View Item 

Show simple item record

Members of Minority and Underserved Communities Set Priorities for Health Research
dc.contributor.authorGoold, Susan Dorr
dc.contributor.authorMyers, C. Daniel
dc.contributor.authorDanis, Marion
dc.contributor.authorAbelson, Julia
dc.contributor.authorBarnett, Steve
dc.contributor.authorCalhoun, Karen
dc.contributor.authorCampbell, Eric G.
dc.contributor.authorLaHahnn, Lynette
dc.contributor.authorHammad, Adnan
dc.contributor.authorRosenbaum, René Pérez
dc.contributor.authorKim, Hyungjin Myra
dc.contributor.authorSalman, Cengiz
dc.contributor.authorSzymecko, Lisa
dc.contributor.authorRowe, Zachary E.
dc.date.accessioned2019-01-15T20:23:38Z
dc.date.available2020-02-03T20:18:24Zen
dc.date.issued2018-12
dc.identifier.citationGoold, Susan Dorr ; Myers, C. Daniel ; Danis, Marion ; Abelson, Julia ; Barnett, Steve ; Calhoun, Karen ; Campbell, Eric G. ; , LYNETTE; Hammad, Adnan ; Rosenbaum, René Pérez ; Kim, Hyungjin Myra ; Salman, Cengiz ; Szymecko, Lisa ; Rowe, Zachary E. (2018). "Members of Minority and Underserved Communities Set Priorities for Health Research." The Milbank Quarterly 96(4): 675-705.
dc.identifier.issn0887-378X
dc.identifier.issn1468-0009
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/146820
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.publisherGlobal Forum for Health Research
dc.subject.otherminority groups, decision making, research priorities, deliberation, deliberative democracy, community engagement
dc.subject.otherresource allocation
dc.titleMembers of Minority and Underserved Communities Set Priorities for Health Research
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPublic Health (General)
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/146820/1/milq12354.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/146820/2/milq12354_am.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/1468-0009.12354
dc.identifier.sourceThe Milbank Quarterly
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDavis MM, Singer DC, Butchart A, Clark SJ. Who do voters prefer for children’s health issues? University of Michigan Child Health Evaluation and Research Unit, C.S. Mott Children’s Hospital. National Poll on Children’s Health. 2008; 5 ( 1 ).
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLomas J, Fulop N, Gagnon D, Allen P. On being a good listener: setting priorities for applied health services research. Milbank Q. 2003; 81 ( 3 ): 363 ‐ 388.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePatient‐Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI). What we mean by engagement. http://www.pcori.org/funding-opportunities/what-we-mean-engagement. Updated October 12, 2015. Accessed February 16, 2018.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJames Lind Alliance. About the James Lind Alliance. http://www.jla.nihr.ac.uk/about-the-james-lind-alliance/. Accessed February 16, 2018.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNational Institute for Health Research. Patient and public involvement. https://www.nihr.ac.uk/patients-and-public/. Accessed February 16, 2018.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSolomon S, Abelson J. Why and when should we use public deliberation ? Hastings Cent Rep. 2012; 42 ( 2 ): 17 ‐ 20.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFishkin J. The Voice of the People. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press; 1997.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCohen, J. Deliberation and democratic legitimacy. In: Bohman J, Rehg W, eds. Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reasons and Politics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1997: 321 ‐ 348.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBurkhalter S, Gastil J, Kelshaw T. A conceptual definition and theoretical model of public deliberation in small face‐to‐face groups. Community Theory. 2002; 12 ( 4 ): 398 ‐ 422.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGoold SD, Biddle AK, Klipp G, Hall CN, Danis M. Choosing healthplans all together: a deliberative exercise for allocating limited health care resources. J Health Politics Policy Law. 2005; 30 ( 4 ): 563 ‐ 601.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDanis M, Ginsburg M, Goold S. Experience in the United States with public deliberation about health insurance benefits using the small group decision exercise, CHAT. J Ambulatory Care Manage. 2010; 33 ( 3 ): 205 ‐ 214.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMayer IS. The gaming of policy and the politics of gaming: a review. Simul Gaming. 2009; 40 ( 6 ): 825 ‐ 862.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHassan L. Governments should play games: towards a framework for the gamification of civic engagement platforms. Simul Gaming. 2017; 48 ( 2 ): 249 ‐ 267.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGoold S, Rowe Z, Calhoun K, et al. The state as community in community‐based participatory research. Prog Community Health Partnership. 2016; 10 ( 4 ): 515 ‐ 522.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHealth Resources & Services Administration. Medically Underserved Areas and Populations (MUA/Ps). https://bhw.hrsa.gov/shortage-designation/muap. Updated October 2016. Accessed February 16, 2018.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGutman A, Thompson D. Why Deliberative Democracy ? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 2004.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChen H, Kramer EJ, Chen T, Chung H. Engaging Asian Americans for mental health research: challenges and solutions. J Immigrant Minority Health. 2005; 7 ( 2 ): 109 ‐ 116.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePadgett DK, Henwood B, Abrams C, Drake RE. Social relationships among persons who have experienced serious mental illness, substance abuse, and homelessness: implications for recovery. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2008; 78 ( 3 ): 333 ‐ 339.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDeegan PE. Spirit breaking: when the helping professions hurt. Humanistic Psychol. 1990; 18 ( 3 ): 301 ‐ 313.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGinsburg M, Goold SD, Danis M. (De)constructing “basic” benefits: citizens define the limits of coverage. Health Aff. 2006; 25 ( 6 ): 1648 ‐ 1655.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEvans‐Lacko SE, Baum N, Danis M, Biddle A, Goold S. Laypersons’ choices and deliberations for mental health coverage. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2012; 39 ( 3 ): 158 ‐ 169.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBroman CL. Race differences in the receipt of mental health services among young adults. Psychol Serv. 2012; 9 ( 1 ): 38 ‐ 48.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGeorge S, Duran N, Norris K. A systematic review of barriers and facilitators to minority research participation among African Americans, Latinos, Asian Americans, and Pacific Islanders. Am J Public Health. 2014; 104 ( 2 ): e16 ‐ e31.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWilkins CH, Spofford M, Williams N, et al. Community representatives’ involvement in clinical and translational science awardee activities. Clin Translational Sci. 2013; 6 ( 4 ): 292 ‐ 296.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHannagan RJ, Larimer CW. Does gender composition affect group decision outcomes? Evidence from a laboratory experiment. Political Behav. 2010; 32 ( 1 ): 51 ‐ 67.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKarpowitz CF, Mendelberg T, Shaker L. Gender inequality in deliberative participation. Am Political Sci Rev. 2012; 106 ( 3 ): 533 ‐ 547.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSampat BN, Buterbaugh K, Perl M. New evidence on the allocation of NIH funds across diseases. Milbank Q. 2013; 91 ( 1 ): 163 ‐ 185.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceThurston WE, MacKean G, Vollman A, et al. Public participation in regional health policy: a theoretical framework. Health Policy. 2004; 73: 237 ‐ 252.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDuke RD. A paradigm for game design. Simul Gaming. 1980; 1 ( 3 ): 364 ‐ 377.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGeurts JLA, Duke RD, Vermeulen PAM. Policy gaming for strategy and change. Long Range Planning. 2007; 40 ( 6 ): 535 ‐ 558.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDavey S. The 10/90 Report on Health Research 2003–2004. Geneva, Switzerland: Global Forum for Health Research; 2004.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceViergever RF, Hendriks TC. The 10 largest public and philanthropic funders of health research in the world: what they fund and how they distribute their funds. Health Res Policy Syst. 2016; 14: 12.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCallahan D. Shaping biomedical research priorities: the case of the National Institutes of Health. Health Care Analysis. 1999; 7 ( 2 ): 115 ‐ 129.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceResnik D. Setting biomedical research priorities: justice, science, and public participation. Kennedy Institute Ethics J. 2001; 11 ( 2 ): 181 ‐ 204.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFleck L. Healthcare justice and rational democratic deliberation. Am. J. Bioethics. 2001; 1 ( 2 ): 20 ‐ 21.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGoold SD. Allocating health care: cost‐utility analysis, informed democratic decision making, or the veil of ignorance ? J Health Politics Policy Law. 1996; 21 ( 1 ): 69 ‐ 98.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVayena E. The next step in the patient revolution: patients initiating and leading research. BMJ. 2014; 349: g4318.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSelby JV, Beal AC, Frank L. The Patient‐Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) national priorities for research and initial research agenda. JAMA. 2012; 307 ( 15 ): 1583 ‐ 1584.
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
milq12354.pdf
Size:
504.1KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open
Name:
milq12354_am.pdf
Size:
1.026MB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.