View Item 

Show simple item record

Design by taking perspectives: How engineers explore problems
dc.contributor.authorMurray, Jaclyn K.
dc.contributor.authorStuder, Jaryn A.
dc.contributor.authorDaly, Shanna R.
dc.contributor.authorMcKilligan, Seda
dc.contributor.authorSeifert, Colleen M.
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-03T19:55:51Z
dc.date.available2020-06-01T14:50:01Zen
dc.date.issued2019-04
dc.identifier.citationMurray, Jaclyn K.; Studer, Jaryn A.; Daly, Shanna R.; McKilligan, Seda; Seifert, Colleen M. (2019). "Design by taking perspectives: How engineers explore problems." Journal of Engineering Education 108(2): 248-275.
dc.identifier.issn1069-4730
dc.identifier.issn2168-9830
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/149675
dc.description.abstractBackgroundProblem exploration includes identifying, framing, and defining design problems and bounding problem spaces. Intentional and unintentional changes in problem understanding naturally occur as designers explore design problems to create solutions. Through problem exploration, new perspectives on the problem can emerge along with new and diverse ideas for solutions. By considering multiple problem perspectives varying in scope and focus, designers position themselves to increase their understandings of the “real” problem and engage in more diverse idea generation processes leading to an increasing variety of potential solutions.Purpose/HypothesisThe purpose of this study was to investigate systematic patterns in problem exploration in the early design phases of mechanical engineers.Design/MethodThirty‐five senior undergraduate students and experienced designers with mechanical engineering backgrounds worked individually following a think‐aloud protocol. They explored problems and generated solutions for two of four randomly assigned design problems. After generating solutions, participants framed and rewrote problem statements to reflect their perspectives on the design problem their solutions addressed. Thematic analysis and a priori codes guided the identification of problem exploration patterns within and across problems.ResultsThe set of patterns in engineers’ problem exploration that emerged from the analysis documents alternative strategies in exploring problems to arrive at solutions. The results provide evidence that engineering designers, working individually, apply both problem‐specific and more general strategies to explore design problems.ConclusionsOur study identified common patterns in the explorations of presented problems by individual engineering designers. The observed patterns, described as Problem Exploration Perspectives, capture alternative approaches to discovering problems and taking multiple problem perspectives during design. Learning about Problem Exploration Perspectives may be helpful in creating alternative perspectives on a design problem, potentially leading to more varied and innovative solutions. This paper concludes with an extended example illustrating the process of applying Problem Exploration Perspectives to move between problem perspectives to generate varied design outcomes.
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons, Inc.
dc.subject.otheridea generation
dc.subject.othercreativity
dc.subject.otherproblem exploration
dc.subject.otherproblem definition
dc.subject.otherdesign
dc.titleDesign by taking perspectives: How engineers explore problems
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEngineering Education
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelEngineering
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/149675/1/jee20263_am.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/149675/2/jee20263.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/jee.20263
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Engineering Education
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRickards, T. ( 1975 ). Problem‐solving through creative analysis. Essex: Gower Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSaldaña, J. ( 2015 ). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchön, D. A. ( 1983 ). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York, NY: Basic Books.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchön, D. A. ( 1984 ). Problems, frames and perspectives on designing. Design Studies, 5 ( 3 ), 132 – 136.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchön, D. A. ( 1988 ). Designing: Rules, types and words. Design Studies, 9 ( 3 ), 181 – 190.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShull, F. A., Delbecq, A. L., & Cummings, L. L. ( 1970 ). Organizational decision making. New York, NY: McGraw‐Hill Book Co.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSimon, H. A. ( 1973 ). The structure of ill‐structured problems. Artificial Intelligence, 4 ( 3–4 ), 181 – 204.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSimon, H. A. ( 1977 ). The structure of ill‐structured problems. In Models of discovery (pp. 304 – 325 ). Netherlands: Springer.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSio, U. N., Kotovsky, K., & Cagan, J. ( 2015 ). Fixation or inspiration? A meta‐analytic review of the role of examples on design processes. Design Studies, 39, 70 – 99.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSpace Debris Problem Getting Worse, Say Scientists. ( 2017, April 18). Retrieved from https://phys.org/news/2017-04-space-debris-problem-worse-scientists.html
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSpradlin, D. ( 2012 ). Are you solving the right problem? Asking the right questions is crucial. Harvard Business Review, 90 ( 9 ), 84 – 101.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStanhope, M., & Lancaster, J. ( 2015 ). Public health nursing‐e‐book: Population‐centered health care in the community. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Health Sciences.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStauffer, L. A., & Ullman, D. G. ( 1991 ). Fundamental processes of mechanical designers based on empirical data. Journal of Engineering Design, 2 ( 2 ), 113 – 125.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStieff, M. ( 2011 ). When is a molecule three dimensional? A task‐specific role for imagistic reasoning in advanced chemistry. Science Education, 95 ( 2 ), 310 – 336.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStuder, J. A., Daly, S. R., McKilligan, S., & Seifert, C. M. ( 2018 ). Evidence of problem exploration in creative designs. AI EDAM, 32 ( 4 ), 415 – 430.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStumpf, S., & McDonnell, J. ( 1999, April ). Relating argument to design problem framing. Paper presented at the Fourth Design Thinking Research Symposium, West Lafayette, IN.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSuwa, M., Purcell, T., & Gero, J. ( 1998 ). Macroscopic analysis of design processes based on a scheme for coding designers’ cognitive actions. Design Studies, 19 ( 4 ), 455 – 483.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTeddlie, C., & Yu, F. ( 2007 ). Mixed methods sampling: A typology with examples. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1 ( 1 ), 77 – 100.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceViswanathan, V. K., & Linsey, J. S. ( 2012 ). Physical models and design thinking: A study of functionality, novelty and variety of ideas. Journal of Mechanical Design, 134 ( 9 ), 091004‐1 – 091004‐13.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVolkema, R. J. ( 1983 ). Problem formulation in planning and design. Management Science, 29 ( 6 ), 639 – 652.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWallas, G. ( 1926 ). The art of thought. New York, NY: Harcourt‐Brace.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWiltschnig, S., Christensen, B. T., & Ball, L. J. ( 2013 ). Collaborative problem–solution co‐evolution in creative design. Design Studies, 34 ( 5 ), 515 – 542.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceYilmaz, S., & Seifert, C. M. ( 2011 ). Creativity through design heuristics: A case study of expert product design. Design Studies, 32 ( 4 ), 384 – 415.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceYilmaz, S., Seifert, C. M., & Gonzalez, R. ( 2010 ). Cognitive heuristics in design: Instructional strategies to increase creativity in idea generation. AI EDAM, 24 ( 3 ), 335 – 355.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceYoumans, R. J., & Arciszewski, T. ( 2014 ). Design fixation: Classifications and modern methods of prevention. AI EDAM, 28 ( 2 ), 129 – 137.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceABET Board of Directors. ( 2016 ). 2017–2018 Criteria for accrediting engineering programs. Retrieved from http://www.abet.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/E001-17-18-EAC-Criteria-10-29-16-1.pdf
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAdams, R. S., Turns, J., & Atman, C. J. ( 2003, November ). What could design learning look like ? Paper presented at the Sixth Design Thinking Research Symposium, West Lafayette, IN: (DTRS6).
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAkin, Ö. ( 1993 ). Architects’ reasoning with structures and functions. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 20 ( 3 ), 273 – 294.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAl’tshuller, G. S. ( 1999 ). The innovation algorithm: TRIZ, systematic innovation and technical creativity. Worcester, MA: Technical Innovation Center.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAllen, M. S. ( 1962 ). Morphological creativity: The miracle of your hidden brain power: A practical guide to the utilization of your creative potential. Princeton, NJ: Prentice‐Hall.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAtman, C. J., Adams, R. S., Cardella, M. E., Turns, J., Mosborg, S., & Saleem, J. ( 2007 ). Engineering design processes: A comparison of students and expert practitioners. Journal of Engineering Education, 96 ( 4 ), 359 – 379.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAtman, C. J., & Bursic, K. M. ( 1998 ). Verbal protocol analysis as a method to document engineering student design processes. Journal of Engineering Education, 87 ( 2 ), 121 – 132.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAtman, C. J., Chimka, J. R., Bursic, K. M., & Nachtmann, H. L. ( 1999 ). A comparison of freshman and senior engineering design processes. Design Studies, 20 ( 2 ), 131 – 152.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAtman, C. J., Kilgore, D., & McKenna, A. ( 2008 ). Characterizing design learning: A mixed‐methods study of engineering designers’ use of language. Journal of Engineering Education, 97 ( 3 ), 309 – 326.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAtman, C. J., & Turns, J. ( 2001 ). Studying engineering design learning: Four verbal protocol studies. In C. Eastman, M. McCracken, & W. Newstetter (Eds.), Design knowing and learning: Cognition in design education (pp. 37 – 60 ). Oxford, England: Elsevier Science Ltd.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBernadowski, C. ( 2016 ). “I can’t even get why she would make me rite in her class”: Using think‐alouds in middle school math for “at‐risk” students. Middle School Journal, 47 ( 4 ), 3 – 14.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBilda, Z., Gero, J. S., & Purcell, T. ( 2006 ). To sketch or not to sketch? That is the question. Design Studies, 27 ( 5 ), 587 – 613.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBraun, V., & Clarke, V. ( 2006 ). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3 ( 2 ), 77 – 101.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBulsuk, K. G. ( 2009 ). An introduction to 5‐why [Website]. Retrieved from https://www.bulsuk.com/2009/03/5-why-finding-root-causes.html
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChristiaans, H. H. ( 1992 ). Creativity in design: The role of domain knowledge in designing. Delft, Netherlands: Lemma BV.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCrismond, D. P., & Adams, R. S. ( 2012 ). The informed design teaching and learning matrix. Journal of Engineering Education, 101 ( 4 ), 738 – 797.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCropley, D. H. ( 2015 ). Promoting creativity and innovation in engineering education. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9 ( 2 ), 161 – 171.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCross, N. ( 1984 ). Developments in design methodology. Chichester, England: John Wiley & Sons.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCross, N. ( 1997 ). Descriptive models of creative design: Application to an example. Design Studies, 18 ( 4 ), 427 – 440.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCross, N. ( 2004 ). Expertise in design: An overview. Design Studies, 25 ( 5 ), 427 – 441.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCross, N. ( 2011 ). Design thinking: Understanding how designers think and work. London: Berg.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCross, N., & Clayburn Cross, A. C. ( 1998 ). Expertise in engineering design. Research in Engineering Design, 10 ( 3 ), 141 – 149.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCsikszentmihalyi, M., & Getzels, J. W. ( 1971 ). Discovery‐oriented behaviour and the originality of artistic products: A study with artists. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 19 ( 1 ), 47 – 52.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCsikszentmihalyi, M., & Getzels, J. W. ( 1988 ). Creativity and problem finding in art. In F. Farley & R. Neperud (Eds.), The foundations of aethetics, art, and art education (pp. 91 – 116 ). New York, NY: Praeger.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDaly, S. R., McKilligan, S., Studer, J. A., Murray, J. K., & Seifert, C. M. ( 2018 ). Innovated solutions through innovated problems. International Journal of Engineering Education, 34 ( 2 ), 695 – 707.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDaly, S. R., Yilmaz, S., Christian, J. L., Seifert, C. M., & Gonzalez, R. ( 2012 ). Design heuristics in engineering concept generation. Journal of Engineering Education, 101 ( 4 ), 601 – 629.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDewey, J. ( 1910 ). How we think. Boston, MA: DC Heath.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDillon, J. T. ( 1982 ). Problem finding and solving. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 16 ( 2 ), 97 – 111.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDinar, M., Shah, J. J., Cagan, J., Leifer, L., Linsey, J., Smith, S. M., & Hernandez, N. V. ( 2015 ). Empirical studies of designer thinking: Past, present, and future. Journal of Mechanical Design, 137 ( 2 ), 021101‐1–021101‐13.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDorst, K. ( 2006 ). Design problems and design paradoxes. Design Issues, 22 ( 3 ), 4 – 17.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDorst, K. ( 2010 ). The nature of design thinking. Paper presented at the Eighth Design Thinking Research Symposium, West Lafayette, IN. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1948-7,169.2005.tb00008.x
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDorst, K., Christiaans, H., & Cross, N. ( 1996 ). Analyzing design activity. Chichester, England: Wiley.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDorst, K., & Cross, N. ( 2001 ). Creativity in the design process: Co‐evolution of problem–solution. Design Studies, 22 ( 5 ), 425 – 437. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(01)00009-6
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDuncker, K., & Lees, L. S. ( 1945 ). On problem‐solving. Psychological Monographs, 58 ( 5 ), 1 – 113.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEberle, B. ( 1995 ). Scamper. Waco, TX: Prufrock.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEinstein, A., & Infeld, L. ( 1938 ). The evolution of physics. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEricsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. ( 1993 ). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data (Rev. ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFarrell, R., & Hooker, C. ( 2013 ). Design, science and wicked problems. Design Studies, 34 ( 6 ), 681 – 705.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFogler, H. S., & LeBlanc, S. E. ( 2014 ). Strategies for creative problem solving. Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFonteyn, M. E., Kuipers, B., & Grobe, S. J. ( 1993 ). A description of think aloud method and protocol analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 3 ( 4 ), 430 – 441.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGero, J. S., & Tang, H. H. ( 2001 ). The differences between retrospective and concurrent protocols in revealing the process‐oriented aspects of the design process. Design Studies, 22 ( 3 ), 283 – 295.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGetzels, J. W. ( 1975 ). Problem‐finding and the inventiveness of solutions. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 9 ( 1 ), 12 – 18.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGetzels, J. W. ( 1979 ). Problem finding: A theoretical note. Cognitive Science, 3 ( 2 ), 167 – 172.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGetzels, J. W., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. ( 1977 ). The creative vision: A longitudinal study of problem finding in art. New York, NY: Wiley.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGoel, V., & Pirolli, P. ( 1992 ). The structure of design problem spaces. Cognitive Science, 16 ( 3 ), 395 – 429.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGoldschmidt, G. ( 1997 ). Capturing indeterminism: Representation in the design problem space. Design Studies, 18 ( 4 ), 441 – 455.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGotwals, A. W., & Songer, N. B. ( 2013 ). Validity evidence for learning progression‐based assessment items that fuse core disciplinary ideas and science practices. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50 ( 5 ), 597 – 626.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHall, A. D. ( 1962 ). A methodology for systems engineering. New York, NY: Litton Educational Publishing.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHay, L., Duffy, A., McTeague, C., Pidgeon, L., Vuletic, T., & Grealy, M. ( 2017 ). A systematic review of protocol studies on conceptual design cognition: Design as search and exploration. Design Science, 3 ( 10 ), 1 – 36. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsj.2017.11
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHernandez, N. V., Schmidt, L. C., & Okudan, G. E. ( 2013 ). Systematic ideation effectiveness study of TRIZ. Journal of Mechanical Design, 135 ( 10 ), 101009‐1 – 101009‐10.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHey, J., Linsey, J., Agogino, A. M., & Wood, K. L. ( 2008 ). Analogies and metaphors in creative design. International Journal of Engineering Education, 24 ( 2 ), 283.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHey, J. H. G. ( 2008 ). Effective framing in design (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Berkeley, CA: University of California. Retrieved from https://s3.amazonaws.com/academia.edu.documents/110575/Hey_Thesis_Effective_Framing_in_Design_Teams_2008.pdf?AWSAccessKeyId=AKIAIWOWYYGZ2Y53UL3A&Expires=1558393322&Signature=t07VhBWbUQ0Js05bF2sVNWQJI1o%3D&response‐content‐disposition=inline%3B%20filename%3DEffective_Framing_in_Design.pdf
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHolyoak, K. J. ( 1984 ). Mental models in problem solving. In J. R. Anderson & S. Kosslyn (Eds.), Tutorials in learning and memory: Essays in honor of Gordon Bower (pp. 193 – 218 ). New York, NY: W.H. Freeman.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJansson, D. G., & Smith, S. M. ( 1991 ). Design fixation. Design Studies, 12 ( 1 ), 3 – 11.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJohnson, R. B. ( 1997 ). Examining the validity structure of qualitative research. Education, 118 ( 2 ), 282 – 292.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJonassen, D., Strobel, J., & Lee, C. B. ( 2006 ). Everyday problem solving in engineering: Lessons for engineering educators. Journal of Engineering Education, 95 ( 2 ), 139 – 151.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJonassen, D. H. ( 1997 ). Instructional design models for well‐structured and ill‐structured problem‐solving learning outcomes. Educational Technology Research and Development, 45 ( 1 ), 65 – 94.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKepner, C. H., & Tregoe, B. B. ( 1981 ). The new rational manager. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Research Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKruger, C., & Cross, N. ( 2006 ). Solution driven versus problem driven design: Strategies and outcomes. Design Studies, 27 ( 5 ), 527 – 548.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLloyd, P., Lawson, B., & Scott, P. ( 1995 ). Can concurrent verbalization reveal design cognition? Design Studies, 16 ( 2 ), 237 – 259.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLloyd, P., & Scott, P. ( 1994 ). Discovering the design problem. Design Studies, 15 ( 2 ), 125 – 140.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMacCrimmon, K. R., & Taylor, R. N. ( 1976 ). Decision making and problem solving. In M. D. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 1397 – 1463 ). Chicago, IL: Rand McNally College Publishing.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMaher, M. L., Poon, J., & Boulanger, S. ( 1996a ). Formalising design exploration as co‐evolution: A combined gene approach. Paper presented at Advances in Formal Design Methods for CAD: Proceedings of the IFIP WG5.2 Workshop on Formal Design Methods for Computer‐Aided Design, Pittsburgh, PA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-34,925-1_1
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMaher, M. L., Poon, J., & Boulanger, S. ( 1996b ). Formalising design exploration as co‐evolution. In J. S. Gero & F. Sudweeks (Eds.), Advances in formal design methods for CAD (pp. 3 – 30 ). Sydney, AU: Springer.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcDonnell, J. ( 2015 ). Gifts to the future: Design reasoning, design research, and critical design practitioners. She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, 1 ( 2 ), 107 – 117.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcGuire, W. J. ( 1973 ). The yin and yang of progress in social psychology: Seven koan. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 26 ( 3 ), 446 – 456.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMerrifield, P. R., Guilford, J. P., Christensen, P. R., & Frick, J. W. ( 1962 ). The role of intellectual factors in problem solving. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 76 ( 10 ), 1 – 21.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMorgan, J. M., & Liker, J. K. ( 2006 ). The Toyota product development system. New York, NY: Productivity Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMumford, M. D., Baughman, W. A., Threlfall, K. V., Supinski, E. P., & Costanza, D. P. ( 1996 ). Process‐based measures of creative problem‐solving skills: I. Problem construction. Creativity Research Journal, 9 ( 1 ), 63 – 76.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMumford, M. D., Reiter‐Palmon, R., & Redmond, M. R. ( 1994 ). Problem construction and cognition: Applying problem representations in ill‐defined domains. In M. A. Runco (Ed.), Creativity research. Problem finding, problem solving, and creativity (pp. 3 – 39 ). Westport, CT: Ablex Publishing.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNadler, G., Smith, J. M., & Frey, C. E. ( 1989 ). Research needs regarding formulation of the initial design problem. Design Studies, 10 ( 3 ), 151 – 154.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNational Academy of Engineering. (n. d.) NAE grand challenges for engineering. Retrieved from http://www.engineeringchallenges.org/challenges.aspx
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNewell, A., & Simon, H. A. ( 1972 ). Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice‐Hall.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNorman, D., & Draper, S. ( 1986 ). User centered system design: New perspectives on human‐computer interaction. Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOkuda, S. M., Runco, M. A., & Berger, D. E. ( 1991 ). Creativity and the finding and solving of real‐world problems. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 9 ( 1 ), 45 – 53.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePahl, G., & Beitz, W. W. ( 1996 ). Engineering design: A systematic approach. New York, NY: Springer‐Verlag.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceParnes, S. J. ( 1967 ). Creative behavior workbook. New York, NY: Scribner.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePaton, B., & Dorst, K. ( 2011 ). Briefing and reframing: A situated practice. Design Studies, 32 ( 6 ), 573 – 587.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePergams, O. R., Jake‐Matthews, C. E., & Mohanty, L. M. ( 2018 ). A combined read‐aloud think‐aloud strategy improves student learning experiences in college‐level biology courses. Journal of College Science Teaching, 47 ( 5 ), 10 – 15.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePurcell, A. T., & Gero, J. S. ( 1996 ). Design and other types of fixation. Design Studies, 17 ( 4 ), 363 – 383.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePurcell, A. T., & Gero, J. S. ( 1998 ). Drawings and the design process: A review of protocol studies in design and other disciplines and related research in cognitive psychology. Design Studies, 19 ( 4 ), 389 – 430.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRittel, H. W. ( 1988 ). The reasoning of designers. Techlink, Singapore: IG Publishing.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRostan, S. M. ( 1994 ). Problem finding, problem solving, and cognitive controls: An empirical investigation of critically acclaimed productivity. Creativity Research Journal, 7 ( 2 ), 97 – 110.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRunco, M. A., & Chand, I. ( 1994 ). Problemfinding, evaluative thinking and creativity. In M. A. Runco (Ed.), Creativity research. Problem finding, problem solving, andcreativity (pp. 3–39). Westport, CT: Ablex Publishing.
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
jee20263_am.pdf
Size:
641.7KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open
Name:
jee20263.pdf
Size:
2.199MB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.