View Item 

Show simple item record

Reviewing research priorities in weed ecology, evolution and management: a horizon scan
dc.contributor.authorNeve, P
dc.contributor.authorBarney, J N
dc.contributor.authorBuckley, Y
dc.contributor.authorCousens, R D
dc.contributor.authorGraham, S
dc.contributor.authorJordan, N R
dc.contributor.authorLawton‐rauh, A
dc.contributor.authorLiebman, M
dc.contributor.authorMesgaran, M B
dc.contributor.authorSchut, M
dc.contributor.authorShaw, J
dc.contributor.authorStorkey, J
dc.contributor.authorBaraibar, B
dc.contributor.authorBaucom, R S
dc.contributor.authorChalak, M
dc.contributor.authorChilds, D Z
dc.contributor.authorChristensen, S
dc.contributor.authorEizenberg, H
dc.contributor.authorFernández‐quintanilla, C
dc.contributor.authorFrench, K
dc.contributor.authorHarsch, M
dc.contributor.authorHeijting, S
dc.contributor.authorHarrison, L
dc.contributor.authorLoddo, D
dc.contributor.authorMacel, M
dc.contributor.authorMaczey, N
dc.contributor.authorMerotto, A
dc.contributor.authorMortensen, D
dc.contributor.authorNecajeva, J
dc.contributor.authorPeltzer, D A
dc.contributor.authorRecasens, J
dc.contributor.authorRenton, M
dc.contributor.authorRiemens, M
dc.contributor.authorSønderskov, M
dc.contributor.authorWilliams, M
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-13T18:48:19Z
dc.date.available2019-10-01T16:02:10Zen
dc.date.issued2018-08
dc.identifier.citationNeve, P; Barney, J N; Buckley, Y; Cousens, R D; Graham, S; Jordan, N R; Lawton‐rauh, A ; Liebman, M; Mesgaran, M B; Schut, M; Shaw, J; Storkey, J; Baraibar, B; Baucom, R S; Chalak, M; Childs, D Z; Christensen, S; Eizenberg, H; Fernández‐quintanilla, C ; French, K; Harsch, M; Heijting, S; Harrison, L; Loddo, D; Macel, M; Maczey, N; Merotto, A; Mortensen, D; Necajeva, J; Peltzer, D A; Recasens, J; Renton, M; Riemens, M; Sønderskov, M ; Williams, M (2018). "Reviewing research priorities in weed ecology, evolution and management: a horizon scan." Weed Research 58(4): 250-258.
dc.identifier.issn0043-1737
dc.identifier.issn1365-3180
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/145210
dc.publisherThe Royal Society of London
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.subject.othertransdisciplinary research
dc.subject.otheragroecology
dc.subject.otherweed adaptation
dc.subject.otherinvasive plants
dc.subject.otherintegrated weed management
dc.titleReviewing research priorities in weed ecology, evolution and management: a horizon scan
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelNatural Resources and Environment
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScience
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/145210/1/wre12304_am.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/145210/2/wre12304.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/wre.12304
dc.identifier.sourceWeed Research
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNeve P, Vilaâ Aiub M & Roux F ( 2009 ) Evolutionaryâ thinking in agricultural weed management. New Phytologist 184, 783 â 793.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceErvin D & Jussaume R ( 2014 ) Integrating social science into managing herbicideâ resistant weeds and associated environmental impacts. Weed Science 62, 403 â 414.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFlory SL & Clay K ( 2013 ) Pathogen accumulation and longâ term dynamics of plant invasions. Journal of Ecology 101, 607 â 613.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFranke AC, Lotz LAP, Van Der Burg WJ & Van Overbeek L ( 2009 ) The role of arable weed seeds for agroecosystem functioning. Weed Research 49, 131 â 141.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFuhrer J ( 2003 ) Agroecosystem responses to combinations of elevated CO 2, ozone and global climate change. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 97, 1 â 20.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGodfray HCJ, Beddington JR, Crute IR et al. ( 2010 ) Food security: the challenge of feeding 9 billion people. Science 327, 812 â 818.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGraham S ( 2013 ) Three cooperative pathways to solving a collective weed management problem. Australasian Journal of Environmental Management 20, 116 â 129.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGrierson CS, Barnes SR, Chase MW et al. ( 2011 ) One hundred important questions facing plant science research. New Phytologist 192, 6 â 12.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHamaouiâ Laguel L, Vautard R, Liu L et al. ( 2015 ) Effects of climate change and seed dispersal on airborne ragweed pollen loads in Europe. Nature Climate Change 5, 766 â 771.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHarker KN, Malloryâ Smith C, Maxwell BD, Mortensen DA & Smith RG ( 2017 ) Another view. Weed Science 65, 203 â 205.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHarper JL ( 1956 ) The evolution of weeds in relation to resistance to herbicides. Proceedings of the 3rd British Weed Control Conference, Nov. 5â 8, British Weed Control Council, Farnham, UK, 179 â 188.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHueston W, Appert J, Denny T, King L, Umber J & Valeri L ( 2013 ) Assessing global adoption of one health approaches. EcoHealth 10, 228 â 233.
dc.identifier.citedreferencevan Ittersum MK, Cassman KG, Grassini P, Wolf J, Tittonell P & Hochman Z ( 2013 ) Yield gap analysis with local to global relevanceâ a review. Field Crops Research 143, 4 â 17.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJordan NR & Davis A ( 2015 ) Middleâ way strategies for sustainable intensification of agriculture. BioScience 65, 513 â 519.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJordan N, Schut M, Graham S et al. ( 2016 ) Transdisciplinary weed research: new leverage on challenging weed problems? Weed Research 56, 345 â 358.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKlironomos JN ( 2002 ) Feedback with soil biota contributes to plant rarity and invasiveness in communities. Nature 417, 67 â 70.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLang DJ, Wiek A, Bergmann M et al. ( 2012 ) Transdisciplinary research in sustainability science: practice, principles, and challenges. Sustainability Science 7, 25 â 43.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLiebman M, Baraibar B, Buckley Y et al. ( 2016 ) Ecologically sustainable weed management: how do we get from proofâ ofâ concept to adoption? Ecological Applications 26, 1352 â 1369.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLlewellyn RS ( 2007 ) Information quality and effectiveness for more rapid adoption decisions by farmers. Field Crops Research 104, 148 â 156.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMarshall EJP, Brown VK, Boatman ND, Lutman PJW, Squire GR & Ward LK ( 2003 ) The role of weeds in supporting biological diversity within crop fields. Weed Research 43, 77 â 89.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcDonald A, Riha S, Ditomasso A & Degaetano A ( 2009 ) Climate change and geography of weed damage: analysis of US maize systems suggests the potential for significant range transformations. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 130, 131 â 140.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMitchell CE & Power AG ( 2003 ) Release of invasive plants from fungal and viral pathogens. Nature 421, 625 â 627.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMortensen DA, Egan JT, Maxwell BD, Ryan MR & Smith RG ( 2012 ) Navigating a critical juncture for sustainable weed management. BioScience 62, 75 â 84.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMoss SR, Storkey J, Cussans JW, Perryman SA & Hewitt M ( 2004 ) The Broadbalk longâ term experiment at Rothamsted: what has it told us about weeds? Weed Science 52, 864 â 873.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMüllerâ Stöver D, Nybroe O, Baraibar B et al. ( 2016 ) Contribution of the seed microbiome to weed management. Weed Research 56, 335 â 339.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNavas ML ( 2012 ) Traitâ based approaches to unravelling the assembly of weed communities and their impact on agroâ ecosystem functioning. Weed Research 52, 479 â 488.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNeve P, Busi R, Renton M & Vilaâ Aiub MM ( 2014 ) Expanding the ecoâ evolutionary context of herbicide resistance research. Pest Management Science 70, 1385 â 1393.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOerke EC ( 2006 ) Crop losses to pests. Journal of Agricultural Science 144, 31 â 43.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOwen MJ, Martinez NJ & Powles SB ( 2014 ) Multiple herbicideâ resistant Lolium rigidum (annual ryegrass) now dominates across the Western Australian grain belt. Weed Research 54, 314 â 324.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePearson DE, Ortega YK, Runyon JB & Butler JL ( 2016 ) Secondary invasion: the bane of weed management. Biological Conservation 197, 8 â 17.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePimentel D, McNair S, Janecka J et al. ( 2001 ) Economic and environmental threats of alien plant, animal and microbe invasions. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 84, 1 â 20.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePimentel D, Zuniga R & Morrison D ( 2005 ) Update on the environmental and economic costs associated with alienâ invasive species in the United States. Ecological Economics 52, 273 â 288.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePowles SB & Yu Q ( 2010 ) Evolution in action: plants resistant to herbicides. Annual Review of Plant Biology 61, 317 â 347.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePrentis PJ, Wilson JR, Dormontt EE, Richardson DM & Lowe AJ ( 2008 ) Adaptive evolution in invasive species. Trends in Plant Science 13, 288 â 294.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRicciardi A, Blackburn TM, Carlton JT et al. ( 2017 ) Invasion science: a horizon scan of emerging challenges and opportunities. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 32, 464 â 474.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRichardson DM, Allsopp N, D’antonio DM, Milton SJ & Rejmanek M ( 2000 ) Plant invasionsâ the role of mutualisms. Biological Reviews 75, 65 â 93.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRoyal Society of London ( 2009 ) Reaping the Benefits: Science and the Sustainable Intensification of Global Agriculture. The Royal Society of London, London.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSimberloff D & von Holle B ( 1999 ) Positive interactions of nonindigenous species: invasional meltdown? Biological Invasions 1, 21 â 32.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSimberloff D, Martin J, Genovesi P et al. ( 2013 ) Impacts of biological invasions: what’s what and the way forward. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 28, 58 â 66.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStratonovitch P, Storkey J & Semenov MA ( 2012 ) A processâ based approach to modelling impacts of climate change on the damage niche of an agricultural weed. Global Change Biology 18, 2071 â 2080.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStruik PC & Kuyper TW ( 2017 ) Sustainable intensification in agriculture: the richer shade of green. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 37, 39.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSutherland WJ, Armstrongâ Brown S, Armsworth PR et al. ( 2006 ) The identification of 100 ecological questions of high policy relevance in the UK. Journal of Applied Ecology 43, 617 â 627.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTilman D, Balzer C, Hill J & Befort BL ( 2011 ) Global food demand and the sustainable intensification of agriculture. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the United States of America 108, 20260 â 20264.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVigueira CC, Olsen KM & Caicedo AL ( 2012 ) The red queen in the corn: agricultural weeds as models of rapid adaptive evolution. Heredity 110, 303 â 311.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVilà M, Espinar JL, Hejda M et al. ( 2011 ) Ecological impacts of invasive alien plants: a metaâ analysis of their effects on species, communities and ecosystems. Ecology Letters 14, 702 â 708.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWard SM, Webster TM & Steckel LE ( 2013 ) Palmer amaranth ( Amaranthus palmeri ): a review. Weed Technology 27, 12 â 27.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWard SM, Cousens RD, Bagavathiannan MV et al. ( 2014 ) Agricultural weed research: a critique and two proposals. Weed Science 62, 672 â 678.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWebber BL & Scott JK ( 2012 ) Rapid global change: implications for defining natives and aliens. Global Ecology and Biogeography 21, 305 â 311.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWesterman PR, Liebman M, Menalled FD, Heggenstaller AH, Hartzler RG & Dixon PM ( 2005 ) Are many little hammers effective? Velvetleaf population dynamics in twoâ and fourâ year crop rotation systems Weed Science 53, 382 â 392.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWilliamson M ( 1996 ) Biological Invasions. Chapman & Hall, London.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWilson RS, Hooker N, Tucker M, Lejeune J & Doohan D ( 2009 ) Targeting the farmer decision making process: a pathway to increased adoption of integrated weed management. Crop Protection 28, 756 â 764.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWisler GC & Norris RF ( 2005 ) Interactions between weeds and cultivated plants as related to management of plant pathogens. Weed Science 53, 914 â 917.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBarrett M, Ervin DE, Frisvold GB, Jussaume RA, Shaw DR & Ward SM ( 2017 ) A wicked view. Weed Science 65, 441 â 443.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBaucom RS & Holt JS ( 2009 ) Weeds of agricultural importance: bridging the gap between evolutionary ecology and crop and weed science. New Phytologist 184, 741 â 743.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBecker C & Weigel D ( 2012 ) Epigenetic variation: origin and transgenerational inheritance. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 15, 562 â 567.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBradley BA, Blumenthal DM, Wilcove DS & Ziska LH ( 2010 ) Predicting plant invasions in an era of global change. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 25, 310 â 318.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCallaway RM, Thelen GC, Rodriguez A & Holben WE ( 2004 ) Soil biota and exotic plant invasion. Nature 427, 731 â 733.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCheeâ Sanford JC, Williams MW, Davis AS & Sims GK ( 2006 ) Do microorganisms influence seedâ bank dynamics? Weed Science 54, 575 â 587.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDélye C, Michel S, Bérard A et al. ( 2010 ) Geographical variation in resistance to acetylâ coenzyme A carboxylaseâ inhibiting herbicides across the range of the arable weed Alopecurus myosuroides (blackâ grass). New Phytologist 186, 1005 â 1017.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDiez JM, D’antonio CM, Dukes JS et al. ( 2012 ) Will extreme climatic effects facilitate biological invasions? Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 10, 249 â 257.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDriscoll DA, Catford JA, Barney JN et al. ( 2014 ) New pasture plants intensify invasive species. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the United States of America 111, 16622 â 16627.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDukes JS & Mooney HA ( 1999 ) Does global change increase the success of biological invaders? Trends in Ecology & Evolution 14, 135 â 139.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEhrenfeld JG ( 2010 ) Ecosystem consequences of biological invasions. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 41, 59 â 80.
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
wre12304_am.pdf
Size:
178.8KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open
Name:
wre12304.pdf
Size:
210.2KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.