Show simple item record

Amputee perception of prosthetic ankle stiffness during locomotion

dc.contributor.authorShepherd, Max K
dc.contributor.authorAzocar, Alejandro F
dc.contributor.authorMajor, Matthew J
dc.contributor.authorRouse, Elliott J
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-11T08:08:18Z
dc.date.available2018-11-11T08:08:18Z
dc.date.issued2018-11-08
dc.identifier.citationJournal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation. 2018 Nov 08;15(1):99
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-018-0432-5
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/146187
dc.description.abstractAbstract Background Prosthetic feet are spring-like, and their stiffness critically affects the wearer’s stability, comfort, and energetic cost of walking. Despite the importance of stiffness in ambulation, the prescription process often entails testing a limited number of prostheses, which may result in patients receiving a foot with suboptimal mechanics. To understand the resolution with which prostheses should be individually optimized, we sought to characterize below-knee prosthesis users’ psychophysical sensitivity to prosthesis stiffness. Methods We used a novel variable-stiffness ankle prosthesis to measure the repeatability of user-selected preferred stiffness, and implemented a psychophysical experiment to characterize the just noticeable difference of stiffness during locomotion. Results All eight subjects with below-knee amputation exhibited high repeatability in selecting their Preferred Stiffness (mean coefficient of variation: 14.2 ± 1.7%) and were able to correctly identify a 7.7 ± 1.3% change in ankle stiffness (with 75% accuracy). Conclusions This high sensitivity suggests prosthetic foot stiffness should be tuned with a high degree of precision on an individual basis. These results also highlight the need for a pairing of new robotic prescription tools and mechanical characterizations of prosthetic feet.
dc.titleAmputee perception of prosthetic ankle stiffness during locomotion
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/146187/1/12984_2018_Article_432.pdf
dc.language.rfc3066en
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s).
dc.date.updated2018-11-11T08:08:22Z
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.