View Item 

Show simple item record

Metaâ analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing clinical and patientâ reported outcomes between extraâ short (â ¤6 mm) and longer (â ¥10 mm) implants
dc.contributor.authorRavidà, Andrea
dc.contributor.authorWang, I‐ching
dc.contributor.authorBarootchi, Shayan
dc.contributor.authorAskar, Houssam
dc.contributor.authorTavelli, Lorenzo
dc.contributor.authorGargallo‐albiol, Jordi
dc.contributor.authorWang, Hom‐lay
dc.date.accessioned2019-02-12T20:22:45Z
dc.date.available2020-03-03T21:29:35Zen
dc.date.issued2019-01
dc.identifier.citationRavidà, Andrea ; Wang, I‐ching ; Barootchi, Shayan; Askar, Houssam; Tavelli, Lorenzo; Gargallo‐albiol, Jordi ; Wang, Hom‐lay (2019). "Metaâ analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing clinical and patientâ reported outcomes between extraâ short (â ¤6 mm) and longer (â ¥10 mm) implants." Journal of Clinical Periodontology (1): 118-142.
dc.identifier.issn0303-6979
dc.identifier.issn1600-051X
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/147756
dc.description.abstractAimTo compare the clinical outcomes of â ¤6 mm extraâ short implants (test group) versus â ¥10 mm long implants (control group), with and without bone augmentation procedures.Materials and MethodsA systemic literature search of randomized clinical trials was performed using the PubMed (MEDLINE) and EMBASE databases. A quantitative metaâ analysis was conducted to compare all the outcome variables. Metaâ regression analysis determined the effect of bone augmentation procedures and the influence of other clinical covariates on the results.ResultsEighteen studies comprising 1,612 implants (793 extraâ short and 820 long implants) were selected for the metaâ analysis. No statistically significant difference in the survival rate was observed at 1 and 3 years (p > 0.05). Extraâ short implants displayed less marginal bone loss (MBL) from both implant placement time points (1 and 3 years) and prosthetic placement (1 year), as well as less biological complications, surgical time and treatment cost (p < 0.05). Contrarily, a statistically significant small number of prosthetic complications were reported with long implants (p < 0.05).ConclusionsPlacement of extraâ short implants (â ¤6 mm) presented as an equivalent option in the treatment of patients with an atrophic posterior arch up to 3â year followâ up. However, the longâ term effectiveness of extraâ short dental implants remains to be further studied.
dc.publisherQuintessence Publishing
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.subject.otherdental implant
dc.subject.othershort implant
dc.subject.otheratrophic maxilla
dc.subject.othermetaâ analysis
dc.titleMetaâ analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing clinical and patientâ reported outcomes between extraâ short (â ¤6 mm) and longer (â ¥10 mm) implants
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelDentistry
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/147756/1/jcpe13026_am.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/147756/2/jcpe13026.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jcpe.13026
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Clinical Periodontology
dc.identifier.citedreferencePohl, V., Thoma, D. S., Sporniakâ Tutak, K., Garciaâ Garcia, A., Taylor, T. D., Haas, R., & Hammerle, C. H. ( 2017 ). Short dental implants (6 mm) versus long dental implants (11â 15 mm) in combination with sinus floor elevation procedures: 3â year results from a multicentre, randomized, controlled clinical trial. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 44, 438 â 445. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12694
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGosau, M., Rink, D., Driemel, O., & Draenert, F. G. ( 2009 ). Maxillary sinus anatomy: A cadaveric study with clinical implications. Anatomical Record (Hoboken), 292, 352 â 354. https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.20859
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNisand, D., Picard, N., & Rocchietta, I. ( 2015 ). Short implants compared to implants in vertically augmented bone: A systematic review. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 26 ( Suppl 11 ), 170 â 179. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12632
dc.identifier.citedreferencePietrabissa, R., Gionso, L., Quaglini, V., Di Martino, E., & Simion, M. ( 2000 ). An in vitro study on compensation of mismatch of screw versus cementâ retained implant supported fixed prostheses. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 11, 448 â 457. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.011005448.x
dc.identifier.citedreferencePistilli, R., Felice, P., Cannizzaro, G., Piatelli, M., Corvino, V., Barausse, C., â ¦ Esposito, M. ( 2013 ). Posterior atrophic jaws rehabilitated with prostheses supported by 6 mm long 4 mm wide implants or by longer implants in augmented bone. Oneâ year postâ loading results from a pilot randomised controlled trial. European Journal of Oral Implantology, 6, 359 â 372.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePistilli, R., Felice, P., Piattelli, M., Gessaroli, M., Soardi, E., Barausse, C., â ¦ Corvino, V. ( 2013 ). Posterior atrophic jaws rehabilitated with prostheses supported by 5 x 5 mm implants with a novel nanostructured calciumâ incorporated titanium surface or by longer implants in augmented bone. Oneâ year results from a randomised controlled trial. European Journal of Oral Implantology, 6, 343 â 357.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStone, P. W. ( 2002 ). Popping the (PICO) question in research and evidenceâ based practice. Applied Nursing Research, 15, 197 â 198. https://doi.org/10.1053/apnr.2002.34181
dc.identifier.citedreferenceReinert, S., König, S., Bremerich, A., Eufinger, H., & Krimmel, M. ( 2003 ). Stability of bone grafting and placement of implants in the severely atrophic maxilla. British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 41, 249 â 255. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-4356(03)00078-0
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRomeo, E., Storelli, S., Casano, G., Scanferla, M., & Botticelli, D. ( 2014 ). Sixâ mm versus 10â mm long implants in the rehabilitation of posterior edentulous jaws: A 5â year followâ up of a randomised controlled trial. European Journal of Oral Implantology, 7, 371 â 381.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRossi, F., Lang, N. P., Ricci, E., Ferraioli, L., Marchetti, C., & Botticelli, D. ( 2015 ). Early loading of 6â mmâ short implants with a moderately rough surface supporting single crownsâ a prospective 5â year cohort study. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 26, 471 â 477. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12409
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRossi, F., Botticelli, D., Cesaretti, G., De Santis, E., Storelli, S., & Lang, N. P. ( 2016 ). Use of short implants (6 mm) in a singleâ tooth replacement: A 5â year followâ up prospective randomized controlled multicenter clinical study. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 27, 458 â 464. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12564
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRossi, F., Lang, N. P., Ricci, E., Ferraioli, L., Marchetti, C., & Botticelli, D. ( 2017 ). 6â mmâ long implants loaded with fiberâ reinforced composite resinâ bonded fixed prostheses (FRCRBFDPs). A 5â year prospective study. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 28, 1478 â 1483. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13015
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSahrmann, P., Naenni, N., Jung, R. E., Held, U., Truninger, T., Hammerle, C. H., â ¦ Schmidlin, P. R. ( 2016 ). Success of 6â mm implants with singleâ tooth restorations: A 3â year randomized controlled clinical trial. Journal of Dental Research, 95, 623 â 628. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034516633432
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSahrmann, P., Schoen, P., Naenni, N., Jung, R., Attin, T., & Schmidlin, P. R. ( 2017 ). Periâ implant bone density around implants of different lengths: A 3â year followâ up of a randomized clinical trial. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 44, 762 â 768. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12737
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSargozaie, N., Moeintaghavi, A., & Shojaie, H. ( 2017 ). Comparing the quality of life of patients requesting dental implants before and after implant [WWW document]. Retrieved from http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/29114333, http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5646019?pdf=render; http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5646019; https://doi.org/10.2174/1874210601711010485 (Accessed on 2017)
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSbordone, L., Toti, P., Menchiniâ Fabris, G., Sbordone, C., & Guidetti, F. ( 2009 ). Implant survival in maxillary and mandibular osseous onlay grafts and native bone: A 3â year clinical and computerized tomographic followâ up. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants, 24, 695 â 703.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchincaglia, G. P., Thoma, D. S., Haas, R., Tutak, M., Garcia, A., Taylor, T. D., & Hammerle, C. H. ( 2015 ). Randomized controlled multicenter study comparing short dental implants (6 mm) versus longer dental implants (11â 15 mm) in combination with sinus floor elevation procedures. Part 2: Clinical and radiographic outcomes at 1 year of loading. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 42, 1042 â 1051. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12465
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShea, B. J., Hamel, C., Wells, G. A., Bouter, L. M., Kristjansson, E., Grimshaw, J., â ¦ Boers, M. ( 2009 ). AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 62, 1013 â 1020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.10.009
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSlotte, C., Gronningsaeter, A., Halmoy, A. M., Ohrnell, L. O., Mordenfeld, A., Isaksson, S., & Johansson, L. A. ( 2015 ). Fourâ Millimeterâ Long Posteriorâ Mandible Implants: 5â Year Outcomes of a Prospective Multicenter Study. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, 17 ( Suppl 2 ), e385 â e395. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12252
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSrinivasan, M., Vazquez, L., Rieder, P., Moraguez, O., Bernard, J. P., & Belser, U. C. ( 2012 ). Efficacy and predictability of short dental implants (<8 mm): A critical appraisal of the recent literature. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants, 27, 1429 â 1437.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSuarez, F., Chan, H. L., Monje, A., Galindoâ Moreno, P., & Wang, H. L. ( 2013 ). Effect of the timing of restoration on implant marginal bone loss: A systematic review. Journal of Periodontology, 84, 159 â 169. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2012.120099
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSun, H. L., Huang, C., Wu, Y. R., & Shi, B. ( 2011 ). Failure rates of short (</= 10 mm) dental implants and factors influencing their failure: A systematic review. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants, 26, 816 â 825.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSweeting, M.J., Sutton, A.J., & Lambert, P.C. ( 2004 ). What to add to nothing? Use and avoidance of continuity corrections in metaâ analysis of sparse data. Statistics in Medicine, 23 ( 9 ),: 1351 â 1375. https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0258
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTelleman, G., Raghoebar, G. M., Vissink, A., den Hartog, L., Huddleston Slater, J. J., & Meijer, H. J. ( 2011 ). A systematic review of the prognosis of short (<10 mm) dental implants placed in the partially edentulous patient. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 38, 667 â 676. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2011.01736.x
dc.identifier.citedreferenceThoma, D. S., Haas, R., Tutak, M., Garcia, A., Schincaglia, G. P., & Hammerle, C. H. ( 2015 ). Randomized controlled multicentre study comparing short dental implants (6 mm) versus longer dental implants (11â 15 mm) in combination with sinus floor elevation procedures. Part 1: Demographics and patientâ reported outcomes at 1 year of loading. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 42, 72 â 80. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12323
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTong, Q., Zhang, X., & Yu, L. ( 2017 ). Metaâ analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing clinical outcomes between short implants and long implants with bone augmentation procedure. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants, 32, e25 â e34. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.4793
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWilson, T. G. Jr ( 2009 ). The positive relationship between excess cement and periâ implant disease: A prospective clinical endoscopic study. Journal of Periodontology, 80, 1388 â 1392. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2009.090115
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAbrahamsson, I., Berglundh, T., & Lindhe, J. ( 1997 ). The mucosal barrier following abutment dis/reconnection. An experimental study in dogs. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 24, 568 â 572. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1997.tb00230.x
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAlbrektsson, T, Isidor, F, ( 1994 ). Consensus report of session IV. In: Lang NP, Karring T editors. Proceedings of the 1st European Workshop on Periodontology. London (UK): Quintessence Publishing. p. 365 â 369.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAlâ Hashedi, A. A., Taiyeb Ali, T. B., & Yunus, N. ( 2014 ). Short dental implants: An emerging concept in implant treatment. Quintessence International, 45, 499 â 514. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.qi.a31539
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAlqutaibi, A. Y., & Altaib, F. ( 2016 ). Short dental implant is considered as a reliable treatment option for patients with atrophic posterior maxilla. Journal of Evidenceâ Based Dental Practice, 16, 173 â 175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebdp.2016.07.003
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAnnibali, S., Cristalli, M. P., Dell’Aquila, D., Bignozzi, I., La Monaca, G., & Pilloni, A. ( 2012 ). Short dental implants: A systematic review. Journal of Dental Research, 91, 25 â 32. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034511425675
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAtieh, M. A., Zadeh, H., Stanford, C. M., & Cooper, L. F. ( 2012 ). Survival of short dental implants for treatment of posterior partial edentulism: A systematic review. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants, 27, 1323 â 1331.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBaker, W. L., White, C. M., Cappelleri, J. C., Kluger, J., Coleman, C. I., Health Outcomes, P., & Economics Collaborative, G. ( 2009 ). Understanding heterogeneity in metaâ analysis: The role of metaâ regression. International Journal of Clinical Practice, 63, 1426 â 1434. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-1241.2009.02168.x
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBechara, S., Kubilius, R., Veronesi, G., Pires, J. T., Shibli, J. A., & Mangano, F. G. ( 2017 ). Short (6â mm) dental implants versus sinus floor elevation and placement of longer (>/=10â mm) dental implants: A randomized controlled trial with a 3â year followâ up. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 28, 1097 â 1107. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12923
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBidez, MW & Misch, CE ( 2008 ). Clinical biomechanics in implant dentistry. In: Misch CE (ed). Contemporary Implant Dentistry, ed 3. St.Louis: Mosby, 2008, pp 543 â 555.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBolle, C., Felice, P., Barausse, C., Pistilli, V., Trullenqueâ Eriksson, A., & Esposito, M. ( 2018 ). 4 mm long vs longer implants in augmented bone in posterior atrophic jaws: 1â year postâ loading results from a multicentre randomised controlled trial. European Journal of Oral Implantology, 11, 31 â 47.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBoyne, P. J. ( 1980 ). Grafting of the maxillary sinus floor with autogenous marrow and bone. The Journal of Oral Surgery, 38, 613 â 616.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCampsâ Font, O., Burguenoâ Barris, G., Figueiredo, R., Jung, R. E., Gayâ Escoda, C., & Valmasedaâ Castellon, E. ( 2016 ). Interventions for dental implant placement in atrophic edentulous mandibles: vertical bone augmentation and alternative treatments. A metaâ analysis of randomized clinical trials. Journal of Periodontology, 87, 1444 â 1457. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2016.160226
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCannizzaro, G., Felice, P., Buti, J., Leone, M., Ferri, V., & Esposito, M. ( 2015 ). Immediate loading of fixed crossâ arch prostheses supported by flaplessâ placed supershort or long implants: 1â year results from a randomised controlled trial. European Journal of Oral Implantology, 8, 27 â 36.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChan, H. L., Brooks, S. L., Fu, J. H., Yeh, C. Y., Rudek, I., & Wang, H. L. ( 2011 ). Crossâ sectional analysis of the mandibular lingual concavity using cone beam computed tomography. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 22, 201 â 206. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02018.x
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChappuis, V., Araújo, M. G., & Buser, D. ( 2017 ). Clinical relevance of dimensional bone and soft tissue alterations postâ extraction in esthetic sites. Periodontology 2000 73, 73 â 83. https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12167
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCucchi, A., & Ghensi, P. ( 2014 ). Vertical guided bone regeneration using titaniumâ reinforced dâ PTFE membrane and prehydrated corticocancellous bone graft. The Open Dentistry Journal, 8, 194 â 200. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874210601408010194
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEsposito, M., Grusovin, M. G., Willings, M., Coulthard, P., & Worthington, H. V. ( 2007 ). The effectiveness of immediate, early, and conventional loading of dental implants: A Cochrane systematic review of randomized controlled clinical trials. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants, 22, 893 â 904.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEsposito, M., Pistilli, R., Barausse, C., & Felice, P. ( 2014 ). Threeâ year results from a randomised controlled trial comparing prostheses supported by 5â mm long implants or by longer implants in augmented bone in posterior atrophic edentulous jaws. European Journal of Oral Implantology, 7, 383 â 395.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFan, T., Li, Y., Deng, W. W., Wu, T., & Zhang, W. ( 2017 ). Short Implants (5 to 8 mm) Versus Longer Implants (>8 mm) with Sinus Lifting in Atrophic Posterior Maxilla: A Metaâ Analysis of RCTs. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, 19, 207 â 215. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12432
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFaucher, R. R., & Bryant, R. A. ( 1983 ). Bilateral fixed splints. The International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry, 3, 8 â 37.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFelice, P., Pistilli, R., Barausse, C., Bruno, V., Trullenqueâ Eriksson, A., & Esposito, M. ( 2015 ). Short implants as an alternative to crestal sinus lift: A 1â year multicentre randomised controlled trial. European Journal of Oral Implantology, 8, 375 â 384.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFelice, P., Barausse, C., Pistilli, V., Piattelli, M., Ippolito, D. R., & Esposito, M. ( 2018 ). Posterior atrophic jaws rehabilitated with prostheses supported by 6 mm long x 4 mm wide implants or by longer implants in augmented bone. 3â year postâ loading results from a randomised controlled trial. European Journal of Oral Implantology, 11, 175 â 187.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFontana, F., Maschera, E., Rocchietta, I., & Simion, M. ( 2011 ). Clinical classification of complications in guided bone regeneration procedures by means of a nonresorbable membrane. The International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry, 31, 265 â 273.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFriedrich, J. O., Adhikari, N. K., & Beyene, J. ( 2007 ). Inclusion of zero total event trials in metaâ analyses maintains analytic consistency and incorporates all available data. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 7, 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-7-5
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGastaldi, G., Felice, P., Pistilli, R., Barausse, C., Trullenqueâ Eriksson, A., & Esposito, M. ( 2017 ). Short implants as an alternative to crestal sinus lift: A 3â year multicentre randomised controlled trial. European Journal of Oral Implantology, 10, 391 â 400.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGaneles, J., Zollner, A., Jackowski, J., ten Bruggenkate, C., Beagle, J., & Guerra, F. ( 2008 ). Immediate and early loading of Straumann implants with a chemically modified surface (SLActive) in the posterior mandible and maxilla: 1â year results from a prospective multicenter study. Clin Oral Implants Res, 19, 1119 â 1128. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01626.x.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGastaldi, G., Felice, P., Pistilli, V., Barausse, C., Ippolito, D. R., & Esposito, M. ( 2018 ). Posterior atrophic jaws rehabilitated with prostheses supported by 5 x 5 mm implants with a nanostructured calciumâ incorporated titanium surface or by longer implants in augmented bone. 3â year results from a randomised controlled trial. European Journal of Oral Implantology, 11, 49 â 61.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGuichet, D. L., Caputo, A. A., Choi, H., & Sorensen, J. A. ( 2000 ). Passivity of fit and marginal opening in screwâ or cementâ retained implant fixed partial denture designs. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants, 15, 239 â 246.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGulje, F., Abrahamsson, I., Chen, S., Stanford, C., Zadeh, H., & Palmer, R. ( 2013 ). Implants of 6 mm vs. 11 mm lengths in the posterior maxilla and mandible: A 1â year multicenter randomized controlled trial. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 24, 1325 â 1331. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12001
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHelmy, M. H. E., Alqutaibi, A. Y., Elâ Ella, A. A., & Shawky, A. F. ( 2017 ). Effect of implant loading protocols on failure and marginal bone loss with unsplinted twoâ implantâ supported mandibular overdentures: Systematic review and metaâ analysis. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 47, 642 â 650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2017.10.018
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHiggins, J. P. T., Thompson, S. G., Deeks, J. J., & Altman, D. G. ( 2003 ). Measuring inconsistency in metaâ analyses. BMJ, 327 ( 7414 ), 557 â 560. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHiggins, J. P., Altman, D. G., Gotzsche, P. C., Juni, P., Moher, D., Oxman, A. D., â ¦ Cochrane Statistical Methods Group ( 2011 ). The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 343, d5928. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d5928
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHiggins, J. P.T., & Green, S. ( 2011 ). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews ofInterventions Version 5.1.0. London: The Cochrane Collaboration. www.cochrane-handbook.org.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHiggins, J. P., Lane, P. W., Anagnostelis, B., Anzuresâ Cabrera, J., Baker, N. F., Cappelleri, J. C., â ¦ Whitehead, A. ( 2013 ). A tool to assess the quality of a metaâ analysis. Research Synthesis Methods, 4 ( 4 ), 351 â 366. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1092
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHingsammer, L., Watzek, G., & Pommer, B. ( 2017 ). The influence of crownâ toâ implant ratio on marginal bone levels around splinted short dental implants: A radiological and clincial short term analysis. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, 19, 1090 â 1098. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12546
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKhouly, I., & Veitzâ Keenan, A. ( 2015 ). Insufficient evidence for sinus lifts over short implants for dental implant rehabilitation. Evidence Based Dental, 16, 21 â 22. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ebd.6401081
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKwon, T., Bain, P. A., & Levin, L. ( 2014 ). Systematic review of shortâ (5â 10 years) and longâ term (10 years or more) survival and success of fullâ arch fixed dental hybrid prostheses and supporting implants. Journal of Dentistry, 42, 1228 â 1241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2014.05.016
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLee, S. A., Lee, C. T., Fu, M. M., Elmisalati, W., & Chuang, S. K. ( 2014 ). Systematic review and metaâ analysis of randomized controlled trials for the management of limited vertical height in the posterior region: Short implants (5 to 8 mm) vs longer implants (> 8 mm) in vertically augmented sites. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants, 29, 1085 â 1097. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.3504
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLemos, C. A., de Souza Batista, V. E., Almeida, D. A., Santiago Junior, J. F., Verri, F. R., & Pellizzer, E. P. ( 2016 ). Evaluation of cementâ retained versus screwâ retained implantâ supported restorations for marginal bone loss: A systematic review and metaâ analysis. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 115, 419 â 427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.08.026
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLemos, C. A., Ferroâ Alves, M. L., Okamoto, R., Mendonca, M. R., & Pellizzer, E. P. ( 2016 ). Short dental implants versus standard dental implants placed in the posterior jaws: A systematic review and metaâ analysis. Journal of Dentistry, 47, 8 â 17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2016.01.005
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMertens, C., Decker, C., Seeberger, R., Hoffmann, J., Sander, A., & Freier, K. ( 2013 ). Early bone resorption after vertical bone augmentationâ a comparison of calvarial and iliac grafts. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 24, 820 â 825. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02463.x
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMezzomo, L. A., Miller, R., Triches, D., Alonso, F., & Shinkai, R. S. ( 2014 ). Metaâ analysis of single crowns supported by short (<10 mm) implants in the posterior region. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 41, 191 â 213. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12180
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMisch, C. E. ( 2007 ). Contemporary implant dentistry ( 3rd ed., pp. 26 â 37 ). St.Louis, Missouri: Mosby Elsevier Health Sciences.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMoher, D, Liberati, A, Tetzlaff, J, Altman, DG, & PRISMA Group ( 2009 ). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and metaâ analyses: The PRISMA statement. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 62, 1006 â 1012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.005
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMonje, A., Fu, J. H., Chan, H. L., Suarez, F., Galindoâ Moreno, P., Catena, A., & Wang, H. L. ( 2013 ). Do implant length and width matter for short dental implants (<10 mm)? A metaâ analysis of prospective studies. Journal of Periodontology, 84, 1783 â 1791. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2013.120745
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNaenni, N., Sahrmann, P., Schmidlin, P. R., Attin, T., Wiedemeier, D. B., Sapata, V., â ¦ Jung, R. E. ( 2018 ). Fiveâ year survival of short singleâ tooth implants (6 mm): A randomized controlled clinical trial. Journal of Dental Research, 97, 887 â 892. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034518758036
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNeldam, C. A., & Pinholt, E. M. ( 2012 ). State of the art of short dental implants: A systematic review of the literature. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, 14, 622 â 632. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00303.x
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
jcpe13026_am.pdf
Size:
677.7KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open
Name:
jcpe13026.pdf
Size:
1.771MB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe its collections in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in them. We encourage you to Contact Us anonymously if you encounter harmful or problematic language in catalog records or finding aids. More information about our policies and practices is available at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.