Show simple item record

American Head and Neck Society Endocrine Section clinical consensus statement: North American quality statements and evidence‐based multidisciplinary workflow algorithms for the evaluation and management of thyroid nodules

dc.contributor.authorMeltzer, Charles J.
dc.contributor.authorIrish, Jonathan
dc.contributor.authorAngelos, Peter
dc.contributor.authorBusaidy, Naifa L.
dc.contributor.authorDavies, Louise
dc.contributor.authorDwojak, Sunshine
dc.contributor.authorFerris, Robert L.
dc.contributor.authorHaugen, Bryan R.
dc.contributor.authorHarrell, Richard M.
dc.contributor.authorHaymart, Megan R.
dc.contributor.authorMcIver, Bryan
dc.contributor.authorMechanick, Jeffrey I.
dc.contributor.authorMonteiro, Eric
dc.contributor.authorMorris, John C.
dc.contributor.authorMorris, Luc G. T.
dc.contributor.authorOdell, Michael
dc.contributor.authorScharpf, Joseph
dc.contributor.authorShaha, Ashok
dc.contributor.authorShin, Jennifer J.
dc.contributor.authorShonka, David C.
dc.contributor.authorThompson, Geoffrey B.
dc.contributor.authorTuttle, R. Michael
dc.contributor.authorUrken, Mark L.
dc.contributor.authorWiseman, Sam M.
dc.contributor.authorWong, Richard J.
dc.contributor.authorRandolph, Gregory
dc.date.accessioned2019-04-02T18:10:07Z
dc.date.available2020-06-01T14:50:01Zen
dc.date.issued2019-04
dc.identifier.citationMeltzer, Charles J.; Irish, Jonathan; Angelos, Peter; Busaidy, Naifa L.; Davies, Louise; Dwojak, Sunshine; Ferris, Robert L.; Haugen, Bryan R.; Harrell, Richard M.; Haymart, Megan R.; McIver, Bryan; Mechanick, Jeffrey I.; Monteiro, Eric; Morris, John C.; Morris, Luc G. T.; Odell, Michael; Scharpf, Joseph; Shaha, Ashok; Shin, Jennifer J.; Shonka, David C.; Thompson, Geoffrey B.; Tuttle, R. Michael; Urken, Mark L.; Wiseman, Sam M.; Wong, Richard J.; Randolph, Gregory (2019). "American Head and Neck Society Endocrine Section clinical consensus statement: North American quality statements and evidence‐based multidisciplinary workflow algorithms for the evaluation and management of thyroid nodules." Head & Neck 41(4): 843-856.
dc.identifier.issn1043-3074
dc.identifier.issn1097-0347
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/148340
dc.description.abstractBackgroundCare for patients with thyroid nodules is complex and multidisciplinary, and research demonstrates variation in care. The objective was to develop clinical guidelines and quality metrics to reduce unwarranted variation and improve quality.MethodsMultidisciplinary expert consensus and modified Delphi approach. Source documents were workflow algorithms from Kaiser Permanente Northern California and Cancer Care of Ontario based on the 2015 American Thyroid Association management guidelines for adult patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer.ResultsA consensus‐based, unified preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative workflow was developed for North American use. Twenty‐one panelists achieved consensus on 16 statements about workflow‐embedded process and outcomes metrics addressing safety, access, appropriateness, efficiency, effectiveness, and patient centeredness of care.ConclusionA panel of Canadian and United States experts achieved consensus on workflows and quality metric statements to help reduce unwarranted variation in care, improving overall quality of care for patients diagnosed with thyroid nodules.
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons, Inc.
dc.subject.otherthryoidectomy
dc.subject.otherquality of care
dc.subject.otherdifferentiated thyroid carcinoma
dc.subject.otherthyroid
dc.subject.otherthyroid nodules
dc.titleAmerican Head and Neck Society Endocrine Section clinical consensus statement: North American quality statements and evidence‐based multidisciplinary workflow algorithms for the evaluation and management of thyroid nodules
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelOtolaryngology
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/148340/1/hed25526_am.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/148340/2/hed25526.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/hed.25526
dc.identifier.sourceHead & Neck
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCibas ES, Ali SZ. The 2017 Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology. Thyroid. 2017; 27: 1341 ‐ 1346.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceQaseem A, Snow V, Owens DK, Shekelle P, Clinical Guidelines Committee of the American College of Physicians. The development of clinical practice guidelines and guidance statements of the American College of Physicians: summary of methods. Ann Intern Med. 2010; 153: 194 ‐ 199.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchunemann HJ, Oxman AD, Brozek J, et al. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations for diagnostic tests and strategies. BMJ. 2008; 336: 1106 ‐ 1110.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrozek JL, Akl EA, Jaeschke R, et al. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations in clinical practice guidelines: part 2 of 3. The GRADE approach to grading quality of evidence about diagnostic tests and strategies. Allergy. 2009; 64: 1109 ‐ 1116.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBossuyt PM, Reitsma JB. Standards for reporting of diagnostic accuracy group. The STARD Initiative Lancet. 2003; 361: 71.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLeung AN, Bull TM, Jaeschke R, et al. An official American Thoracic Society/Society of Thoracic Radiology clinical practice guideline: evaluation of suspected pulmonary embolism in pregnancy. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011; 184: 1200 ‐ 1208.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWhiting PF, Rutjes AW, Westwood ME, et al. QUADAS‐2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med. 2011; 155: 529 ‐ 536.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStack BC Jr, Bimston DN, Bodenner DL, et al. American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and American College of endocrinology disease state clinical review: postoperative hypoparathyroidism—definitions and management. Endocr Pract. 2015; 21: 674 ‐ 685.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMechanick JI, Camacho PM, Garber AJ, et al. American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and American College of endocrinology protocol for standardized production of clinical practice guidelines, algorithms, and checklists‐‐2014 update and the AACE G4G program. Endocr Pract. 2014; 20: 692 ‐ 702.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMechanick JI, Pessah‐Pollack R, Camacho P, et al. American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and American College of endocrinology protocol for standardized production of clinical practice guidelines, algorithms, and checklists—2017 update. Endocr Pract. 2017; 23: 1006 ‐ 1021.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMechanick JI, Bergman DA, Braithwaite SS, Palumbo PJ, American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists Ad Hoc Task Force for Standardized Production of Clinical Practice Guidelines. American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists protocol for standardized production of clinical practice guidelines. Endocr Pract. 2004; 10: 353 ‐ 361.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMechanick JI, Camacho PM, Cobin RH, et al. American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists protocol for standardized production of clinical practice guidelines—2010 update. Endocr Pract. 2010; 16: 270 ‐ 283.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFitch K, Bernstein S. The RAND/UCLA appropriateness method user’s manual. Rand Corporation; 2001. https://www.rand/org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR1269.html Accessed April 23, 2018.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePincus T, Miles C, Froud R, Underwood M, Carnes D, Taylor SJ. Methodological criteria for the assessment of moderators in systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials: a consensus study. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011; 11: 14.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDalkey N, Helmer O. An experimental application of the Delphi method in the use of experts. Manage Sci. 1963; 9: 458 ‐ 467.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDalkey NC. The Delphi method: an experimental study of group opinion. RAND Corporation; 1969. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_memoranda/RM5888.html Accessed April 23, 2018.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBasger BJ, Chen TF, Moles RJ. Validation of prescribing appropriateness criteria for older Australians using the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method. BMJ Open. 2012; 2: e001431.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGrant S. Pre‐analysis plan: decision rules for adolescent substance use treatment settings: an online Delphi process. RAND Corporation; 2017 https://osf.io/c5ffh/?action=download&version=1. Accessed April 23, 2018.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTessler FN, Middleton WD, Grant EG, et al. ACR thyroid imaging, reporting and data system (TI‐RADS): white paper of the ACR TI‐RADS Committee. J Am Coll Radiol. 2017; 14: 587 ‐ 595.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMartin D, Miller AP, Quesnel‐Vallee A, Caron NR, Vissandjee B, Marchildon GP. Canada’s universal health‐care system: achieving its potential. Lancet. 2018; 391: 1718 ‐ 1735.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEskander A, Devins GM, Freeman J, et al. Waiting for thyroid surgery: a study of psychological morbidity and determinants of health associated with long wait times for thyroid surgery. Laryngoscope. 2013; 123: 541 ‐ 547.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGharib H, Papini E, Garber JR, et al. American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, American College of Endocrinology, and Associazione Medici Endocrinologi medical guidelines for clinical practice for the diagnosis and management of thyroid nodules—2016 update. Endocr Pract. 2016; 22: 622 ‐ 639.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDavies L, Welch HG. Current thyroid cancer trends in the United States. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014; 140: 317 ‐ 322.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLee S, Skelton TS, Zheng F, et al. The biopsy‐proven benign thyroid nodule: is long‐term follow‐up necessary? J Am Coll Surg. 2013; 217: 81 ‐ 88. Discussion 8‐9.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMazotas IG, Wang TS. The role and timing of parathyroid hormone determination after total thyroidectomy. Gland Surg. 2017; 6: S38 ‐ S48.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHelme S, Lulsegged A, Sinha P. Incidental parathyroid disease during thyroid surgery: should we remove them? ISRN Surg. 2011; 2011: 962186.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAl‐Qurayshi Z, Robins R, Hauch A, Randolph GW, Kandil E. Association of surgeon volume with outcomes and cost savings following thyroidectomy: a national forecast. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016; 142: 32 ‐ 39.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHauch A, Al‐Qurayshi Z, Randolph G, Kandil E. Total thyroidectomy is associated with increased risk of complications for low‐ and high‐volume surgeons. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014; 21: 3844 ‐ 3852.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSosa JA, Bowman HM, Tielsch JM, Powe NR, Gordon TA, Udelsman R. The importance of surgeon experience for clinical and economic outcomes from thyroidectomy. Ann Surg. 1998; 228: 320 ‐ 330.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSosa JA, Mehta PJ, Wang TS, Boudourakis L, Roman SA. A population‐based study of outcomes from thyroidectomy in aging Americans: at what cost? J Am Coll Surg. 2008; 206: 1097 ‐ 1105.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAdam MA, Thomas S, Youngwirth L, et al. Is there a minimum number of thyroidectomies a surgeon should perform to optimize patient outcomes? Ann Surg. 2017; 265: 402 ‐ 407.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHoller T, Anderson J. Prevalence of voice & swallowing complaints in pre‐operative thyroidectomy patients: a prospective cohort study. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014; 43: 28.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBratzler DW, Dellinger EP, Olsen KM, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2013; 70: 195 ‐ 283.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKrajewska J, Chmielik E, Jarzab B. Dynamic risk stratification in the follow‐up of thyroid cancer: what is still to be discovered in 2017? Endocr Relat Cancer. 2017; 24: R387 ‐ R402.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePapaleontiou M, Hughes DT, Guo C, Banerjee M, Haymart MR. Population‐based assessment of complications following surgery for thyroid cancer. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2017; 102: 2543 ‐ 2551.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKhan MI, Waguespack SG, Hu MI. Medical management of postsurgical hypoparathyroidism. Endocr Pract. 2011; 17 ( suppl 1 ): 18 ‐ 25.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHessman C, Fields J, Schuman E. Outpatient thyroidectomy: is it a safe and reasonable option? Am J Surg. 2011; 201: 565 ‐ 568.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKandil E, Noureldine SI, Abbas A, Tufano RP. The impact of surgical volume on patient outcomes following thyroid surgery. Surgery. 2013; 154: 1346 ‐ 1352. Discussion 52‐3.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKhavanin N, Mlodinow A, Kim JY, Ver Halen JP, Antony AK, Samant S. Assessing safety and outcomes in outpatient versus inpatient thyroidectomy using the NSQIP: a propensity score matched analysis of 16,370 patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015; 22: 429 ‐ 436.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOrosco RK, Lin HW, Bhattacharyya N. Ambulatory thyroidectomy: a multistate study of revisits and complications. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015; 152: 1017 ‐ 1023.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStavrakis AI, Ituarte PH, Ko CY, Yeh MW. Surgeon volume as a predictor of outcomes in inpatient and outpatient endocrine surgery. Surgery. 2007; 142: 887 – 99; discussion −99.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHoulton JJ, Pechter W, Steward DL. PACU PTH facilitates safe outpatient total thyroidectomy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011; 144: 43 ‐ 47.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKhavanin N, Mlodinow A, Kim JY, Ver Halen JP, Samant S. Predictors of 30‐day readmission after outpatient thyroidectomy: an analysis of the 2011 NSQIP data set. Am J Otolaryngol. 2014; 35: 332 ‐ 339.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMullen MG, LaPar DJ, Daniel SK, Turrentine FE, Hanks JB, Smith PW. Risk factors for 30‐day hospital readmission after thyroidectomy and parathyroidectomy in the United States: an analysis of National Surgical Quality Improvement Program outcomes. Surgery. 2014; 156: 1423 ‐ 1430. discussion 30‐1.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTerris DJ, Snyder S, Carneiro‐Pla D, et al. American Thyroid Association statement on outpatient thyroidectomy. Thyroid. 2013; 23: 1193 ‐ 1202.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHauch A, Al‐Qurayshi Z, Friedlander P, Kandil E. Association of socioeconomic status, race, and ethnicity with outcomes of patients undergoing thyroid surgery. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014; 140: 1173 ‐ 1183.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVander JB, Gaston EA, Dawber TR. The significance of nontoxic thyroid nodules. Final report of a 15‐year study of the incidence of thyroid malignancy. Ann Intern Med. 1968; 69: 537 ‐ 540.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTunbridge WM, Evered DC, Hall R, et al. The spectrum of thyroid disease in a community: the Whickham survey. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1977; 7: 481 ‐ 493.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTamhane S, Gharib H. Thyroid nodule update on diagnosis and management. Clin Diabetes Endocrinol. 2016; 2: 17.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGuth S, Theune U, Aberle J, Galach A, Bamberger CM. Very high prevalence of thyroid nodules detected by high frequency (13 MHz) ultrasound examination. Eur J Clin Invest. 2009; 39: 699 ‐ 706.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHaugen BR, Alexander EK, Bible KC, et al. 2015 American Thyroid Association management guidelines for adult patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer: the American Thyroid Association guidelines task force on thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer. Thyroid. 2016; 26: 1 ‐ 133.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHegedus L. Clinical practice. The thyroid nodule. N Engl J Med. 2004; 351: 1764 ‐ 1771.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceIglesias ML, Schmidt A, Ghuzlan AA, et al. Radiation exposure and thyroid cancer: a review. Arch Endocrinol Metab. 2017; 61: 180 ‐ 187.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWerk EE Jr, Vernon BM, Gonzalez JJ, Ungaro PC, McCoy RC. Cancer in thyroid nodules. A community hospital survey. Arch Intern Med. 1984; 144: 474 ‐ 476.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLin JD, Chao TC, Huang BY, Chen ST, Chang HY, Hsueh C. Thyroid cancer in the thyroid nodules evaluated by ultrasonography and fine‐needle aspiration cytology. Thyroid. 2005; 15: 708 ‐ 717.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceXu L, Li G, Wei Q, El‐Naggar AK, Sturgis EM. Family history of cancer and risk of sporadic differentiated thyroid carcinoma. Cancer. 2012; 118: 1228 ‐ 1235.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSherman SI. Thyroid carcinoma. Lancet. 2003; 361: 501 ‐ 511.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAschebrook‐Kilfoy B, Schechter RB, Shih YC, et al. The clinical and economic burden of a sustained increase in thyroid cancer incidence. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2013; 22: 1252 ‐ 1259.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLim H, Devesa SS, Sosa JA, Check D, Kitahara CM. Trends in thyroid cancer incidence and mortality in the United States, 1974‐2013. JAMA. 2017; 317: 1338 ‐ 1348.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSiegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016; 66: 7 ‐ 30.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrito JP, Al Nofal A, Montori VM, Hay ID, Morris JC. The impact of subclinical disease and mechanism of detection on the rise in thyroid cancer incidence: a population‐based study in Olmsted County, Minnesota during 1935 through 2012. Thyroid. 2015; 25: 999 ‐ 1007.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDavies L, Welch HG. Increasing incidence of thyroid cancer in the United States, 1973‐2002. JAMA. 2006; 295: 2164 ‐ 2167.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMorris LG, Sikora AG, Tosteson TD, Davies L. The increasing incidence of thyroid cancer: the influence of access to care. Thyroid. 2013; 23: 885 ‐ 891.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFrancis DO, Randolph G, Davies L. Nationwide variation in rates of thyroidectomy among US Medicare beneficiaries. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017; 143: 1122 ‐ 1125.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceField MJ, Lohr KN. Guidelines for Clinical Practice: From Development to Use. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 1992.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCabana MD, Rand CS, Powe NR, et al. Why don’t physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement. JAMA. 1999; 282: 1458 ‐ 1465.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTu SW, Musen MA. A Typology for Modeling Processes in Clinical Guidelines and Protocols. Communications in Computer and Information Science. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2010: 545.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCanadian Partnership Against Cancer. A coordinated approach to improve consistency in surgical care across Canada: pan‐Canadian standards for eight types of cancer. 2016. https://content.cancerview.ca/download/cv/treatment_and_support/diagnosis_and_treatment/documents/pan_canadian_standards_eight_types_cancer_reportpdf?attachment=0. Accessed April 23, 2018.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMeltzer C, Budayr A, Chavez A, et al. Evidence‐based workflows for thyroid and parathyroid surgery. Perm J. 2016; 20: 57 ‐ 73.
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.