View Item 

Show simple item record

MRI of the Acute Injured Knee

dc.contributor.authorHuegli, Rolf W.
dc.contributor.authorTirman, Phillip F.J.
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-13T18:53:34Z
dc.date.available2018-08-13T18:53:34Z
dc.date.issued2001-12
dc.identifier.citationHuegli, Rolf W.; Tirman, Phillip F.J. (2001). "MRI of the Acute Injured Knee." Current Protocols in Magnetic Resonance Imaging 3(1): A23.1.1-A23.1.11.
dc.identifier.issn2572-5637
dc.identifier.issn2572-5637
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/145407
dc.description.abstractMagnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) has become a mainstay in the assessment of internal derangement of the knee. MRI prior to surgery increases diagnostic confidence. It also influences clinical practice by identifying alternative diagnoses, e.g., for an osteochondral injury that clinically may mimic meniscal tears, different surgical approaches exist for many cases. This unit presents the standard protocol for imaging injured knees in a clinical setting. The parameters given in this unit are derived from a 1.5 T machine and may need to be altered slightly depending on the main magnetic field strength and the equipment manufacturer.
dc.publisherLippincott‐Raven
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.titleMRI of the Acute Injured Knee
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelFamily Medicine and Primary Care
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelRadiology
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/145407/1/cpmia2301.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/0471142719.mia2301s03
dc.identifier.sourceCurrent Protocols in Magnetic Resonance Imaging
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHeron, C.W. and Calvert, P.T. 1992. Three‐dimensional gradient‐echo MR imaging of the knee: comparison with arthroscopy in 100 patients. Radiology 183: 839 ‐ 844.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBui‐Mansfield, L.T., Youngberg, R.A., Warme, W., Pitche, J.D., and Nguyen, P.L. 1997. Potential cost savings of MR imaging obtained before arthroscopy of the knee: Evaluation of 50 consecutive patients. A.J.R. 168: 913 ‐ 918.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCarmichael, I.W., MacLeod, A.M., and Travlos, J. 1997. MRI can prevent unnecessary arthroscopy. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 79: 624 ‐ 625.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEscobedo, E.M., Hunter, J.C., Zink‐Brody, G.C., Wilson, A.J., Harrison, S.D., and Fisher, D.J. 1996. Usefulness of turbo spin‐echo MR imaging in the evaluation of meniscal tears: Comparison with a conventional spin‐echo sequence. A.J.R. 167: 1223 ‐ 1227.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGuckel, C., Jundt, G., Schnabel, K., and Gachter, A. 1995. Spin‐echo and 3D gradient‐echo imaging of the knee joint: A clinical and histopathological comparison. Eur. J. Radiol. 21: 25 ‐ 33.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHodler, J., Buess, E., Rodriguez, M., and Imhoff, A. 1993. [Magnetic resonance tomography (MRT) of the knee joint: meniscus, cruciate ligaments and hyaline cartilage]. Rofo. Fortschr. Geb. Rontgenstr. Neuen. Bildgeb. Verfahr. 159: 107 ‐ 112.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMackenzie, R., Dixon, A.K., Keene, G.S., Hollingworth, W., Lomas, D.J., and Villar, R.N. 1996. Magnetic resonance imaging of the knee: Assessment of effectiveness. Clin. Radiol. 51: 245 ‐ 250.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMaurer, E.J., Kaplan, P.A., Dussault, R.G., Diduch, D.R., Schuett, A., McCue, F.C., Hornsby, P.P., and Hillman, B.J. 1997. Acutely injured knee: Effect of MR imaging on diagnostic and therapeutic decisions. Radiology 204: 799 ‐ 805.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMirowitz, S.A. 1994. Motion artifact as a pitfall in diagnosis of meniscal tear on gradient reoriented MRI of the knee. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 18: 279 ‐ 282.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePeterfy, C.G., Janzen, D.L., Tirman, P.F., van Dijke, C.F., Pollack, M., and Genant, H.K. 1994. “Magic‐angle” phenomenon: A cause of increased signal in the normal lateral meniscus on short‐ T E. MR images of the knee. A.J.R. 163: 149 ‐ 154.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceReeder, J.D., Matz, S.O., Becker, L., and Andelman, S.M. 1989. MR imaging of the knee in the sagittal projection: Comparison of three‐dimensional gradient‐echo and spin‐echo sequences. A.J.R. 153: 537 ‐ 540.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRubin, D.A. and Paletta, G.A. Jr. 2000. Current concepts and controversies in meniscal imaging. Magn. Reson. Imaging Clin. N. Am. 8: 243 ‐ 270.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRubin, D.A., Kettering, J.M., Towers, J.D., and Britton, C.A. 1998. MR imaging of knees having isolated and combined ligament injuries. A.J.R. 170: 1207 ‐ 1213.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRuwe, P.A., Wright, J., Randall, R.L., Lynch, J.K., Jokl, P., and McCarthy, S. 1992. Can MR imaging effectively replace diagnostic arthroscopy? Radiology. 183: 335 ‐ 339.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShellock, F.G. 1996. Pocket Guide to MR Procedures and Metallic Objects. Lippincott‐Raven, Philadelphia.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSolomon, S.L., Totty, W.G., and Lee, J.K. 1989. MR imaging of the knee: Comparison of three‐dimensional FISP and two‐dimensional spin‐echo pulse sequences. Radiology. 173: 739 ‐ 742.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSpiers, A.S., Meagher, T., Ostlere, S.J., Wilson, D.J., and Dodd, C.A. 1993. Can MRI of the knee affect arthroscopic practice? A prospective study of 58 patients. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 75: 49 ‐ 52.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStoller, D.W. and Anderson, L.J. 1997. agnetic Resonance Imaging in Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine. 2nd edition. Lippincott‐Raven, Philadelphia.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAnderson, M.W., Raghavan, N., Seidenwurm, D.J., Greenspan, A., and Drake, C. 1995. Evaluation of meniscal tears: Fast spin‐echo versus conventional spin‐echo magnetic resonance imaging. Acad. Radiol. 2: 209 ‐ 214.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBredella, M.A., Tirman, P.F., Peterfy, C.G., Zarlingo, M., Feller, J.F., Bost, F.W., Belzer, J.P., Wischer, T.K., and Genant, H.K. 1999. Accuracy of T 2.‐weighted fast spin‐echo MR imaging with fat saturation in detecting cartilage defects in the knee: Comparison with arthroscopy in 130 patients. A.J.R. 172: 1073 ‐ 1080.
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
cpmia2301.pdf
Size:
925.8KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.