Show simple item record

Rational Structures in Learning and Memory

dc.contributor.authorAronowitz, Sarah
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-25T17:39:12Z
dc.date.availableNO_RESTRICTION
dc.date.available2018-10-25T17:39:12Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.date.submitted2018
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/145896
dc.description.abstractMy dissertation aims to disrupt an increasingly ubiquitous view of epistemology which claim that we can study rationality by considering a single belief at a single time. I target three areas where diachronic (i.e. temporal) factors make a difference in the three sections: 1. memory, a system of tremendous importance in our cognitive lives yet which is often reduced to a one-sided question of whether to trust what one’s memory says, 2. learning, where I argue that we should sometimes believe in a way that’s not warranted or reasonable in light of our current evidence, but which puts us in a better position to acquire evidence in the future, and 3. the connection between memory and learning, as exemplified in the case of remembering anomalous events. This project is important because our whole lives are organized around getting things right at the right time. When we try to act morally, we might try to have a life that is built around moral principles, or to become wiser and kinder over time, as opposed to amassing a collection of acts that all have independent moral value. I think the same thing is true of our endeavors to acquire knowledge the process of inquiry is not made up of individual, independent good inferences that happen to follow one another, but is instead about a trajectory where we learn over time, and take the right steps now to get things right in the future, and overall. So I think that to understand this more complete sense of inquiry, philosophy needs to make a place for memory, the system that sustains and directs inquiry in the background, over long periods of time even as the sciences are learning more and more about how natural memory systems work, philosophers have boxed it out of relevance.My methodology is to study natural and artificial learning and memory systems as a process of discovery, a way of using real-world cases as inspiration and guide to the normative landscape. Conversely, I hope that figuring out new normative possibilities can shed light on empirical facts - though this is not the main focus of my dissertation.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.subjectepistemology
dc.subjectmemory
dc.subjectdiachronic rationality
dc.titleRational Structures in Learning and Memory
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreenamePhDen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplinePhilosophy
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studies
dc.contributor.committeememberRailton, Peter A
dc.contributor.committeememberLewis, Richard L
dc.contributor.committeememberJoyce, James M
dc.contributor.committeememberSripada, Sekhar Chandra
dc.contributor.committeememberWilliamson, Timothy
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPhilosophy
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHumanities
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/145896/1/skaron_1.pdf
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-9099-3031
dc.identifier.name-orcidAronowitz, Sara; 0000-0001-9099-3031en_US
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.