Show simple item record

Advancing the Science of Self‐Management in Adults With Long‐Term Left Ventricular Assist Devices

dc.contributor.authorCasida, Jesus
dc.contributor.authorAikens, James
dc.contributor.authorPagani, Francis
dc.contributor.authorEwald, Gregory
dc.contributor.authorCraddock, Heidi
dc.contributor.authorPavol, Marykay
dc.contributor.authorSchroeder, Sarah
dc.contributor.authorYang, James
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-06T17:36:32Z
dc.date.available2020-01-06T16:41:00Zen
dc.date.issued2018-11
dc.identifier.citationCasida, Jesus; Aikens, James; Pagani, Francis; Ewald, Gregory; Craddock, Heidi; Pavol, Marykay; Schroeder, Sarah; Yang, James (2018). "Advancing the Science of Self‐Management in Adults With Long‐Term Left Ventricular Assist Devices." Artificial Organs (11): 1095-1103.
dc.identifier.issn0160-564X
dc.identifier.issn1525-1594
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/146581
dc.description.abstractThis study tested the applicability of the individual and family self‐management theory (IFSMT) to self‐management (SM) in patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs). From an existing data set, we extracted the following variables that correspond to IFSMT’s conceptual dimensions: anxiety, depression, and cognition (context dimension); self‐efficacy (SM process dimension); adherence and quality of life (QOL; outcome dimensions). Descriptive statistics and partial least squares path modeling procedures were used for data analyses. A total of 100 patients (mean age 52 ± 13.4 years) with continuous flow LVAD designs comprised the present study. Most patients were White (78%), married (69%), college‐educated (72%), and on disability (53%). Their mean anxiety and depression scores were slightly above normal, while their cognitive function scores were slightly lower than normal. LVAD care self‐efficacy, adherence, and QOL were within normal ranges. Factor loadings ranged from 0.50 to 1.0, and there were significant forward path relationships among the context, process, and outcome dimensions (β ranges from 0.02 to 0.60, all P values < 0.05). In conclusion, the IFSMT provides a good fit for SM in LVAD. Further research is needed to clarify how best to improve LVAD SM practice and treatment outcomes.
dc.publisherIBM Corp
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.subject.otherSelf‐management
dc.subject.otherSelf‐management theory
dc.subject.otherCirculatory support
dc.subject.otherLeft‐ventricular assist devices
dc.subject.otherSelf‐management of implantable artificial organs
dc.titleAdvancing the Science of Self‐Management in Adults With Long‐Term Left Ventricular Assist Devices
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMedicine (General)
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/146581/1/aor13113_am.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/146581/2/aor13113.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/aor.13113
dc.identifier.sourceArtificial Organs
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRuppar TM, Cooper PS, Mehr DR, Delgado JM, Dunbar‐Jacob JM. Medication adherence interventions improve heart failure mortality and readmission rates: systematic review and meta‐analysis of controlled trials. J Am Heart Assoc 2016; 17:pii: e002606.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchulman‐Green D, Jaser S, Martin F, et al. Processes of self‐management in chronic illness. J Nurs Scholarsh 2012; 44: 136 – 44.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNational Institute of Health. Self‐Management: improving the Quality of Life for Individuals with Chronic Illness. National Institute of Nursing Research. Available at: https://www.ninr.nih.gov/aboutninr/ninr-mission-and-strategic-plan/themes-self-management. Accessed July 28, 2017.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGrey M, Knafl K, Ryan P, Sawin KJ. Differing perspectives on conceptual approaches to self‐management. Nurs Outlook 2010; 58: 111 – 2.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCasida JM, Peters RM, Magnan MA. Self‐care demands of persons living with an implantable left‐ventricular assist device. Res Theory Nurs Pract 2009; 23: 279 – 93.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceUniversity of Wisconsin‐Milwaukee. Self‐Management Science Center – Theory. College of Nursing. Available at: https://uwm.edu/nursing/about/centers-institutes/self-management/theory/. Accessed July 28, 2017.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCasida J, Wu HS, Harden J, Chern J, Carie A. Development and initial evaluation of the psychometric properties of self‐efficacy and adherence scales for patients with a left ventricular assist device. Prog Transplant 2015; 25: 107 – 15.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS). User Manual for the Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro‐QOL) Measures, Version 1.0, September, 2010.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNIH‐PROMIS. Anxiety: a Brief Guide to the Anxiety PROMIS Instruments. Available at: https://www.assessmentcenter.net/documents/PROMIS%20Anxiety%20Scoring%20Manual.pdf. September 2015. Accessed July 28, 2017.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNIH‐PROMIS. Depression: a Brief Guide to the Depression PROMIS Instruments. Available at: https://www.assessmentcenter.net/documents/PROMIS%20Depression%20Scoring%20Manual.pdf. September 2015. Accessed July 28, 2017.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWorld Health Organization Quality of Life‐BREF (WHOQOL‐BREF) U. S. Version. Available at: http://depts.washington.edu/seaqol/docs/WHOQOL-BREF. January 2014. Accessed July 28, 2017.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTenenhaus M, Vinzi VE, Chatelin Y‐M, Lauro C. PLS path modeling. Comput Stat Data Anal 2005; 48: 159 – 205.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceIBM Corporation. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows Version 22. Armok, NY: IBM Corp, 2013.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceR Core Team. R: a Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available at: https://www.R-project.org/. Accessed August 30, 2017.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCasida JM, Wu HS, Senkiv V, Yang JJ. Self‐efficacy and adherence are predictors of quality of life in patients with left ventricular assist devices. J Heart Lung Trans 2016; 35: S90 – 1.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAllahverdipour A, AsghariJafarabadi M, Heshmati R, Hashemiparast M. Functional status, anxiety, cardiac self‐efficacy, and health beliefs of patients with coronary heart disease. Health Promot Perspect 2013; 3: 217 – 29.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVellone E, Pancani L, Greco A, Steca P, Riegel B. Self‐care confidence may be more important than cognition to influence self‐care behaviors in adults with heart failure: testing a mediation model. Int J Nurs Stud 2016; 60: 191 – 9.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLin MY, Liu MF, Hsu LF, Tsai PS. Effects of self‐management on chronic kidney disease: a meta‐analysis. Int J Nurs Stud 2017; 74: 128 – 37.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceReynard AK, Butler RS, McKee MG, Starling RC, Gorodeski EZ. Frequency of depression and anxiety before and after insertion of a continuous flow left ventricular assist device. AM J Cardiol 2014; 114: 433 – 40.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBidwell JT, Lyons KS, Mudd JO, et al. Quality of life, depression, and anxiety in ventricular assist device therapy: Longitudinal outcomes for patients and family caregivers. J Cardiovasc Nurs 2017; 32: 455 – 63.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEaston K, Coventry P, Lovell K, Carter LVA, Deaton C. Prevalence and measurement of anxiety in samples of patients with heart failure: meta‐analysis. J Cardiovasc Nurs 2016; 31: 367 – 79.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBhat G, Yost G, Mahoney E. Cognitive function and left ventricular assist device implantation. J Heart Lung Transplant 2015; 34: 1398 – 405.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFendler TJ, Spertus JA, Gosch KL, et al. Incidence and predictors of cognitive decline in patients with left ventricular assist devices. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2015; 8: 285 – 91.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFredericks S, Lapum J, Lo J. Anxiety, depression, and self‐management: a systematic review. Clin Nurs Res 2012; 21: 411 – 30.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSaffer BY, Lanting SC, Koehle MS, Klonsky ED, Iverson GL. Assessing cognitive impairment using PROMIS® applied cognition‐abilities scales in a medical outpatient sample. Psychiatry Res 2015; 226: 169 – 72.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMeltzer EP, Kapoor A, Fogel J, et al. Association of psychological, cognitive, and functional variables with self‐reported executive functioning in a sample of nondemented community‐dwelling older adults. Appl Neuropsychol Adult 2017; 24: 364 – 75.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMohn C, Rund BR. Neurocognitive profile in major depressive disorders: relationship to symptom level and subjective memory complaints. BMC Psychiatry 2016; 16: 108.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGustafsson F, Rogers JG. Left ventricular assist device therapy in advanced heart failure: patient selection and outcomes. Eur J Heart Fail 2017; 19: 595 – 602.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSilva Enciso J. Mechanical circulatory support: current status and future directionsProg. Cardiovasc Dis 2016; 58: 444 – 54.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCasida JM, Wu HS, Abshire M, Ghosh B, Yang JJ. Cognition and adherence are self‐management factors predicting the quality of life of adults living with a left ventricular assist device. J Heart Lung Transplant 2017; 36: 325 – 30.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKato N, Jaarsma T, Ben Gal T. Learning self‐care after left ventricular assist device implantation. Curr Heart Fail Rep 2014; 11: 290 – 8.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCasida J, Wu HS, Harden J, Carie A, Chern J. Evaluation of the psychometric properties of self‐efficacy and adherence scales for caregivers of patients with a left ventricular assist device. Prog Transplant 2015; 25: 116 – 23.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCasida JM, Ilacqua J. A survey of nurses in the mechanical circulatory support programs in the United States. Heart Lung 2011; 40: e103 – 11.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLorig KR, Holman H. Self‐management education: history, definition, outcomes, and mechanisms. Ann Behav Med 2003; 26: 1 – 7.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRyan P, Sawin KJ. The individual and family self‐management theory: background and perspectives on context, process, and outcomes. Nurs Outlook 2009; 57: 217 – 25.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGrey M, Schulman‐Green D, Knafl K, Reynolds NR. A revised self‐and family management framework. Nurs Outlook 2015; 63: 162 – 70.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGrady PA, Gough LL. Self‐management: a comprehensive approach to management of chronic conditions. Am J Public Health 2014; 104: e25 – 31.
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.