Show simple item record

Three‐dimensional evaluation of the maxillary effects of two orthopaedic protocols for the treatment of Class III malocclusion: A prospective study

dc.contributor.authorFischer, Brittany
dc.contributor.authorMasucci, Caterina
dc.contributor.authorRuellas, Antonio
dc.contributor.authorCevidanes, Lucia
dc.contributor.authorGiuntini, Veronica
dc.contributor.authorNieri, Michele
dc.contributor.authorNardi, Cosimo
dc.contributor.authorFranchi, Lorenzo
dc.contributor.authorMcNamara, James A.
dc.contributor.authorDefraia, Efisio
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-20T15:32:43Z
dc.date.available2020-01-06T16:40:59Zen
dc.date.issued2018-11
dc.identifier.citationFischer, Brittany; Masucci, Caterina; Ruellas, Antonio; Cevidanes, Lucia; Giuntini, Veronica; Nieri, Michele; Nardi, Cosimo; Franchi, Lorenzo; McNamara, James A.; Defraia, Efisio (2018). "Three‐dimensional evaluation of the maxillary effects of two orthopaedic protocols for the treatment of Class III malocclusion: A prospective study." Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research 21(4): 248-257.
dc.identifier.issn1601-6335
dc.identifier.issn1601-6343
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/146332
dc.publisherNeedham Press
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.subject.other3D imaging
dc.subject.otherclass III malocclusion
dc.subject.otherdentofacial orthopedics
dc.titleThree‐dimensional evaluation of the maxillary effects of two orthopaedic protocols for the treatment of Class III malocclusion: A prospective study
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelDentistry
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/146332/1/ocr12247.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/146332/2/ocr12247_am.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/ocr.12247
dc.identifier.sourceOrthodontics & Craniofacial Research
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBaccetti T, Franchi L, McNamara JA Jr. The cervical vertebral maturation (CVM) method for the assessment of optimal treatment timing in dentofacial orthopedics. Semin Orthod. 2005; 11: 119 ‐ 129.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHardy DK, Cubas YP, Orellana MF. Prevalence of angle class III malocclusion: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Open J Epidemiol. 2012; 2: 75 ‐ 82.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcNamara JA Jr, Brudon WL. Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. Ann Arbor, Michigan: Needham Press; 2001: 375 ‐ 385.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFoersch M, Jacobs C, Wriedt S, Hechtner M, Wehrbein H. Effectiveness of maxillary protraction using facemask with or without maxillary expansion: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Clin Oral Investig. 2015; 19: 1181 ‐ 1192.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCordasco G, Matarese G, Rustico L, et al. Efficacy of orthopedic treatment with protraction facemask on skeletal Class III malocclusion: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2014; 17: 133 ‐ 143.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWoon SC, Thiruvenkatachari B. Early orthodontic treatment for Class III malocclusion: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2017; 151: 28 ‐ 52.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRongo R, D’Antò V, Bucci R, Polito I, Martina R, Michelotti A. Skeletal and dental effects of Class III orthopaedic treatment: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. J Oral Rehabil. 2017; 44: 545 ‐ 562.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLiou EJ‐W. Effective maxillary orthopedic protraction for growing Class III patients: a clinical application simulates distraction osteogenesis. Prog Orthod. 2005; 6: 154 ‐ 171.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLiou EJ‐W. Toothborne orthopedic maxillary protraction in Class III patients. J Clin Orthod. 2005; 39: 68 ‐ 75.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDo‐deLatour TB, Ngan P, Martin CA, Razmus T, Gunel E. Effect of alternate maxillary expansion and contraction on protraction of the maxilla: a pilot study. Hong Kong Dent J. 2009; 6: 72 ‐ 82.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceIsci D, Turk T, Elekdag‐Turk S. Activation‐deactivation rapid palatal expansion and reverse headgear in Class III cases. Eur J Orthod. 2010; 32: 706 ‐ 715.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMasucci C, Franchi L, Giuntini V, Defraia E. Short‐term effects of a modified Alt‐RAMEC protocol for early treatment of Class III malocclusion: a controlled study. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2014; 17: 259 ‐ 269.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLiu W, Zhou Y, Wang X, Liu D, Zhou S. Effect of maxillary protraction with alternating rapid palatal expansion and constriction vs expansion alone in maxillary retrusive patients: a single‐center, randomized controlled trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2015; 148: 641 ‐ 651.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePithon MM, Santos NL, Santos CR, et al. Is alternate rapid maxillary expansion and constriction an effective protocol in the treatment of Class III malocclusion? A systematic review. Dental Press J Orthod. 2016; 21: 34 ‐ 42.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcNamara JA Jr, Franchi L. The cervical vertebral maturation method: a user’s guide. Angle Orthod. 2018; 88: 133 ‐ 143.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNgan P, Hagg U, Yiu C, Wei SH. Treatment response and long‐term dentofacial adaptations to maxillary expansion and protraction. Semin Orthod. 1997; 3: 255 ‐ 264.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRuellas AC, Tonello C, Gomes LR, et al. Common 3‐dimensional coordinate system for assessment of direction changes. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016; 149: 645 ‐ 656.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRuellas AC, Huanca Ghislanzoni LT, Gomes MR, et al. Comparison and reproducibility of 2 regions of reference for maxillary regional registration with cone‐bean computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016; 149: 533 ‐ 542.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSpringate SD. The effect of sample size and bias on the reliability of estimates of error: a comparative study of Dahlberg’s formula. Eur J Orthod. 2012; 34: 158 ‐ 163.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFleiss JL. The design and analysis of clinical experiments. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.; 1986: 7.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFedorov A, Beichel R, Kalpathy‐Cramer J, et al. 3D slicer as an image computing platform for the quantitative imaging network. Magn Reson Imaging. 2012; 30: 1323 ‐ 1341.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMelsen B, Melsen F. The postnatal development of the palatomaxillary region studied on human autopsy material. Am J Orthod. 1982; 82: 329 ‐ 342.
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.