Show simple item record

Facilitated Peer Mentorship to Support Aging Research: A RE‐AIM Evaluation of the CoMPAdRE Program

dc.contributor.authorMasterson Creber, Ruth M.
dc.contributor.authorBaldwin, Matthew R.
dc.contributor.authorBrown, Patrick J.
dc.contributor.authorRao, Maya K.
dc.contributor.authorGoyal, Parag
dc.contributor.authorHummel, Scott
dc.contributor.authorDodson, John A.
dc.contributor.authorHelmke, Stephen
dc.contributor.authorMaurer, Mathew S.
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-31T18:28:15Z
dc.date.available2020-06-01T14:50:01Zen
dc.date.issued2019-04
dc.identifier.citationMasterson Creber, Ruth M.; Baldwin, Matthew R.; Brown, Patrick J.; Rao, Maya K.; Goyal, Parag; Hummel, Scott; Dodson, John A.; Helmke, Stephen; Maurer, Mathew S. (2019). "Facilitated Peer Mentorship to Support Aging Research: A RE‐AIM Evaluation of the CoMPAdRE Program." Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 67(4): 804-810.
dc.identifier.issn0002-8614
dc.identifier.issn1532-5415
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/149354
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons, Inc.
dc.subject.otherimplementation science
dc.subject.otherfaculty development
dc.subject.otherearly career
dc.subject.otheracademic medicine
dc.subject.othergeriatrics
dc.subject.otherolder adults
dc.subject.otheraging
dc.subject.othermentoring
dc.subject.otherpeer group
dc.titleFacilitated Peer Mentorship to Support Aging Research: A RE‐AIM Evaluation of the CoMPAdRE Program
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelGeriatrics
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/149354/1/jgs15792.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/149354/2/jgs15792_am.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jgs.15792
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of the American Geriatrics Society
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHarvard Business School. Beyond the myth of the perfect mentor: building a network of developmental relationships. Harv Bus Rev. 1998; 1 ‐ 12.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWhite HK, Buhr GT, Pinheiro SO. Mentoring: a key strategy to prepare the next generation of physicians to care for an aging America. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2009; 57 ( 7 ): 1270 ‐ 1277.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMaurer MS, Mancini D. HFpEF: is splitting into distinct phenotypes by comorbidities the pathway forward? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014; 64 ( 6 ): 550 ‐ 552.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMaurer MS. Heart failure with a normal ejection fraction (HFNEF): embracing complexity. J Card Fail. 2009; 15 ( 7 ): 561 ‐ 564.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJohnson JC, Williams B, Jayadevappa R. Mentoring program for minority faculty at the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine. Acad Med. 1999; 74 ( 4 ): 376 ‐ 379.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVarkey P, Jatoi A, Williams A, et al. The positive impact of a facilitated peer mentoring program on academic skills of women faculty. BMC Med Educ. 2012; 12: 14.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKashiwagi DT, Varkey P, Cook DA. Mentoring programs for physicians in academic medicine: a systematic review. Acad Med. 2013; 88 ( 7 ): 1029 ‐ 1037.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMiller AP, Maurer M, Alexander KP. Geriatric cardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018; 71 ( 25 ): 2970 ‐ 2973.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWingard DL, Garman KA, Reznik V. Facilitating faculty success: outcomes and cost benefit of the UCSD National Center of Leadership in Academic Medicine. Acad Med. 2004; 79 ( suppl 10 ): S9 ‐ S11.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBeech BM, Calles‐Escandon J, Hairston KG, Langdon SE, Latham‐Sadler BA, Bell RA. Mentoring programs for underrepresented minority faculty in academic medical centers: a systematic review of the literature. Acad Med. 2013; 88 ( 4 ): 541 ‐ 549.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEfstathiou JA, Drumm MR, Paly JP, et al. Long‐term impact of a faculty mentoring program in academic medicine. PLoS One. 2018; 13 ( 11 ): e0207634.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAmerican Association of Medical Colleges (AAMC). Striving Toward Excellence: Faculty Diversity in Medical Education. Washington, DC: AAMC; 2009.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLewis D, Paulsen E. Proceedings of the Diversity and Inclusion Innovation Forum: Unconscious Bias in Academic Medicine. Washington, DC: Association of American Medical Colleges; 2017.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceYedidia M, Bickel J. Why aren’t there more women leaders in academic medicine? The views of clinical department chairs. Acad Med. 2001; 76 ( 5 ): 453 ‐ 465.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGraneheim UH, Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today. 2004; 24 ( 2 ): 105 ‐ 112.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005; 15 ( 9 ): 1277 ‐ 1288.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGlasgow RE, Klesges LM, Dzewaltowski DA, Estabrooks PA, Vogt TM. Evaluating the impact of health promotion programs: using the RE‐AIM framework to form summary measures for decision making involving complex issues. Health Educ Res. 2006; 21 ( 5 ): 688 ‐ 694.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGlasgow RE, Vogt TM, Boles SM. Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE‐AIM framework. Am J Public Health. 1999; 89 ( 9 ): 1322 ‐ 1327.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDeCastro R, Sambuco D, Ubel PA, Stewart A, Jagsi R. Mentor networks in academic medicine: moving beyond a dyadic conception of mentoring for junior faculty researchers. Acad Med. 2013; 88 ( 4 ): 488 ‐ 496.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePololi LH, Knight SM, Dennis K, Frankel RM. Helping medical school faculty realize their dreams: an innovative, collaborative mentoring program. Acad Med. 2002; 77 ( 5 ): 377 ‐ 384.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceInouye SK, Studenski S, Tinetti ME, Kuchel GA. Geriatric syndromes: clinical, research and policy implications of a core geriatric concept. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007; 55 ( 5 ): 780 ‐ 791.
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.