View Item 

Show simple item record

Male‐mediated prenatal loss: Functions and mechanisms
dc.contributor.authorZipple, Matthew N.
dc.contributor.authorRoberts, Eila K.
dc.contributor.authorAlberts, Susan C.
dc.contributor.authorBeehner, Jacinta C.
dc.date.accessioned2019-06-20T17:05:18Z
dc.date.available2020-07-01T17:47:46Zen
dc.date.issued2019-05
dc.identifier.citationZipple, Matthew N.; Roberts, Eila K.; Alberts, Susan C.; Beehner, Jacinta C. (2019). "Male‐mediated prenatal loss: Functions and mechanisms." Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews 28(3): 114-125.
dc.identifier.issn1060-1538
dc.identifier.issn1520-6505
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/149530
dc.description.abstractSexually selected infanticide has been the subject of intense empirical and theoretical study for decades; a related phenomenon, male‐mediated prenatal loss, has received much less attention in evolutionary studies. Male‐mediated prenatal loss occurs when inseminated or pregnant females terminate reproductive effort following exposure to a nonsire male, either through implantation failure or pregnancy termination. Male‐mediated prenatal loss encompasses two sub‐phenomena: sexually selected feticide and the Bruce effect. In this review, we provide a framework that explains the relationship between feticide and the Bruce effect and describes what is known about the proximate and ultimate mechanisms involved in each. Using a simple model, we demonstrate that male‐mediated prenatal loss can provide greater reproductive benefits to males than infanticide. We therefore suggest that, compared to infanticide, male‐mediated prenatal loss may be more prevalent in mammalian species and may have played a greater role in their social evolution than has previously been documented.
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons, Inc.
dc.subject.otherpregnancy disruption
dc.subject.otherpregnancy failure
dc.subject.otherpregnancy interruption
dc.subject.otherpregnancy termination
dc.subject.otherreproductive failure
dc.subject.otherpregnancy block
dc.subject.otherimplantation failure
dc.subject.otherfeticide
dc.subject.otherBruce effect
dc.titleMale‐mediated prenatal loss: Functions and mechanisms
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelAnthropology
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/149530/1/evan21776_am.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/149530/2/evan21776.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/evan.21776
dc.identifier.sourceEvolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEccard JA, Dammhahn M, Ylönen H. 2017. The Bruce effect revisited: is pregnancy termination in female rodents an adaptation to ensure breeding success after male turnover in low densities? Oecologia 185: 81 – 94.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCheney DL, Seyfarth RM, Fischer J, et al. 2006. Reproduction, mortality, and female reproductive success in chacma baboons of the Okavango Delta, Botswana. In: Swedell L, Leigh S, editors. Reproduction and fitness in baboons: behavioral, ecological, and life history perspectives, New York: Springer. p 147 – 176.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCheney D et al. 2004. Factors affecting reproduction and mortality among baboons in the Okavango Delta, Botswana. Int J Primatol 25: 401 – 428.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHamilton W, Bulger J. 1990. Natal male baboon rank rises and successful challenges to resident alpha males. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 26: 357 – 362.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePalombit RA et al. 1997. The adaptive value of “friendships” to female baboons: experimental and observational evidence. Anim Behav 54: 599 – 614.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBeehner JC, Bergman TJ. 2008. Infant mortality following male takeovers in wild geladas. Am J Primatol 70: 1152 – 1159.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSnyder‐Mackler N, Alberts SC, Bergman TJ. 2012. Concessions of an alpha male? Cooperative defence and shared reproduction in multi‐male primate groups. Proc Biol Sci 279: 3788 – 3795.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRoberts EK, Lu A, Bergman TJ, Beehner JC. 2017. Female reproductive parameters in wild geladas ( Theropithecus gelada ). Int J Primatol 38: 1 – 20.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAltmann SA, Altmann J. 1973. Baboon ecology: African field research. Chicago, Illinois: University of Chicago Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceYoung AJ, Carlson AA, Monfort SL, Russell AF, Bennett NC, Clutton‐Brock T. 2006. Stress and the suppression of subordinate reproduction in cooperatively breeding meerkats. Proc Natl Acad Sci 103: 12005 – 12010.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNunn C. 2011. The comparative method in evolutionary anthropology and biology. Chicago, Illinois: University of Chicago Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBlumstein D. 2000. The evolution of infanticide in rodents: a comparative analysis. In: van Schaik CP, Janson CH, editors. Infanticide by males its Implic, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, p 178 – 197.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKerhoas D, Perwitasari‐Farajallah D, Agil M, Widdig A, Engelhardt A. 2014. Social and ecological factors influencing offspring survival in wild macaques. Behav Ecol 25: 1164 – 1172.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLukas D, Clutton‐Brock TH. 2013. The evolution of social monogamy in mammals. Science 341: 526 – 530.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOpie C, Atkinson QD, Dunbar RIM, Shultz S. 2013. Male infanticide leads to social monogamy in primates. Proc Natl Acad Sci 110: 13328 – 13332.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLukas D, Huchard E. 2014. The evolution of infanticide by males in mammalian societies. Science 346: 841 – 844.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOpie C, Atkinson QD, Dunbar RIM, Shultz S. 2014. Reply to Lukas and Clutton‐Brock: infanticide still drives primate monogamy. Proc Natl Acad Sci 111: E1675 – E1675.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSapolsky RM, Romero LM, Munck AU. 2000. How do glucocorticoids influence stress responses? Integrating permissives, suppressive, stimulatory, and preparative actions. Endocr Rev 21: 55 – 89.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDeCatanzaro D, Murji T. 2004. Inseminated female mice ( Mus musculus ) investigate rather than avoid novel males that disrupt pregnancy, but sires protect pregnancy. J Comp Psychol 118: 251 – 257.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBecker SD, Hurst JL. 2009. Female behaviour plays a critical role in controlling murine pregnancy block. Proceed Biol Sci 276: 1723 – 1729.
dc.identifier.citedreferencede la Maza HM, Wolff JO, Lindsey A. 1999. Exposure to strange adults does not cause pregnancy disruption or infanticide in the gray‐tailed vole. Behav Ecol Sociobiol Springer‐Verlag. 45: 107 – 113.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMahady S, Wolff J. 2002. A field test of the Bruce effect in the monogamous prairie vole ( Microtus ochrogaster ). Behav Ecol Sociobiol Springer‐Verlag 52: 31 – 37.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWolff JO. 2003. Laboratory studies with rodents: facts or artifacts? Bioscience Oxford University Press 53: 421 – 427.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKrebs C et al. 2007. Social behaviour and self‐regulation in murid rodents. In: Wolff JO, Sherman PW, editors. Rodent societies: An Ecological and Evolutionary Perspective, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. p 173 – 181.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCatalano R et al. 2017. Separating the Bruce and Trivers‐Willard effects in theory and in human data. Am J Hum Biol 30: e23074.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGesquiere LR, Altmann J, Archie EA, Alberts SC. 2018. Interbirth intervals in wild baboons: environmental predictors and hormonal correlates. Am J Phys Anthropol 166: 107 – 126.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNguyen N, van Horn RC, Alberts SC, Altmann J. 2009. “Friendships” between new mothers and adult males: adaptive benefits and determinants in wild baboons ( Papio cynocephalus ). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 63: 1331 – 1344.
dc.identifier.citedreferencede Magalhaes JP, Costa J. 2009. A database of vertebrate longevity records and their relation to other life‐history traits. J Evol Biol Wiley/Blackwell (10.1111) 22: 1770 – 1774.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePalombit RA. 2015. Infanticide as sexual conflict: coevolution of male strategies and female counterstrategies. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 7: 1 – 31.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePereira ME. 1983. Abortion following the immigration of an adult male baboon ( Papio Cynocephalus ). Am J Primatol 4: 93 – 98.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAgoramoorthy G, Mohnot SM, Sommer V, Srivastava A. 1988. Abortions in free ranging Hanuman langurs ( Presbytis entellus ) ‐ a male induced strategy? Hum Evol 3: 297 – 308.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSommer V. 1994. Infanticide among the langurs of Jodhpur: testing the sexual selection hypothesis with a long‐term record. In: Parmigiani S, vom Saal FS, editors. Chur, Switzerland: Infanticide Parent, Care. p 155 – 198.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAlberts SC et al. 1992. Behavioral, endocrine, and immunological correlates of immigration by an aggressive male into a natural primate group. Horm Behav 26: 167 – 178.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZipple MN, Grady JH, Gordon JB, et al. 2017. Conditional fetal and infant killing by male baboons. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 284: 20162561.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBruce HM. 1959. An exteroreceptive block to pregnancy in the mouse. Nature 184: 105.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBronson F, Eleftheriou B. 1963. Influence of strange males on implantation in the deermouse. Gen Comp Endocrinol 3: 515 – 518.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStehn RA, Richmond ME. 1975. Male‐induced pregnancy termination in the prairie vole, Microtus ochrogaster. Science 187: 1211 – 1213.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKenney AM et al. 1977. Postimplantation pregnancy disruption in Microtus ochrogaster, M. pennsylvanicus and Peromyscus maniculatus. Reproduction 49: 365 – 367.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBartoš L, Bartošová J, Pluháček J, Šindelářová J. 2011. Promiscuous behaviour disrupts pregnancy block in domestic horse mares. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 65: 1567 – 1572.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBartos L et al. 2016. A sociobiological origin of pregnancy failure in domestic dogs. Sci Rep 6: 22188.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRoberts EK, Lu A, Bergman TJ, Beehner JC. 2012. A Bruce effect in wild geladas. Science 335: 1222 – 1225.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHacklander K, Arnold W. 1999. Male‐caused failure of female reproduction and its adaptive value in alpine marmots ( Marmota marmota ). Behav Ecol 10: 592 – 597.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAmann AL, Pines M, Swedell L. 2017. Contexts and consequences of takeovers in hamadryas baboons: female parity, reproductive state, and observational evidence of pregnancy loss. Am J Primatol 79: e22649.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLabov JB. 1981. Pregnancy blocking in rodents: adaptive advantages for females. Am Nat 118: 361 – 371.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRülicke T et al. 2006. Early maternal investment in mice: no evidence for compatible‐genes sexual selection despite hybrid vigor. J Evol Biol 19: 922 – 928.
dc.identifier.citedreferencedeCatanzaro D. 2015. Sex steroids as pheromones in mammals: the exceptional role of estradiol. Horm Behav 68: 103 – 116.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSaxton KB, Gemmill A, Catalano RA. 2017. Reproductive suppression follows threats to child survival. J Evol Biol 30: 889 – 897.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCatalano RA et al. 2016. Twinning in Norway following the Oslo massacre: evidence of a ‘Bruce effect’ in humans. Twin Res Hum Genet 19: 485 – 491.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePalombit RA. 2014. Sexual conflict in nonhuman primates. In: Advances in the Study of Behavior, Vol 46, 1st ed. Oxford, UK: Elsevier Inc.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBruce HM. 1960. A block to pregnancy in the mouse caused by proximity of strange males. J Reprod Fertil 1: 96 – 103.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStorey AE. 1986. Influence of sires on male‐induced pregnancy disruptions in meadow voles ( Microtus pennsylvanicus ) differs with stage of pregnancy. J Comp Psychol 100: 15 – 20.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStorey A, Snow D. 1990. Postimplantation pregnancy disruptions in meadow voles: relationship to variation in male sexual and aggressive behavior. Physiol Behav Elsevier 47: 19 – 25.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSmale L. 1988. Influence of male gonadal hormones and familiarity on pregnancy interruption in prairie voles. Biol Reprod 39: 28 – 31.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchadler MH. 1981. Postimplantation abortion in pine voles ( Microtus pinetorum ) induced by strange males and pheromones of strange males. Biol Reprod 25: 295 – 297.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMarashi V, Rülicke T. 2012. The Bruce effect in Norway rats. Biol Reprod 86: 1 – 5.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRohrbach C. 1982. Investigation of the Bruce effect in the Mongolian gerbil ( Meriones unguiculatus ). J Reprod Fertil 65: 411 – 417.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGale T et al. 2013. Exposure to a novel male during late pregnancy influences subsequent growth of offspring during lactation. J Evol Biol Wiley/Blackwell (10.1111) 26: 2057 – 2062.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBerger J. 1983. Induced abortion and social factors in wild horses. Nature 303: 59 – 61.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBeehner JC, Lu A. 2013. Reproductive suppression in female primates: a review. Evol Anthropol 22: 226 – 238.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSommer V. 1987. Infanticide among free‐ranging langurs ( Presbytis entellus ) at Jodhpur (Rajasthan/India): recent observations and a reconsideration of hypotheses. Primates 28: 163 – 197.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrennan P, Keverne EB. 2015. Biological complexity and adaptability of simple mammalian olfactory memory systems. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 50: 29 – 40.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDominic CJ. 1966. Observations on the reproductive pheromones of mice. J Reprod Fertil 11: 407 – 414.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceParkes AS, Bruce HM. 1962. Pregnancy‐block in female mice placed in boxes soiled by males. J Reprod Fertil 4: 303 – 308.
dc.identifier.citedreferencedeCatanzaro D, Wyngaarden P, Griffiths J, Ham M, Hancox J, Brain D. 1995. Interactions of contact, odor cues, and androgens in strange‐male‐induced early pregnancy disruptions in mice ( Mus musculus ). J Comp Psychol 109: 115 – 122.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBruce H. 1960. Further observations on pregnancy block in mice caused by the proximity of strange males. J Reprod Fertil 1: 311 – 312.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceParia BC, Reese J, Das SK, Dey SK. 2002. Deciphering the cross‐talk of implantation: advances and challenges. Science 296: 2185 – 2188.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMartel D, Psychoyos A. 1982. Different responses of rat endometrial epithelium and stroma to induction of oestradiol binding sites by progesterone. J Reprod Fertil 64: 387 – 389.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCarson DD, Bagchi I, Dey SK, et al. 2000. Embryo implantation. Dev Biol 223: 217 – 237.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMacNiven E, deCatanzaro D, Younglai EV. 1992. Chronic stress increases estrogen and other steroids in inseminated rats. Physiol Behav 52: 159 – 162.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceThorpe JB, Burgess PS, Sadkowski M, deCatanzaro D. 2013. Estrogen‐progesterone balance in the context of blastocyst implantation failure induced by predator stress. Psychoneuroendocrinology 38: 3048 – 3056.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceThorpe J, Gould KE, Borman ED, deCatanzaro D. 2014. Circulating and urinary adrenal corticosterone, progesterone, and estradiol in response to acute stress in female mice ( Mus musculus ). Horm Metab Res 46: 211 – 218.
dc.identifier.citedreferencedeCatanzaro D, Graham C. 1992. Influences of exogenous epinephrine on two reproductive parameters in female mice: disruption of receptivity but not implantation. Horm Behav 26: 330 – 338.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKeverne EB et al. 1996. Primate brain evolution: genetic and functional considerations. Proceed Biol Sci 263: 689 – 696.
dc.identifier.citedreferencede Catanzaro D, MacNiven E, Ricciuti F. 1991. Comparison of the adverse effects of adrenal and ovarian seteroids on early pregnancy in mice. Psychoneuroendocrinology 16: 525 – 536.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMa W, Song H, Das SK, Paria BC, Dey SK. 2003. Estrogen is a critical determinant that specifies the duration of the window of uterine receptivity for implantation. Proc Natl Acad Sci 100: 2963 – 2968.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMacniven E, de Catanzaro D. 1990. Reversal of stress‐induced pregnancy blocks in mice by progesterone and metyrapone. Physiol Behav Elsevier 47: 443 – 448.
dc.identifier.citedreferencedeCatanzaro D, Macniven E, Goodison T, Richardson D. 1994. Estrogen antibodies reduce vulnerability to stress‐induced failure of intrauterine implantation in inseminated mice. Physiol Behav 55: 35 – 38.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGuzzo AC, Jheon J, Imtiaz F, deCatanzaro D. 2012. Oestradiol transmission from males to females in the context of the Bruce and Vandenbergh effects in mice ( Mus musculus ). Reproduction 143: 539 – 548.
dc.identifier.citedreferencedeCatanzaro D, Pollock T. 2016. Absorption and distribution of estradiol from male seminal emissions during mating. J Endocrinol 231: 245 – 257.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceThorpe JB, de Catanzaro D. 2012. Oestradiol treatment restores the capacity of castrated males to induce both the Vandenbergh and the Bruce effects in mice ( Mus musculus ). Reproduction 143: 123 – 132.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBeaton EA, de Catanzaro D. 2005. Novel males’ capacity to disrupt early pregnancy in mice ( Mus musculus ) is attenuated via a chronic reduction of males’ urinary 17β‐estradiol. Psychoneuroendocrinology 30: 688 – 697.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLi CS, Kaba H, Saito H, Seto K. 1990. Neural mechanisms underlying the action of primer pheromones in mice. Neuroscience 36: 773 – 778.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMarchlewska‐Koj A, Jemiolo B. 1978. Evidence for the involvement of dopaminergic neurons in the pregnancy block effect. Neuroendocrinology 26: 186 – 192.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBruce H, Parkes A. 1960. Hormonal factors in exteroceptive block to pregnancy in mice. J Endocrinol 20: xxix – xxx.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRajendren G, Dominic CJ. 1987. The male‐induced pregnancy block (the Bruce effect) in mice: re‐evaluation of the ability of exogenous progesterone in preventing implantation failure. Exp Clin Endocrinol 89: 188 – 196.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMarsden HM, Bronson FH. 1965. Strange male block to pregnancy: its absence in inbred mouse strains. Nature 207: 878 – 878.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSpironello E, DeCatanzaro D. 1999. Sexual satiety diminishes the capacity of novel males to disrupt early pregnancy in inseminated female mice ( Mus musculus ). J Comp Psychol 113: 218 – 222.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKeverne EB, de la Riva C. 1982. Pheromones in mice: reciprocal interaction between the nose and brain. Nature 296: 148 – 150.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLeinders‐Zufall T et al. 2004. MHC class I peptides as chemosensory signals in the vomeronasal organ. Science 306: 1033 – 1037.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHattori T, Osakada T, Masaoka T, et al. 2017. Exocrine gland‐secreting peptide 1 is a key chemosensory signal responsible for the Bruce effect in mice. Curr Biol 27: 3197 – 3201.e3.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePetrulis A. 2013. Chemosignals, hormones and mammalian reproduction. Horm Behav 63: 723 – 741.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrennan P, Kaba H, Keverne E. 1990. Olfactory recognition: a simple memory system. Science 250: 1223 – 1226.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePerrett DI, Mistlin AJ, Chitty AJ. 1987. Visual neurones responsive to faces. Trends Neurosci 10: 358 – 364.
dc.identifier.citedreferencede Catanzaro D, Macniven E. 1992. Psychogenic pregnancy disruptions in mammals. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 16: 43 – 53.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceArck PC. 2001. Stress and pregnancy loss: role of immune mediators, hormones and neurotransmitters. Am J Reprod Immunol 46: 117 – 123.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChristian LM. 2012. Physiological reactivity to psychological stress in human pregnancy: current knowledge and future directions. Prog Neurobiol 99: 106 – 116.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceClark DA. 2008. Immunological factors in pregnancy wastage: fact or fiction. Am J Reprod Immunol 59: 277 – 300.
dc.identifier.citedreferencevan Schaik CP. 2000. Social counterstrategies against male infanticide in primates and other mammals. In: Kappeler PM, editor. Primate males: causes and consequences of variation in group composition, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p 34 – 52.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStearns SC. 1992. The evolution of life histories, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWasser SK, Barash DP. 1983. Reproductive suppression among female mammals: implications for biomedicine and sexual selection theory. Q Rev Biol 58: 513 – 538.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWingfield JC, Sapolsky RM. 2003. Reproduction and resistance to stress: when and how. J Neuroendocrinol 15: 711 – 724.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSmuts BB, Smuts RW. 1993. Male aggression and sexual coercion of females in nonhuman primates and other mammals: evidence and theoretical implications. Adv Study Behav Academic Press 22: 1 – 63.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWallen K, Zehr JL. 2004. Hormones and history: the evolution and development of primate female sexuality. J Sex Res 41: 101 – 112.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDeCatanzaro D et al. 2009. Exposure to developing females induces polyuria, polydipsia, and altered urinary levels of creatinine, 17β‐estradiol, and testosterone in adult male mice ( Mus musculus ). Horm Behav 55: 240 – 247.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMuir C, Spironello‐Vella E, Pisani N, deCatanzaro D. 2001. Enzyme immunoassay of 17β‐estradiol, estrone conjugates, and testosterone in urinary and fecal samples from male and female mice. Horm Metab Res 33: 653 – 658.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePeso M et al. 2015. Pheromonal control: reconciling physiological mechanism with signalling theory. Biol Rev Wiley/Blackwell (10.1111) 90: 542 – 559.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSearcy WA, Nowicki S. 2005. The evolution of animal communication: reliability and deception in signaling systems, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
evan21776_am.pdf
Size:
607.4KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open
Name:
evan21776.pdf
Size:
1.979MB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.