Show simple item record

Clinical impact of baseline chronic kidney disease in patients undergoing transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement

dc.contributor.authorPineda, Andres M.
dc.contributor.authorKevin Harrison, J.
dc.contributor.authorKleiman, Neal S.
dc.contributor.authorReardon, Michael J.
dc.contributor.authorConte, John V.
dc.contributor.authorO’Hair, Daniel P.
dc.contributor.authorChetcuti, Stanley J.
dc.contributor.authorHuang, Jian
dc.contributor.authorYakubov, Steven J.
dc.contributor.authorPopma, Jeffrey J.
dc.contributor.authorBeohar, Nirat
dc.date.accessioned2019-04-02T18:10:37Z
dc.date.available2020-05-01T18:03:25Zen
dc.date.issued2019-03-01
dc.identifier.citationPineda, Andres M.; Kevin Harrison, J.; Kleiman, Neal S.; Reardon, Michael J.; Conte, John V.; O’Hair, Daniel P.; Chetcuti, Stanley J.; Huang, Jian; Yakubov, Steven J.; Popma, Jeffrey J.; Beohar, Nirat (2019). "Clinical impact of baseline chronic kidney disease in patients undergoing transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement." Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions 93(4): 740-748.
dc.identifier.issn1522-1946
dc.identifier.issn1522-726X
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/148361
dc.description.abstractObjectivesTo assess the treatment effect of TAVR versus SAVR on clinical outcomes to 3 years in patients stratified by chronic kidney disease (CKD) by retrospectively studying patients randomized to TAVR or SAVR.BackgroundThe impact of CKD on mid‐term outcomes of patients undergoing TAVR versus SAVR is unclear.MethodsPatients randomized to TAVR or SAVR in the CoreValve US Pivotal High Risk Trial were retrospectively stratified by eGFR: none/mild or moderate/severe CKD. To evaluate the impact of baseline CKD in TAVR patients only, all patients undergoing an attempted TAVR implant in the US Pivotal Trial and CAS were stratified by baseline eGFR into none/mild, moderate, and severe CKD. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular and renal events (MACRE), a composite of all‐cause mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke/TIA, and new requirement of dialysis.ResultsModerate/severe CKD was present in 62.7% and 60.7% of high‐risk patients randomized to TAVR or SAVR, respectively. Baseline characteristics were similar between TAVR and SAVR patients in both CKD subgroups, except for higher rates of diabetes and higher serum creatinine in SAVR patients. Among high‐risk patients with moderate/severe CKD, TAVR provided a lower 3‐year MACRE rate compared with SAVR: 42.1% vs. 51.0, P = .04. Of 3,733 extreme‐ and high‐risk TAVR patients, 39.9% had none/mild, 53.8% moderate, and 6.4% severe CKD. Worsening baseline CKD was associated with increased 3‐year MACRE rates [none/mild 51.5%, moderate 54.5%, severe 63.1%, P = .001].ConclusionsTAVR results in lower 3‐year MACRE versus SAVR in high‐risk patients with moderate/severe CKD. In patients undergoing TAVR, worsening CKD increases mid‐term mortality and MACRE. Randomized trials of TAVR vs. SAVR in patients with moderate‐severe CKD would help elucidate the best treatment for these complex patients.Trial RegistrationCoreValve US Pivotal Trial: NCT01240902.CoreValve Continued Access Study: NCT01531374.
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons, Inc.
dc.subject.otheraortic stenosis
dc.subject.otherrenal disease
dc.subject.otherTAVR
dc.subject.otherSAVR
dc.titleClinical impact of baseline chronic kidney disease in patients undergoing transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMedicine (General)
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/148361/1/ccd27928_am.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/148361/2/ccd27928.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/ccd.27928
dc.identifier.sourceCatheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
dc.identifier.citedreferenceIung B, Baron G, Butchart EG, et al. A prospective survey of patients with valvular heart disease in Europe: The euro heart survey on valvular heart disease. Eur Heart J 2003; 24: 1231 ‐ 1243.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLeon MB, Piazza N, Nikolsky E, et al. Standardized endpoint definitions for transcatheter aortic valve implantation clinical trials: A consensus report from the valve academic research consortium. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011; 57: 253 ‐ 269.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBeohar N, Doshi D, Thourani V, et al. Association of transcatheter aortic valve replacement with 30‐day renal function and 1‐year outcomes among patients presenting with compromised baseline renal function: Experience from the PARTNER 1 trial and registry. JAMA Cardiol 2017; 2: 742 ‐ 749.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFerro CJ, Chue CD, de Belder MA, et al. Impact of renal function on survival after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI): An analysis of the UKTAVI registry. Heart 2015; 101: 546 ‐ 552.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHerzog CA, Ma JZ, Collins AJ. Long‐term survival of dialysis patients in the United States with prosthetic heart valves: Should ACC/AHA practice guidelines on valve selection be modified? Circulation 2002; 105: 1336 ‐ 1341.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMack MJ, Leon MB, Smith CR, et al. 5‐year outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement or surgical aortic valve replacement for high surgical risk patients with aortic stenosis (PARTNER 1): A randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2015; 385: 2477 ‐ 2484.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDeeb GM, Reardon MJ, Chetcuti S, et al. 3‐year outcomes in high‐risk patients who underwent surgical or transcatheter aortic valve replacement. J Am Coll Cardiol 2016; 67: 2565 ‐ 2574.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceO’Hair DP, Bajwa TK, Chetcuti SJ, et al. One‐year outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with end‐stage renal disease. Ann Thorac Surg 2017; 103: 1392 ‐ 1398.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAllende R, Webb JG, Munoz‐Garcia AJ, et al. Advanced chronic kidney disease in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation: Insights on clinical outcomes and prognostic markers from a large cohort of patients. Eur Heart J 2014; 35: 2685 ‐ 2696.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceConrotto F, Salizzoni S, Andreis A, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease. Am J Cardiol 2017; 119: 1438 ‐ 1442.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceD’Errigo P, Moretti C, D’Ascenzo F, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgical aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis in patients with chronic kidney disease stages 3b to 5. Ann Thorac Surg 2016; 102: 540 ‐ 547.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAlqahtani F, Aljohani S, Boobes K, et al. Outcomes of transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement in patients on maintenance dialysis. Am J Med 2017; 130: 1464.e1 ‐ 1464.e11.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKobrin DM, McCarthy FH, Herrmann HC, et al. Transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement in dialysis patients: A propensity‐matched comparison. Ann Thorac Surg 2015; 100: 1230 ‐ 1236. discussion 1236–1237.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNguyen TC, Babaliaros VC, Razavi SA, et al. Impact of varying degrees of renal dysfunction on transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013; 146: 1399 ‐ 1406. discussion 13406–13407.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceThourani VH, Forcillo J, Beohar N, et al. Impact of preoperative chronic kidney disease in 2,531 high‐risk and inoperable patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement in the PARTNER trial. Ann Thorac Surg 2016; 102: 1172 ‐ 1180.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCodner P, Levi A, Gargiulo G, et al. Impact of renal dysfunction on results of transcatheter aortic valve replacement outcomes in a large multicenter cohort. Am J Cardiol 2016; 118: 1888 ‐ 1896.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceConte JV, Hermiller J Jr, Resar JR, et al. Complications after self‐expanding transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2017; 29: 321 ‐ 330.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePopma JJ, Adams DH, Reardon MJ, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement using a self‐expanding bioprosthesis in patients with severe aortic stenosis at extreme risk for surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014; 63: 1972 ‐ 1981.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAdams DH, Popma JJ, Reardon MJ, et al. Transcatheter aortic‐valve replacement with a self‐expanding prosthesis. N Engl J Med 2014; 370: 1790 ‐ 1798.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOguri A, Yamamoto M, Mouillet G, et al. Impact of chronic kidney disease on the outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve implantation: Results from the France 2 registry. EuroIntervention 2015; 10: e1 ‐ e9.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWilliams M, Kodali SK, Hahn RT, et al. Sex‐related differences in outcomes after transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis: Insights from the PARTNER trial (placement of aortic transcatheter valve). J Am Coll Cardiol 2014; 63: 1522 ‐ 1528.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLindman BR, Maniar HS, Jaber WA, et al. Effect of tricuspid regurgitation and the right heart on survival after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: Insights from the placement of aortic transcatheter valves II inoperable cohort. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2015; 8: e002073.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCortes C, Amat‐Santos IJ, Nombela‐Franco L, et al. Mitral regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: Prognosis, imaging predictors, and potential management. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2016; 9: 1603 ‐ 1614.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMehran R, Aymong ED, Nikolsky E, et al. A simple risk score for prediction of contrast‐induced nephropathy after percutaneous coronary intervention: Development and initial validation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 44: 1393 ‐ 1399.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSinning JM, Ghanem A, Steinhauser H, et al. Renal function as predictor of mortality in patients after percutaneous transcatheter aortic valve implantation. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2010; 3: 1141 ‐ 1149.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcCullough PA, Wolyn R, Rocher LL, Levin RN, O’Neill WW. Acute renal failure after coronary intervention: Incidence, risk factors, and relationship to mortality. Am J Med 1997; 103: 368 ‐ 375.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceToggweiler S, Gurvitch R, Leipsic J, et al. Percutaneous aortic valve replacement: Vascular outcomes with a fully percutaneous procedure. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012; 59: 113 ‐ 118.
dc.identifier.citedreferencevan Rosendael PJ, Delgado V, Bax JJ. Pacemaker implantation rate after transcatheter aortic valve implantation with early and new‐generation devices: A systematic review. Eur Heart J 2018; 39: 2003 ‐ 2013.
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.