Show simple item record

Primary care provider–reported involvement in breast cancer treatment decisions

dc.contributor.authorWallner, Lauren P.
dc.contributor.authorLi, Yun
dc.contributor.authorMcLeod, M. Chandler
dc.contributor.authorGargaro, Joan
dc.contributor.authorKurian, Allison W.
dc.contributor.authorJagsi, Reshma
dc.contributor.authorRadhakrishnan, Archana
dc.contributor.authorHamilton, Ann S.
dc.contributor.authorWard, Kevin C.
dc.contributor.authorHawley, Sarah T.
dc.contributor.authorKatz, Steven J.
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-31T18:25:22Z
dc.date.availableWITHHELD_14_MONTHS
dc.date.available2019-05-31T18:25:22Z
dc.date.issued2019-06-01
dc.identifier.citationWallner, Lauren P.; Li, Yun; McLeod, M. Chandler; Gargaro, Joan; Kurian, Allison W.; Jagsi, Reshma; Radhakrishnan, Archana; Hamilton, Ann S.; Ward, Kevin C.; Hawley, Sarah T.; Katz, Steven J. (2019). "Primary care provider–reported involvement in breast cancer treatment decisions." Cancer (11): 1815-1822.
dc.identifier.issn0008-543X
dc.identifier.issn1097-0142
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/149227
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.publisherAmerican Cancer Society
dc.subject.otherbreast cancer
dc.subject.othertreatment decision making
dc.subject.otherprimary care provider
dc.subject.othercancer treatment decisions
dc.subject.othercancer care
dc.titlePrimary care provider–reported involvement in breast cancer treatment decisions
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelOncology and Hematology
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPublic Health
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/149227/1/cncr31998.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/149227/2/cncr31998_am.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/cncr.31998
dc.identifier.sourceCancer
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMaly RC, Umezawa Y, Ratliff CT, Leake B. Racial/ethnic group differences in treatment decision‐making and treatment received among older breast carcinoma patients. Cancer. 2006; 106: 957 ‐ 965.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHawley ST, Griggs JJ, Hamilton AS, et al. Decision involvement and receipt of mastectomy among racially and ethnically diverse breast cancer patients. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009; 101: 1337 ‐ 1347.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePotosky AL, Han PK, Rowland J, et al. Differences between primary care physicians’ and oncologists’ knowledge, attitudes and practices regarding the care of cancer survivors. J Gen Intern Med. 2011; 26: 1403 ‐ 1410.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLawrence RA, McLoone JK, Wakefield CE, Cohn RJ. Primary care physicians’ perspectives of their role in cancer care: a systematic review. J Gen Intern Med. 2016; 31: 1222 ‐ 1236.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDel Giudice ME, Grunfeld E, Harvey BJ, Piliotis E, Verma S. Primary care physicians’ views of routine follow‐up care of cancer survivors. J Clin Oncol. 2009; 27: 3338 ‐ 3345.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStiggelbout AM, Jansen SJ, Otten W, Baas‐Thijssen MC, van Slooten H, van de Velde CJ. How important is the opinion of significant others to cancer patients’ adjuvant chemotherapy decision‐making? Support Care Cancer. 2007; 15: 319 ‐ 325.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWallner LP, Li Y, McLeod MC, et al. Decision‐support networks of women newly diagnosed with breast cancer. Cancer. 2017; 123: 3895 ‐ 3903.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWallner LP, Martinez KA, Li Y, et al. Use of online communication by patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer during the treatment decision process. JAMA Oncol. 2016; 2: 1654 ‐ 1656.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMaly RC, Umezawa Y, Leake B, Silliman RA. Determinants of participation in treatment decision‐making by older breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2004; 85: 201 ‐ 209.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRoorda C, de Bock GH, Scholing C, et al. Patients’ preferences for post‐treatment breast cancer follow‐up in primary care vs. secondary care: a qualitative study. Health Expect. 2015; 18: 2192 ‐ 2201.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWallner LP, Li Y, Furgal AKC, et al. Patient preferences for primary care provider roles in breast cancer survivorship care. J Clin Oncol. 2017; 35: 2942 ‐ 2948.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJagsi R, Abrahamse PH, Lee KL, et al. Treatment decisions and employment of breast cancer patients: results of a population‐based survey. Cancer. 2017; 123: 4791 ‐ 4799.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSmith SL, Wai ES, Alexander C, Singh‐Carlson S. Caring for survivors of breast cancer: perspective of the primary care physician. Curr Oncol. 2011; 18: e218 ‐ e226.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHawley ST, Janz NK, Griffith KA, et al. Recurrence risk perception and quality of life following treatment of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017; 161: 557 ‐ 565.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRadhakrishnan A, Grande D, Ross M, et al. When primary care providers (PCPs) help patients choose prostate cancer treatment. J Am Board Fam Med. 2017; 30: 298 ‐ 307.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWallner LP, Abrahamse P, Uppal JK, et al. Involvement of primary care physicians in the decision making and care of patients with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2016; 34: 3969 ‐ 3975.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCohen HJ. A model for the shared care of elderly patients with cancer. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2009; 57 ( suppl 2 ): S300 ‐ S302.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLevit LA, Balogh EP, Nass SJ, Ganz PA, eds. Delivering High‐Quality Cancer Care: Charting a New Course for a System in Crisis. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2013.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAmerican Cancer Society. Breast Cancer Facts & Figures 2016‐2017. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society; 2017.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGilbar R, Gilbar O. The medical decision‐making process and the family: the case of breast cancer patients and their husbands. Bioethics. 2009; 23: 183 ‐ 192.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOhlen J, Balneaves LG, Bottorff JL, Brazier AS. The influence of significant others in complementary and alternative medicine decisions by cancer patients. Soc Sci Med. 2006; 63: 1625 ‐ 1636.
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.