Show simple item record

Minimizing radiographic contrast administration during coronary angiography using a novel contrast reduction system: A multicenter observational study of the DyeVert™ plus contrast reduction system

dc.contributor.authorGurm, Hitinder S.
dc.contributor.authorMavromatis, Kreton
dc.contributor.authorBertolet, Barry
dc.contributor.authorKereiakes, Dean J.
dc.contributor.authorAmin, Amit P.
dc.contributor.authorShah, Atman P.
dc.contributor.authorHanzel, George S.
dc.contributor.authorRao, Siddhartha
dc.contributor.authorThomas, Joseph L.
dc.contributor.authorKumar, Gautam
dc.date.accessioned2019-06-20T17:05:29Z
dc.date.availableWITHHELD_13_MONTHS
dc.date.available2019-06-20T17:05:29Z
dc.date.issued2019-06-01
dc.identifier.citationGurm, Hitinder S.; Mavromatis, Kreton; Bertolet, Barry; Kereiakes, Dean J.; Amin, Amit P.; Shah, Atman P.; Hanzel, George S.; Rao, Siddhartha; Thomas, Joseph L.; Kumar, Gautam (2019). "Minimizing radiographic contrast administration during coronary angiography using a novel contrast reduction system: A multicenter observational study of the DyeVert™ plus contrast reduction system." Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions 93(7): 1228-1235.
dc.identifier.issn1522-1946
dc.identifier.issn1522-726X
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/149537
dc.description.abstractObjectiveTo evaluate contrast media (CM) volume (CMV) saved using the DyeVert™ Plus Contrast Reduction System (DyeVert Plus System, Osprey Medical) in patients undergoing diagnostic coronary angiogram (CAG) and/or percutaneous coronary interventional (PCI) procedures performed with manual injections.BackgroundCurrent guidelines advocate for monitoring and minimization of the total volume of CM in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients undergoing invasive cardiac procedures. The DyeVert Plus System is an FDA cleared device designed to reduce CMV delivered during angiography and permit real‐time CMV monitoring.MethodsWe performed a multicenter, single‐arm, observational study. Eligible subjects were ≥ 18 years old with baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) 20–60 mL/min/1.73 m2. The primary endpoint was % CMV saved over the total procedure. A secondary objective was to evaluate adverse events (AEs) related to DyeVert Plus System or to CM use.ResultsA total of 114 subjects were enrolled at eight centers. Mean age was 72 ± 9 years, 72% were male, and mean body mass index was 29 ± 5. Baseline eGFR was 43 ± 11 mL/min/1.73 m2. CAG‐only was performed in 65% of cases. One hundred and five subjects were evaluable for the primary endpoint. Mean CMV attempted was 112 ± 85 mL (range 22–681) and mean CMV delivered was 67 ± 51 mL (range 12–403), resulting in an overall CMV savings of 40.1 ± 8.8% (95% CI 38.4, 41.8; P < 0.0001) per procedure. Image quality was maintained in all but one case where the system was turned off for one injection. No DyeVert Plus System‐related AEs were reported. Acute kidney injury (AKI; defined as serum creatinine rise of >0.3 mg/dL from baseline) was reported in 11 cases with seven occurring in subjects with baseline eGFR < 30 and three AKI events were attributed to CM. AKI rates increased as CMV/eGFR ratios increased.ConclusionsThese data suggest DyeVert Plus System use in CKD patients undergoing CAG and/or PCI results in clinically meaningful CMV savings while maintaining image quality.
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons, Inc.
dc.subject.otherPCI‐percutaneous coronary intervention
dc.subject.otherRDAC‐renal disease‐acute
dc.subject.otherCONT‐contrast agents
dc.subject.othercoronary
dc.subject.otherIAF‐imaging
dc.subject.otherangiographic/fluoroscopic
dc.subject.otherANCO‐angiography
dc.titleMinimizing radiographic contrast administration during coronary angiography using a novel contrast reduction system: A multicenter observational study of the DyeVert™ plus contrast reduction system
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMedicine (General)
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/149537/1/ccd27935_am.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/149537/2/ccd27935.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/ccd.27935
dc.identifier.sourceCatheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcCullough PA. Contrast‐induced acute kidney injury. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016; 68 ( 13 ): 1465 ‐ 1473.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGurm HS, Dixon SR, Smith DE, et al. Renal function‐based contrast dosing to define safe limits of radiographic contrast media in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011; 58 ( 9 ): 907 ‐ 914.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGurm HS, Seth M, Dixon S, Kraft P, Jensen A. Trends in contrast volume use and incidence of acute kidney injury in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: Insights from blue cross blue shield of Michigan cardiovascular collaborative (BMC2). JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018; 11 ( 5 ): 509 ‐ 511.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSeeliger E, Sendeski M, Rihal CS, Persson PB. Contrast‐induced kidney injury: Mechanisms, risk factors, and prevention. Eur Heart J. 2012; 33 ( 16 ): 2007 ‐ 2015.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKooiman J, Seth M, Nallamothu BK, Heung M, Humes D, Gurm HS. Association between acute kidney injury and in‐hospital mortality in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2015; 8 ( 6 ): e002212.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGiacoppo D, Madhavan MV, Baber U, et al. Impact of contrast‐induced acute kidney injury after percutaneous coronary intervention on short‐ and long‐term outcomes: Pooled analysis from the HORIZONS‐AMI and ACUITY trials. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2015; 8 ( 8 ): e002475.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTsai TT, Patel UD, Chang TI, et al. Contemporary incidence, predictors, and outcomes of acute kidney injury in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions: Insights from the NCDR Cath‐PCI registry. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014; 7 ( 1 ): 1 ‐ 9.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNeyra JA, Shah S, Mooney R, Jacobsen G, Yee J, Novak JE. Contrast‐induced acute kidney injury following coronary angiography: A cohort study of hospitalized patients with or without chronic kidney disease. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2013; 28 ( 6 ): 1463 ‐ 1471.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNaidu SS, Aronow HD, Box LC, et al. SCAI expert consensus statement: 2016 Best practices in the cardiac catheterization laboratory: (Endorsed by the cardiological society of India, and sociedad Latino Americana de Cardiologia intervencionista; affirmation of value by the Canadian Association of interventional cardiology‐Association canadienne de cardiologie d’intervention). Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016; 88 ( 3 ): 407 ‐ 423.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNallamothu BK, Tommaso CL, Anderson HV, et al. ACC/AHA/SCAI/AMA‐Convened PCPI/NCQA 2013 performance measures for adults undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on performance measures, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, the American Medical Association‐convened physician consortium for performance improvement, and the National Committee for quality assurance. Circulation. 2014; 129 ( 8 ): 926 ‐ 949.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKhwaja A. KDIGO clinical practice guidelines for acute kidney injury. Nephron Clin Pract. 2012; 120 ( 4 ): c179 ‐ c184.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMarenzi G, Assanelli E, Campodonico J, et al. Contrast volume during primary percutaneous coronary intervention and subsequent contrast‐induced nephropathy and mortality. Ann Intern Med. 2009; 150 ( 3 ): 170 ‐ 177.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLauver DA, Carey EG, Bergin IL, Lucchesi BR, Gurm HS. Sildenafil citrate for prophylaxis of nephropathy in an animal model of contrast‐induced acute kidney injury. PLoS One. 2014; 9 ( 11 ): e113598.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrown JR, Robb JF, Block CA, et al. Does safe dosing of iodinated contrast prevent contrast‐induced acute kidney injury? Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2010; 3 ( 4 ): 346 ‐ 350.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFreeman RV, O’Donnell M, Share D, et al. Nephropathy requiring dialysis after percutaneous coronary intervention and the critical role of an adjusted contrast dose. Am J Cardiol. 2002; 90 ( 10 ): 1068 ‐ 1073.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrown JR, Solomon RJ, Sarnak MJ, et al. Reducing contrast‐induced acute kidney injury using a regional multicenter quality improvement intervention. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2014; 7 ( 5 ): 693 ‐ 700.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDesch S, Fuernau G, Poss J, et al. Impact of a novel contrast reduction system on contrast savings in coronary angiography—The DyeVert randomised controlled trial. Int J Cardiol. 2018; 257: 50 ‐ 53.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSapontis J, Barron G, Seneviratne S, et al. A first in human evaluation of a novel contrast media saving device. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017; 90 ( 6 ): 928 ‐ 934.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCorcione N, Biondi‐Zoccai G, Ferraro P, et al. Contrast minimization with the new‐generation DyeVert Plus System for contrast reduction and real‐time monitoring during coronary and peripheral procedures: First experience. J Invas Cardiol. 2017; 29 ( 8 ): 259 ‐ 262.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLaskey WK, Jenkins C, Selzer F, et al. Volume‐to‐creatinine clearance ratio: A pharmacokinetically based risk factor for prediction of early creatinine increase after percutaneous coronary intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007; 50 ( 7 ): 584 ‐ 590.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMehran R, Aymong ED, Nikolsky E, et al. A simple risk score for prediction of contrast‐induced nephropathy after percutaneous coronary intervention: Development and initial validation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004; 44 ( 7 ): 1393 ‐ 1399.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRaposeiras‐Roubin S, Abu‐Assi E, Ocaranza‐Sanchez R, et al. Dosing of iodinated contrast volume: A new simple algorithm to stratify the risk of contrast‐induced nephropathy in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013; 82 ( 6 ): 888 ‐ 897.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGurm HS, Seth M, Mehran R, et al. Impact of contrast dose reduction on incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) among patients undergoing PCI: A modeling study. J Invasive Cardiol. 2016; 28 ( 4 ): 142 ‐ 146.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOgata N, Ikari Y, Nanasato M, et al. Safety margin of minimized contrast volume during percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with chronic kidney disease. Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2014; 29 ( 3 ): 209 ‐ 215.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLiu Y, Tan N, Zhou YL, He PC, Luo JF, Chen JY. The contrast medium volume to estimated glomerular filtration rate ratio as a predictor of contrast‐induced nephropathy after primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Int Urol Nephrol. 2012; 44 ( 1 ): 221 ‐ 229.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNyman U, Bjork J, Aspelin P, Marenzi G. Contrast medium dose‐to‐GFR ratio: A measure of systemic exposure to predict contrast‐induced nephropathy after percutaneous coronary intervention. Acta Radiol. 2008; 49 ( 6 ): 658 ‐ 667.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCigarroa RG, Lange RA, Williams RH, Hillis LD. Dosing of contrast material to prevent contrast nephropathy in patients with renal disease. Am J Med. 1989; 86: 649 ‐ 652.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAmin AP, Bach RG, Caruso ML, Kennedy KF, Spertus JA. Association of variation in contrast volume with acute kidney injury in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. JAMA Cardiol. 2017; 2 ( 9 ): 1007 ‐ 1012.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePrasad A, Sohn A, Morales J, et al. Contemporary practice patterns related to the risk of acute kidney injury in the catheterization laboratory: Results from a survey of Society of Cardiovascular Angiography and Intervention (SCAI) cardiologists. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017; 89 ( 3 ): 383 ‐ 392.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWeisbord SD, Gallagher M, Jneid H, et al. Outcomes after Angiography with Sodium Bicarbonate and Acetylcysteine. New England Journal of Medicine. 2018; 378 ( 7 ): 603 ‐ 614.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGurm H, Seth M, Dixon S, Kraft P, Jensen A. Trends in contrast volume use and incidence of acute kidney injury in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018; 11 ( 5 ): 509 ‐ 511.
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.