Bayesian hierarchical EMAX model for doseâ response in early phase efficacy clinical trials
dc.contributor.author | Gajewski, Byron J. | |
dc.contributor.author | Meinzer, Caitlyn | |
dc.contributor.author | Berry, Scott M. | |
dc.contributor.author | Rockswold, Gaylan L. | |
dc.contributor.author | Barsan, William G. | |
dc.contributor.author | Korley, Frederick K. | |
dc.contributor.author | Martin, Renee’ H. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-07-03T19:55:43Z | |
dc.date.available | WITHHELD_13_MONTHS | |
dc.date.available | 2019-07-03T19:55:43Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019-07-30 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Gajewski, Byron J.; Meinzer, Caitlyn; Berry, Scott M.; Rockswold, Gaylan L.; Barsan, William G.; Korley, Frederick K.; Martin, Renee’ H. (2019). "Bayesian hierarchical EMAX model for doseâ response in early phase efficacy clinical trials." Statistics in Medicine 38(17): 3123-3138. | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0277-6715 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1097-0258 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/149669 | |
dc.publisher | CRC Press | |
dc.publisher | Wiley Periodicals, Inc. | |
dc.subject.other | hierarchical models | |
dc.subject.other | dosing design, Bayesian models | |
dc.subject.other | EMAX | |
dc.subject.other | logistic | |
dc.title | Bayesian hierarchical EMAX model for doseâ response in early phase efficacy clinical trials | |
dc.type | Article | |
dc.rights.robots | IndexNoFollow | |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Public Health | |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Medicine (General) | |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Statistics and Numeric Data | |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Health Sciences | |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Science | |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Social Sciences | |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Peer Reviewed | |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/149669/1/sim8167_am.pdf | |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/149669/2/sim8167.pdf | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1002/sim.8167 | |
dc.identifier.source | Statistics in Medicine | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Zaslavsky BG. Bayesian hypothesis testing in twoâ arm trials with dichotomous outcomes. Biometrics. 2013; 69 ( 1 ): 157 â 163. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Gelman A, Carlin J, Stern H, Dunson D, Vehtari A, Rubin D. Bayesian Data Analysis. New York, NY: CRC Press; 2014. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Bornkamp B, Pinheiro J, Bretz F. MCPMod: an R package for the design and analysis of doseâ finding studies. J Stat Softw. 2009; 29 ( 7 ): 1 â 23. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Thomas N, Sweeney K, Somayaji V. Metaâ analysis of clinical doseâ response in a large drug development portfolio. Stat Biopharm Res. 2014; 6 ( 4 ): 302 â 317. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Bretz F, Pinheiro JC, Branson M. Combining multiple comparisons and modeling techniques in doseâ response studies. Biometrics. 2005; 61 ( 3 ): 738 â 748. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Hjort NL, Claeskens G. Frequentist model average estimators. J am Stat Assoc. 2003; 98 ( 464 ): 879 â 899. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Lunn DJ, Thomas A, Best N, Spiegelhalter D. WinBUGS â a Bayesian modelling framework: concepts, structure, and extensibility. Stat Comput. 2000; 10: 325 â 337. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Berry SM, Carlin BP, Lee JJ, Muller P. Bayesian Adaptive Methods for Clinical Trials. New York, NY: CRC Press; 2011. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Steyerberg EW, Mushkudiani N, Perel P, et al. Predicting outcome after traumatic brain injury: development and international validation of prognostic scores based on admission characteristics. PLoS Medicine. 2008; 5 ( 8 ):e165 | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Gajewski B, Berry S, Barsan W, et al. Hyperbaric oxygen brain injury treatment (HOBIT) trial: a novel multiâ factor design with response adaptive randomization and longitudinal modeling. Pharmaceutical Statistics. 2016; 15 ( 5 ): 396 â 404. | |
dc.owningcollname | Interdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.