Show simple item record

Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Patient Health Questionnaire‐9: A Study of the Participants From the Spinal Cord Injury Model Systems

dc.contributor.authorKrause, James S.
dc.contributor.authorSaunders, Lee L.
dc.contributor.authorBombardier, Charles
dc.contributor.authorKalpakjian, Claire
dc.date.accessioned2019-01-15T20:27:18Z
dc.date.available2019-01-15T20:27:18Z
dc.date.issued2011-06
dc.identifier.citationKrause, James S.; Saunders, Lee L.; Bombardier, Charles; Kalpakjian, Claire (2011). "Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Patient Health Questionnaire‐9: A Study of the Participants From the Spinal Cord Injury Model Systems." PM&R 3(6): 533-540.
dc.identifier.issn1934-1482
dc.identifier.issn1934-1563
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/146986
dc.publisherAmerican Psychological Association
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.titleConfirmatory Factor Analysis of the Patient Health Questionnaire‐9: A Study of the Participants From the Spinal Cord Injury Model Systems
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelKinesiology and Sports
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
dc.contributor.affiliationotherCollege of Health Professions, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Health Sciences and Research, College of Health Professions, Medical University of South Carolina, 77 President St, C101, MSC 700, Charleston, SC 29425
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/146986/1/pmr2533.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.pmrj.2011.03.003
dc.identifier.sourcePM&R
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJ.S. Krause, B. Kemp, J.L. Coker. Depression after spinal cord injury: Relation to gender, ethnicity, aging, and socioeconomic indicators. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000; 81: 1099 – 1109.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceS.H. Aggen, M.C. Neale, K.S. Kendler. DSM criteria for major depression: Evaluating symptom patterns using latent‐trait item response models. Psychol Med. 2005; 35: 475 – 487.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceF.Y. Huang, H. Chung, K. Kroenke, K.L. Delucchi, R.L. Spitzer. Using the Patient Health Questionnaire‐9 to measure depression among racially and ethnically diverse primary care patients. J Gen Intern Med. 2006; 21: 547 – 552.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceE.L. Lamoureux, H.W. Tee, K. Pesudovs, J.F. Pallant, J.E. Keeffe, G. Rees. Can clinicians use the PHQ‐9 to assess depression in people with vision loss?. Optom Vis Sci. 2009; 86: 139 – 145.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceM. Dum, J. Pickren, L.C. Sobell, M.B. Sobell. Comparing the BDI‐II and the PHQ‐9 with outpatient substance abusers. Addict Behav. 2008; 33: 381 – 387.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceA. Shafer. Meta‐analysis of the factor structures of four depression questionnaires: Beck, CES‐D, Hamilton and Zung. J Clin Psychol. 2006; 61: 123 – 146.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceE.J. Richardson, J.S. Richards. Factor structure of the PHQ‐9 screen for depression across time since injury among persons with spinal cord injury. Rehabil Psychol. 2008; 53: 243 – 249.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceC.Z. Kalpakjian, L.L. Toussaint, K.J. Albright, C.H. Bombardier, J.K. Krause, D.G. Tate. Patient health Questionnaire‐9 in spinal cord injury: an examination of factor structure as related to gender. J Spinal Cord Med. 2009; 32: 147 – 156.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceD.E. Graves, C.H. Bombardier. Improving the efficiency of screening for major depression in people with spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med. 2008; 31: 177 – 184.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceR.C. MacCallum, M. Browne, L. Cai. Testing differences between nested covariance structure models: Power analysis and null hypotheses. Psychol Methods. 2006; 11: 19 – 35.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceR.H. Heck. Mplus 1.04 software review. Structural Equation Modeling. 2000; 7: 309 – 317.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJ.S. Krause, C.H. Bombardier, R.E. Carter. Assessment of depressive symptoms during inpatient rehabilitation for spinal cord injury: Is there an underlying somatic factor when using the PHQ?. Rehabil Psychol. 2008; 53: 513 – 520.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJ.S. Krause, K.S. Reed, J.J. McArdle. Prediction of somatic and non‐somatic depressive symptoms between inpatient rehabilitation and follow‐up. Spinal Cord. 2010; 48: 239 – 244.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceB. Kemp, J. Krause, R. Adkins. Depression among African Americans, Latinos, and Caucasians with spinal cord injury: An exploratory study. Rehabil Psychol. 1999; 44: 235 – 247.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAmerican Psychological Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 4th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association. 1994.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceC.Z. Kalpakjian, L.L. Toussaint, K.J. Albright, C.H. Bombardier, J.K. Krause, D.G. Tate. Patient health Questionnaire‐9 in spinal cord injury: An examination of factor structure as related to gender. J Spinal Cord Med. 2009; 32: 147 – 156.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceL. Muthen, B. Muthen. Mplus, The Comprehensive Modeling Program for Applied Researchers User’s Guide. 4th ed. Los Angeles, CA: Muthen & Muthen. 2006.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceM. Browne, R. Cudeck. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. Bollen, S. Long, eds. Testing Structural Equation Models. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. 1993, 136 – 162.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceP.M. Bentler. Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychol Bull. 1990; 107: 238 – 246.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceT.A. Brown. Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research. New York, NY: The Gulliford Press. 2006.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceC.Z. Kalpakjian, C. Bombardier, K. Schomer, P. Brown, K. Johnson. Measuring depression in persons with spinal cord injury: A systematic review. J Spinal Cord Med. 2009; 32: 6 – 24.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceT.R. Elliott, R.G. Frank. Depression following spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996; 77: 816 – 823.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceR.G. Frank, T.R. Elliott, J.R. Corcoran, S.A. Wonderlich. Depression after spinal cord injury: Is it necessary?. Clin Psychol Rev. 1987; 7: 611 – 630.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceC.Z. Kalpakjian, C.H. Bombardier, K. Schomer, P.A. Brown, K.L. Johnson. Measuring depression in persons with spinal cord injury: A systematic review. J Spinal Cord Med. 2009; 32: 6 – 24.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceD.E. Stewart. Physical symptoms of depression: Unmet needs in special populations. J Clin Psych. 2003; 64 (Suppl 7): 12 – 16.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJ.W. Williams Jr., P.H. Noel, J.A. Cordes, G. Ramirez, M. Pignone. Is this patient clinically depressed?. JAMA. 2002; 287: 1160 – 1170.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceC.H. Bombardier, J.S. Richards, J.S. Krause, D. Tulsky, D.G. Tate. Symptoms of major depression in people with spinal cord injury: Implications for screening. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004; 85: 1749 – 1756.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceK. Kroenke, R.L. Spitzer, J.B. Williams. The PHQ‐9: Validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med. 2001; 16: 606 – 613.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceA.T. Beck, C.H. Ward, M. Mendelson, J. Mock, J. Erbaugh. An inventory for measuring depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1961; 4: 561 – 571.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceR.A. Steer, R. Ball, W.F. Ranieri, A.T. Beck. Dimensions of the Beck Depression Inventory‐II in clinically depressed outpatients. J Clin Psychol. 1999; 55: 117 – 128.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceR.C. Arnau, M.W. Meagher, M.P. Norris, R. Bramson. Psychometric evaluation of the Beck Depression Inventory‐II with primary care medical patients. Health Psychol. 2001; 20: 112 – 119.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAmerican Psychological Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 3rd, revised ed. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. 1987.
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.