View Item 

Show simple item record

Coronary MRA
dc.contributor.authorDeshpande, Vibhas S.
dc.contributor.authorLi, Debiao
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-13T18:53:15Z
dc.date.available2018-08-13T18:53:15Z
dc.date.issued2008-06
dc.identifier.citationDeshpande, Vibhas S.; Li, Debiao (2008). "Coronary MRA." Current Protocols in Magnetic Resonance Imaging 15(1): A11.5.1-A11.5.22.
dc.identifier.issn2572-5637
dc.identifier.issn2572-5637
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/145393
dc.description.abstractCoronary X‐ray angiography is the gold standard for coronary artery imaging, but is an invasive procedure, with a minor risk of potentially serious complications in addition to the drawback of exposure to ionizing radiation. Coronary magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) is a noninvasive method of imaging the coronary arteries, with no known adverse effects. In addition to morphologic evaluation of coronary artery disease with coronary MRA, cardiac MRI offers exciting possibilities to study the functional significance of coronary artery disease in the same setting. Three widely used coronary MRA approaches are presented‐‐two free‐breathing navigator‐gated methods, and a breath‐hold method. Although the positive predictive value of coronary MRA for detecting stenoses remains lower than that of X‐ray angiography, coronary MRA can reliably detect anomalous origins of coronary arteries, and has a high negative predictive value for stenoses. In conclusion, coronary MRA is a promising tool to study coronary artery disease.
dc.publisherAmerican Heart Association
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.subject.othermagnetic resonance angiography (MRA)
dc.subject.othermagnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
dc.subject.othercoronary artery imaging
dc.subject.othernon‐contrast MR angiography
dc.subject.otherfast imaging
dc.subject.othersteady‐state free precession
dc.titleCoronary MRA
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelRadiology
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelFamily Medicine and Primary Care
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/145393/1/cpmia1105.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/0471142719.mia1105s15
dc.identifier.sourceCurrent Protocols in Magnetic Resonance Imaging
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDeshpande, V.S., Shea, S.M., Laub, G., Simonetti, O.P., Finn, J.P.,and Li, D. 2001. 3D magnetization‐prepared true‐FISP: A new technique for imaging coronary arteries. Magn. Reson. Med. 46: 494 ‐ 502.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAHA. 1999. Heart and Stroke Statistical Update. American Heart Association, Dallas, Texas.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDeshpande, V.S., Shea, S.M.,and Li, D. 2003. Artifact reduction in true‐FISP imaging of the coronary arteries by adjusting imaging frequency. Magn. Reson. Med. 49: 803 ‐ 809.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGerber, B.L., Garot, J., Bluemke, D.A., Wu, K.C.,and Lima, J.A. 2002. Accuracy of contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in predicting improvement of regional myocardial function in patients after acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 106: 1083 ‐ 1089.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceIbrahim, T., Nekolla, S.G., Schreiber, K., Odaka, K., Volz, S., Mehilli, J., Güthlin, M., Delius, W.,and Schwaiger, M. 2002. Assessment of coronary flow reserve: Comparison between contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 39: 864 ‐ 870.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKim, R.J., Fieno, D.S., Parrish, T.B., Harris, K., Chen, E.L., Simonetti, O., Bundy, J., Finn, J.P., Klocke, F.J.,and Judd, R.M. 1999. Relationship of MRI delayed contrast enhancement to irreversible injury, infarct age, and contractile function. Circulation 100: 1992 ‐ 2002.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKoskenvuo, J.W., Sakuma, H., Niemi, P., Toikka, J.O., Knuuti, J., Laine, H., Komu, M., Kormano, M., Saraste, M.,and Hartiala, J.J. 2001. Global myocardial blood flow and global flow reserve measurements by MRI and PET are comparable. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 13: 361 ‐ 366.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMahrholdt, H., Wagner, A., Judd, R.M.,and Sechtem, U. 2002. Assessment of myocardial viability by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging. Eur. Heart J. 23: 602 ‐ 619.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShellock, F.G. 2001. Magnetic Resonance Procedures: Health Effects and Safety. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTaylor, A.M., Jhooti, P., Wiesmann, F., Keegan, J., Firmin, D.N.,and Pennell, D.J. 1997. MR navigator‐echo monitoring of temporal changes in diaphragm position: Implications for MR coronary angiography. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 7: 629 ‐ 636.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWang, Y., Riederer, S.,and Ehman, R. 1995. Respiratory motion of the heart: Kinematics and the implications for spatial resolution of coronary MR imaging.1995. Magn. Reson. Med. 33: 713 ‐ 719.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWeber, O.M., Martin, A.J.,and Higgins, C.B. 2003. Whole‐heart steady‐state free precession coronary artery magnetic resonance angiography. 2003. Magn. Reson. Med. 50: 1223 ‐ 1228.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWielopolski, P., van Geuns, R., de Feyter, P.,and Oudkerk, M. 1998. Breath‐hold coronary MR angiography with volume‐targeted imaging. Radiology 209: 209 ‐ 219.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWilke, N., Jerosch‐Herold, M., Zenovich, A.,and Stillman, A. 1999. Magnetic resonance first‐pass myocardial perfusion imaging: Clinical validation and future applications. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 10: 676 ‐ 685.
dc.identifier.citedreferencehttp://www.mrisafety.com
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShellock, 2001.See above.
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
cpmia1105.pdf
Size:
327.4KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.