Show simple item record

Counselees’ Perspectives of Genomic Counseling Following Online Receipt of Multiple Actionable Complex Disease and Pharmacogenomic Results: a Qualitative Research Study

dc.contributor.authorSweet, Kevin
dc.contributor.authorHovick, Shelly
dc.contributor.authorSturm, Amy C.
dc.contributor.authorSchmidlen, Tara
dc.contributor.authorGordon, Erynn
dc.contributor.authorBernhardt, Barbara
dc.contributor.authorWawak, Lisa
dc.contributor.authorWernke, Karen
dc.contributor.authorMcElroy, Joseph
dc.contributor.authorScheinfeldt, Laura
dc.contributor.authorToland, Amanda E.
dc.contributor.authorRoberts, J. S.
dc.contributor.authorChristman, Michael
dc.date.accessioned2019-01-15T20:23:17Z
dc.date.available2019-01-15T20:23:17Z
dc.date.issued2017-08
dc.identifier.citationSweet, Kevin; Hovick, Shelly; Sturm, Amy C.; Schmidlen, Tara; Gordon, Erynn; Bernhardt, Barbara; Wawak, Lisa; Wernke, Karen; McElroy, Joseph; Scheinfeldt, Laura; Toland, Amanda E.; Roberts, J. S.; Christman, Michael (2017). "Counselees’ Perspectives of Genomic Counseling Following Online Receipt of Multiple Actionable Complex Disease and Pharmacogenomic Results: a Qualitative Research Study." Journal of Genetic Counseling 26(4): 738-751.
dc.identifier.issn1059-7700
dc.identifier.issn1573-3599
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/146805
dc.description.abstractGenomic applications raise multiple challenges including the optimization of genomic counseling (GC) services as part of the results delivery process. More information on patients’ motivations, preferences, and informational needs are essential to guide the development of new, more efficient practice delivery models that capitalize on the existing strengths of a limited genetic counseling workforce. Semi‐structured telephone interviews were conducted with a subset of counselees from the Coriell Personalized Medicine Collaborative following online receipt of multiple personalized genomic test reports. Participants previously had either in‐person GC (chronic disease cohort, n = 20; mean age 60 years) or telephone GC (community cohort, n = 31; mean age 46.8 years). Transcripts were analyzed using a Grounded Theory framework. Major themes that emerged from the interviews include 1) primary reasons for seeking GC were to clarify results, put results into perspective relative to other health‐related concerns, and to receive personalized recommendations; 2) there is need for a more participant driven approach in terms of mode of GC communication (in‐person, phone, video), and refining the counseling agenda pre‐session; and 3) there was strong interest in the option of follow up GC. By clarifying counselees’ expectations, views and desired outcomes, we have uncovered a need for a more participant‐driven GC model when potentially actionable genomic results are received online.
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.publisherSpringer US
dc.subject.otherComplex disease
dc.subject.otherQualitative interviews
dc.subject.otherPractice models
dc.subject.otherCounseling
dc.subject.otherGenomic
dc.subject.otherGenetic
dc.subject.otherService delivery
dc.titleCounselees’ Perspectives of Genomic Counseling Following Online Receipt of Multiple Actionable Complex Disease and Pharmacogenomic Results: a Qualitative Research Study
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelHuman Genetics
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/146805/1/jgc40738.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10897-016-0044-9
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Genetic Counseling
dc.identifier.citedreferenceO’Daniel, J. M. ( 2010 ). The prospect of genome‐guided preventive medicine: a need and opportunity for genetic counselors. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 19 ( 4 ), 315 – 327. doi:10.1007/s10897‐010‐9302‐4.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDivision of Cancer Prevention and Control, C. f. D. C. a. P. ( 2015 ). Social ecological model. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/cancer/crccp/sem.htm.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGolden, S. D., McLeroy, K. R., Green, L. W., Earp, J. A., & Lieberman, L. D. ( 2015 ). Upending the social ecological model to guide health promotion efforts toward policy and environmental change. Health Education & Behavior, 42 ( 1 Suppl ), 8S – 14S. doi:10.1177/1090198115575098.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGollust, S. E., Gordon, E. S., Zayac, C., Griffin, G., Christman, M. F., Pyeritz, R. E., & Bernhardt, B. A. ( 2012 ). Motivations and perceptions of early adopters of personalized genomics: perspectives from research participants. Public Health Genomics, 15 ( 1 ), 22 – 30. doi:10.1159/000327296.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGordon, E. S., Griffin, G., Wawak, L., Pang, H., Gollust, S. E., & Bernhardt, B. A. ( 2012 ). It’s not like judgment day: public understanding of and reactions to personalized genomic risk information. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 21 ( 3 ), 423 – 432. doi:10.1007/s10897‐011‐9476‐4.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHaga, S. B., Barry, W. T., Mills, R., Svetkey, L., Suchindran, S., Willard, H. F., & Ginsburg, G. S. ( 2014 ). Impact of delivery models on understanding genomic risk for type 2 diabetes. Public Health Genomics, 17 ( 2 ), 95 – 104. doi:10.1159/000358413.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHollands, G. J., French, D. P., Griffin, S. J., Prevost, A. T., Sutton, S., King, S., & Marteau, T. M. ( 2016 ). The impact of communicating genetic risks of disease on risk‐reducing health behaviour: systematic review with meta‐analysis. BMJ, 352, i1102. doi:10.1136/bmj.i1102.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHovick, S. R., Wilkinson, A. V., Ashida, S., de Heer, H. D., & Koehly, L. M. ( 2014 ). The impact of personalized risk feedback on Mexican Americans’ perceived risk for heart disease and diabetes. Health Education Research, 29 ( 2 ), 222 – 234. doi:10.1093/her/cyt151.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJacobs, A. S., Schwartz, M. D., Valdimarsdottir, H., Nusbaum, R. H., Hooker, G. W., DeMarco, T. A., & Peshkin, B. N. ( 2016 ). Patient and genetic counselor perceptions of in‐person versus telephone genetic counseling for hereditary breast/ovarian cancer. Familial Cancer. doi:10.1007/s10689‐016‐9900‐x.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKaphingst, K. A., McBride, C. M., Wade, C., Alford, S. H., Reid, R., Larson, E., & Brody, L. C. ( 2012 ). Patients’ understanding of and responses to multiplex genetic susceptibility test results. Genetics in Medicine, 14 ( 7 ), 681 – 687. doi:10.1038/gim.2012.22.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKaufman, D. J., Bollinger, J. M., Dvoskin, R. L., & Scott, J. A. ( 2012 ). Risky business: risk perception and the use of medical services among customers of DTC personal genetic testing. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 21 ( 3 ), 413 – 422. doi:10.1007/s10897‐012‐9483‐0.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKeller, M., Gordon, E., Stack, C., Gharani, N., Sill, C., Schmidlen, T., Mintzer, J., Pallies, J., Gerry, N. P., & Christman, M. ( 2010 ). The Coriell personalized medicine collaborative: a prospective study of the utility of personalized medicine. Personalized Medicine, 7, 301 – 307.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKessler, S. ( 1981 ). Psychological aspects of genetic counseling: analysis of a transcript. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 8 ( 2 ), 137 – 153. doi:10.1002/ajmg.1320080204.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKhoury, M. J., & Evans, J. P. ( 2015 ). A public health perspective on a national precision medicine cohort: balancing long‐term knowledge generation with early health benefit. JAMA, 313 ( 21 ), 2117 – 2118. doi:10.1001/jama.2015.3382.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKhoury, M. J., Janssens, A. C., & Ransohoff, D. F. ( 2013 ). How can polygenic inheritance be used in population screening for common diseases? Genetics in Medicine, 15 ( 6 ), 437 – 443. doi:10.1038/gim.2012.182.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLautenbach, D. M., Christensen, K. D., Sparks, J. A., & Green, R. C. ( 2013 ). Communicating genetic risk information for common disorders in the era of genomic medicine. Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics, 14, 491 – 513. doi:10.1146/annurev‐genom‐092010‐110722.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceManolio, T. A., Abramowicz, M., Al‐Mulla, F., Anderson, W., Balling, R., Berger, A. C., & Ginsburg, G. S. ( 2015 ). Global implementation of genomic medicine: We are not alone. Science Translational Medicine, 7 ( 290 ), 290ps213. doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.aab0194.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMills, R., & Haga, S. B. ( 2014 ). Genomic counseling: next generation counseling. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 23 ( 4 ), 689 – 692. doi:10.1007/s10897‐013‐9641‐z.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMills, R., Powell, J., Barry, W., & Haga, S. B. ( 2014 ). Information‐seeking and sharing behavior following genomic testing for diabetes risk. Journal of Genetic Counseling. doi:10.1007/s10897‐014‐9736‐1.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMishra, S. R., Neupane, D., Briffa, T. G., & Kallestrup, P. ( 2016 ). mHealth plus community health worker interventions: the future research agenda. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol, 4 ( 5 ), 387 – 388. doi:10.1016/S2213‐8587(16)30001‐8.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOrmond, K. E. ( 2013 ). From genetic counseling to “genomic counseling”. Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine, 1 ( 4 ), 189 – 193. doi:10.1002/mgg3.45.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRobinson, T. N., Patrick, K., Eng, T. R., & Gustafson, D. ( 1998 ). An evidence‐based approach to interactive health communication: a challenge to medicine in the information age. Science panel on interactive communication and health. JAMA, 280 ( 14 ), 1264 – 1269.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRoche, M. I. ( 2012 ). Moving toward Next Genetic counseling. Genetics in Medicine, 14 ( 9 ), 777 – 778. doi:10.1038/gim.2012.84.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchmidlen, T., Wawak, L., Kasper, R., Garcia‐Espana, J. F., Christman, M. F., & Gordon, E. S. ( 2014 ). Personalized genomic results: analysis of informational needs. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 23 ( 4 ), 578 – 587. doi:10.1007/s10897‐014‐9693‐8.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchmidlen, T., Scheinfeldt, L., Zhaoyang, R., Kasper, R., Sweet, K., Gordon, E. S., Keller, M., Stack, C., Gharani, N., Daly, M. B., Jarvis, J., & Christman, M. ( 2016 ). Genetic knowledge among participants in the coriell personalized medicine collaborative. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 2, 385 – 394. doi:10.1007/s10897‐015‐9883‐z.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSelect Committee on Science and Technology, House of Lords, Second Report—Genomic Medicine ( London, The Stationery Office, HL Paper 107‐I, 2009 ), p. 104
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShelton, C. A., & Whitcomb, D. C. ( 2015 ). Evolving roles for physicians and genetic counselors in managing complex genetic disorders. Clin Transl Gastroenterol, 6, e124. doi:10.1038/ctg.2015.46.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSimmons, L. A., Wolever, R. Q., Bechard, E. M., & Snyderman, R. ( 2014 ). Patient engagement as a risk factor in personalized health care: a systematic review of the literature on chronic disease. Genome Medicine, 6 ( 2 ), 16. doi:10.1186/gm533.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSweet, K., Gordon, E. S., Sturm, A. C., Schmidlen, T. J., Manickam, K., Toland, A. E., & Marsh, C. ( 2014 ). Design and implementation of a randomized controlled trial of genomic counseling for patients with chronic disease. J Pers Med, 4 ( 1 ), 1 – 19. doi:10.3390/jpm4010001.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSweet, K., Sturm, A. C., Schmidlen, T., Hovick, S., Peng, J., Manickam, K., et al. ( 2016 ). EMR documentation of physician‐patient communication following genomic counseling for actionable complex disease and Pharmacogenomic results. Clinical Genetics. doi:10.1111/cge.12820.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTrepanier, A. M., & Allain, D. C. ( 2014 ). Models of service delivery for cancer genetic risk assessment and counseling. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 23 ( 2 ), 239 – 253. doi:10.1007/s10897‐013‐9655‐6.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVassy, J. L., McLaughlin, H. L., MacRae, C. A., Seidman, C. E., Lautenbach, D., Krier, J. B., & Green, R. C. ( 2015 ). A one‐page summary report of genome sequencing for the healthy adult. Public Health Genomics, 18 ( 2 ), 123 – 129. doi:10.1159/000370102.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVeach, P. M., Bartels, D. M., & Leroy, B. S. ( 2007 ). Coming full circle: a reciprocal‐engagement model of genetic counseling practice. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 16 ( 6 ), 713 – 728. doi:10.1007/s10897‐007‐9113‐4.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWright, M. F., Lewis, K. L., Fisher, T. C., Hooker, G. W., Emanuel, T. E., Biesecker, L. G., & Biesecker, B. B. ( 2014 ). Preferences for results delivery from exome sequencing/ genome sequencing. Genetics in Medicine, 16 ( 6 ), 442 – 447. doi:10.1038/gim.2013.170.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAshley, E. A. ( 2015 ). The precision medicine initiative: a new national effort. JAMA, 313 ( 21 ), 2119 – 2120. doi:10.1001/jama.2015.3595.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAustin, J. ( 2015 ). The effect of genetic test‐based risk information on behavioral outcomes: a critical examination of failed trials and a call to action. American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part A, 167 ( 12 ), 2913 – 2915. doi:10.1002/ajmg.a.37289.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBennett, H. D., Coleman, E. A., Parry, C., Bodenheimer, T., & Chen, E. H. ( 2010 ). Health coaching for patients with chronic illness. Family Practice Management, 17 ( 5 ), 24 – 29.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBernhardt, B. ( 2014 ). Genetic counselors and the future of clinical genomics. Genome Medicine, 6 ( 7 ), 49. doi:10.1186/gm565.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBloss, C. S., Wineinger, N. E., Darst, B. F., Schork, N. J., & Topol, E. J. ( 2013 ). Impact of direct‐to‐consumer genomic testing at long term follow‐up. Journal of Medical Genetics, 50 ( 6 ), 393 – 400. doi:10.1136/jmedgenet‐2012‐101207.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBuchanan, A. H., Rahm, A. K., & Williams, J. L. ( 2016 ). Alternate service delivery models in cancer genetic counseling: a mini‐review. Frontiers in Oncology, 6 ( 120 ). doi:10.3389/fonc.2016.00120.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChow, C. K., Redfern, J., Hillis, G. S., Thakkar, J., Santo, K., Hackett, M. L., et al. ( 2015 ). Effect of lifestyle‐focused text messaging on risk factor modification in patients with coronary heart disease: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA, 314 ( 12 ), 1255 – 1263. doi:10.1001/jama.2015.10945.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCohen, S. A., Marvin, M. L., Riley, B. D., Vig, H. S., Rousseau, J. A., & Gustafson, S. L. ( 2013 ). Identification of genetic counseling service delivery models in practice: a report from the NSGC Service delivery model task force. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 22 ( 4 ), 411 – 421. doi:10.1007/s10897‐013‐9588‐0.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCohen, S. A., Huziak, R. C., Gustafson, S., & Grubs, R. E. ( 2016 ). Analysis of advantages, limitations, and barriers of genetic counseling service delivery models. Journal of Genetic Counseling. doi:10.1007/s10897‐016‐9932‐2.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCollins, F. S., & Varmus, H. ( 2015 ). A new initiative on precision medicine. The New England Journal of Medicine, 372 ( 9 ), 793 – 795. doi:10.1056/NEJMp1500523.
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.