View Item 

Show simple item record

Data management in anthropology: the next phase in ethics governance?
dc.contributor.authorPels, Peter
dc.contributor.authorBoog, Igor
dc.contributor.authorHenrike Florusbosch, J.
dc.contributor.authorKripe, Zane
dc.contributor.authorMinter, Tessa
dc.contributor.authorPostma, Metje
dc.contributor.authorSleeboom‐faulkner, Margaret
dc.contributor.authorSimpson, Bob
dc.contributor.authorDilger, Hansjörg
dc.contributor.authorSchönhuth, Michael
dc.contributor.authorPoser, Anita
dc.contributor.authorCastillo, Rosa Cordillera A.
dc.contributor.authorLederman, Rena
dc.contributor.authorRichards‐rissetto, Heather
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-04T20:08:43Z
dc.date.available2019-09-04T20:15:39Zen
dc.date.issued2018-08
dc.identifier.citationPels, Peter; Boog, Igor; Henrike Florusbosch, J.; Kripe, Zane; Minter, Tessa; Postma, Metje; Sleeboom‐faulkner, Margaret ; Simpson, Bob; Dilger, Hansjörg ; Schönhuth, Michael ; Poser, Anita; Castillo, Rosa Cordillera A.; Lederman, Rena; Richards‐rissetto, Heather (2018). "Data management in anthropology: the next phase in ethics governance?." Social Anthropology (3): 391-413.
dc.identifier.issn0964-0282
dc.identifier.issn1469-8676
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/145538
dc.publisherChicago University Press
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.subject.othergestion de données
dc.subject.otherépistémologie
dc.subject.otheréthique
dc.subject.othergouvernance universitaire
dc.subject.otherculture de l’audit
dc.subject.otherdata management
dc.subject.otherethics
dc.subject.otheracademic governance
dc.subject.otheraudit culture
dc.subject.otherepistemology
dc.titleData management in anthropology: the next phase in ethics governance?
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelAnthropology and Archaeology
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/145538/1/soca12526_am.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/145538/2/soca12526.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/1469-8676.12526
dc.identifier.sourceSocial Anthropology
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMarkham, A. and E. Buchanan 2012. Ethical decisionâ making and internet research recommendations from the AoIR Ethics Working Committee (Version 2.0) ( http://aoir.org/reports/ethics2.pdf ).
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBerreman, G. 1991. Ethics versus â realismâ in anthropology, in C. Fluehrâ Lobban (ed.), Ethics and the profession of anthropology: dialogue for a new era. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCho, J. and A. Trent 2006. â Validity in qualitative research revisited â , Qualitative Research 6: 319 â 40.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEvens, T. and D. Handelman (eds.) 2006. The Manchester School: practice and ethnographic praxis in anthropology. Oxford: Berghahn Books.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFabian, J. 1971. â Language, history and anthropology â , Philosophy of the Social Sciences 1: 19 â 47.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFabian, J. 1983. Time and the other. How anthropology makes its object. New York: Columbia University Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFluehrâ Lobban, C. 1994. â Informed consent in anthropological research: we are not exempt â , Human Organization 53: 1 â 10.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHarding, S. 2000. The book of Jerry Fallwel. Fundamentalist language and politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKuklick, H. 1991. The savage within: the social history of British anthropology, 1885â 1945. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMosse, D. 2006. â Antiâ social anthropology? Objectivity, objection, and the ethnography of public policy and professional communities â , Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 12: 935 â 56.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePels, P. 1999. â Professions of duplexity: a prehistory of ethical codes in anthropology â , Current Anthropology 40: 101 â 36.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRibot, J. C. and N. L. Peluso 2003. â A theory of access â , Rural Sociology 68: 153 â 81.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStocking Jr, G. W. 1979. Anthropology as Kulturkampf: science and politics in the career of Franz Boas, in W. Goldschmidt (ed.), The uses of anthropology. American Anthropological Association Special Publication.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStrathern, M. 2000. Audit culture. Anthropological studies in accountability, ethics and the academy. London: Routledge.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTsing, A. L. 2015. The mushroom at the end of the world. On the possibility of life in capitalist ruins. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBaud, M., S. Legène and P. Pels 2013. Circumventing reality. Report on the anthropological work of Professor Emeritus M.M.G. Bax. Amsterdam: Free University, 9 September.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEss, C. and the Ethics Working Committee Association of Internet Research 2002. Ethical decisionâ making and internet research recommendations from the AoIR Ethics Working Committee, Approved by AoIR, 27 November ( http://aoir.org/reports/ethics.pdf ).
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFabian, J. 1971. â Language, history and anthropology â , Philosophy of the Social Sciences 1: 19 â 47.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFabian, J. 1983. Time and the other. How anthropology makes its object. New York: Columbia University Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFluehrâ Lobban, C. 1991. Ethics and the profession of anthropology. Dialogue for a new era. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHarding, S. 1991. â Representing fundamentalism: the problem of the repugnant cultural other â , Social Research 58: 373 â 93.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKelly, J. D., B. Jauregui, S. T. Mitchell and J. Walton (eds.) 2010. Anthropology and global counterinsurgency. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLevelt Committee, Noort Committee and Drenth Committee 2012. Flawed science: the fraudulent research practices of social psychologist Diederik Stapel. Tilburg: Tilburg University, 28 November.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMosse, D. 2006. â Antiâ social anthropology? Objectivity, objection, and the ethnography of public policy and professional communities â , Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 12: 935 â 56.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePels, P. 2014. â After objectivity. A historical approach to the intersubjective in ethnography â , HAU. Journal of Ethnographic Theory 4: 211 â 36.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePels, P. and O. Salemink 1999. Introduction: Locating the colonial subjects of anthropology, in P. Pels and O. Salemink (eds.), Colonial subjects: essays in the practical history of anthropology, 1 â 52. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGDPR 2016. EURâ Lex ( http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/en/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32016R067 ) Accessed 2 April 2018.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJoint Submission 2016. Submission to DCMS ( https://www.britac.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2017-05-10%20DCMS%20GDPR%20Derogations%20submission.pdf ) Accessed 13 June 2018.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVon Unger, H., H. Dilger and M. Schönhuth 2016. â Ethics reviews in the social and cultural sciences? A sociological and anthropological contribution to the debate â , Forum: Qualitative Social Research/Sozialforschung 17 ( https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-17.3.2719 ).
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLave, J. 2011. Apprenticeship in critical ethnographic practice. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLederman, R. 2007. â Comparative â researchâ : a modest proposal concerning the object of ethics regulation â , PoLAR 30: 305 â 27.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLederman, R. 2016. Fieldwork doubleâ bound in human researchâ ethics reviews: disciplinary competence, or regulatory compliance and the muting of disciplinary values, in W. van den Hoonaard and A. Hamilton (eds.), The ethics rupture, 43 â 72. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceClarke, M. 2017. â The digital dilemma: preservation and the digital archaeological record â , Advances in Archaeological Practice 3: 313 â 30.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRichardsâ Rissetto, H. and J. von Schwerin 2017. â A catch 22 of 3D data sustainability: lessons in 3D archaeological data management & accessibility â , Journal of Digital Applications in Archaeology and Cultural Heritage 6: 38 â 48.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceUNESCO 2016. Operational guidelines for the implementation of the World Heritage Convention. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, Intergovernmental Committee for the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage. Paris: France.
dc.identifier.citedreferencevan der Elst, J., H. Richardsâ Rissetto and J. Garcia 2011. Creating digital heritage content: bridging communities and mediating perspectives, in M. Lytras, P. Ordonez De Pablos, E. Damiani and L. Diaz (eds.), Digital culture and eâ tourism: technologies, applications and management approaches, 139 â 57. New York: IGI Global Publishing.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCollins, S. G., M. Durington and H. Gill 2017. â Multimodality: an invitation â , American Anthropologist 119: 142 â 6.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAbbott, A. 2001. Time matters. On theory and method. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
soca12526_am.pdf
Size:
429.7KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open
Name:
soca12526.pdf
Size:
173.8KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.