View Item 

Show simple item record

Access and closure management of large bore femoral arterial access
dc.contributor.authorKaki, Amir
dc.contributor.authorBlank, Nimrod
dc.contributor.authorAlraies, M. Chadi
dc.contributor.authorKajy, Marvin
dc.contributor.authorGrines, Cindy L.
dc.contributor.authorHasan, Reema
dc.contributor.authorHtun, Wah Wah
dc.contributor.authorGlazier, James
dc.contributor.authorMohamad, Tamam
dc.contributor.authorElder, Mahir
dc.contributor.authorSchreiber, Theodore
dc.date.accessioned2019-01-15T20:31:34Z
dc.date.available2020-02-03T20:18:24Zen
dc.date.issued2018-12
dc.identifier.citationKaki, Amir; Blank, Nimrod; Alraies, M. Chadi; Kajy, Marvin; Grines, Cindy L.; Hasan, Reema; Htun, Wah Wah; Glazier, James; Mohamad, Tamam; Elder, Mahir; Schreiber, Theodore (2018). "Access and closure management of large bore femoral arterial access." Journal of Interventional Cardiology 31(6): 969-977.
dc.identifier.issn0896-4327
dc.identifier.issn1540-8183
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/147180
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.publisherInforma Healthcare
dc.subject.otherstructural heart disease
dc.subject.otherinterventional devices
dc.subject.otherfemoral closure devices
dc.subject.othercoronary artery disease
dc.subject.othercomplex coronary intervention
dc.subject.otherlarge femoral access
dc.titleAccess and closure management of large bore femoral arterial access
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelInternal Medicine and Specialties
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/147180/1/joic12571.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/147180/2/joic12571_am.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/joic.12571
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Interventional Cardiology
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKurra V, Schoenhagen P, Roselli EE, et al. Prevalence of significant peripheral artery disease in patients evaluated for percutaneous aortic valve insertion: preprocedural assessment with multidetector computed tomography. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009; 137: 1258 – 1264.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSamal AK, White CJ. Percutaneous management of access site complications. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2002; 57: 12 – 23.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSanghvi K, Kurian D, Coppola J. Transradial intervention of iliac and superficial femoral artery disease is feasible. J Interv Cardiol. 2008; 21: 385 – 387.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKiemeneij F, Laarman GJ, Odekerken D, Slagboom T, van der Wieken R. A randomized comparison of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty by the radial, brachial and femoral approaches: the access study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997; 29: 1269 – 1275.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWalther T, Simon P, Dewey T, et al. Transapical minimally invasive aortic valve implantation. Circulation. 2007; 116: I‐240 – I‐245.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCoburn MA. A Perspective on Sheath Selection and Access Sites for Coronary Angiography. In. Cath Lab Digest. Vol 18: HMP Cardiovascular; Sep. 2010.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHtyte N, White CJ. Vascular access for percutaneous interventions and angiography. In: Mukherjee D, Bates ER, Roffi M, Moliterno DJ, eds. Cardiovascular Catheterization and Intervention: A Textbook of Coronary, Peripheral, and Structural Heart Disease. 1st ed. London: Informa Healthcare; 2010.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBauernschmitt R, Schreiber C, Bleiziffer S, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation through the ascending aorta: an alternative option for no‐access patients. Paper presented at: The heart surgery forum, 2009.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGreenbaum AB, O’Neill WW, Paone G, et al. Caval‐aortic access to allow transcatheter aortic valve replacement in otherwise ineligible patients: initial human experience. J Am College Cardiol. 2014; 63: 2795 – 2804.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAbu‐Fadel MS, Sparling JM, Zacharias SJ, et al. Fluoroscopy vs traditional guided femoral arterial access and the use of closure devices: a randomized controlled trial. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2009; 74: 533 – 539.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFitts J, Ver Lee P, Hofmaster P, Malenka D. Fluoroscopy‐guided femoral artery puncture reduces the risk of PCI‐related vascular complications. J Interv Cardiol. 2008; 21: 273 – 278.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSeto AH, Abu‐Fadel MS, Sparling JM, et al. Real‐time ultrasound guidance facilitates femoral arterial access and reduces vascular complications: fAUST (Femoral Arterial Access With Ultrasound Trial). JACC. 2010; 3: 751 – 758.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHind D, Calvert N, McWilliams R, et al. Ultrasonic locating devices for central venous cannulation: meta‐analysis. BMJ. 2003; 327: 361.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRamlawi B, Anaya‐Ayala JE, Reardon MJ. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR): access planning and strategies. Methodist DeBakey Cardiovasc J. 2012; 8: 22 – 25.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMartin JL, Pratsos A, Magargee E, et al. A randomized trial comparing compression, perclose proglide™ and Angio‐Seal VIP™ for arterial closure following percutaneous coronary intervention: the cap trial. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2008; 71: 1 – 5.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDosluoglu HH, Cherr GS, Harris LM, Dryjski ML. Total percutaneous endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms using Perclose ProGlide closure devices. J Endovasc Ther. 2007; 14: 184 – 188.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLukasiewicz A. Treatment of acute lower limb ischaemia. Vasa. 2016; 45: 213 – 221.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceToggweiler S. Percutaneous aortic valve replacement: vascular outcomes with a fully percutaneous procedure.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDurand E, Borz B, Godin M, et al. Transfemoral aortic valve replacement with the Edwards SAPIEN and Edwards SAPIEN XT prosthesis using exclusively local anesthesia and fluoroscopic guidance: feasibility and 30‐day outcomes. JACC. 2012; 5: 461 – 467.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAbdul‐Jawad Altisent O, Durand E, Muñoz‐García AJ, et al. Warfarin and antiplatelet therapy versus warfarin alone for treating patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016; 9: 1706 – 1717.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceResnic FS, Wang TY, Arora N, et al. Quantifying the learning curve in the use of a novel vascular closure device: an analysis of the NCDR (National Cardiovascular Data Registry) CathPCI registry. JACC. 2012; 5: 82 – 89.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVan Mieghem NM, Latib A, van der Heyden J, et al. Percutaneous plug‐based arteriotomy closure device for large‐bore access: a multicenter prospective study. JACC. 2017; 10: 613 – 619.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLata K, Htun WW, Grines C, Kaki A, Schreiber T. Pre‐close technique of percutaneous closure for delayed hemostasis of large‐bore femoral sheaths. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016; 87: S165.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSherev DA, Shaw RE, Brent BN. Angiographic predictors of femoral access site complications: implication for planned percutaneous coronary intervention.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHamraoui K, Ernst SM, van Dessel PF, et al. Efficacy and safety of percutaneous treatment of iatrogenic femoral artery pseudoaneurysm by biodegradable collagen injection. J Am College Cardiol. 2002; 39: 1297 – 1304.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHessel SJ, Adams DF, Abrams HL. Complications of angiography. Radiology. 1981; 138: 273 – 281.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAltin R, Flicker S, Naidech H. Pseudoaneurysm and arteriovenous fistula after femoral artery catheterization: association with low femoral punctures. Am J Roentgenol. 1989; 152: 629 – 631.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAhmad F, Turner S, Torrie P, Gibson M. Iatrogenic femoral artery pseudoaneurysms—a review of current methods of diagnosis and treatment. Clin Radiol. 2008; 63: 1310 – 1316.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMorgan R, Belli A‐M. Current treatment methods for postcatheterization pseudoaneurysms. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2003; 14: 697 – 710.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLee MS, Applegate B, Rao SV, Kirtane AJ, Seto A, Stone GW. Minimizing femoral artery access complications during percutaneous coronary intervention: a comprehensive review. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014; 84: 62 – 69.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePitta SR, Prasad A, Kumar G, Lennon R, Rihal CS, Holmes DR. Location of femoral artery access and correlation with vascular complications. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2011; 78: 294 – 299.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRadner S. An attempt at the roentgenologic visualization of coronary blood vessels in man. Acta Radiologica. 1945; 26: 497 – 502.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRadner S. Thoracal aortography by catheterization from the radlal artery. Acta Radiologica. 1948; 29: 178 – 180.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrodén B, Jönsson G, Karnell J. Thoracic aortography: observations on technical problems connected with the method and various risks involved in its use. Acta Radiologica. 1949: 498 – 508.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWebb JG, Chandavimol M, Thompson CR, et al. Percutaneous aortic valve implantation retrograde from the femoral artery. Circulation. 2006; 113: 842 – 850.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHowell M, Villareal R, Krajcer Z. Percutaneous access and closure of femoral artery access sites associated with endoluminal repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Endovasc Ther. 2001; 8: 68 – 74.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRedfors B, Watson BM, McAndrew T, et al. Mortality, length of stay, and cost implications of procedural bleeding after percutaneous interventions using large‐bore catheters. JAMA Cardiol. 2017; 2: 798 – 802.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHarold JG, Bass TA, Bashore TM, et al. ACCF/AHA/SCAI 2013 update of the clinical competence statement on coronary artery interventional procedures. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013; 82: 2.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLevine GN, Bates ER, Blankenship JC, et al. ACC/AHA/SCAI focused update on primary percutaneous coronary intervention for patients with ST‐elevation myocardial infarction: an update of the 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI guideline for percutaneous coronary intervention and the 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST‐elevation myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2015; CIR.0000000000000336.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceArchbold RA, Robinson NM, Schilling RJ. Radial artery access for coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention. BMJ. 2004; 329: 443.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceO’neill WW, Kleiman NS, Moses J, et al. A prospective randomized clinical trial of hemodynamic support with impella 2.5 TM versus intra‐aortic balloon pump in patients undergoing high‐risk percutaneous coronary intervention: the PROTECT II study. Circulation. 2012; CIRCULATIONAHA. 112.098194.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWerdan K, Gielen S, Ebelt H, Hochman JS. Mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock. Eur Heart J. 2013; 35: 156 – 167.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePedersen OM, Aslaksen A, Vik‐Mo H. Ultrasound measurement of the luminal diameter of the abdominal aorta and iliac arteries in patients without vascular disease. J Vasc Surg. 1993; 17: 596 – 601.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePearce WH, Slaughter MS, LeMaire S, et al. Aortic diameter as a function of age, gender, and body surface area. Surgery. 1993; 114: 691 – 697.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGerhard‐Herman MD, Gornik HL, Barrett C, et al. 2016 AHA/ACC guideline on the management of patients with lower extremity peripheral artery disease: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2017; 135: e686 – e725.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMontalescot G, Sechtem U, Achenbach S, et al. 2013 ESC guidelines on the management of stable coronary artery disease: the task force on the management of stable coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J. 2013; 34: 2949 – 3003.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJudkins MP, Gander MP. Prevention of complications of coronary arteriography. Circulation. 1974; 49: 599 – 602.
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
joic12571.pdf
Size:
2.138MB
Format:
PDF
View/Open
Name:
joic12571_am.pdf
Size:
963.4KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.