View Item 

Show simple item record

Prospective randomized study evaluating ultrasound versus fluoroscopy guided sacral InterStim® lead placement: A pilot study
dc.contributor.authorShakuri‐rad, Jaschar
dc.contributor.authorCicic, Arman
dc.contributor.authorThompson, Jannah
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-13T18:52:31Z
dc.date.available2019-08-01T19:53:23Zen
dc.date.issued2018-06
dc.identifier.citationShakuri‐rad, Jaschar ; Cicic, Arman; Thompson, Jannah (2018). "Prospective randomized study evaluating ultrasound versus fluoroscopy guided sacral InterStim® lead placement: A pilot study." Neurourology and Urodynamics 37(5): 1737-1743.
dc.identifier.issn0733-2467
dc.identifier.issn1520-6777
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/145364
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.subject.othersacral neuromodulation
dc.subject.otherstage I
dc.subject.otherultrasound
dc.subject.otherradiation
dc.subject.otherfecal incontinence
dc.subject.otherInterStim
dc.subject.otheroveractive bladder
dc.titleProspective randomized study evaluating ultrasound versus fluoroscopy guided sacral InterStim® lead placement: A pilot study
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelInternal Medicine and Specialties
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/145364/1/nau23502_am.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/145364/2/nau23502.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/nau.23502
dc.identifier.sourceNeurourology and Urodynamics
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNoblett K, Siegel S, Mangel J, et al. Results of a prospective, multicenter study evaluating quality of life, safety, and efficacy of sacral neuromodulation at twelve months in subjects with symptoms of overactive bladder. Neurourol Urodyn. 2016; 35: 246 â 251.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChughtai B, Sedrakyan A, Isaacs A, Lee R, Te A, Kaplan S. Long term safety of sacral nerve modulation in medicare beneficiaries. Neurourol Urodyn. 2015; 34: 659 â 663.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBanakhar M, Gazwani Y, Kelini ME, Alâ shaiji T, Hassouna M. Effect of sacral neuromodulation on female sexual function and quality of life: are they correlated ? Can Urol Assoc J. 2015; 8: E762 â E767.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSiegel S, Noblett K, Mangel J, et al. Results of a prospective, randomized, multicenter study evaluating sacral neuromodulation with InterStim therapy compared to standard medical therapy at 6â months in subjects with mild symptoms of overactive bladder. Neurourol Urodyn. 2015; 34: 224 â 230.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChai TC, Mamo GJ. Modified techniques of S3 foramen localization and lead implantation in S3 neuromodulation. Urology. 2001; 58: 786 â 790.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCoyne K, Revicki D, Hunt T, et al. Psychometric validation of an overactive bladder symptom and healthâ related quality of life questionnaire: the OABâ q. Qual Life Res. 2002; 11: 563 â 574.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHomma Y, Yoshida M, Seki N, et al. Symptom assessment tool for overactive bladder syndromeâ overactive bladder symptom score. Urology. 2006; 68: 318 â 323.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRockwood TH, Church JM, Fleshman JW, et al. Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale: quality of life instrument for patients with fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 2000; 43: 9 â 16.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJacobs SA, Lane FL, Osann KE, Noblett KL. Randomized prospective crossover study of interstim lead wire placement with curved versus straight stylet. Neurourol Urodyn. 2014; 33: 488 â 492.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChen TT, Wang C, Ferrandino MN, et al. Radiation exposure during the evaluation and management of nephrolithiasis. J Urol. 2015; 194: 878 â 885.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTaylor ER, Kramer B, Frye TP, Wang S, Schwartz BF, Köhler TS. Ocular radiation exposure in modern urological practice. J Urol. 2013; 190: 139 â 143.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDeters LA, Dagrosa LM, Herrick BW, Silas A, Pais VM. Ultrasound guided ureteroscopy for the definitive management of ureteral stones: a randomized, controlled trial. J Urol. 2014; 192: 1710 â 1713.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSiegel SW, Catanzaro F, Dijkema HE, et al. Longâ term results of a multicenter study on sacral nerve stimulation for treatment of urinary urge incontinence, urgencyâ frequency, and retention. Urology. 2000; 56: 87 â 91.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGormley EA, Lightner DJ, Burgio KL, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of overactive bladder (nonâ neurogenic) in adults: aUA/SUFU guideline. J Urol. 2012; 188: 2455 â 2463.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVan kerrebroeck PE, Van voskuilen AC, Heesakkers JP, et al. Results of sacral neuromodulation therapy for urinary voiding dysfunction: outcomes of a prospective, worldwide clinical study. J Urol. 2007; 178: 2029 â 2034.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePeeters K, Sahai A, De ridder D, Van der aa F. Longâ term followâ up of sacral neuromodulation for lower urinary tract dysfunction. BJU Int. 2014; 113: 789 â 794.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDeng DY, Gulati M, Rutman M, Raz S, Rodríguez LV. Failure of sacral nerve stimulation due to migration of tined lead. J Urol. 2006; 175: 2182 â 2185.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCohen BL, Tunuguntla HS, Gousse A. Predictors of success for first stage neuromodulation: motor versus sensory response. J Urol. 2006; 175: 2178 â 2180.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLai HH, Grewal S. Bacterial colonization rate of InterStim and infection outcome with staged testing. Urology. 2013; 82: 1255 â 1260.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAlâ zahrani AA, Elzayat EA, Gajewski JB. Longâ term outcome and surgical interventions after sacral neuromodulation implant for lower urinary tract symptoms: 14â year experience at 1 center. J Urol. 2011; 185: 981 â 986.
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
nau23502_am.pdf
Size:
125.7KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open
Name:
nau23502.pdf
Size:
615.2KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.