View Item 

Show simple item record

A Prospective, Masked 18‐Month Minimum Follow‐up On Neurophysiologic Changes In Persons with Spinal Stenosis, Low Back Pain, and No Symptoms
dc.contributor.authorHaig, Andrew J.
dc.contributor.authorYamakawa, Karen S.J.
dc.contributor.authorParres, Christopher
dc.contributor.authorChiodo, Anthony
dc.contributor.authorTong, Henry
dc.date.accessioned2019-01-15T20:28:23Z
dc.date.available2019-01-15T20:28:23Z
dc.date.issued2009-02
dc.identifier.citationHaig, Andrew J.; Yamakawa, Karen S.J.; Parres, Christopher; Chiodo, Anthony; Tong, Henry (2009). "A Prospective, Masked 18‐Month Minimum Follow‐up On Neurophysiologic Changes In Persons with Spinal Stenosis, Low Back Pain, and No Symptoms." PM&R 1(2): 127-136.
dc.identifier.issn1934-1482
dc.identifier.issn1934-1563
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/147029
dc.publisherHanley and Belfus
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.titleA Prospective, Masked 18‐Month Minimum Follow‐up On Neurophysiologic Changes In Persons with Spinal Stenosis, Low Back Pain, and No Symptoms
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelKinesiology and Sports
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, The University of Michigan, 325 E Eisenhower, Ann Arbor, MI 48108
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/147029/1/pmr2127.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.pmrj.2008.10.007
dc.identifier.sourcePM&R
dc.identifier.citedreferenceH.C. Tong, A.J. Haig, K.S.J. Yamakawa, J.A. Miner. Paraspinal electromyography: age‐correlated normative valves in asymptotic subjects. Spine. 2005; 30 (17): 499 – 502.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceA.J. Haig, J.B. Weiner, J. Tew, D. Quint, K. Yamakawa. The relation among spinal geometry on MRI, paraspinal electromyographic abnormalities, and age in person referred for electrodiagnostic testing of low back symptoms. Spine. 2002; 27: 1918 – 1925.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceH.C. Tong, I.A. Young, J. Koch, A.J. Haig, K.S. Yamakawa, A. Wallbom. Paraspinal electromyography that compares concentric with monopolar needles: a blinded study. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2003; 82: 917 – 924.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceA.J. Haig, K.S.J. Yamakawa, R. Kendall, J.A. Miner, C. Parres, M. Harris. masking in electrodiagnostic medicine research. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2006; 85: 475 – 481.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceT.R. Dillingham, T.D. Lauder, M. Andary, S. Shannon. Identifying lumbosacral radiculopathies: an optimal electromyographic screen. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2000; 79: 496 – 503.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJ.R. Daube. AAEM Minimonograph #11: Needle examination in clinical electromyography. Muscle Nerve. 1991; 4: 685 – 700.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceA.J. Haig, D.B. LeBreck, S.G. Powley. Paraspinal mapping: quantified needle electromyography of the paraspinal muscles in persons without low back pain. Spine. 1995; 20: 715 – 721.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceA.J. Haig. clinical experience with paraspinal mapping, I: neurophysiology of the paraspinal muscles in various spinal disorders. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997; 78: 1177 – 1184.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceA.J. Haig. Clinical experience with paraspinal mapping. II: a simplified technique that eliminates three fourths of needle insertions. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997; 78: 1185 – 1190.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceA.J. Haig. Paraspinal mapping. American Association of Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine course handout, Revised 2005. Rochester, MN: AANEM www.aanem.org.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceA.J. Haig, K. Yamakawa, D.M. Hudson. Paraspinal electromyography in high lumbar and thoracic lesions. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2000; 79: 336 – 342.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceR.W. Porter. Spinal stenosis and neurogenic claudication. Spine. 1996; 21: 2046 – 2052.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceD. Dumitru, C.A. Diaz, J.C. King. Prevalence of denervation in paraspinal and foot intrinsic musculature. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2001; 80: 482 – 490.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceP.F. Gatens, M.A. Saeed. Electromyographic findings in the intrinsic muscles of normal feet. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1982; 63: 317 – 318.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceD. Dumitru, A. Amato, M.J. Zwarts. Electrodiagnostic Medicine. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Hanley and Belfus. 2001.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJ. Kimura. Electrodiagnosis in Diseases of Nerve and Muscle: Principles and Practice. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. 2001.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceE.S. Date, E.Y. Mar, M.R. Bugola, J.K. Teraoka. The prevalence of lumbar paraspinal spontaneous activity in asymptomatic subjects. Muscle Nerve. 1996; 19: 350 – 354.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceM.R. Durette, A.A. Rodriquez, J.C. Agre, J.L. Silverman. Needle electromyographic evaluation of patients with myofascial or fibromyalgic pain. Am J. Phys Med Rehabil. 1991; 70: 154 – 156.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceS. Atlas, Y. Chang, Y. Wu, R. Keller, D. Singer. Predictors of longitudinal outcomes for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis followed over a 10 year period. New York, NY: International Society for the Study of the Lumbar Spine. 2005, May 12, poster 106.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceM.A. Fisher, D. Kacr, J. Houchin. Electrodiagnostic examination, back pain, and entrapment of posterior rami. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1985; 25: 187.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceM. Benoist. The natural history of lumbar degenerative spinal stenosis. J Bone Spine Rev Rhumat. 2002; 69: 450 – 457.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceK.E. Johnsson, I. Rosen, A. Uden. The effect of decompression on the natural course of spinal stenosis. A comparison of surgically treated and untreated patients. Spine. 1991; 16: 615 – 619.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceK.E. Johnsson, I. Rosen, A. Uden. The natural course of lumbar spinal stenosis. Clin Orthop. 1992; 279: 82 – 86.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceR.W. Porter, C. Hibbert, C. Evans. The natural history of root entrapment syndrome. Spine. 1984; 9: 418 – 421.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceW.S. Aronow. Management of peripheral arterial disease. Cardiol Rev. 2005; 13: 61 – 68.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceK.J. Goh, W. Khalifa, P. Anslow, T. Cadoux‐Hudson, M. Donaghy. The clinical syndrome associated with lumbar spinal stenosis. Eur Neurol. 2004; 52: 242 – 249.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceA.J. Haig, H.C. Tong, R. Kendall. The bent spine syndrome: myopathy + biomechanics = symptoms. Spine J. 2006; 6: 190 – 194.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceS. Boden, P.R. McCowin, D.O. Davis, T.S. Dina, A.S. Mark, S. Wiesel. Abnormal magnetic resonance scans of the lumbar spine in asymptomatic subjects. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990; 72: 1178 – 1184.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceA.J. Haig, H.C. Tong, K.S.J. Yamakawa, et al. Spinal stenosis, back pain, or no symptoms at all?. A masked study comparing radiologic and electrodiagnostic diagnoses to the clinical impression. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006; 87: 897 – 903.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceM.C. Jensen, M.N. Brant‐Zawadzki, N. Obuchowski, M.T. Modic, D. Malkasian, J.S. Ross. Magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine in people without back pain. N Engl J Med. 1994; 14: 69 – 73.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceC. Ertekin, H. Sirin, H.R. Koyuncuoglu, et al. Diagnostic value of electrical stimulation of lumbosacral roots in radiculopathies. Acta Neurol Scand. 1994; 90: 26 – 33.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceR.E. Jacobson. Lumbar stenosis. An electromyographic evaluation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1976; 115: 68 – 71.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceK.E. Johnsson, I. Rosen, A. Uden. Neurophysiologic investigation of patients with spinal stenosis. Spine. 1987; 12: 483 – 487.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceM. Kondo, H. Matsuda, S. Kureya, A. Shimazu. Electrophysiological studies of intermittent claudication in lumbar stenosis. Spine. 1989; 14: 862 – 866.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceC.T. Plastaras. Electrodiagnostic challenges in the evaluation of lumbar spinal stenosis. Phys Med Rehabil Clin North Am. 2003; 14: 57 – 69.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceA.M. Seppalainen, H. Alaranta, J. Soini. Electromyography in the diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1981; 21: 55 – 66.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceA.J. Haig. Paraspinal denervation and the spinal degenerative cascade. Spine J. 2002; 2: 372 – 380.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceA.J. Haig, H.C. Tong, K.S. Yamakawa, et al. The sensitivity and specificity of electrodiagnostic testing for the clinical syndrome of lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine. 2005; 30: 2667 – 2676.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceA.J. Haig, M.E. Geisser, H.C. Tong, et al. Electromyographic and magnetic resonance imaging to predict lumbar stenosis, low‐back pain, and no back symptoms. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007; 89: 358 – 366.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceA.J. Haig, H.C. Tong, K.S. Yamakawa, et al. Predictors of pain and function in persons with spinal stenosis, low back pain, and no back pain. Spine. 2006; 31 (25): 2950 – 2957.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceP.E. Bijur, W. Silver, E.J. Gallagher. Reliability of the visual analog scale for measurement of acute pain. Acad Emerg Med. 2001; 8: 1153 – 1157.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJ.A. Kopec, J.M. Esdaile, M. Abrahamowics, et al. The Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale: conceptualization and development. J Clin Epidemiol. 1996; 49: 151 – 161.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceR. Melzack. The McGill Pain Questionnaire: major properties and scoring methods. Pain. 1975; 1: 277 – 279.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceC. Ohlund, C. Eek, S. Palmblad, B. Areskous, A. Nachemson. Quantified pain drawing in subacute low back pain. Validation in nonselected outpatient industrial sample. Spine. 1996; 21: 1021 – 1031.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceR.C. Tait, J.T. Chibnall, S. Krause. The Pain Disability Index: psychometric properties. Pain. 1990; 40: 171 – 182.
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
pmr2127.pdf
Size:
139.5KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.