Show simple item record

A molecular phylogeny and classification of the largely succulent and mainly African Euphorbia subg. Athymalus (Euphorbiaceae)

dc.contributor.authorPeirson, Jess A.
dc.contributor.authorBruyns, Peter V.
dc.contributor.authorRiina, Ricarda
dc.contributor.authorMorawetz, Jeffery J.
dc.contributor.authorBerry, Paul E.
dc.date.accessioned2019-01-15T20:31:01Z
dc.date.available2019-01-15T20:31:01Z
dc.date.issued2013-12
dc.identifier.citationPeirson, Jess A.; Bruyns, Peter V.; Riina, Ricarda; Morawetz, Jeffery J.; Berry, Paul E. (2013). "A molecular phylogeny and classification of the largely succulent and mainly African Euphorbia subg. Athymalus (Euphorbiaceae)." TAXON 62(6): 1178-1199.
dc.identifier.issn0040-0262
dc.identifier.issn1996-8175
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/147157
dc.description.abstractEuphorbia subg. Athymalus consists of approximately 150 species and is one of the four main lineages that comprise the species–rich genus Euphorbia. Most species in the subgenus are stem succulents with greatly reduced leaves, but there are also leafy herbs, shrubs, trees and geophytes. The subgenus is restricted to arid regions of the Old World. Most species are found in sub–Saharan Africa, with one in Macaronesia and adjacent parts of western Africa, a few in the Arabian Peninsula (one of which extends into Iran) and one native to Madagascar. Twenty–three species are endemic to the northeastern Horn of Africa (SE Ethiopia, Socotra, Somalia), while 72 species are restricted to southern Africa (including Botswana, Lesotho, Namibia, South Africa and Swaziland). Sixty of those are endemic to South Africa alone, where they are particularly associated with the semi–arid west and south of the country in the Greater Cape Floristic Region and the Nama Karoo Region. We sampled 88 species and analyzed data from the nuclear ribosomal ITS and plastid ndhF regions. Analyses of the separate and combined datasets produced phylogenies that confirm the monophyly of E. subg. Athymalus and the placement of E. antso from Madagascar as sister to the rest of the subgenus. Our analyses also show that the subgenus consists of a grade of early–diverging lineages that are relatively poor in species and that the major radiation of succulent species in southern Africa forms a highly supported clade (E. sect. Anthacanthae). Species–level relationships within this southern African clade, however, remain largely unresolved. Our phylogenetic hypotheses allow us to propose a new classification for E. subg. Athymalus where seven sections are recognized, two of which are newly described. The large southern African E. sect. Anthacanthae is further divided into five subsections, and four series are recognized in E. subsect. Florispinae.
dc.publisherVictor Masson & Fils.
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.subject.otherNrITS
dc.subject.otherPhylogeny
dc.subject.otherSouthern africa
dc.subject.otherSucculents
dc.subject.otherGreater cape floristic region
dc.subject.otherBiogeography
dc.subject.otherEuphorbia subg. athymalus
dc.subject.otherCpdna
dc.subject.otherMedusoids
dc.titleA molecular phylogeny and classification of the largely succulent and mainly African Euphorbia subg. Athymalus (Euphorbiaceae)
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelBiology
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScience
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/147157/1/tax6269.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/147157/2/tax6269-sup-001-pdf.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.12705/626.9
dc.identifier.sourceTAXON
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRiina, R. & Berry, P.E. 2013a. Euphorbia Planetary Biodiversity Inventory website. http://euphorbiaceae.org/pages/data_portal.html (accessed 23 Apr. 2013).
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMaddison, W.P. & Maddison, D.R. 2011. Mesquite: A modular system for evolutionary analysis, version 2.75. http://mesquiteproject.org
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMeve, U. & Liede, S. 2002. A molecular phylogeny and generic rearrangement of the stapelioid Ceropegieae (Apocynaceae—Ascle-piadoideae). Pl. Syst. Evol. 234: 171 – 209. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00606-002-0220-2
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMorawetz, J.J., Wagner, B., Riina, R. & Berry, P.E. 2009. Euphorbia Seed Atlas - Part 1. Euphorbia World 5 ( 3 ): 26 – 29.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNecker, N.J. de. 1790. Elementa Botanica, vol. 2. Neuwied am Rhein. http://dx.doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.4452
dc.identifier.citedreferencePartridge, T.C. & Maud, R.R. 2000. The Cenozoic of southern Africa. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePax, F. 1921. Euphorbiaceae. Pp. 1 – 168 in: Engler, A. & Drude, O. (eds.). Die Vegetation der Erde, vol. 9, Die Pflanzenwelt Afrikas, insbesondere seiner tropischen Gebiete, vol. 3 ( 2 ). Leipzig: Engelmann. http://dx.doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.50144
dc.identifier.citedreferencePosada, D. 2008. jModelTest: Phylogenetic model averaging. Molec. Biol. Evol. 25: 1253 – 1256. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msn083
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRambaut, A. & Drummond, A. 2007. Tracer, version 1.4. Computer program and documentation distributed by the authors. http://beast.bio.ed.ac.uk/Tracer (accessed 10 June 2012).
dc.identifier.citedreferenceReichenbach, H.G.L. 1829 (“1828”). Conspectus regni vegetabilisper gradus naturales evoluti, pars prima. Leipzig.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRiina, R. & Berry, P.E. (coord.) 2013b. Euphorbia Planetary Biodiversity Inventory database. http://www.tolkin.org/projects/72 (accessed 23 April 2013).
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRiina, R., Peirson, J.A., Geltman, D.V., Molero, J., Frajman, B., Pahlevani, A., Barres, L., Morawetz, J.J., Salmaki, Y, Zarre, S., Kryukov, A., Bruyns, P.V. & Berry, P.E. 2013. A worldwide molecular phylogeny and classification of the leafy spurges, Euphorbia subgenus Esula (Euphorbiaceae). Taxon 62: 316 – 342. http://dx.doi.org/10.12705/622.3
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRitz, C.M., Zimmermann, N.F.A. & Hellwig, F.H. 2003. Phylogeny of subsect. Meleuphorbia (A. Berger) Pax & Hoffm. (Euphorbia L.) reflects the climatic regime in South Africa. Pl. Syst. Evol. 241: 245 – 259. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00606-003-0064-4
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRonquist, F. & Huelsenbeck, J.P. 2003. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19: 1572 – 1574. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btg180
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSiesser, W. G. 1980. Late Miocene origin of the Benguela upswelling system off northern Namibia. Science 208: 283 – 285. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.208.4441.283
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSimmons, M.P. 2004. Independence of alignment and tree search. Molec. Phylogen. Evol. 31: 874 – 879. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2003.10.008
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSnijman, D.A. In press. The Greater Cape Floristic Region, the extra Cape subregion. In: Snijman, D.A. (ed.). Plants of the Greater Cape Floristic Region, vol. 2, The Extra Cape flora. Strelitzia 30. Cape Town: South African National Biodiversity Institute.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStamatakis, A. 2006. RAxML-VI-HPC: Maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics 22: 2688 – 2690. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btl446
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSteinmann, V.W. & Porter, J.M. 2002. Phylogenetic relationships in Euphorbieae (Euphorbiaceae) based on ITS and ndhF sequence data. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 89: 453 – 490. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3298591
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSwofford, D.L. 2003. PAUP*: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods), version 4. Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceUhlarz, H. 1974. Entwicklungsgeschichtliche Untersuchungen zur Morphologie der basalen Blatteffigurationen sukkulenter Euphorbien aus den Subsektionen Diacanthium Boiss. und Goniostema Baill. Trop. Subtrop. Pflanzenwelt 9: 571 – 639.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWagner, B., Morawetz, J.J., Riina, R., Berry, P.E., Moller, A. & Becker, R.W. 2010. Euphorbia Seed Atlas - Part 5. Euphorbia World 7 ( 1 ): 11.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWagner, B., Morawetz, J.J., Riina, R., Berry, P.E., Moller, A. & Becker, R.W. 2011. Euphorbia Seed Atlas - Part 6. Euphorbia World 7 ( 2 ): 21.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWheeler, L.C. 1943. The genera of living Euphorbieae. Amer. Midland Naturalist 30: 456 – 503. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2421292
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWheeler, T.J. & Kececioglu, J.D. 2007. Multiple alignments by aligning alignments. Bioinformatics 23: i559 - i568. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btm226
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWhite, A.C., Dyer, R.A. & Sloan, B. 1941. The succulent Euphorbieae, 2 vols. Pasadena: Abbey Gardens Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceYang, Y., Riina, R., Morawetz, J.J., Haevermans, T., Aubriot, X. & Berry, P.E. 2012. Molecular phylogenetics and classification of Euphorbia subgenus Chamaesyce (Euphorbiaceae). Taxon 61: 764 – 789.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZimmermann, N.F.A., Ritz, C.M. & Hellwig, F.H. 2010. Further support for the phylogenetic relationships within Euphorbia L. (Euphorbiaceae) from nrITS and trnL-trnF IGS sequence data. Pl. Syst. Evol. 286: 39 – 58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00606-010-0272-7
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAli, J.R. & Huber, M. 2010. Mammalian biodiversity on Madagascar controlled by ocean currents. Nature 463: 653 – 657. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature08706
dc.identifier.citedreferenceArakaki, M., Christin, P.-A., Nyffeler, R., Lendel, A., Eggli, U., Ogburn, R.M., Spriggs, E, Moore, M.J. & Edwards, E.J. 2011. Contemporaneous and recent radiations of the world’s major succulent plant lineages. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 108: 8379 – 8384. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1100628108
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBally, P.R.O. 1959. Lithocaulon Bally (Asclepiadaceae), a new genus from Somaliland. Candollea 17: 53 – 59.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBarres, L., Vilatersana, R., Molero, J., Susanna, A. & Galbany-Casals, M. 2011. Molecular phylogeny of Euphorbia subg. Esula sect. Aphyllis (Euphorbiaceae) inferred from nrDNA and cpDNA markers with biogeographic insights. Taxon 60: 705 – 720.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBellstedt, D.U., Van Zyl, L., Marais, E.M., Bytebier, B., De Villiers, C.A., Makwarela, A.M. & Dreyer, L.L. 2008. Phylogenetic relationships, character evolution and biogeography of southern African members of Zygophyllum (Zygophyllaceae) based on three plastid regions. Molec. Phylogen. Evol. 47: 932 – 949. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2008.02.019
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBoissier, E. 1862. Euphorbieae. Pp. 3 – 188 in: Candolle, A.P. de (ed.), Prodromus systematis naturalis regni vegetabilis, vol. 15 ( 2 ). Paris: Victor Masson & Fils. http://dx.doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.286
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBorn, J., Linder, H.P. & Desmet, P. 2007. The Greater Cape Floristic Region. J. Biogeogr. 34: 147 – 162. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2699.2006.01595.x
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrown, N.E. 1915 (“1925”). Euphorbia. Pp. 222 – 375 in: Thiselton-Dyer, W.T. (ed.), Flora capensis, vol. 5 ( 2 ). London: Reeve. http://dx.doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.821
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBruyns, P.V. 1992. Notes on African plants, Euphorbiaceae. Notes on Euphorbia species from the northwestern Cape. Bothalia 22: 37 – 42.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBruyns, P.V. 2000. Euphorbia. Pp. 455 – 458 in: Goldblatt, P. & Manning, J. (eds.), Cape plants. Strelitzia 9. Pretoria, St. Louis: National Botanical Institute: Missouri Botanical Garden.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBruyns, P.V. 2012. Nomenclature and typification of southern African species of Euphorbia. Bothalia 42: 217 – 245.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBruyns, P.V., Mapaya, R.J. & Hedderson, T. 2006. A new subgeneric classification for Euphorbia (Euphorbiaceae) in southern Africa based on ITS and psbA-trnH sequence data. Taxon 55: 397 – 420. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/25065587
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBruyns, P.V., Klak, C. & Hanácek, P. 2011. Age and diversity in Old World succulent species of Euphorbia (Euphorbiaceae). Taxon 60: 1717 – 1733.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCarter, S. 1988. Euphorbieae. Pp. 409 – 564 in: Polhill, R.M. (ed.), Flora of tropical East Africa: Euphorbiaceae, part 2. Rotterdam: A.A. Balkema.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCoetzee, J.A. 1980. Tertiary environmental changes along the southwestern African coast. Palaeontol. Afr. 23: 197 – 203.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDanty d’Isnard, A.-T. 1720. Établissement d’un genre de plante appelle Euphorbe; avec le dénombrement de ses espèces, de deux desquelles on donne les descriptions & les figures. Hist. Acad. Roy. Sci. Mém. Math. Phys. (Paris, 4to) 1720: 384 – 399.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDaru, B.H., Manning, J.C., Boatwright, J.S., Maurin, O., Maclean, N., Schaefer, H., Kuzmina, M. & Van der Bank, M. 2013. Molecular and morphological analysis of subfamily Alooideae (Asphodelaceae) and the inclusion of Chortolirion in Aloe. Taxon 62: 62 – 76.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDavis, S.D., Heywood, V.H. & Hamilton, A.C. (eds.) 1994. Centres of plant diversity: A guide and strategy for their conservation, vol. 1, Europe, Africa, South-west Asia and The Middle East. Cambridge, U.K.: WWF and IUCN.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDenis, M. 1921. Les Euphorbiées des Iles Australes d’Afrique. Nemours, France: Imprimerie Nemourienne. http://dx.doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.36553
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDorsey, B.L., Haevermans, T., Aubriot, X. Morawetz, J.J., Riina, R., Steinmann, V.W. & Berry, P.E. 2013. Phylogenetics, morphological evolution, and classification of Euphorbia subgenus Euphorbia. Taxon 62: 291 – 315. http://dx.doi.org/10.12705/622.!
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEsser, H.-J., Berry, P.E. & Riina, R. 2009. EuphORBia: A global inventory of the spurges. Blumea 54: 11 – 12. http://dx.doi.org/10.3767/000651909X474023
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHässler, A. 1931. Verwandtschaflichte Gliederung der afrikanischen Euphorbien aus der Sektionen Trichadenia Pax und Rhizanthium Boiss. Bot. Not. 1931: 317 – 338.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHendey, Q.B. 1981. Geological succession at Langebaanweg, Cape Province and global events of the late Tertiary. S. African J. Sci. 77: 33 – 38.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHolmes, S. Carter. 1993. Euphorbia. Pp. 323 – 337 in: Thulin, M. (ed.). Flora of Somalia, vol. 1. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHorn, J.W., Van Ee, B.W., Morawetz, J.J., Riina, R., Steinmann, V.W., Berry, P.E. & Wurdack, K.J. 2012. Phylogenetics and the evolution of major structural characters in the giant genus Euphorbia L. (Euphorbiaceae). Molec. Phylogen. Evol. 63: 305 – 326. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2011.12.022
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHuelsenbeck, J.P. & Ronquist, F. 2001. MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17: 754 – 755. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/17.8.754
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJürgens, N. 1991. A new approach to the Namib Region I, Phytogeo-graphic subdivision. Vegetatio 97: 21 – 38.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJürgens, N. 1997. Floristic biodiversity and history of African arid regions. Biodivers. & Conservation 6: 495 – 514. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1018325026863
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKatoh, K., Kuma, K.-I., Toh, H. & Miyata, T. 2005. MAFFT version 5: Improvement in accuracy of multiple sequence alignment. Nucl. Acids Res. 33: 511 – 518. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gki198
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKlak, C., Reeves, G. & Hedderson, T.A.J. 2004. Unmatched tempo of evolution in southern African semi-desert ice plants. Nature 427: 63 – 65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature02243
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKoutnik, D.L. 1984. A brief taxonomy of the Euphorbia clava-loricata complex (Treisia). Euphorbia J. 2: 38 – 50.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLeach, L.C. 1983. A new Euphorbia from South West Africa. J. S. African Bot. 49: 189 – 192.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLeach, L.C. 1984. A new Euphorbia from South Africa. J. S. African Bot. 50: 341 – 345.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLeandri, J. 1957. Euphorbia mandravioky, nom. nov. et un nom nouveau pour une sous-section du genre Euphorbe. Bull. Soc. Bot. France 104: 499 – 501.
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.