View Item 

Show simple item record

Misaccounting for endogeneity: The peril of relying on the Heckman two‐step method without a valid instrument
dc.contributor.authorWolfolds, Sarah E.
dc.contributor.authorSiegel, Jordan
dc.date.accessioned2019-02-12T20:22:48Z
dc.date.available2020-05-01T18:03:25Zen
dc.date.issued2019-03
dc.identifier.citationWolfolds, Sarah E.; Siegel, Jordan (2019). "Misaccounting for endogeneity: The peril of relying on the Heckman two‐step method without a valid instrument." Strategic Management Journal 40(3): 432-462.
dc.identifier.issn0143-2095
dc.identifier.issn1097-0266
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/147758
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons, Ltd
dc.subject.otherselection bias
dc.subject.otherHeckman correction
dc.subject.otherentry mode
dc.subject.otherforeign investment
dc.subject.othertwo‐step estimator
dc.titleMisaccounting for endogeneity: The peril of relying on the Heckman two‐step method without a valid instrument
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelUrban Planning
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelBusiness (General)
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEconomics
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelFilm and Video Studies
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelManagement
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciences
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelBusiness and Economics
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelArts
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/147758/1/smj2995.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/147758/2/smj2995-sup-0001-AppendixS1.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/147758/3/smj2995_am.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/smj.2995
dc.identifier.sourceStrategic Management Journal
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSiegel, J. ( 2007 ). Contingent political capital and international alliances: Evidence from South Korea. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52 ( 4 ), 621 – 666.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStolzenberg, R., & Relles, D. ( 1997 ). Tools for intuition about sample selection bias and its correction. American Sociological Review, 62 ( 3 ), 494 – 507.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTucker, J. ( 2010 ). Selection bias and econometric remedies in accounting and finance research. Journal of Accounting Literature, 29, 31 – 57.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTukey, J. W. ( 1962 ). The future of data analysis. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 33, 1 – 67.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVan de Ven, W., & Van Praag, B. ( 1981 ). The demand for deductibles in private health insurance: A probit model with sample selection. Journal of Econometrics, 17 ( 2 ), 229 – 252.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMurray, M. ( 2006 ). Avoiding invalid instruments and coping with weak instruments. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20 ( 4 ), 111 – 132.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNelson, F. ( 1984 ). Efficiency of the two‐step estimator for models with endogenous sample selection. Journal of Econometrics, 24, 181 – 196.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOlsen, R. ( 1980 ). A least squares correction for selectivity bias. Econometrica, 48 ( 7 ), 1815 – 1820.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePuhani, P. ( 2000 ). The Heckman correction for sample selection and its critique. Journal of Economic Surveys, 14 ( 1 ), 53 – 68.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShaver, M. ( 1998 ). Accounting for Endogeneity when assessing strategy performance: Does entry mode choice affect FDI survival? Management Science, 44, 571 – 585.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSmith, J., & Todd, P. ( 2001 ). Reconciling conflicting evidence on the performance of propensity‐score matching methods. American Economic Review, 91 (2), 112 – 118.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZejan, M. C. ( 1990 ). New ventures or acquisitions: The choice of Swedish multinational enterprises. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 38 (3), 349 – 355.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWinship, C., & Mare, R. ( 1992 ). Models for sample selection bias. American Review of Sociology, 18, 327 – 350.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWagner, J. ( 1994 ). The post‐entry performance of new small firms in German manufacturing industries. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 42 (2), 141 – 154.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVerbeek, M. ( 2000 ). A guide to modern econometrics. West Sussex, England: John Wiley and Sons.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAckerberg, D., & Botticini, M. ( 2002 ). Endogeneous matching and the empirical determinants of contract form. Journal of Political Economy, 110 ( 3 ), 564 – 591.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAngrist, J., & Krueger, A. ( 2001 ). Instrumental variables and the search for identification: From supply to demand to natural experiments. Journal of Economics Perspectives, 2 ( 4 ), 69 – 85.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAntonakis, J., Bendahan, S., Jacquart, P., & Lalive, R. ( 2014 ). Causality and endogeneity: Problems and solutions. In D. V. Day (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of leadership and organizations (Vol. 1, pp. 93 – 117 ). Oxford, England: Oxford Library of Psychology.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBascle, G. ( 2008 ). Controlling for endogeneity with instrumental variables in strategic management. Strategic Organization, 6 ( 3 ), 285 – 327.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCaliendo, M. & Kopeinig, S. ( 2005 ). Some practice guidance for implementation of propensity score matching (IZA Discussion Paper No. 1588).
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCaves, R., & Mehra, S. ( 1986 ). Entry of foreign multinationals into US manufacturing industries. In M. E. Porter (Ed.), Competition in global industries (pp. 449 – 481 ). Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCerto, S., Busenbark, J., Woo, H., & Semadeni, M. ( 2016 ). Sample selection bias and Heckman models in strategic management research. Strategic Management Journal, 37 ( 13 ), 2639 – 2657.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChang, S., Kogut, B., & Yang, J. S. ( 2016 ). Global diversification discount and its discontents: A bit of self‐selection makes a world of difference. Strategic Management Journal, 37 ( 11 ), 2254 – 2274.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceClatworthy, M., Makepeace, G., & Peel, M. ( 2009 ). Selection bias and the big four premium: New evidence using Heckman and matching models. Accounting and Business Research, 39 ( 2 ), 139 – 166.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEberlein, E., & Keller, U. ( 1995 ). Hyperbolic distributions in finance. Bernoulli, 1 ( 3 ), 281 – 299.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGeary, R. ( 1947 ). Testing for normality. Biometrika, 34, 209 – 242.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGenius, M., & Strazzera, E. ( 2008 ). Applying the copula approach to sample selection modelling. Applied Economics, 40 ( 11 ), 1443 – 1455.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGreene, W. ( 2008 ). Econometric analysis ( 6th ed.). New York, NY: Pearson Prentice Hall.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHamilton, B., & Nickerson, J. ( 2003 ). Correcting for endogeneity in strategic management research. Strategic Organization, 1 ( 1 ), 57 – 78.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHartman, R. ( 1991 ). A Monte Carlo analysis of alternative estimators in models involving selectivity. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 9 ( 1 ), 41 – 49.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHeckman, J. ( 1978 ). Dummy endogenous variables in a simultaneous equation system. Econometrica, 46 ( 4 ), 931 – 959.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHeckman, J. ( 1979 ). Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica, 47 ( 1 ), 153 – 161.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHennart, J. F., & Park, Y. R. ( 1993 ). Greenfield vs. acquisition: The strategy of Japanese investors in the United States. Management Science, 39 ( 9 ), 1054 – 1070.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHolland, P. W. ( 1986 ). Statistics and causal inference. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 81 ( 396 ), 945 – 960.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKenny, D. A. ( 1979 ). Correlation and causality. New York, NY: Wiley‐Interscience.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKogut, B., & Singh, H. ( 1988 ). The effect of national culture on the choice of entry mode. Journal of International Business Studies, 19 ( 3 ), 411 – 432.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLaLonde, R. ( 1986 ). Evaluating the econometric evaluations of training programs with experimental data. The American Economic Review, 76 ( 4 ), 604 – 620.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLarcker, D., & Rusticus, T. ( 2010 ). On the use of instrumental variables in accounting research. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 49, 86 – 205.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLee, L. ( 1983 ). Generalized econometric models with selectivity. Econometrica, 51 ( 2 ), 507 – 512.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLeung, S., & Yu, S. ( 1996 ). On the choice between sample selection and two‐part models. Journal of Econometrics, 72, 197 – 229.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLeuven, E., & Sianesi, B. ( 2003 ). PSMATCH2: Stata module to perform full mahalanobis and propensity score matching, common support graphing, and covariate imbalance testing. Software.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLittle, R. ( 1985 ). A note about models for selectivity bias. Econometrica, 53 ( 6 ), 1469 – 1474.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMicceri, T. ( 1989 ). The unicorn, the normal curve, and other improbable creatures. Psychological Bulletin, 105 ( 1 ), 156 – 166.
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
smj2995.pdf
Size:
7.176MB
Format:
PDF
View/Open
Name:
smj2995-sup-0001-AppendixS1.pdf
Size:
267.7KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open
Name:
smj2995_am.pdf
Size:
574.4KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.