View Item 

Show simple item record

Untangling phylogenetic patterns and taxonomic confusion in tribe Caryophylleae (Caryophyllaceae) with special focus on generic boundaries
dc.contributor.authorMadhani, Hossein
dc.contributor.authorRabeler, Richard
dc.contributor.authorPirani, Atefeh
dc.contributor.authorOxelman, Bengt
dc.contributor.authorHeubl, Guenther
dc.contributor.authorZarre, Shahin
dc.date.accessioned2019-01-15T20:25:33Z
dc.date.available2019-04-01T15:01:09Zen
dc.date.issued2018-02
dc.identifier.citationMadhani, Hossein; Rabeler, Richard; Pirani, Atefeh; Oxelman, Bengt; Heubl, Guenther; Zarre, Shahin (2018). "Untangling phylogenetic patterns and taxonomic confusion in tribe Caryophylleae (Caryophyllaceae) with special focus on generic boundaries." TAXON 67(1): 83-112.
dc.identifier.issn0040-0262
dc.identifier.issn1996-8175
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/146908
dc.description.abstractAssigning correct names to taxa is a challenging goal in the taxonomy of many groups within the Caryophyllaceae. This challenge is most serious in tribe Caryophylleae since the supposed genera seem to be highly artificial, and the available morphological evidence cannot effectively be used for delimitation and exact determination of taxa. The main goal of the present study was to re–assess the monophyly of the genera currently recognized in this tribe using molecular phylogenetic data. We used the sequences of nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) and the chloroplast gene rps16 for 135 and 94 accessions, respectively, representing all 16 genera currently recognized in the tribe Caryophylleae, with a rich sampling of Gypsophila as one of the most heterogeneous groups in the tribe. Phylogenetic trees were reconstructed using maximum parsimony and Bayesian inference methods. The results show that most of the large genera of Caryophylleae are not monophyletic. As a result, we propose a new classification system matching both molecular phylogenetic and morphological evidence. The main taxonomic conclusions include: (1) the description of three new genera, (2) treating five small genera as synonyms, (3) resurrecting the genus Heterochroa with six species, and (4) proposing 23 new combinations plus 2 replacement names at the specific level. As a result, we recognize 14 genera in Caryophylleae. A diagnostic key to all genera of Caryophylleae is provided.
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.publishervenit apud A. Black, etc
dc.subject.othersystematics
dc.subject.othercarnation
dc.subject.otherDianthus
dc.subject.otherGypsophila
dc.subject.otherSaponaria
dc.subject.othertaxonomic revision
dc.titleUntangling phylogenetic patterns and taxonomic confusion in tribe Caryophylleae (Caryophyllaceae) with special focus on generic boundaries
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelBiology
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScience
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/146908/1/tax6716.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.12705/671.6
dc.identifier.sourceTAXON
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRabeler, R.K. & Bittrich, V. 1993. Suprageneric nomenclature in the Caryophyllaceae. Taxon 42: 857 – 863. https://doi.org/10.2307/1223270
dc.identifier.citedreferencePax, F. & Hoffmann, K. 1934. Caryophyllaceae. Pp. 275 – 364 in: Engler, A. & Harms, H. (eds.), Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien, ed. 2, vol. 16c. – Leipzig: Engelmann.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePetri, A. & Oxelman, B. 2011. Phylogenetic relationships within Silene (Caryophyllaceae) section Physolychnis. Taxon 60: 953 – 968.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePhitos, D. 1981. The genus Bolanthus (Caryophyllaceae) in Greece. Bot. Chron. (Patras) 1: 35 – 45.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePirani, A., Zarre, S., Pfeil, B.E., Bertrand, Y.J.K., Assadi, M. & Oxelman, B. 2014. Molecular phylogeny of Acanthophyllum (Caryophyllaceae: Caryophylleae), with emphasis on infrageneric classification. Taxon 63: 592 – 607. https://doi.org/10.12705/633.39
dc.identifier.citedreferencePosada, D. 2008. jModelTest: Phylogenetic model averaging. Molec. Biol. Evol. 25: 1253 – 1256. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msn083
dc.identifier.citedreferencePoyraz, I.E. & Ataşlar, E. 2010. Pollen and seed morphology of Velezia L. (Caryophyllaceae) genus in Turkey. Turk. J. Bot. 34: 179 – 190.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRabeler, R.K. 1984. Notes on nomenclature within Petrorhagia (Caryophyllaceae). Taxon 33: 714 – 716. https://doi.org/10.2307/1220793
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRabeler, R.K. 1993. Infrageneric nomenclature: Corrections and additions in the Caryophyllaceae. Contr. Univ. Michigan Herb. 19: 149 – 164.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRambault, A., Suchard, M.A., Xie, D. & Drummond, A.J. 2014. Tracer, version 1.60. http://beast.bio.ed.ac.uk/tracer
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRechinger, K.H. 1988. Gypsophila. Pp. 206 – 246 in: Rechinger, K.H., Melzheimer, V., Möschl, W. & Schiman-Czeika, H., Flora Iranica, vol. 163, Caryophyllaceae II. Graz: Akademische Drucku. Verlagsanstalt.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceReeve, H., Coode, M.J.E., Cullen, J., Hedge, I.C. & Huber-Morath, A. 1967. Caryophyllaceae Group V. Pp. 99 – 179 in: Davis, P.H. (ed.), Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands, vol. 2. Edinburgh University Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRonquist, F. & Huelsenbeck, J.P. 2003. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19: 1572 – 1574. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btg180
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSadeghian, S., Zarre, S., Rabeler, R.K. & Heubl, G. 2015. Molecular phylogenetic analysis of Arenaria (Caryophyllaceae: tribe Arenarieae) and its allies inferred from nuclear DNA internal transcribed spacer and plastid DNA rps16 sequences. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 178: 648 – 669. https://doi.org/10.1111/boj.12293
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchischkin, B.K. 1936. Caryophyllaceae (Diantheae). Pp. 555 – 660 in: Komarov, V.L. (ed.), Flora of the U.S.S.R., English translation 1936. Caryophyllaceae (Diantheae). Pp. 555 – 660 in: Komarov, V.L. (ed.), Flora of the U.S.S.R., English translation 1970, vol. 6. Leningrad: Izdatel’stvo Akademii Nauk SSSR Moskva.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceScopoli, J.A. 1771 (“1772”). Flora carniolica, ed. 2, vol. 1. Vindoboniae [Vienna]: impensis Joannis Pauli Krauss. http://bibdigital.rjb.csic.es/ing/Libro.php?Libro=982
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShults, V.A. 1989. Rod myl’nyanka (Saponaria L. s.l.) vo flore SSSR. Riga: Zinatne.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSimmler, G. 1910. Monographie der Gattung Saponaria. Denkschr. Kaiserl. Akad. Wiss. Wien., Math.-Naturwiss. Kl. 85: 433 – 509.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceŠourková, M. 1978. Caryophyllaceae subfam. Dianthoideae – Begrenzung, Charakteristik, und Gliederung. Preslia 50: 139 – 152.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStamatakis, A. 2014. RAxML version 8: A tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 30: 1312 – 1313. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btu033
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStrid, A. 1986. Mountain flora of Greece, vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSwofford, D.L. 2003. PAUP*: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods), version 4.0b10 for 32-bit Microsoft Windows. Sunderland (Massachusetts): Sinauer.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTutin, T.G., Burges, N.A., Chater, A.O., Edmonson, J.R., Heywood, V.H., Moore, D.M., Valentine, D.H., Walters, S.M. & Webb, D.A. 1964. Flora Europaea, vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceValente, L.M., Savolainen, V. & Vargas, P. 2010. Unparalleled rates of species diversification in Europe. Proc. Roy. Soc. London, Ser. B, Biol. Sci. 277: 1489 – 1496. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2009.2163
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVargas, P., Baldwin, B.G. & Constance, L. 1998. Nuclear ribosomal DNA evidence for a western North American origin of Hawaiian and South American species of Sanicula (Apiaceae). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 95: 235 – 240. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.95.1.235
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVítová, J., Vít, P. & Suda, J. 2015. Rare occurrence of reciprocal hybridization in a sympatric population of the Czech stenoendemic Dianthus arenarius subsp. bohemicus and widespread D. carthusianorum. Preslia 87: 329 – 345.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWhite, T.J., Bruns, T., Lee, S. & Taylor, J. 1990. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. Pp. 315 – 322 in: Innis, M.A., Gelfand, D.H., Sninsky, J.J. & White, T.J. (eds.), PCR protocols: A guide to methods and applications. San Diego: Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-372180-8.50042-1
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAmini, E., Zarre, S. & Assadi, M. 2011. Seed micro-morphology and its systematic significance in Gypsophila (Caryophyllaceae) and allied genera. Nordic J. Bot. 29: 1 – 10. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-1051.2011.01208.x
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBall, P.W. & Heywood, V.H. 1964. A revision of the genus Petrorhagia. Bull. Brit. Mus. (Nat. Hist.) Bot. 3: 119 – 172.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBarkoudah, Y.I. 1962. A revision of Gypsophila, Bolanthus, Ankyropetalum and Phryna. Wentia 9: 1 – 203. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1438-8677.1962.tb00012.x
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBentham, G. & Hooker, W.G. 1862. Genera plantarum, vol. 1 ( 1 ). Londini [London]: venit apud A. Black, etc. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.747
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBittrich, V. 1993. Caryophyllaceae. Pp. 206 – 236 in: Kubitzki, J., Rohwer, J.G. & Bittrich, V. (eds.), The families and genera of vascular plants, vol. 2. Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-02899-5_21
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBoissier, E. 1867. Flora orientalis, vol. 1. Basileae [Basel]: apud H. Georg. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.20323
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCandolle, A.P. de 1824. Prodromus systematis naturalis regni vegetabilis, pars 1. Parisiis [Paris]: sumptibus sociorum Treuttel et Würtz. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.286
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDillenberger, M.S. & Kadereit, J.W. 2014. Maximum polyphyly: Multiple origins and delimitation with plesiomorphic characters require a new circumscription of Minuartia (Caryophyllaceae). Taxon 63: 64 – 88. https://doi.org/10.12705/631.5
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEig, A. 1931. Les éléments et les groupes phytogéographiques auxiliaires dans la flore palestinienne: Étude phytogéographique. Dahlem bei Berlin: Verlag des Repertoriums.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFenzl, E. 1840 (“1836–1840”). Subordo IV. Sileneae DC. Pp. 970 – 974 in: Endlicher, S. (ed.) Genera plantarum secundum ordines naturales disposita. Vindobonae [Vienna]: apud Fr. Beck. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.728
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFior, S., Karis, P.O., Casazza, G., Minuto, L. & Sala, F. 2006. Molecular phylogeny of the Caryophyllaceae (Caryophyllales) inferred from chloroplast matK and nuclear rDNA ITS sequences. Amer. J. Bot. 93: 399 – 411. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.93.3.399
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGreenberg, A.K. & Donoghue, M.J. 2011. Molecular systematics and character evolution in Caryophyllaceae. Taxon 60: 1637 – 1652.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGrisebach, A.H.R. 1843. Spicilegium florae rumelicae et bithynicae, vol. 1. Brunsvigae [Braunschweig]: prostat apud Fridericum Vieweg et filium.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHaller, A. von 1742. Enumeratio methodica stirpium Helvetiae indi-genarum, vol. 1. Gottingae [Göttingen]: ex officina academica Abrami Vandenhoek. http://bibdigital.rjb.csic.es/ing/Libro.php?Libro=2860
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHarbaugh, D.T., Nepokroeff, M., Rabeler, R.K., McNeill, J., Zimmer, E.A. & Wagner, W.L. 2010. A new lineage-based tribal classification of the family Caryophyllaceae. Int. J. Pl. Sci. 171: 185 – 198. https://doi.org/10.1086/648993
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHernández-Ledesma, P., Walter, G., Berendsohn, W.G., Borsch, T., Mering, S. von, Akhani, H., Arias, S., Castañeda-Noa, I., Eggli, U., Eriksson, R., Flores-Olvera, H., Fuentes-Bazán, S., Kadereit, G., Klak, C., Korotkova, N., Nyffeler, R., Ocampo, G., Ochoterena, H., Oxelman, B., Rabeler, R.K., Sanchez, A., Schlumpberger, B.O. & Uotila, P. 2015. A taxonomic backbone for the global synthesis of species diversity in the angiosperm order Caryophyllales. Willdenowia 45: 281 – 383. https://doi.org/10.3372/wi.45.45301
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHuson, D.H. & Scornavacca, C. 2012. Dendroscope 3: An interactive tool for rooted phylogenetic trees and networks. Syst. Biol. 61: 1061 – 1067. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/sys062
dc.identifier.citedreferenceIkonnikov S.S. 1976. Notae de Caryophyllaceis, 3. Novosti Sist. Vyssh. Rast. 13: 113 – 117. [In Russian]
dc.identifier.citedreferenceIkonnikov, S.S. 2004. Two new genera of the family Caryophyllaceae from Afghanistan. Bot. Zhurn. 89: 114 – 116. [In Russian]
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJakovljević, K., Lakušić, D., Vukojičić, S., Tomović, G., Šinžar-Sekulić, J. & Stevanović, V. 2011. Richness and diversity of Pontic flora on serpentine of Serbia. Centr. Eur. J. Biol. 6: 260 – 274. https://doi.org/10.2478/s11535-010-0110-5
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKadereit, J.W., Albach, D.C., Ehrendorfer, F., Galbany-Casals, M., Garcia-Jacas, N., Gehrke, B., Kadereit, G., Kilian, N., Klein, J.T., Koch, M.A. & Kropf, M. 2016. Which changes are needed to render all genera of the German flora monophyletic? Willdenowia 46: 39 – 91. https://doi.org/10.3372/wi.46.46105
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKatoh, K. & Standley, D.M. 2013. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: Improvements in performance and usability. Molec. Biol. Evol. 30: 772 – 780. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mst010
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKearse, M., Moir, R., Wilson, A., Stones-Havas, S., Cheung, M., Sturrock, S., Busxton, S., Cooper, A., Markowitz, S., Duran, C., Thierer, T., Ashton, B., Mentjies, P. & Drummond, A. 2012. Geneious Basic: An integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics 28: 1647 – 1649.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKemler, M., Martín, M.P., Telleria, M.T., Schäfer, A.M., Yurkov, A. & Begerow, D. 2013. Contrasting phylogenetic patterns of anther smuts (Pucciniomycotina: Microbotryum ) reflect phylogenetic patterns of their caryophyllaceous hosts. Organisms Diversity Evol. 13: 111 – 126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13127-012-0115-1
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKool, A., Perrigo, A. & Thulin, M. 2012. Bristly versus juicy: Phylogenetic position and taxonomy of Sphaerocoma (Caryophyllaceae). Taxon 61: 67 – 75.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLinnaeus, C. 1753. Species plantarum, vol. 1. Holmiae [Stockholm]: impensis Laurentii Salvii. http://dx.doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.669
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLöve, Á. 1973. IOPB chromosome number reports XLII. Taxon: 647 – 654.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLudwig, C.G. 1757. Institutiones historico physicae regni vegetabilis, ed. 2. Lipsiae [Leipzig]: apud Ioh. Fridericum Gleditsch. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.112554
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMaddison, W.P. & Maddison, D.R. 2011. Mesquite: A modular system for evolutionary analysis, version 2.75. http://mesquiteproject.org/
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMarin, P.D. & Tatić, B. 2001. Serpentine soil and plant diversity with emphasis of Balkan Peninsula. Bocconea 13: 145 – 150.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcNeill, J., Barrie, F.R., Buck, W.R., Demoulin, V., Greuter, W., Hawksworth, D.L., Herendeen, P.S., Knapp, S., Marhold, K., Prado, J., Prud’homme van Reine, W.F., Smith, G.F., Wiersema, J.H., & Turland, N.J. (eds.) 2012. International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (Melbourne Code). Regnum Vegetabile 154. Königstein: Koeltz Scientific Books.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMiller, A.G. & Cope, T.A. 1996. Flora of the Arabian Peninsula and Socotra, vol. 1. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press,
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMiller, M.A., Pfeiffer, W. & Schwartz, T. 2010. Creating the CIPRES Science Gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees. Pp. 45 – 52 in: Proceedings of the Gateway Computing Environments Workshop (GCE), New Orleans, Louisiana, 14 Nov 2010. Piscataway: IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/GCE.2010.5676129
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOxelman, B., Lidén, M. & Berglund, D. 1997. Chloroplast rps16 intron phylogeny of the tribe Sileneae (Caryophyllaceae). Pl. Syst. Evol. 206: 393 – 410. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00987959
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
tax6716.pdf
Size:
4.555MB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.