View Item 

Show simple item record

CRTC1â MAML2 fusion in mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the breast
dc.contributor.authorBean, Gregory R
dc.contributor.authorKrings, Gregor
dc.contributor.authorOtis, Christopher N
dc.contributor.authorSolomon, David A
dc.contributor.authorGarcía, Joaquín J
dc.contributor.authorZante, Annemieke
dc.contributor.authorCamelo‐piragua, Sandra
dc.contributor.authorZiffle, Jessica
dc.contributor.authorChen, Yunn‐yi
dc.date.accessioned2019-02-12T20:23:41Z
dc.date.available2020-04-01T15:06:24Zen
dc.date.issued2019-02
dc.identifier.citationBean, Gregory R; Krings, Gregor; Otis, Christopher N; Solomon, David A; García, Joaquín J ; Zante, Annemieke; Camelo‐piragua, Sandra ; Ziffle, Jessica; Chen, Yunn‐yi (2019). "CRTC1â MAML2 fusion in mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the breast." Histopathology 74(3): 463-473.
dc.identifier.issn0309-0167
dc.identifier.issn1365-2559
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/147797
dc.publisherArmed Forces Institute of Pathology
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.subject.otherbreast cancer
dc.subject.otherCRTC1â MAML2
dc.subject.othermucoepidermoid carcinoma
dc.subject.othersalivary gland
dc.subject.othercancer genetics
dc.titleCRTC1â MAML2 fusion in mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the breast
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMicrobiology and Immunology
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/147797/1/his13779_am.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/147797/2/his13779.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/147797/3/his13779-sup-0001-TableS1.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/his.13779
dc.identifier.sourceHistopathology
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBanerji S, Cibulskis K, Rangelâ Escareno C et al. Sequence analysis of mutations and translocations across breast cancer subtypes. Nature 2012; 486; 405 â 409.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRausch T, Zichner T, Schlattl A, Stutz AM, Benes V, Korbel JO. Delly: structural variant discovery by integrated pairedâ end and splitâ read analysis. Bioinformatics 2012; 28; i333 â i339.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVan der Auwera GA, Carneiro MO, Hartl C et al. From FASTQ data to high confidence variant calls: the genome analysis toolkit best practices pipeline. Curr. Protoc. Bioinformatics 2013; 43; 11 â 33.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceYang H, Wang K. Genomic variant annotation and prioritization with ANNOVAR and WANNOVAR. Nat. Protoc. 2015; 10; 1556 â 1566.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceYe K, Schulz MH, Long Q, Apweiler R, Ning Z. Pindel: a pattern growth approach to detect break points of large deletions and medium sized insertions from pairedâ end short reads. Bioinformatics 2009; 25; 2865 â 2871.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBajaj J, Gimenez C, Slim F, Aziz M, Das K. Fineâ needle aspiration cytology of mammary analog secretory carcinoma masquerading as lowâ grade mucoepidermoid carcinoma: case report with a review of the literature. Acta Cytol. 2014; 58; 501 â 510.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHandraâ Luca A, Lamas G, Bertrand JC, Fouret P. MUC1, MUC2, MUC4, and MUC5AC expression in salivary gland mucoepidermoid carcinoma: diagnostic and prognostic implications. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2005; 29; 881 â 889.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLi J, Duns G, Westers H, Sijmons R, van den Berg A, Kok K. SETD2: aAn epigenetic modifier with tumor suppressor functionality. Oncotarget 2016; 7; 50719 â 50734.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNewbold RF, Mokbel K. Evidence for a tumour suppressor function of SETD2 in human breast cancer: a new hypothesis. Anticancer Res. 2010; 30; 3309 â 3311.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePereira B, Chin SF, Rueda OM et al. The somatic mutation profiles of 2,433 breast cancers refines their genomic and transcriptomic landscapes. Nat. Commun. 2016; 7; 11479.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShah SP, Roth A, Goya R et al. The clonal and mutational evolution spectrum of primary tripleâ negative breast cancers. Nature 2012; 486; 395 â 399.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNikâ Zainal S, Davies H, Staaf J et al. Landscape of somatic mutations in 560 breast cancer wholeâ genome sequences. Nature 2016; 534; 47 â 54.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStephens PJ, Tarpey PS, Davies H et al. The landscape of cancer genes and mutational processes in breast cancer. Nature 2012; 486; 400 â 404.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLiu SY, Joseph NM, Ravindranathan A et al. Genomic profiling of malignant phyllodes tumors reveals aberrations in FGFR1 and PIâ 3 kinase/RAS signaling pathways and provides insights into intratumoral heterogeneity. Mod. Pathol. 2016; 29; 1012 â 1027.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKang H, Tan M, Bishop JA et al. Wholeâ exome sequencing of salivary gland mucoepidermoid carcinoma. Clin. Cancer Res. 2017; 23; 283 â 288.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCancer Genome Atlas Network. Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature 2012; 490; 61 â 70.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCiriello G, Gatza ML, Beck AH et al. Comprehensive molecular portraits of invasive lobular breast cancer. Cell 2015; 163; 506 â 519.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCurtis C, Shah SP, Chin SF et al. The genomic and transcriptomic architecture of 2,000 breast tumours reveals novel subgroups. Nature 2012; 486; 346 â 352.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDawson SJ, Rueda OM, Aparicio S, Caldas C. A new genomeâ driven integrated classification of breast cancer and its implications. EMBO J. 2013; 32; 617 â 628.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePerou CM, Sorlie T, Eisen MB et al. Molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature 2000; 406; 747 â 752.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMartelotto LG, De Filippo MR, Ng CK et al. Genomic landscape of adenoid cystic carcinoma of the breast. J. Pathol. 2015; 237; 179 â 189.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePersson M, Andren Y, Mark J, Horlings HM, Persson F, Stenman G. Recurrent fusion of MYB and NFIB transcription factor genes in carcinomas of the breast and head and neck. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 2009; 106; 18740 â 18744.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePiaâ Foschini M, Reisâ Filho JS, Eusebi V, Lakhani SR. Salivary glandâ like tumours of the breast: surgical and molecular pathology. J. Clin. Pathol. 2003; 56; 497 â 506.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKrings G, Joseph NM, Bean GR et al. Genomic profiling of breast secretory carcinomas reveals distinct genetics from other breast cancers and similarity to mammary analog secretory carcinomas. Mod. Pathol. 2017; 30; 1086 â 1099.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGueriniâ Rocco E, Hodi Z, Piscuoglio S et al. The repertoire of somatic genetic alterations of acinic cell carcinomas of the breast: an exploratory, hypothesisâ generating study. J. Pathol. 2015; 237; 166 â 178.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePiscuoglio S, Hodi Z, Katabi N et al. Are acinic cell carcinomas of the breast and salivary glands distinct diseases? Histopathology 2015; 67; 529 â 537.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWang K, McDermott JD, Schrock AB et al. Comprehensive genomic profiling of salivary mucoepidermoid carcinomas reveals frequent BAP1, PIK3CA, and other actionable genomic alterations. Ann. Oncol. 2017; 28; 748 â 753.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFisher ER, Palekar AS, Gregorio RM, Paulson JD. Mucoepidermoid and squamous cell carcinomas of breast with reference to squamous metaplasia and giant cell tumors. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 1983; 7; 15 â 27.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCheng M, Geng C, Tang T, Song Z. Mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the breast: four case reports and review of the literature. Medicine (Baltimore) 2017; 96; e9385.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBasbug M, Akbulut S, Arikanoglu Z, Sogutcu N, Firat U, Kucukoner M. Mucoepidermoid carcinoma in a breast affected by burn scars: comprehensive literature review and case report. Breast Care (Basel) 2011; 6; 293 â 297.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFoschini MP, Morandi L, Asioli S, Giove G, Corradini AG, Eusebi V. The morphological spectrum of salivary gland type tumours of the breast. Pathology 2017; 49; 215 â 227.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCameloâ Piragua SI, Habib C, Kanumuri P, Lago CE, Mason HS, Otis CN. Mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the breast shares cytogenetic abnormality with mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the salivary gland: a case report with molecular analysis and review of the literature. Hum. Pathol. 2009; 40; 887 â 892.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSherwellâ Cabello S, Maffuzâ Aziz A, Riosâ Luna NP, Bautistaâ Pina V, Rodriguezâ Cuevas S. Salivary glandâ like breast carcinomas: an infrequent disease. Pathol. Res. Pract. 2016; 212; 1034 â 1038.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGhabach B, Anderson WF, Curtis RE, Huycke MM, Lavigne JA, Dores GM. Adenoid cystic carcinoma of the breast in the United States (1977 to 2006): a populationâ based cohort study. Breast Cancer Res. 2010; 12; R54.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRoden AC, Garcia JJ, Wehrs RN et al. Histopathologic, immunophenotypic and cytogenetic features of pulmonary mucoepidermoid carcinoma. Mod. Pathol. 2014; 27; 1479 â 1488.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLiu C, Zhao Y, Chu W, Zhang F, Zhang Z. Mucoepidermoid carcinoma of esophagus combined with squamous carcinoma of lung: a case report and literature review. J. Cancer. Res. Ther. 2015; 11; 658.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEviatar JA, Hornblass A. Mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the lacrimal gland: 25 cases and a review and update of the literature. Ophthalmic Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 1993; 9; 170 â 181.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStefanou D, Goussia AC, Arkoumani E et al. Mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the thymus: a case presentation and a literature review. Pathol. Res. Pract. 2004; 200; 567 â 573.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLarson RS, Wick MR. Primary mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the thyroid: diagnosis by fineâ needle aspiration biopsy. Diagn. Cytopathol. 1993; 9; 438 â 443.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMoran CA, Suster S. Primary mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the pleura. A clinicopathologic study of two cases. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 2003; 120; 381 â 385.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCosta MR, Sugita DM, Vilela MH et al. Mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the penis: case report and literature review. Can. Urol. Assoc. J. 2015; 9; E27 â E29.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGartrell R, Pauli J, Zonta M. Primary cutaneous mucoepidermoid carcinoma: a case study with a review of the literature. Int. J. Surg. Pathol. 2015; 23; 161 â 164.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGoh GH, Lim CM, Vanacek T, Michal M, Petersson F. Spindle cell mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the palatine tonsil with CRTC1â MAML2 fusion transcript: report of a rare case in a 17â yearâ old boy and a review of the literature. Int. J. Surg. Pathol. 2017; 25; 705 â 710.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHu HJ, Zhou RX, Liu F, Wang JK, Li FY. You cannot miss it: pancreatic mucoepidermoid carcinoma: a case report and literature review. Medicine (Baltimore) 2018; 97; e9990.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTurk E, Karagulle E, Erinanc OH, Soy EA, Moray G. Mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the breast. Breast J. 2013; 19; 206 â 208.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDi Tommaso L, Foschini MP, Ragazzini T et al. Mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the breast. Virchows Arch. 2004; 444; 13 â 19.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHorii R, Akiyama F, Ikenaga M, Iwase T, Sakamoto G. Mucoâ epidermoid carcinoma of the breast. Pathol. Int. 2006; 56; 549 â 553.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEllis GL, Auclair PL. Tumors of the salivary glands. In Ellis GL, Auclair PL eds. Atlas of tumor pathology, 3rd series, fascicle 17. Washington, DC: Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, 1996; 155 â 175.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSeethala RR. An update on grading of salivary gland carcinomas. Head Neck Pathol. 2009; 3; 69 â 77.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFehr A, Roser K, Heidorn K, Hallas C, Loning T, Bullerdiek J. A new type of MAML2 fusion in mucoepidermoid carcinoma. Genes Chromosom. Cancer 2008; 47; 203 â 206.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSaade RE, Bell D, Garcia J, Roberts D, Weber R. Role of CRTC1/MAML2 translocation in the prognosis and clinical outcomes of mucoepidermoid carcinoma. JAMA Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 2016; 142; 234 â 240.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBehboudi A, Enlund F, Winnes M et al. Molecular classification of mucoepidermoid carcinomas â  prognostic significance of the MECT1â MAML2 fusion oncogene. Genes Chromosom. Cancer 2006; 45; 470 â 481.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSeethala RR, Dacic S, Cieply K, Kelly LM, Nikiforova MN. A reappraisal of the MECT1/MAML2 translocation in salivary mucoepidermoid carcinomas. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2010; 34; 1106 â 1121.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWolff AC, Hammond MEH, Allison KH et al. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists clinical practice guideline focused update. J. Clin. Oncol. 2018; 36; 2105 â 2122.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHammond ME, Hayes DF, Dowsett M et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for immunohistochemical testing of estrogen and progesterone receptors in breast cancer (unabridged version). Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 2010; 134; e48 â e72.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNakayama T, Miyabe S, Okabe M et al. Clinicopathological significance of the CRTC3â MAML2 fusion transcript in mucoepidermoid carcinoma. Mod. Pathol. 2009; 22; 1575 â 1581.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNoda H, Okumura Y, Nakayama T et al. Clinicopathological significance of MAML2 gene split in mucoepidermoid carcinoma. Cancer Sci. 2013; 104; 85 â 92.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePicard: A set of tools (in Java) for working with next generation sequencing data in the bam. Available at: http://broadinstitute.github.io/picard. Accessed December 1, 2015
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDePristo MA, Banks E, Poplin R et al. A framework for variation discovery and genotyping using nextâ generation DNA sequencing data. Nat. Genet. 2011; 43; 491 â 498.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGarrison E, Marth G. Haplotypeâ based variant detection from shortâ read sequencing. 2012; arXiv:1207.3907 [qâ bio.GN]. Available at: http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.3907. Accessed December 1, 2015
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLi H, Durbin R. Fast and accurate longâ read alignment with Burrowsâ Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 2010; 26; 589 â 595.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLi H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A et al. The sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 2009; 25; 2078 â 2079.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcKenna A, Hanna M, Banks E et al. The genome analysis toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing nextâ generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res. 2010; 20; 1297 â 1303.
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
his13779_am.pdf
Size:
1.132MB
Format:
PDF
View/Open
Name:
his13779.pdf
Size:
1.343MB
Format:
PDF
View/Open
Name:
his13779-sup-0001-TableS1.pdf
Size:
51.77KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.