Show simple item record

Global CO2 Initiative Complete Mineralization Study 2018

dc.contributor.authorMcCord, Stephen
dc.contributor.authorVilla Zaragoza, Ana
dc.contributor.authorSanderson, Peter
dc.contributor.authorArmstrong, Katy
dc.contributor.authorStyring, Peter
dc.contributor.authorHills, Colin
dc.contributor.authorCarey, Paula
dc.contributor.authorOsbourne, Mark
dc.contributor.authorMüller, Leonard
dc.contributor.authorBardow, André
dc.date.accessioned2019-02-04T15:05:16Z
dc.date.available2019-02-04T15:05:16Z
dc.date.issued2019-02-04
dc.identifier.isbn978-1-9164636-3-6
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/147467
dc.description.abstractThis document contains worked examples of how to apply the accompanying “Guideline for Techno-Economic Assessment of CO2 Utilization” and “Guideline for Life Cycle Assessment of CO2 Utilization”. The Guidelines can be downloaded via http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/145436. These worked examples are not intended to be a definitive TEA or LCA report on the process described, but are provided as supporting material to show how the TEA and LCA methodologies described in the guidelines can be specifically applied to tackle the issues surrounding CO2 utilization. This document contains worked examples of how to apply the accompanying “Guideline for Techno- Economic Assessment of CO2 Utilization” and “Guideline for Life Cycle Assessment of CO2 Utilization”, hereafter referred to as "the TEA and LCA guidelines". These worked examples are not intended to be a definitive TEA or LCA report on the process described, but are provided as supporting material to show how the TEA and LCA methodologies described in the guidelines can be specifically applied to tackle the issues surrounding CO2 utilization. This example was constructed using data collected from a demonstration plant operated by Carbon8 Systems in Ontario, Canada, together with data obtained from the literature and from the ecoinvent database v3.4. As with the methanol worked example, the aim is not to prove whether the selected process is economically or environmentally viable or to make process alterations to make it so, but to clearly demonstrate how the proposed guidelines can be used to conduct a transparent TEA and LCA which can then be followed by others. The TEA example is provided in Part B, followed by the LCA example in Part C. In Part D, the reader will find a short example of how a TEA and LCA can be integrated. This integration is not an exhaustive example. As many aspects can be analyzed to produce combined indicators and many approaches to multi-criteria decision making applied. However, it is included here to provide a starting point and initial example of how integration can be carried out.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipCO2 Sciences, Inc.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipEIT Climate-KICen_US
dc.description.sponsorship3Men_US
dc.description.sponsorshipCO2 Value Europeen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipEmissions Reduction Albertaen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe Grantham Foundationen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipRichard King Mellon Foundationen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe Cynthia&George Mitchell Foundationen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNICE Americaen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipPraxairen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNRG Cosia Carbon XPrizeen_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherCO2 Chem Media and Publishing Ltd.en_US
dc.subjectCO2 Utilizationen_US
dc.subjectCCUen_US
dc.subjectCarbon Capture and Useen_US
dc.subjectTechno-Economic Assessmenten_US
dc.subjectLife-Cycle Assessmenten_US
dc.subjectGlobal CO2 Initiativeen_US
dc.subjectLCAen_US
dc.subjectTEAen_US
dc.subjectStandardizing LCA/TEAen_US
dc.titleGlobal CO2 Initiative Complete Mineralization Study 2018en_US
dc.typeTechnical Reporten_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumMechanical Engineeringen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherThe University of Sheffielden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherThe University of Sheffielden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherThe University of Sheffielden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherThe University of Sheffielden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherThe University of Sheffielden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherCarbon8Systemsen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherCarbon8Systemsen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherCarbon8Systemsen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherRWTH Aachenen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherRWTH Aachenen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/147467/3/Global CO2 Initiative Complete Mineralization Study 2018.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.3998/2027.42/147467
dc.description.mapping27en_US
dc.owningcollnameGlobal CO2 Initiative


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.