Show simple item record

Human and Environmental Well-being in Alaska’s Kachemak Bay Watershed: An Ecosystem Services Assessment

dc.contributor.authorFlaherty, Ellie
dc.contributor.authorKirkpatrick, Kathryn
dc.contributor.authorSnow, Trey
dc.contributor.advisorWondolleck, Julia
dc.date.accessioned2019-04-26T17:50:55Z
dc.date.availableNO_RESTRICTIONen_US
dc.date.available2019-04-26T17:50:55Z
dc.date.issued2019-04
dc.date.submitted2019-04
dc.identifier341en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/148820
dc.description.abstractThe Kachemak Bay watershed, located on the Kenai Peninsula in Alaska, encompasses several terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems. The Kachemak Bay National Estuarine Research Reserve (KBNERR) conducts research, monitoring, education, and community engagement that helps inform decision making in the region. This project provides insights for KBNERR regarding current ecosystem services valued in Kachemak Bay using a socio-cultural, place-based, ecosystem services framework. Major ecosystem services and values, community-perceived drivers of ecosystem health, and community relevant indicators were identified to help inform future monitoring and outreach. Methods employed include 31 semi-structured interviews with residents in public and private sectors and three focus groups with KBNERR’s Community Council. When asked what ecosystem services they valued, participants frequently mentioned fisheries, other wildlife (including moose, shellfish, birds), recreation, aesthetics, ecological processes, agriculture, and forests. Using a social value typology framework, this study analyzed the value orientations associated with these natural systems and resources. Several common value types emerged that align with existing literature, including: values for pristine environments, recreation opportunities, and life-sustaining ecological processes. However, other values outside of existing typologies were also present, including the value of connections to community, family, self and nature that were inspired by ecological systems. Interviewees discussed perceived drivers of ecosystem change, organized here as threats and assets. Major threats mentioned include pressures from population growth, climate change, social division/conflict, extraction, overharvesting, and aquaculture. Conversely, assets for positive ecosystem change include an engaged and concerned community, large scientific community, and aquaculture. Interviewees offered differing perspectives on the positive and negative impacts of natural resources management decisions on ecosystem change. Moving forward, the most salient ecosystem services values in the Kachemak Bay watershed that KBNERR could continue to monitor and target include pristine, economic, access, and cultural values. Indicators based on literature and interviewee responses are provided across provisioning, cultural, regulating, and supporting ecosystem service types. Methodologies to plan future research on coastal and marine ecosystem service valuation, both monetary and non-monetary, are provided. Using complementary methods and a larger sample size, KBNERR could continue to use the ecosystem services, values, and drivers in this report in their ongoing research and outreach.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectecosystem services managementen_US
dc.subjectenvironmental well-beingen_US
dc.subjectKachemak Bayen_US
dc.subjectNational Estuarine Research Reserveen_US
dc.titleHuman and Environmental Well-being in Alaska’s Kachemak Bay Watershed: An Ecosystem Services Assessmenten_US
dc.typeProjecten_US
dc.description.thesisdegreenameMaster of Science (MS)en_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineSchool for Environment and Sustainabilityen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.committeememberna, na
dc.identifier.uniqnameellieflaen_US
dc.identifier.uniqnamekirkpakaen_US
dc.identifier.uniqnametreysnowen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/148820/1/WellbeingKachemakBay_341_OpusReport.pdf
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.