 743 – 748.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTurunc T, Gul U, Haydardedeoglu B, Bal N, Kuzgunbay B, Peskircioglu L & Ozkardes H. ( 2010 ) Conventional testicular sperm extraction combined with the microdissection technique in nonobstructive azoospermic patients: a prospective comparative study. Fertil Steril 94, 2157 – 2160.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWald M, Makhlouf AA & Niederberger CS. ( 2007 ) Therapeutic testis biopsy for sperm retrieval. Curr Opin Urol 17, 431 – 438.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWillott GM. ( 1982 ) Frequency of azoospermia. Forensic Sci Int 20, 9 – 10.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWorld Health Organization ( 2010 ). WHO laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen, 5th edn. World Health Organization, Switzerland.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWosnitzer MS & Goldstein M. ( 2014 ) Obstructive azoospermia. Urol Clin North Am 41, 83 – 95.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAmer M, Ateyah A, Hany R & Zohdy W. ( 2000 ) Prospective comparative study between microsurgical and conventional testicular sperm extraction in non‐obstructive azoospermia: follow‐up by serial ultrasound examinations. Hum Reprod 15, 653 – 656.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBeliveau ME & Turek PJ. ( 2011 ) The value of testicular ‘mapping’ in men with non‐obstructive azoospermia. Asian J Androl 13, 225 – 230.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDabaja AA & Schlegel PN. ( 2013 ) Microdissection testicular sperm extraction: an update. Asian J Androl 15, 35 – 39.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDeruyver Y, Vanderschueren D & Van der Aa F. ( 2014 ) Outcome of microdissection TESE compared with conventional TESE in non‐obstructive azoospermia: a systematic review. Andrology 2, 20 – 24.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDohle GR, Elzanaty S & van Casteren NJ. ( 2012 ) Testicular biopsy: clinical practice and interpretation. Asian J Androl 14, 88 – 93.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDonoso P, Tournaye H & Devroey P. ( 2007 ) Which is the best sperm retrieval technique for non‐obstructive azoospermia? A systematic review. Hum Reprod Update 13, 539 – 549.
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
andr12143_am.pdf
Size:
210.3KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open
Name:
andr12143.pdf
Size:
256.8KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.