View Item 

Show simple item record

Diagnosis, assessment, and management of surgical complications following esophagectomy

dc.contributor.authorGrimminger, Peter P.
dc.contributor.authorGoense, Lucas
dc.contributor.authorGockel, Ines
dc.contributor.authorBergeat, Damien
dc.contributor.authorBertheuil, Nicolas
dc.contributor.authorChandramohan, Servarayan M.
dc.contributor.authorChen, Ke‐neng
dc.contributor.authorChon, Seung‐hon
dc.contributor.authorDenis, Collet
dc.contributor.authorGoh, Khean‐lee
dc.contributor.authorGronnier, Caroline
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Jun‐feng
dc.contributor.authorMeunier, Bernard
dc.contributor.authorNafteux, Phillippe
dc.contributor.authorPirchi, Enrique D.
dc.contributor.authorSchiesser, Marc
dc.contributor.authorThieme, René
dc.contributor.authorWu, Aaron
dc.contributor.authorWu, Peter C.
dc.contributor.authorButtar, Navtej
dc.contributor.authorChang, Andrew C.
dc.date.accessioned2019-01-15T20:23:22Z
dc.date.available2020-02-03T20:18:23Zen
dc.date.issued2018-12
dc.identifier.citationGrimminger, Peter P.; Goense, Lucas; Gockel, Ines; Bergeat, Damien; Bertheuil, Nicolas; Chandramohan, Servarayan M.; Chen, Ke‐neng ; Chon, Seung‐hon ; Denis, Collet; Goh, Khean‐lee ; Gronnier, Caroline; Liu, Jun‐feng ; Meunier, Bernard; Nafteux, Phillippe; Pirchi, Enrique D.; Schiesser, Marc; Thieme, René ; Wu, Aaron; Wu, Peter C.; Buttar, Navtej; Chang, Andrew C. (2018). "Diagnosis, assessment, and management of surgical complications following esophagectomy." Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1434(1): 254-273.
dc.identifier.issn0077-8923
dc.identifier.issn1749-6632
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/146809
dc.description.abstractDespite improvements in operative strategies for esophageal resection, anastomotic leaks, fistula, postoperative pulmonary complications, and chylothorax can occur. Our review seeks to identify potential risk factors, modalities for early diagnosis, and novel interventions that may ameliorate the potential adverse effects of these surgical complications following esophagectomy.Surgical complications, such as anastomotic leaks, fistulas, postoperative pulmonary complications, and chylothoraxes, can occur following esophagectomy. This review seeks to identify potential risk factors, modalities for early diagnosis, and novel interventions that may ameliorate the potential adverse effects of these complications.
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.subject.otheranastomotic leak
dc.subject.otherfistula
dc.subject.otherchylothorax
dc.subject.othercomplications
dc.subject.otheresophageal cancer
dc.titleDiagnosis, assessment, and management of surgical complications following esophagectomy
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelScience (General)
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScience
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/146809/1/nyas13920.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/146809/2/nyas13920_am.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/nyas.13920
dc.identifier.sourceAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAzuma, S., M. Sakuraba, S. Azumi, et al. 2017. Repairing bronchoesophageal tube fistula using a contralateral latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. Glob. Open 5: e1484.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMorita, M., H. Saeki, T. Okamoto, et al. 2015. Tracheobronchial fistula during the perioperative period of esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. World J. Surg. 39: 1119 â 1126.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSakatoku, Y., M. Fukaya, H. Fujieda, et al. 2017. Tracheoesophageal fistula after total resection of gastric conduit for gastroâ aortic fistula due to gastric ulcer. Surg. Case Rep. 3: 90.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSiu, K.F., W.I. Wei, K.H. Lam, et al. 1985. Use of the pectoralis major muscle flap for repair of a tracheoesophageal fistula. Am. J. Surg. 150: 617 â 619.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceArimoto, J., A. Hatada, M. Kawago, et al. 2015. Closure of esophagotracheal fistula after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Gen. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 63: 636 â 639.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLambertz, R., A.H. Holscher, M. Bludau, et al. 2016. Management of tracheoâ or bronchoesophageal fistula after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. World J. Surg. 40: 1680 â 1687.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMartyâ Ane, C.H., M. Prudhome, J.M. Fabre, et al. 1995. Tracheoesophagogastric anastomosis fistula: a rare complication of esophagectomy. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 60: 690 â 693.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBertheuil, N., C. Cusumano, C. Meal, et al. 2017. Skin perforator flap pedicled by intercostal muscle for repair of a tracheobronchoesophageal fistula. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 103: e571 â e573.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShin, J.H., H.Y. Song, G.Y. Ko, et al. 2004. Esophagorespiratory fistula: longâ term results of palliative treatment with covered expandable metallic stents in 61 patients. Radiology 232: 252 â 259.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceD’Journo, X.B., P. Michelet, J.P. Avaro, et al. 2008. [Respiratory complications after oesophagectomy for cancer]. Rev. Mal. Respir. 25: 683 â 694.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKita, T., T. Mammoto & Y. Kishi. 2002. Fluid management and postoperative respiratory disturbances in patients with transthoracic esophagectomy for carcinoma. J. Clin. Anesth. 14: 252 â 256.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKarl, R.C., R. Schreiber, D. Boulware, et al. 2000. Factors affecting morbidity, mortality, and survival in patients undergoing Ivor Lewis esophagogastrectomy. Ann. Surg. 231: 635 â 643.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDoty, J.R., J.D. Salazar, A.A. Forastiere, et al. 2002. Postesophagectomy morbidity, mortality, and length of hospital stay after preoperative chemoradiation therapy. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 74: 227 â 231; discussion 231.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDindo, D., N. Demartines & P.A. Clavien. 2004. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann. Surg. 240: 205 â 213.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLiu, J.F., Q.Z. Wang, Y.M. Ping, et al. 2008. Complications after esophagectomy for cancer: 53â year experience with 20,796 patients. World J. Surg. 32: 395 â 400.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSauvanet, A., C. Mariette, P. Thomas, et al. 2005. Mortality and morbidity after resection for adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction: predictive factors. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 201: 253 â 262.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKinugasa, S., M. Tachibana, H. Yoshimura, et al. 2004. Postoperative pulmonary complications are associated with worse shortâ and longâ term outcomes after extended esophagectomy. J. Surg. Oncol. 88: 71 â 77.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAdachi, W., S. Koike, Y. Nimura, et al. 1996. Clinicopathologic characteristics and postoperative outcome in Japanese and Chinese patients with thoracic esophageal cancer. World J. Surg. 20: 332 â 336.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRentz, J., D. Bull, D. Harpole, et al. 2003. Transthoracic versus transhiatal esophagectomy: a prospective study of 945 patients. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 125: 1114 â 1120.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAviv, J.E., H. Liu, M. Parides, et al. 2000. Laryngopharyngeal sensory deficits in patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux and dysphagia. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 109: 1000 â 1006.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGockel, I., W. Kneist, A. Keilmann, et al. 2005. Recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis (RLNP) following esophagectomy for carcinoma. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. 31: 277 â 281.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMichelet, P., X.B. D’Journo, A. Roch, et al. 2005. Perioperative risk factors for anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy: influence of thoracic epidural analgesia. Chest 128: 3461 â 3466.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAminian, A., N. Panahi, R. Mirsharifi, et al. 2011. Predictors and outcome of cervical anastomotic leakage after esophageal cancer surgery. J. Cancer Res. Ther. 7: 448 â 453.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChumillas, S., J.L. Ponce, F. Delgado, et al. 1998. Prevention of postoperative pulmonary complications through respiratory rehabilitation: a controlled clinical study. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 79: 5 â 9.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLaw, S., K.H. Wong, K.F. Kwok, et al. 2004. Predictive factors for postoperative pulmonary complications and mortality after esophagectomy for cancer. Ann. Surg. 240: 791 â 800.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWhooley, B.P., S. Law, S.C. Murthy, et al. 2001. Analysis of reduced death and complication rates after esophageal resection. Ann. Surg. 233: 338 â 344.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMishra, P.K., S.S. Saluja, D. Ramaswamy, et al. 2013. Thoracic duct injury following esophagectomy in carcinoma of the esophagus: ligation by the abdominal approach. World J. Surg. 37: 141 â 146.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLai, F.C., L. Chen, Y.R. Tu, et al. 2011. Prevention of chylothorax complicating extensive esophageal resection by mass ligation of thoracic duct: a random control study. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 91: 1770 â 1774.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrinkmann, S., W. Schroeder, K. Junggeburth, et al. 2016. Incidence and management of chylothorax after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy for cancer of the esophagus. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 151: 1398 â 1404.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShah, R.D., J.D. Luketich, M.J. Schuchert, et al. 2012. Postesophagectomy chylothorax: incidence, risk factors, and outcomes. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 93: 897 â 903; discussion 903â 904.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCrucitti, P., G. Mangiameli, T. Petitti, et al. 2016. Does prophylactic ligation of the thoracic duct reduce chylothorax rates in patients undergoing oesophagectomy? A systematic review and metaâ analysis. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 50: 1019 â 1024.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDugue, L., A. Sauvanet, O. Farges, et al. 1998. Output of chyle as an indicator of treatment for chylothorax complicating oesophagectomy. Br. J. Surg. 85: 1147 â 1149.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMerigliano, S., D. Molena, A. Ruol, et al. 2000. Chylothorax complicating esophagectomy for cancer: a plea for early thoracic duct ligation. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 119: 453 â 457.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMery, C.M., B.S. Moffett, M.S. Khan, et al. 2014. Incidence and treatment of chylothorax after cardiac surgery in children: analysis of a large multiâ institution database. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 147: 678 â 686.e1; discussion 685â 686.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAlexiou, C., M. Watson, D. Beggs, et al. 1998. Chylothorax following oesophagogastrectomy for malignant disease. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 14: 460 â 466.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAlejandreâ Lafont, E., C. Krompiec, W.S. Rau, et al. 2011. Effectiveness of therapeutic lymphography on lymphatic leakage. Acta Radiol. 52: 305 â 311.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNadolski, G.J. & M. Itkin. 2012. Feasibility of ultrasoundâ guided intranodal lymphangiogram for thoracic duct embolization. J. Vasc. Interv. Radiol. 23: 613 â 616.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGuermazi, A., P. Brice, C. Hennequin, et al. 2003. Lymphography: an old technique retains its usefulness. Radiographics 23: 1541 â 1558; discussion 1559â 1560.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChen, C.Y., Y.H. Chen, E.L. Shiau, et al. 2016. Therapeutic role of ultrasoundâ guided intranodal lymphangiography in refractory cervical chylous leakage after neck dissection: report of a case and review of the literature. Head Neck 38: E54 â E60.
dc.identifier.citedreferencevan Rossum, P.S., L. Haverkamp, H.M. Verkooijen, et al. 2015. Calcification of arteries supplying the gastric tube: a new risk factor for anastomotic leakage after esophageal surgery. Radiology 274: 124 â 132.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKassis, E.S., A.S. Kosinski, P. Ross, Jr., et al. 2013. Predictors of anastomotic leak after esophagectomy: an analysis of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Toracic Database. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 96: 1919 â 1926.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSeesing, M.F.J., S.S. Gisbertz, L. Goense, et al. 2017. A propensity score matched analysis of open versus minimally invasive transthoracic esophagectomy in the Netherlands. Ann. Surg. 266: 839 â 846.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJunemannâ Ramirez, M., M.Y. Awan, Z.M. Khan, & J.S. Rahamim. 2005. Anastomotic leakage postâ esophagogastrectomy for esophageal carcinoma: retrospective analysis of predictive factors, management and influence on longterm survival in a high volume centre. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 27: 3 â 7.
dc.identifier.citedreferencevan Workum, F., J. van der Maas, F.J. van den Wildenberg, et al. 2017. Improved functional results after minimally invasive esophagectomy: intrathoracic versus cervical anastomosis. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 103: 267 â 273.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMarkar, S., C. Gronnier, A. Duhamel, et al. 2015. The impact of severe anastomotic leak on longâ term survival and cancer recurrence after surgical resection for esophageal malignancy. Ann. Surg. 262: 972 â 980.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLow, D.E., M.K. Kuppusamy, D. Alderson, et al. 2017. Benchmarking complications associated with esophagectomy. Ann. Surg. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000002611.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGriffin, S.M., P.J. Lamb, S.M. Dresner, et al. 2001. Diagnosis and management of a mediastinal leak following radical oesophagectomy. Br. J. Surg. 88: 1346 â 1351.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLagarde, S.M., J.D. de Boer, F.J. ten Kate, et al. 2008. Postoperative complications after esophagectomy for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus are related to timing of death due to recurrence. Ann. Surg. 247: 71 â 76.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchaheen, L., S.H. Blackmon & K.S. Nason. 2014. Optimal approach to the management of intrathoracic esophageal leak following esophagectomy: a systematic review. Am. J. Surg. 208: 536 â 543.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJones, C.E. & T.J. Watson. 2015. Anastomotic leakage following esophagectomy. Thorac. Surg. Clin. 25: 449 â 459.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWaitzberg, D.L., H. Saito, L.D. Plank, et al. 2006. Postsurgical infections are reduced with specialized nutrition support. World J. Surg. 30: 1592 â 1604.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePage, R.D., A. Asmat, J. McShane, et al. 2013. Routine endoscopy to detect anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 95: 292 â 298.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGoense, L., P.S. van Rossum, J.P. Ruurda, et al. 2016. Radiation to the gastric fundus increases the risk of anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 102: 1798 â 1804.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKechagias, A., P.S.N. van Rossum, J.P. Ruurda, et al. 2016. Ischemic conditioning of the stomach in the prevention of esophagogastric anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 101: 1614 â 1623.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWang, W.P., Q. Gao, K.N. Wang, et al. 2013. A prospective randomized controlled trial of semimechanical versus handâ sewn or circular stapled esophagogastrostomy for prevention of anastomotic stricture. World J. Surg. 37: 1043 â 1050.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGoense, L., W.A. van Dijk, J.A. Govaert, et al. 2017. Hospital costs of complications after esophagectomy for cancer. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. 43: 696 â 702.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGoense, L., P.S. van Rossum, M. Tromp, et al. 2017. Intraoperative and postoperative risk factors for anastomotic leakage and pneumonia after esophagectomy for cancer. Dis. Esophagus 30: 1 â 10.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRutegard, M., P. Lagergren, I. Rouvelas, et al. 2012. Intrathoracic anastomotic leakage and mortality after esophageal cancer resection: a populationâ based study. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 19: 99 â 103.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDegisors, S., A. Pasquer, F. Renaud, et al. 2017. Are thoracotomy and/or intrathoracic anastomosis still predictors of postoperative mortality after esophageal cancer surgery? A nationwide study. Ann. Surg. 266: 854 â 862.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSiewert, J.R., H.J. Stein & H. Bartels. 2004. [Anastomotic leaks in the upper gastrointestinal tract]. Chirurg 75: 1063 â 1070.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBlewett, C.J., J.D. Miller, J.E. Young, et al. 2001. Anastomotic leaks after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a comparison of thoracic and cervical anastomoses. Ann. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 7: 75 â 78.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGooszen, J.A.H., L. Goense, S.S. Gisbertz, et al. 2018. Intrathoracic versus cervical anastomosis and predictors of anastomotic leakage after oesophagectomy for cancer. Br. J. Surg. 105: 552 â 560.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDaster, S., S.D. Soysal, L. Stoll, et al. 2014. Longâ term quality of life after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. World J. Surg. 38: 2345 â 2351.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKlink, C.D., M. Binnebosel, J. Otto, et al. 2012. Intrathoracic versus cervical anastomosis after resection of esophageal cancer: a matched pair analysis of 72 patients in a single center study. World J. Surg. Oncol. 10: 159.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEgberts, J.H., B. Schniewind, B. Bestmann, et al. 2008. Impact of the site of anastomosis after oncologic esophagectomy on quality of lifeâ a prospective, longitudinal outcome study. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 15: 566 â 575.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChasseray, V.M., G.K. Kiroff, J.L. Buard, et al. 1989. Cervical or thoracic anastomosis for esophagectomy for carcinoma. Surg. Gynecol. Obstet. 169: 55 â 62.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRibet, M., B. Debrueres & M. Lecomteâ Houcke. 1992. Resection for advanced cancer of the thoracic esophagus: cervical or thoracic anastomosis? Late results of a prospective randomized study. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 103: 784 â 789.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWalther, B., J. Johansson, F. Johnsson, et al. 2003. Cervical or thoracic anastomosis after esophageal resection and gastric tube reconstruction: a prospective randomized trial comparing sutured neck anastomosis with stapled intrathoracic anastomosis. Ann. Surg. 238: 803 â 812; discussion 812â 814.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOkuyama, M., S. Motoyama, H. Suzuki, et al. 2007. Handâ sewn cervical anastomosis versus stapled intrathoracic anastomosis after esophagectomy for middle or lower thoracic esophageal cancer: a prospective randomized controlled study. Surg. Today 37: 947 â 952.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBiere, S.S., K.W. Maas, M.A. Cuesta, et al. 2011. Cervical or thoracic anastomosis after esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review and metaâ analysis. Dig. Surg. 28: 29 â 35.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHolscher, A.H., P.M. Schneider, C. Gutschow, et al. 2007. Laparoscopic ischemic conditioning of the stomach for esophageal replacement. Ann. Surg. 245: 241 â 246.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChen, K.N. 2014. Managing complications I: leaks, strictures, emptying, reflux, chylothorax. J. Thorac. Dis. 6: S355 â S363.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBlencowe, N.S., S. Strong, A.G. McNair, et al. 2012. Reporting of shortâ term clinical outcomes after esophagectomy: a systematic review. Ann. Surg. 255: 658 â 666.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLow, D.E., D. Alderson, I. Cecconello, et al. 2015. International consensus on standardization of data collection for complications associated with esophagectomy: Esophagectomy Complications Consensus Group (ECCG). Ann. Surg. 262: 286 â 294.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLerut, T., W. Coosemans, G. Decker, et al. 2002. Anastomotic complications after esophagectomy. Dig. Surg. 19: 92 â 98.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBruce, J., Z.H. Krukowski, G. Alâ Khairy, et al. 2001. Systematic review of the definition and measurement of anastomotic leak after gastrointestinal surgery. Br. J. Surg. 88: 1157 â 1168.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStippel, D.L., C. Taylan, W. Schroder, et al. 2005. Supraventricular tachyarrhythmia as early indicator of a complicated course after esophagectomy. Dis. Esophagus 18: 267 â 273.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWhooley, B.P., S. Law, A. Alexandrou, et al. 2001. Critical appraisal of the significance of intrathoracic anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy for cancer. Am. J. Surg. 181: 198 â 203.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDutta, S., G.M. Fullarton, M.J. Forshaw, et al. 2011. Persistent elevation of Câ reactive protein following esophagogastric cancer resection as a predictor of postoperative surgical site infectious complications. World J. Surg. 35: 1017 â 1025.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBaker, E.H., J.S. Hill, M.K. Reames, et al. 2016. Drain amylase aids detection of anastomotic leak after esophagectomy. J. Gastrointest. Oncol. 7: 181 â 188.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRaman, V., K.L. Moodie, O.O. Ofoche, et al. 2017. Endoscopy after esophagectomy: safety demonstrated in a porcine model. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 154: 1152 â 1158.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMaish, M.S., S.R. DeMeester, E. Choustoulakis, et al. 2005. The safety and usefulness of endoscopy for evaluation of the graft and anastomosis early after esophagectomy and reconstruction. Surg. Endosc. 19: 1093 â 1102.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHogan, B.A., D.C. Winter, D. Broe, et al. 2008. Prospective trial comparing contrast swallow, computed tomography and endoscopy to identify anastomotic leak following oesophagogastric surgery. Surg. Endosc. 22: 767 â 771.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNederlof, N., J. de Jonge, T. de Vringer, et al. 2017. Does routine endoscopy or contrast swallow study after esophagectomy and gastric tube reconstruction change patient management ? J. Gastrointest. Surg. 21: 251 â 258.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchaible, A., P. Sauer, W. Hartwig, et al. 2014. Radiologic versus endoscopic evaluation of the conduit after esophageal resection: a prospective, blinded, intraindividually controlled diagnostic study. Surg. Endosc. 28: 2078 â 2085.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchaible, A., A. Ulrich, U. Hinz, et al. 2016. Role of endoscopy to predict a leak after esophagectomy. Langenbecks Arch. Surg. 401: 805 â 812.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTanomkiat, W. & W. Galassi. 2000. Barium sulfate as contrast medium for evaluation of postoperative anastomotic leaks. Acta Radiol. 41: 482 â 485.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJones, C.M., R. Heah, B. Clarke, et al. 2015. Should routine radiological assessment of anastomotic integrity be performed after oesophagectomy with cervical anastomosis? Best evidence topic (BET). Int. J. Surg. 15: 90 â 94.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSolomon, D.G., C.T. Sasaki & R.R. Salem. 2012. An evaluation of the routine use of contrast radiography as a screening test for cervical anastomotic integrity after esophagectomy. Am. J. Surg. 203: 467 â 471.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHu, Z., X. Wang, X. An, et al. 2017. The diagnostic value of routine contrast esophagram in anastomotic leaks after esophagectomy. World J. Surg. 41: 2062 â 2067.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrams, A., P. Bulois, V. Maunoury, et al. 2008. [Treatment of thoracic anastomotic leaks after oesophagectomy with selfâ expanding and extractible covered stent]. Gastroenterol. Clin. Biol. 32: 41 â 45.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStrauss, C., F. Mal, T. Perniceni, et al. 2010. Computed tomography versus waterâ soluble contrast swallow in the detection of intrathoracic anastomotic leak complicating esophagogastrectomy (Ivor Lewis): a prospective study in 97 patients. Ann. Surg. 251: 647 â 651.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCoolsâ Lartigue, J., A. Andalib, A. Aboâ Alsaud, et al. 2014. Routine contrast esophagram has minimal impact on the postoperative management of patients undergoing esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 21: 2573 â 2579.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLantos, J.E., M.S. Levine, S.E. Rubesin, et al. 2013. Comparison between esophagography and chest computed tomography for evaluation of leaks after esophagectomy and gastric pullâ through. J. Thorac. Imaging 28: 121 â 128.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGoense, L., P.M.C. Stassen, F.J. Wessels, et al. 2017. Diagnostic performance of a CTâ based scoring system for diagnosis of anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy: comparison with subjective CT assessment. Eur. Radiol. 27: 4426 â 4434.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceUpponi, S., A. Ganeshan, H. D’Costa, et al. 2008. Radiological detection of postâ oesophagectomy anastomotic leakâ a comparison between multidetector CT and fluoroscopy. Br. J. Radiol. 81: 545 â 548.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDickinson, K.J. & S.H. Blackmon. 2015. Management of conduit necrosis following esophagectomy. Thorac. Surg. Clin. 25: 461 â 470.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGockel, I., S. Niebisch, C.J. Ahlbrand, et al. 2016. Risk and complication management in esophageal cancer surgery: a review of the literature. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 64: 596 â 605.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMessager, M., M. Warlaumont, F. Renaud, et al. 2017. Recent improvements in the management of esophageal anastomotic leak after surgery for cancer. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. 43: 258 â 269.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePacheco, P.E., S.M. Hill, S.M. Henriques, et al. 2013. The novel use of intraoperative laserâ induced fluorescence of indocyanine green tissue angiography for evaluation of the gastric conduit in esophageal reconstructive surgery. Am. J. Surg. 205: 349 â 352; discussion 352â 353.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGurtner, G.C., G.E. Jones, P.C. Neligan, et al. 2013. Intraoperative laser angiography using the SPY system: review of the literature and recommendations for use. Ann. Surg. Innov. Res. 7: 1.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZehetner, J., S.R. DeMeester, E.T. Alicuben, et al. 2015. Intraoperative assessment of perfusion of the gastric graft and correlation with anastomotic leaks after esophagectomy. Ann. Surg. 262: 74 â 78.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHaverkamp, L., M.F.J. Seesing, J.P. Ruurda, et al. 2017. Worldwide trends in surgical techniques in the treatment of esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancer. Dis. Esophagus 30: 1 â 7.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTurkyilmaz, A., A. Eroglu, Y. Aydin, et al. 2009. The management of esophagogastric anastomotic leak after esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma. Dis. Esophagus 22: 119 â 126.
dc.identifier.citedreferencevan Workum, F., S.A. Bouwense, M.D. Luyer, et al. 2016. Intrathoracic versus cervical anastomosis after minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: study protocol of the ICAN randomized controlled trial. Trials 17: 505.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVashist, Y., G. Cataldigermen, A. König, et al. 2009. Management von Anastomoseninsuffizienz nach à sophagusresektion. Z. Gastroenterol. 47: P021.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCassivi, S.D. 2004. Leaks, strictures, and necrosis: a review of anastomotic complications following esophagectomy. Semin. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 16: 124 â 132.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNederlof, N., H.W. Tilanus, T.C. Tran, et al. 2011. Endâ toâ end versus endâ toâ side esophagogastrostomy after esophageal cancer resection: a prospective randomized study. Ann. Surg. 254: 226 â 233.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSaluja, S.S., S. Ray, S. Pal, et al. 2012. Randomized trial comparing sideâ toâ side stapled and handâ sewn esophagogastric anastomosis in neck. J. Gastrointest. Surg. 16: 1287 â 1295.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVeeramootoo, D., R. Parameswaran, R. Krishnadas, et al. 2009. Classification and early recognition of gastric conduit failure after minimally invasive esophagectomy. Surg. Endosc. 23: 2110 â 2116.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNishikawa, K., T. Fujita, M. Yuda, et al. 2016. Early postoperative endoscopy for targeted management of patients at risks of anastomotic complications after esophagectomy. Surgery 160: 1294 â 1301.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDasari, B.V., D. Neely, A. Kennedy, et al. 2014. The role of esophageal stents in the management of esophageal anastomotic leaks and benign esophageal perforations. Ann. Surg. 259: 852 â 860.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceD’Cunha, J., N.M. Rueth, S.S. Groth, et al. 2011. Esophageal stents for anastomotic leaks and perforations. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 142: 39 â 46.e1.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSiersema, P.D. 2005. Treatment of esophageal perforations and anastomotic leaks: the endoscopist is stepping into the arena. Gastrointest. Endosc. 61: 897 â 900.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSousa, P., A. Castanheira, D. Martins, et al. 2017. Treatment of postoperative leaks of the upper gastrointestinal tract with colonic selfâ expandable metal stents. GE Port. J. Gastroenterol. 24: 169 â 175.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNgamruengphong, S., R.Z. Sharaiha, A. Sethi, et al. 2016. Endoscopic suturing for the prevention of stent migration in benign upper gastrointestinal conditions: a comparative multicenter study. Endoscopy 48: 802 â 808.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShim, C.S., Y.D. Cho, J.H. Moon, et al. 2001. Fixation of a modified covered esophageal stent: its clinical usefulness for preventing stent migration. Endoscopy 33: 843 â 848.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChoi, C.W., D.H. Kang, H.W. Kim, et al. 2017. Full covered selfâ expandable metal stents for the treatment of anastomotic leak using a silk thread. Medicine 96: e7439.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFreeman, R.K., A.J. Ascioti, M. Dake, et al. 2015. An assessment of the optimal time for removal of esophageal stents used in the treatment of an esophageal anastomotic leak or perforation. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 100: 422 â 428.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLaukoetter, M.G., R. Mennigen, P.A. Neumann, et al. 2017. Successful closure of defects in the upper gastrointestinal tract by endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT): a prospective cohort study. Surg. Endosc. 31: 2687 â 2696.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMennigen, R., N. Senninger & M.G. Laukoetter. 2015. Endoscopic vacuum therapy of esophageal anastomotic leakage. Gastrointest. Endosc. 82: 397.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWedemeyer, J., M. Brangewitz, S. Kubicka, et al. 2010. Management of major postsurgical gastroesophageal intrathoracic leaks with an endoscopic vacuumâ assisted closure system. Gastrointest. Endosc. 71: 382 â 386.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHwang, J.J., Y.S. Jeong, Y.S. Park, et al. 2016. Comparison of endoscopic vacuum therapy and endoscopic stent implantation with selfâ expandable metal stent in treating postsurgical gastroesophageal leakage. Medicine 95: e3416.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGubler, C., P.M. Schneider & P. Bauerfeind. 2013. Complex anastomotic leaks following esophageal resections: the new stent over sponge (SOS) approach. Dis. Esophagus 26: 598 â 602.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceToshniwal, J., M. Zabielski, L.C. Fry, et al. 2012. Combination of the â bear clawâ (overâ theâ scopeâ clip system) and fully covered stent for the treatment of postâ operative anastomotic leak. Endoscopy 44 ( Suppl. 2 UCTN ): E288 â E289.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGaur, P., C. Lyons, T.M. Malik, et al. 2015. Endoluminal suturing of an anastomotic leak. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 99: 1430 â 1432.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWillingham, F.F. & J.M. Buscaglia. 2015. Endoscopic management of gastrointestinal leaks and fistulae. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 13: 1714 â 1721.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBohm, G., A. Mossdorf, C. Klink, et al. 2010. Treatment algorithm for postoperative upper gastrointestinal fistulas and leaks using combined vicryl plug and fibrin glue. Endoscopy 42: 599 â 602.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWedemeyer, J., A. Schneider, M.P. Manns, et al. 2008. Endoscopic vacuumâ assisted closure of upper intestinal anastomotic leaks. Gastrointest. Endosc. 67: 708 â 711.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrangewitz, M., T. Voigtlander, F.A. Helfritz, et al. 2013. Endoscopic closure of esophageal intrathoracic leaks: stent versus endoscopic vacuumâ assisted closure, a retrospective analysis. Endoscopy 45: 433 â 438.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNakajima, M., H. Satomura, M. Takahashi, et al. 2014. Effectiveness of sternocleidomastoid flap repair for cervical anastomotic leakage after esophageal reconstruction. Dig. Surg. 31: 306 â 311.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTaniguchi, D., H. Saeki, Y. Nakashima, et al. 2016. Development of fistula between esophagogastric anastomotic site and cartilage portion of trachea after subtotal esophagectomy for cervical esophageal cancer: a case report. Surg. Case Rep. 2: 107.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDent, B., S.M. Griffin, R. Jones, et al. 2016. Management and outcomes of anastomotic leaks after oesophagectomy. Br. J. Surg. 103: 1033 â 1038.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLiberati, A., D.G. Altman, J. Tetzlaff, et al. 2009. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and metaâ analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ 339: b2700.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHayashi, K., N. Ando, S. Ozawa, et al. 1999. Gastric tubeâ toâ tracheal fistula closed with a latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 68: 561 â 562.
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
nyas13920.pdf
Size:
1.165MB
Format:
PDF
View/Open
Name:
nyas13920_am.pdf
Size:
2.010MB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.