View Item 

Show simple item record

Supply network disruption and resilience: A network structural perspective
dc.contributor.authorKim, Yusoon
dc.contributor.authorChen, Yi‐su
dc.contributor.authorLinderman, Kevin
dc.date.accessioned2019-01-15T20:24:55Z
dc.date.available2019-01-15T20:24:55Z
dc.date.issued2015-01
dc.identifier.citationKim, Yusoon; Chen, Yi‐su ; Linderman, Kevin (2015). "Supply network disruption and resilience: A network structural perspective." Journal of Operations Management 33-34(1): 43-59.
dc.identifier.issn0272-6963
dc.identifier.issn1873-1317
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/146874
dc.description.abstractIncreasingly, scholars recognize the importance of understanding supply network disruptions. However, the literature still lacks a clear conceptualization of a networkâ level understanding of supply disruptions. Not having a network level understanding of supply disruptions prevents firms from fully mitigating the negative effects of a supply disruption. Graph theory helps to conceptualize a supply network and differentiate between disruptions at the node/arc level vs. network level. The structure of a supply network consists of a collection of nodes (facilities) and the connecting arcs (transportation). From this perspective, small events that disrupt a node or arc in the network can have major consequences for the network. A failure in a node or arc can potentially stop the flow of material across network. This study conceptualizes supply network disruption and resilience by examining the structural relationships among entities in the network. We compare four fundamental supply network structures to help understand supply network disruption and resilience. The analysis shows that node/arcâ level disruptions do not necessarily lead to networkâ level disruptions, and demonstrates the importance of differentiating a node/arc disruption vs. a network disruption. The results also indicate that network structure significantly determines the likelihood of disruption. In general, different structural relationships among network entities have different levels of resilience. More specifically, resilience improves when the structural relationships in a network follow the powerâ law. This paper not only offers a new perspective of supply network disruption, but also suggests a useful analytical approach to assessing supply network structures for resilience.
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.publisherPerseus
dc.subject.otherResilience
dc.subject.otherComplex networks
dc.subject.otherNetwork analysis
dc.subject.otherSupply network disruption
dc.subject.otherGraph theory
dc.titleSupply network disruption and resilience: A network structural perspective
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelIndustrial and Operations Engineering
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelEngineering
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Management Studies, College of Business, University of Michiganâ Dearborn, 19000 Hubbard Drive, FCS 184, Dearborn, MI 48126, United States
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Supply Chain and Operations Management, Carlson School of Management, University of Minnesota, 321 19th Avenue South, Minneapolis, MN 54545, United States
dc.contributor.affiliationotherCollege of Business, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, United States
dc.contributor.affiliationotherCenter for Supply Networks, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ 85004, United States
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/146874/1/joom43.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jom.2014.10.006
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Operations Management
dc.identifier.citedreferenceR.D. Reid, N.R. Sanders. Operations Management: An Integrated Approach. New York, NY: Wiley. 2010.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceT. Nishiguchi, A. Beaudet. The Toyota group and the Aisin fire. MIT Sloan Manage. Rev. 1998; 40 (1): 49 â 59.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceI. Paniccia. One, a hundred, thousands of industrial districts. Organizational variety in local networks of small and mediumâ sized enterprises. Organ. Stud. 1998; 4 (19): 667 â 699.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceS.Y. Ponomarov, M.C. Holcomb. Understanding the concept of supply chain resilience. Int. J. Logist. Manage. 2009; 20 (1): 124 â 143.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJ.W. Rivkin. Imitation of complex strategies. Manage. Sci. 2000; 46 (6): 824 â 844.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJ.W. Rivkin, N. Siggelkow. Balancing search and stability: interdependencies among elements of organizational design. Manage. Sci. Manage. Sci. 2003; 49 (3): 290 â 311.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJ.W. Rivkin, N. Siggelkow. Patterned interactions in complex systems: implications for exploration. Manage. Sci. 2007; 53 (7): 1068 â 1085.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceM.A. Schilling, C. Phelps. Interfirm Collaboration Networks: the impact of largeâ scale network structure on firm innovation. Manage. Sci. 2007; 53 (7): 1113 â 1126.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceK. Scholten, P.S. Scott, B. Fynes. Mitigation processesâ antecedents for building supply chain resilience. Supply Chain Manage. 2014; 19 (2): 211 â 228.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceY. Sheffi, J. Rice. A supply chain view of the resilient enterprise. MIT Sloan Manage. Rev. 2005; 47 (1): 41 â 48.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceY. Sheffi. The Resilient Enterprise: Overcoming Vulnerability for Competitive Advantage, MIT Press Books. 2005.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceY. Sheffi. The Resilient Enterprise: Overcoming Vulnerability for Competitive Advantage. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. 2007.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceH.A. Simon. The architecture of complexity. Proc. Am. Philos. Soc. 1962; 106 (6): 467 â 482.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceM.K. Starr. Modularâ production: A new concept. Harv. Bus. Rev. 1965; 46 (3): 131 â 142.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceD. Stauffer. Risk: the weak link in your supply chain. Harv. Manage. Update. 2003; 8 (3): 3 â 5.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceS.H. Strogatz. Exploring complex networks. Nature. 2001; 410 (6825): 268 â 276.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceT.J. Sturgeon. Modular production networks: a new American model of industrial organization. Ind. Corp. Change. 2002; 11 (1): 451 â 496.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceG. Svensson. A conceptual framework for the analysis of vulnerability in supply chains. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manage. 2000; 30 (9): 731 â 749.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceC.S. Tang. Robust strategies for mitigating supply chain disruptions. Int. J. Logist. Res. Appl. 2006; 9 (1): 33 â 45 (A Leading Journal of Supply Chain Management).
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJ.H. Thun, M. Drüke, D. Hoenig. Managing uncertaintyâ an empirical analysis of supply chain risk management in small and mediumâ sized enterprises. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2011; 49 (18): 5511 â 5525.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJ.G.A.J. van der Vorst, A.J.M. Beulens. Identifying sources of uncertainty to generate supply chain redesign strategies. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manage. 2002; 32 (6): 409 â 430.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJ.G. Wacker. A theory of formal conceptual definitions: developing theory building measurement instruments. J. Oper. Manage. 2004; 22 (6): 629 â 650.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceS.M. Wagner, N. Neshat. Assessing the vulnerability of supply chains using graph theory. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2010; 126 1: 121 â 129.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceS. Wasserman, K. Faust. Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. 1994.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceT. Wu, J. Blackhurst, P. Oâ grady. Methodology for supply chain disruption analysis. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2007; 45 (7): 1665 â 1682.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceK. Zhao, A. Kumar, T.P. Harrison, J. Yen. Analyzing the resilience of complex supply network topologies against random and targeted disruptions. Sys. J., IEEE. 2011; 5 (1): 28 â 39.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceW.N. Adger, T.P. Hughes, C. Folke, S.R. Carpenter, J. Rockstrom. Socialâ ecological resilience to coastal disasters. Science. 2005; 309 (5737): 1036 â 1039.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceA. Adhitya, R. Srinivasan, I.A. Karimi. A modelâ based rescheduling framework for managing abnormal supply chain events. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2007; 31 (5): 496 â 518.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceR. Albert, H. Jeong, A.â L. Barabási. Diameter of the World Wide Web. Nature. 1999; 401 (6749): 130 â 131.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceR. Albert, H. Jeong, A.â L. Barabási. Error and attack tolerance of complex networks. Nature. 2000; 406 (6794): 378 â 382.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceC.Y. Baldwin, K.B. Clark. Managing in an age of modularity. Harv. Bus. Rev. 1997; 75 (5): 84 â 93.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceA.â L. Barabási. Linked: The New Science of Networks. Cambridge, MA: Perseus. 2002.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceA.â L. Barabási. The origin of bursts and heavy tails in human dynamics. Nature. 2005; 435 (7039): 207 â 211.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceA.â L. Barabási, R. Albert. Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science. 1999; 286 (5439): 509 â 512.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceS.P. Borgatti, X. Li. On social network analysis in a supply chain context. J. Supply Chain Manage. 2009; 45 (2): 5 â 22.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceS. Borgatti, M. Everett. Models of coreâ periphery structures. Soc. Netw. 1999; 21 (4): 375 â 395.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceS. Borgatti, M. Everett, L. Freeman. UCINET6 for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis. Natick, MA: Analytic Technologies, Inc.. 2002.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceA. Broder, R. Kumar, F. Maghoul, P. Raghavan, S. Rajagopalan, R. Stata, A. Tomkins, J. Wiener. Graph structure in the web. Comput. Netw. 2000; 33 (1): 309 â 320.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceT.Y. Choi, Y. Hong. Unveiling the structure of supply networks: case studies in Honda, Acura, and DaimlerChrysler. J. Oper. Manage. 2002; 20 (5): 469 â 493.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceL. Clark, T. Fujimoto. Product Development Performance: Strategy, Organization and Management in the World Auto Industries. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press. 1991.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceM. Christopher, H. Peck. Building the resilient supply chain. Int. J. Logist. Manage. 2004; 15 (2): 1 â 14.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceC.W. Craighead, J. Blackhurst, M.J. Rungtusanatham, R.B. Handfield. The severity of supply chain disruptions: design characteristics and mitigation capabilities. Decis. Sci. 2007; 38 (1): 131 â 156.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceR. Diestel. Decomposing infinite graphs. Discrete Math. 1991; 95 (1): 69 â 89.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJ.A. Dunne, R.J. Williams, N.D. Martinez. Network structure and robustness of marine food webs. Mar. Ecol.â Prog. Ser. 2004; 273: 291 â 302.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceS.C. Ellis, R.M. Henry, J. Shockley. Buyer perceptions of supply disruption risk: a behavioral view and empirical assessment. J. Oper. Manage. 2010; 28 (1): 34 â 46.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceL. Euler. Solutio problematis ad geometriam situs pertinentis. Commentarii academiae scientiarum imperialis Petropolitanae. 1741; 8: 128 â 140.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceG. Ferreira. Toyota to Add Saturday Shifts at San Antonio Site to Ramp up Output. 2012, ã http://www.4wheelsnews.com/toyotaâ toâ addâ saturdayâ shiftsâ atâ sanâ antonioâ siteâ toâ rampâ upâ output/ ã .
dc.identifier.citedreferenceL.C. Freeman. A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness. Sociometry. 1977; 40 (1): 35 â 41.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceL.C. Freeman. Centrality in social networks: conceptual clarification. Soc. Netw. 1979; 1 (3): 215 â 239.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJ.M. Gerlach. The Japanese corporate network: a block model analysis. Adm. Sci. Q. 1992; 37 (1): 15 â 139.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceP. Ghemawat, D. Levinthal. Choice interactions and business strategy. Manage. Sci. 2008; 54 (9): 1638 â 1651.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceM. Gray, E. Golob, A. Markusen. Big firms, long arms, wide shoulders: the â hubâ andâ spokeâ industrial district in the Seattle region. Reg. Stud. 1996; 30 (7): 651 â 666.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJ. Gross, J. Yellen. Graph Theory and its Applications. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. 1998.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJ.L. Gross, J. Yellen. Graph Theory and its Applications. London: Macmillan Press Ltd. 2006.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceT. Hale, C.R. Moberg. Improving supply chain disaster preparedness: a decision process for secure site location. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manage. 2005; 34 (3): 195 â 207.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceG. Hamel, L. Valikangas. The quest for resilience. Harvard Bus. Rev. 2003; 81 September&October): 52 â 65.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceF. Harary. Graph Theory. Reading, MA: Addisonâ Wesley. 1969.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceK.B. Hendricks, V.R. Singhal. The effect of supply chain glitches on shareholder wealth. J. Oper. Manage. 2003; 21 (5): 501 â 522.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceK.B. Hendricks, V.R. Singhal. An empirical analysis of the effect of supply chain disruptions on longâ run stock price performance and equity risk of the firm. Prod. Oper. Manage. 2005; 14 (1): 35 â 52.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceP. Holme, B.J. Kim, C.N. Yoon, S.K. Han. Attack vulnerability of complex networks. Phys. Rev. E: Stat. Nonlinear Soft Matter Phys. 2002; 65 (5): 056109.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceM.A. Janssen, Ã . Bodin, J.M. Anderies, T. Elmqvist, H. Ernstson, R.R.J. McAllister, P. Olsson, P. Ryan. Toward a network perspective of the study of resilience in socialâ ecological systems. Ecol. Soc. 2006; 11 (1): 15.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceN. Johnson, D. Elliott, P. Drake. Exploring the role of social capital in facilitating supply chain resilience. Supply Chain Manage.: Int. J. 2013; 18 (3): 324 â 336.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceU. Jüttner, H. Peck, M. Christopher. Supply chain risk management: outlining an agenda for future research. Int. J. Logis.: Res. Appl. 2003; 6 (4): 197 â 210.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceU. Jüttner, S. Maklan. Supply chain resilience in the global financial crisis: an empirical study. Supply Chain Manage.: Int. J. 2011; 16 (4): 246 â 259.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceS.A. Kauffman. The Origins of Order: Selfâ organization and Selection in Evolution. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. 1993.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceS.A. Kauffman, S. Levin. Toward a general theory of adaptive walks on rugged landscapes. J. Theor. Biol. 1987; 128 (1): 11 â 45.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceP.R. Kleindorfer, G.H. Saad. Managing disruption risks in supply chains. Prod. Oper. Manage. 2005; 14 (1): 53 â 68.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceG. Kovács, P. Tatham. Responding to disruptions in the supply networkâ from dormant to action. J. Bus. Logist. 2009; 30 (2): 215 â 229.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceP. Kraljic. Purchasing must become supply management. Harv. Bus. Rev. 1983; 61 (5): 109 â 117.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceC.G. Langton. Computation at the edge of chaos: phase transition and emergent computation. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenom. 1990; 42 (1): 12 â 37.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceF. Longo, T. Oren. Supply chain vulnerability and resilience: a state of the art overview Proceedings of the European Modeling and Simulation Symposium Campora S. Giovanni (CS), Italy 2008; 17 â 19
dc.identifier.citedreferenceA. Markusen. Sticky places in slippery space: a typology of industrial districts. Econ. Geogr. 1996; 72 (3): 293 â 313.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceM. Mitzenmacher. A brief history of generative models for power law and lognormal distributions. Internet Math. 2004; 1 (2): 226 â 251.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceA. Nair, J.M. Vidal. Supply network topology and robustness against disruptionsâ an investigation using multiâ agent model. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2011; 49 (5): 1391 â 1404.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceM.E.J. Newman. The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Rev. 2003; 45 (2): 167 â 256.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceM.E.J. Newman. Power laws, Pareto distributions and Zipf’s law. Contemp. Phys. 2005; 46 (5): 323 â 351.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceM.E.J. Newman. Networks: An Introduction. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. 2010.
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
joom43.pdf
Size:
1.101MB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.