Show simple item record

Rule Out (R/O) Arteriovenous Malformation

dc.contributor.authorConrad, L. Kirkland
dc.contributor.authorThibodeau, Steven
dc.contributor.authorGrant, Ellen
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-13T18:47:52Z
dc.date.available2018-08-13T18:47:52Z
dc.date.issued2005-04
dc.identifier.citationConrad, L. Kirkland; Thibodeau, Steven; Grant, Ellen (2005). "Rule Out (R/O) Arteriovenous Malformation." Current Protocols in Magnetic Resonance Imaging 13(1): A1.5.1-A1.5.9.
dc.identifier.issn2572-5637
dc.identifier.issn2572-5637
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/145196
dc.description.abstractWhen imaging patients for intracranial arteriovenous malformations, the goals are: (1) to determine if an arteriovenous malformation is present; (2) to assess size, shape, and location of the nidus; (3) to determine potential arterial feeders and venous drainage routes (including screening for aneurysms on arterial feeders); and (4) to determine the state of the surrounding brain parenchyma, including the identification of intracranial hemorrhage. A post‐contrast 3‐D spoiled gradient echo (SPGR) sequence is used for sequences 1 to 3. Standard MR imaging sequences are used to evaluate the brain parenchyma. The protocol contained within this unit can be used for the evaluation of stable patients. In order to perform the optional sequences with perfusion and diffusion studies, a scanner with echoplanar capabilities is required; however, the standard anatomical MR imaging sequences included in the protocols do not require these faster gradients.
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.publisherLippincott‐Raven
dc.titleRule Out (R/O) Arteriovenous Malformation
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelFamily Medicine and Primary Care
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelRadiology
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/145196/1/cpmia0105.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/0471142719.mia0105s13
dc.identifier.sourceCurrent Protocols in Magnetic Resonance Imaging
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShellock, F.G. 1996. Pocket Guide to MR Procedures and Metallic Objects. Lippincott‐Raven, Philadelphia.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchlemmer, H.P., Hess, T., Debus, J., Knopp, M.V., Schad, L.R., and Engenhart, R. 1994. TOF‐MR angiography in radiotherapy treated cerebral arteriovenous malformations. Radiologe 34: 447 ‐ 453.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNussel, F., Wegmuller, H., and Huber, P. 1991. Comparison of magnetic resonance angiography, magnetic resonance imaging and conventional angiography in cerebral arteriovenous malformation. Neuroradiology 33: 56 ‐ 61.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKondziolka, D., Lunsford, L.D., Kanal, E., and Talagala, L. 1994. Stereotactic magnetic resonance angiography for targeting in arteriovenous malformation radiosurgery. Neurosurgery 35: 585 ‐ 590; discussion 590‐591.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceYano, T., Kodama, T., Suzuki, Y., and Watanabe, K. 1997. Gadolinium‐enhanced 3D time‐of‐flight MR angiography. Experimental and clinical evaluation. Acta Radiol. 38: 47 ‐ 54.
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.