View Item 

Show simple item record

3D reconstruction of MRâ visible Fe3O4â mesh implants: Pelvic mesh measurement techniques and preliminary findings
dc.contributor.authorBrocker, Kerstin A.
dc.contributor.authorMokry, Theresa
dc.contributor.authorAlt, Céline D.
dc.contributor.authorKauczor, Hans‐ulrich
dc.contributor.authorLenz, Florian
dc.contributor.authorSohn, Christof
dc.contributor.authorDeLancey, John O.
dc.contributor.authorChen, Luyun
dc.date.accessioned2019-01-15T20:27:54Z
dc.date.available2020-03-03T21:29:35Zen
dc.date.issued2019-01
dc.identifier.citationBrocker, Kerstin A.; Mokry, Theresa; Alt, Céline D. ; Kauczor, Hans‐ulrich ; Lenz, Florian; Sohn, Christof; DeLancey, John O.; Chen, Luyun (2019). "3D reconstruction of MRâ visible Fe3O4â mesh implants: Pelvic mesh measurement techniques and preliminary findings." Neurourology and Urodynamics 38(1): 369-378.
dc.identifier.issn0733-2467
dc.identifier.issn1520-6777
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/147010
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.subject.other3D reconstruction
dc.subject.otherMRI
dc.subject.otherMRIâ visible mesh
dc.subject.otherPelvic organ prolapse
dc.subject.othermeasurement
dc.title3D reconstruction of MRâ visible Fe3O4â mesh implants: Pelvic mesh measurement techniques and preliminary findings
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelInternal Medicine and Specialties
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/147010/1/nau23868.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/147010/2/nau23868_am.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/nau.23868
dc.identifier.sourceNeurourology and Urodynamics
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAnsquer Y, Fernander P, Aimot S, et al. MRI urethrovesical junction mobility is associated with global pelvic floor laxity in female stress incontinence. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2007; 86: 1243 â 1250.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrocker KA, Alt CD, Rzepka J, et al. Oneâ year dynamic MRI followâ up after vaginal mesh repair: evaluation of clinical, radiological, and qualityâ ofâ life results. Acta Radiol. 2014; 56: 1002 â 1008.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFeiner B, Maher C. Vaginal mesh contraction: definition, clinical presentation, and management. Obstet Gynecol. 2010; 115: 325 â 330.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCampagna G, Panico G, Morciano A, et al. Vaginal mesh repair SYSTEMS for pelvic organ prolapse: anatomical study comparing transobturator/trangluteal versus single incision techniques. Neurourol Urodyn. 2017; 37: 1024 â 1030.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBarski D, Otto T, Gerullis H. Systematic review and classification of complications after anterior, posterior, apical, and total vaginal mesh implantation for prolapse repair. Surg Technol Int. 2014; 24: 217 â 224.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDietz HP, Erdmann M, Shek KL. Mesh contraction: myth or reality ? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 204: 173 e171â 174.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBaeà ler K, Aigmueller T, Albrich S, et al. Diagnosis and treatment oft he pelvic organ prolaps. Guideline of the German Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics (S2eâ Level, AWMF Registry No. 015/006, April 2016). 2016.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRodrigo N, Wong V, Shek KL, et al. The use of 3â dimensional ultrasound of the pelvic floor to predict recurrence risk after pelvic reconstructive surgery. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2014; 54: 206 â 211.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShek KL, Dietz HP, Rane A, et al. Transobturator mesh for cystocele repair: a shortâ to mediumâ term followâ up using 3D/4D ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 32: 82 â 86.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChen L, Lenz F, Alt CD, et al. MRI visible Fe3O4 polypropylene mesh: 3D reconstruction of spatial relation to bony pelvis and neurovascular structures. Int Urogynecol J. 2017; 28: 1131 â 1138.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFischer A. OPâ Atlas Praktische UrogynäkologieBirgitt Lucas. 2007. 366 p.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMoore RD, Mitchell GK, Miklos JR. Singleâ incision vaginal approach to treat cystocele and vault prolapse with an anterior wall mesh anchored apically to the sacrospinous ligaments. Int Urogynecol J. 2012; 23: 85 â 91.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrocker KA, Lippus F, Alt CD, et al. Magnetic resonanceâ visible polypropylene mesh for pelvic organ prolapse repair. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2014; 79: 101 â 106.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFarthmann J, Watermann D, Niesel A, et al. Lower exposure rates of partially absorbable mesh compared to nonabsorbable mesh for cystocele treatment: 3â year followâ up of a prospective randomized trial. Int Urogynecol J. 2012; 24: 749 â 758.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBetschart C, Chen L, Ashtonâ Miller JA, et al. On pelvic reference lines and the MR evaluation of genital prolapse: a proposal for standardization using the Pelvic Inclination Correction System. Int Urogynecol J. 2013; 24: 1421 â 1428.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrandon CJ, Lewickyâ Gaupp C, Larson KA, et al. Anatomy of the perineal membrane as seen in magnetic resonance images of nulliparous women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 200: 583 e581â 586.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFritz J, Dellon AL, Williams EH, et al. 3â tesla highâ field magnetic resonance neurography for guiding nerve blocks and its role in pain management. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2015; 23: 533 â 545.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSindhwani N, Feola A, De Keyzer F, et al. Threeâ dimensional analysis of implanted magneticâ resonanceâ visible meshes. Int Urogynecol J. 2015; 26: 1459 â 1465.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCiritsis A, Hansen NL, Barabasch A, et al. Timeâ dependent changes of magnetic resonance imagingâ visible mesh implants in patients. Invest Radiol. 2014; 49: 439 â 444.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCiritsis A, Truhn D, Hansen NL, et al. Positive contrast MRI techniques for visualization of ironâ loaded hernia mesh implants in patients. PLoS ONE. 2016; 11: e0155717.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShek KL, Dietz HP. Imaging of slings and meshes. Australas J Ultrasound Med. 2014; 17: 61 â 71.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDietz HP. Pelvic floor ultrasound: a review. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2017; 60: 58 â 81.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSvabik K, Martan A, Masata J, et al. Ultrasound appearances after mesh implantationâ evidence of mesh contraction or folding ? Int Urogynecol J. 2011; 22: 529 â 533.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLetouzey V, Deffieux X, Levaillant J, et al. Ultrasound evaluation of polypropylene mesh contraction at long term after vaginal surgery for cystocele repair. 34th Annual Scientific Meeting of the International Urogynecological Association, June 2009. Lake Como, Italy.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMamy L, Letouzey V, Lavigne JP, et al. Correlation between shrinkage and infection of implanted synthetic meshes using an animal model of mesh infection. Int Urogynecol J. 2010; 22: 47 â 52.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAltman D, Vayrynen T, Engh ME, et al. Anterior colporrhaphy versus transvaginal mesh for pelvicâ organ prolapse. N Engl J Med. 2011; 364: 1826 â 1836.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJelovsek JE, Maher C, Barber MD. Pelvic organ prolapse. Lancet. 2007; 369: 1027 â 1038.
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
nau23868.pdf
Size:
1.709MB
Format:
PDF
View/Open
Name:
nau23868_am.pdf
Size:
3.911MB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.