View Item 

Show simple item record

Tiered Approach to Resilience Assessment
dc.contributor.authorLinkov, Igor
dc.contributor.authorFox‐lent, Cate
dc.contributor.authorRead, Laura
dc.contributor.authorAllen, Craig R.
dc.contributor.authorArnott, James C.
dc.contributor.authorBellini, Emanuele
dc.contributor.authorCoaffee, Jon
dc.contributor.authorFlorin, Marie‐valentine
dc.contributor.authorHatfield, Kirk
dc.contributor.authorHyde, Iain
dc.contributor.authorHynes, William
dc.contributor.authorJovanovic, Aleksandar
dc.contributor.authorKasperson, Roger
dc.contributor.authorKatzenberger, John
dc.contributor.authorKeys, Patrick W.
dc.contributor.authorLambert, James H.
dc.contributor.authorMoss, Richard
dc.contributor.authorMurdoch, Peter S.
dc.contributor.authorPalma‐oliveira, Jose
dc.contributor.authorPulwarty, Roger S.
dc.contributor.authorSands, Dale
dc.contributor.authorThomas, Edward A.
dc.contributor.authorTye, Mari R.
dc.contributor.authorWoods, David
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-20T15:33:14Z
dc.date.available2019-11-01T15:10:32Zen
dc.date.issued2018-09
dc.identifier.citationLinkov, Igor; Fox‐lent, Cate ; Read, Laura; Allen, Craig R.; Arnott, James C.; Bellini, Emanuele; Coaffee, Jon; Florin, Marie‐valentine ; Hatfield, Kirk; Hyde, Iain; Hynes, William; Jovanovic, Aleksandar; Kasperson, Roger; Katzenberger, John; Keys, Patrick W.; Lambert, James H.; Moss, Richard; Murdoch, Peter S.; Palma‐oliveira, Jose ; Pulwarty, Roger S.; Sands, Dale; Thomas, Edward A.; Tye, Mari R.; Woods, David (2018). "Tiered Approach to Resilience Assessment." Risk Analysis 38(9): 1772-1780.
dc.identifier.issn0272-4332
dc.identifier.issn1539-6924
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/146359
dc.description.abstractRegulatory agencies have long adopted a threeâ tier framework for risk assessment. We build on this structure to propose a tiered approach for resilience assessment that can be integrated into the existing regulatory processes. Comprehensive approaches to assessing resilience at appropriate and operational scales, reconciling analytical complexity as needed with stakeholder needs and resources available, and ultimately creating actionable recommendations to enhance resilience are still lacking. Our proposed framework consists of tiers by which analysts can select resilience assessment and decision support tools to inform associated management actions relative to the scope and urgency of the risk and the capacity of resource managers to improve system resilience. The resilience management framework proposed is not intended to supplant either risk management or the many existing efforts of resilience quantification method development, but instead provide a guide to selecting tools that are appropriate for the given analytic need. The goal of this tiered approach is to intentionally parallel the tiered approach used in regulatory contexts so that resilience assessment might be more easily and quickly integrated into existing structures and with existing policies.
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.subject.otherresilience
dc.subject.otherpolicy analysis
dc.subject.otherdisaster preparedness
dc.subject.otherBusiness processes
dc.subject.otherrisk analysis
dc.subject.othersystems analysis
dc.titleTiered Approach to Resilience Assessment
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelBusiness (General)
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelBusiness and Economics
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/146359/1/risa12991_am.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/146359/2/risa12991.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/risa.12991
dc.identifier.sourceRisk Analysis
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNemec, K. T., Chan, J., Hoffman, C., Spanbauer, T. L., Hamm, J. A., Allen, C. R.,â ¦ Shrestha, P. ( 2013 ). Assessing resilience in stressed watersheds. Ecology and Society, 19 ( 1 ), 34.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceArnott, J. C., Moser, S. C., & Goodrich, K. A. ( 2016 ). Evaluation that counts: A review of climate change adaptation indicators & metrics using lessons from effective evaluation and scienceâ practice interaction. Environmental Science & Policy, 66, 383 â 392.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAyyub, B. M. ( 2014 ). Systems resilience for multihazard environments: Definition, metrics, and valuation for decision making. Risk Analysis, 34 ( 2 ), 340 â 355.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBakkensen, L. A., Foxâ Lent, C., Read, L. K., & Linkov, I. ( 2017 ). Validating resilience and vulnerability indices in the context of natural disasters. Risk Analysis, 37 ( 5 ), 982 â 1004.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBoston, M., Liu, Z., Jacques, C., & Mitraniâ Reiser, J. ( 2014 ). Towards assessing the resilience of a community in seismic events using agent based modeling. Proceedings of the 10th National Conference in Earthquake Engineering, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Anchorage, AK, July 21 â 25, 2014.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCauffman, S. A. ( 2015 ). Community resilience planning guide for buildings and infrastructure systems. Washington, DC: NIST Special Publication 1190.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCutter, S., Burton, C. & Emrich, C. ( 2010 ). Disaster Resilience Indicators for Benchmarking Baseline Conditions. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, 7 ( 1 ), pp. â . Retrieved 10 Apr. 2018, from https://doi.org/10.2202/1547-7355.1732
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDubois, D., & Prade, H. ( 2012 ). Possibility theory. In Meyers R. (Ed.), Computational complexity (pp. 2240 â 2252 ). New York: Springer.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceExecutive Order 13636 (EOâ 13636). ( 2013 ). Improving critical infrastructure cybersecurity. Washington, DC: The White House.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFederal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) 310. ( 1998 ). Handbook for the seismic evaluation of buildingsâ A prestandard. Washington, DC: American Society of Civil Engineers.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFlanagan, B., Gregory, E., Hallisey, E., et al. ( 2011 ). A Social Vulnerability Index for Disaster Management. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, 8 ( 1 ), pp. â . Retrieved 10 Apr. 2018, from https://doi.org/10.2202/1547-7355.1792
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFlorin, M.â V. & Linkov, I. (Eds.) ( 2016 ). IRGC resource guide on resilience. Retrieved from https://www.irgc.org/risk-governance/resilience/.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFoxâ Lent, C., Bates, M. E., & Linkov, I. ( 2015 ). A matrix approach to community resilience assessment: An illustrative case at Rockaway Peninsula. Environment Systems and Decisions, 35 ( 2 ), 209 â 218.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGallopín, G. C. ( 2006 ). Linkages between vulnerability, resilience, and adaptive capacity. Global Environmental Change, 16 ( 3 ), 293 â 303.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGanin, A. A., Kitsak, M., Marchese, D., Keisler, J. M., Seager, T., & Linkov, I. ( 2017 ). Resilience and efficiency in transportation networks. Science Advances, 3 ( 12 ), e1701079.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGanin, A. A., Massaro, E., Gutfraind, A., Steen, N., Keisler, J. M., Kott, A., â ¦ Linkov, I. ( 2016 ). Operational resilience: Concepts, design and analysis. Scientific Reports, 6, 19540.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGao, J., Barzel, B., & Barabási, A. L. ( 2016 ). Universal resilience patterns in complex networks. Nature, 530 ( 7590 ), 307.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGott, D. ( 2012 ). Risk assessment paradigm. European Food Safety Authority. Stakeholder Workshop, September 21, 2012, Brussels.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHollnagel, E. ( 2012 ). FRAM, the functional resonance analysis method: Modelling complex socioâ technical systems. Surrey, UK: Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKott, A., & Linkov, I. (Eds.) ( 2018 ). Cyber resilience of systems and networks. Amsterdam: Springer.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLarkin, S., Foxâ Lent, C., Eisenberg, D. A., Trump, B. D., Wallace, S., Chadderton, C., & Linkov, I. ( 2015 ). Benchmarking agency and organizational practices in resilience decision making. Environment Systems and Decisions, 35 ( 2 ), 185 â 195.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLinkov, I., & Foxâ Lent, C. ( 2016 ). A tiered approach to resilience assessment. In I. Linkov and M.V. Florin (Eds.), IRGC resource guide on resilience. Retrieved from https://www.irgc.org/risk-governance/resilience/.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLinkov, I., & Moberg, E. ( 2011 ). Multiâ criteria decision analysis: Environmental applications and case studies. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLinkov, I., & Palmaâ Oliveira, J. M. (Eds.) ( 2017 ). Resilience and risk: Methods and application in environment, cyber and social domains. Amsterdam: Springer.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMoser, S. C., & Boykoff, M. T. (Eds.) ( 2013 ). Successful adaptation to climate change: Linking science and policy in a rapidly changing world. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMoser, S. C., & Ekstrom, J. A. ( 2010 ). A framework to diagnose barriers to climate change adaptation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107 ( 51 ), 22026 â 22031.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNational Research Council. ( 1983 ). Risk assessment in the federal government: Managing the process. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNordgren, J., Stults, M., & Meerow, S. ( 2016 ). Supporting local climate change adaptation: Where we are and where we need to go. Environmental Science & Policy, 66, 344 â 352.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceà zkaynak, H., Frey, H. C., & Hubbell, B. ( 2008 ). Characterizing variability and uncertainty in exposure assessments improves links to environmental decisionâ making. EM (Pittsburgh, Pa.), 58 ( 7 ), 18.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePeacock, W. G., Brody, S. D., Seitz, W. A., Merrell, W. J., Vedlitz, A., Zahran, S., â ¦ Stickney, R. ( 2010 ). Advancing resilience of coastal localities: Developing, implementing, and sustaining the use of coastal resilience indicators: A final report. College Station, TX: Hazard Reduction and Recovery Center, Texas A&M University.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePresidential Policy Directive 21 (PPDâ 21). ( 2013 ). Critical infrastructure security and resilience. Washington, DC: The While House.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceQuinlan, A. E., Berbésâ Blázquez, M., Haider, L. J., & Peterson, G. D. ( 2016 ). Measuring and assessing resilience: Broadening understanding through multiple disciplinary perspectives. Journal of Applied Ecology, 53 ( 3 ), 677 â 687.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRosati, J. D., Touzinsky, K. F., & Lillycrop, W. J. ( 2015 ). Quantifying coastal system resilience for the US Army Corps of Engineers. Environment Systems and Decisions, 35 ( 2 ), 196 â 208.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSands, D. ( 2015 ). An innovative scorecard for evaluating resiliency in our cities. Planet@ Risk, 3 ( 1 ), 154 â 157.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchultz, M. T., & Smith, E. R. ( 2016 ). Assessing the resilience of coastal systems: A probabilistic approach. Journal of Coastal Research, 32 ( 5 ), 1032 â 1050.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShafer, G. ( 1987 ). Belief functions and possibility measures. Analysis of Fuzzy Information, 1, 51 â 84.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceThorisson, H., Lambert, J. H., Cardenas, J. J., & Linkov, I. ( 2017 ). Resilience analytics with application to power grid of a developing region. Risk Analysis, 37 ( 7 ), 1268 â 1286.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceUnited Nations. ( 2015 ). Sendai framework for disaster risk reduction 2015â 2030. A/CONF.224/CRP.1 Third U.N. World Conference on Disaster Risk Reduction, March 18, 2015.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceU.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) ( 2014 ). Risk assessment forum white paper: Probabilistic risk assessment methods and case studies. EPA/100/Râ 09/001A. Washington, DC: Risk Assessment Forum, Office of the Science Advisor, USEPA.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceU.S. Indian Ocean Tsunami Warning System Program (USIOTWSP). ( 2007 ). How resilient is your coastal community? A guide for evaluating coastal community resilience to tsunamis and other hazards. U.S. Indian Ocean Tsunami Warning System Program supported by the U.S. Agency for International Development and partners, Bangkok, Thailand.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (USNRC) ( 2009 ). An approach for plantâ specific, riskâ informed decision making: Technical specifications. Regulatory Guide, 1, 177. Washington, DC.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWalker, B., Holling, C. S., Carpenter, S., & Kinzig, A. ( 2004 ). Resilience, adaptability and transformability in socialâ ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 9 ( 2 ), 5.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWilliams, P. R., Nolan, M., & Panda, A. ( 2014 ). Disaster resilience scorecard for cities. UNISDR, Retrieved from https://www.unisdr.org/2014/campaign-cities/Resilience%20Scorecard%20V1.5.pdf
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWoods, D. D. ( 2006 ). Essential characteristics of resilience. In Hollnagel, E., Woods, D. D., Levenson, N. (Eds.), Resilience engineering: Concepts and precepts, 21 â 34. Surrey, UK: Ashgate Publishing Ltd.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWorld Health Organization (WHO) ( 2008 ). Part 1: Guidance document on characterizing and communicating uncertainty in exposure assessment. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAllen, C. R., & Garmestani, A. S. ( 2015 ). Adaptive management. In Allen C., Garmestani A. (Eds.), Adaptive management of socialâ ecological systems (pp. 1 â 10 ). Dordrecht: Springer.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAmerican Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). ( 2015 ). Standard guide for riskâ based corrective action. E2081â 00. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAngeler, D. G., & Allen, C. R. ( 2016 ). Quantifying resilience. Journal of Applied Ecology, 53 ( 3 ), 617 â 624.
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
risa12991_am.pdf
Size:
776.1KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open
Name:
risa12991.pdf
Size:
285.5KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe its collections in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in them. We encourage you to Contact Us anonymously if you encounter harmful or problematic language in catalog records or finding aids. More information about our policies and practices is available at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.