Disentangling the Effects of Human Pressures and Available Resources on Critically Endangered Lion Space use in a Protected Area Complex of West Africa
dc.contributor.author | Mills, Kirby | |
dc.contributor.advisor | Harris, Nyeema | |
dc.contributor.advisor | Cardinale, Bradley | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-05-01T12:05:00Z | |
dc.date.available | NO_RESTRICTION | en_US |
dc.date.available | 2019-05-01T12:05:00Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019-04 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2019-04 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/148835 | |
dc.description.abstract | African lions reside primarily in protected areas, both of which are increasingly threatened by human pressures and subsequent depletion of natural resources and suitable habitat. Management of protected areas as hunting concessions often results in higher revenues and smaller areas compared to national parks, allowing for high quality habitat and stronger regulation of illegal activity. The successful conservation of lions in protected areas where both management types are implemented could depend on the extent to which lions avoid the risks associated with human encounters, which likely depends on distribution of high-quality habitat, water availability and prey resources. We conducted the first camera survey of lions in the W-Arly-Pendjari (WAP) protected area in West Africa, a 26,620-km2 complex which has two primary management types: national parks (NPs) and hunting concessions (HCs). We combined occupancy modeling, which accounts for imperfect detection of lions, and structural equation modeling to disentangle the relative effect sizes (ES) of environmental, ecological, and anthropogenic variables expected to influence lion space use. Lion occupancy (𝜓) did not show a response to management type (𝜓NP = 0.56; 𝜓HC = 0.58), exhibiting no spatial avoidance of hunting concessions. Water availability was higher and habitats were more diverse in hunting concessions, which may negate mortality risks from trophy hunting and higher human occupancy (𝜓NP = 0.49; 𝜓HC = 0.61). Lion occupancy was strongly driven by prey availability (ES = 0.219), which was influenced by edge effects and water availability. Cues of highquality habitat combined with increased human pressures may indicate hunting concessions functioning as ecological traps for lions in WAP. We recommend management interventions (e.g., increasing water availability and patrols near park edges) to provide refuge for lions in national parks by reducing the intersection of lion space use and the risk of human encounters. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.subject | management | en_US |
dc.subject | protected area | en_US |
dc.subject | trophy hunting | en_US |
dc.subject | occupancy | en_US |
dc.title | Disentangling the Effects of Human Pressures and Available Resources on Critically Endangered Lion Space use in a Protected Area Complex of West Africa | en_US |
dc.type | Thesis | en_US |
dc.description.thesisdegreename | Master of Science (MS) | en_US |
dc.description.thesisdegreediscipline | School for Environment and Sustainability | en_US |
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantor | University of Michigan | en_US |
dc.contributor.committeemember | na, na | |
dc.identifier.uniqname | kimills | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/148835/1/Mills_Kirby_Thesis.pdf | |
dc.owningcollname | Dissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's) |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.