View Item 

Show simple item record

Another Approach To Leaf Shape Comparisons

dc.contributor.authorDickinson, T. A.
dc.contributor.authorParker, W. H.
dc.contributor.authorStrauss, R. E.
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-03T19:56:12Z
dc.date.available2019-07-03T19:56:12Z
dc.date.issued1987-02
dc.identifier.citationDickinson, T. A.; Parker, W. H.; Strauss, R. E. (1987). "Another Approach To Leaf Shape Comparisons." TAXON 36(1): 1-20.
dc.identifier.issn0040-0262
dc.identifier.issn1996-8175
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/149690
dc.publisherSpringer‐Verlag
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.titleAnother Approach To Leaf Shape Comparisons
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelBiology
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScience
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/149690/1/tax03918.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/j.1996-8175.1987.tb03918.x
dc.identifier.sourceTAXON
dc.identifier.citedreferencePhipps, J. B. 1983. [Studies in Crataegus L. (Rosaceae: Maloideae). VI.] Biogeographic, taxonomic, and cladistic relationships between East Asiatic and North American Crataegus. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 60: 667 – 700.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRickett, H. W. 1937. Forms of Crataegus crus‐galli. Bot. Gaz. (Crawfordsville) 98: 609 – 616.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRohlf, F. J. and J. W. Archie. 1984. A comparison of Fourier methods for the description of wing shape in mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae). Syst. Zool. 33: 302 – 317.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRyan, T. A. and B. L. Joiner. Undated. Normal probability plots and tests for normality. Technical Report, Statistics Department, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRyan, T. A. and B. F. Ryan. 1981. Minitab reference manual. Minitab Project, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSmith, P. G., J. B. Phipps and T. A. Dickinson. 1980. Accumulated heat in relation to Crataegus flowering. Contributed paper. 2nd Int. Congr. Syst. Evol. Biol., p. 353 (Abstr.).
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSneath, P. H. A. 1971. Application of numerical taxonomic methods to positions of hybrids in relation to their parents. Heredity 27: 314 – 315.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSokal, R. R. and F. J. Rohlf. 1981. Biometry, 2nd ed. W. H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStearn, W. T. 1969. Shapes of leaves, etc. In: P. M. Synge (ed.), Supplement to the Dictionary of gardening, 2nd ed., pp. 518 – 522. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStearn, W. T. 1983. Botanical Latin, 3rd ed. David and Charles, Newton Abbott.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStephens, S. G. 1945. Canalization of gene action in the Gossypium leaf‐shape system and its bearing on certain evolutionary mechanisms. J. Genetics 46: 345 – 357.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStrauss, R. E. and F. L. Bookstein. 1982. The truss: Body form reconstruction in morphometrics. Syst. Zool. 31: 113 – 135.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSystematics Association Committee for Descriptive Biological Terminology. 1962. I. Terminology of simple symmetrical plane shapes. Taxon 11: 145 – 156, 245‐247.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTheophrastus. 1916. Enquiry into plants (transl. from Greek by Sir A. Hort ). William Heinemann, London.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVan Valen, L. 1978. The statistics of variation. Evol. Theory 4: 33 – 43.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWells, H. 1980. A distance coefficient as a hybridization index: An example using Mimulus longiflorus and M. flemingii (Scrophulariaceae) from Santa Cruz Island, California. Taxon 29: 53 – 65.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWells, T. C. 1985. An analysis of interserial hybrid crosses in Crataegus (Rosaceae). Unpubl. M.Sc. thesis, Dept. of Plant Sciences, University of Western Ontario, London.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWest, J. G. and I. R. Noble. 1984. Analyses of digitized leaf images of the Dodonaea viscosa complex in Australia. Taxon 33: 595 – 613.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAtchley, W. R., C. T. Gaskins and D. Anderson. 1976. Statistical properties of ratios. I. Empirical results. Syst. Zool. 25: 137 – 148.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBecker, R. A. and J. M. Chambers. 1984. S: An interactive environment for data analysis and graphics. Wadsworth, Belmont, CA.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBerg, A. 1976. Ontogeny of phyllotaxy in axillary buds (abstract). Linnean Society of London Symposium, “Control of shoot form,” 29‐30 June.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBible, B. B. 1976. Non‐equivalence of left‐handed and right‐handed phyllotaxy in tomato and pepper. HortScience 11: 601 – 602.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBookstein, F. L. 1978. The measurement of biological shape and shape change. Lecture notes in biomathematics, 24. Springer‐Verlag, Berlin.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBookstein, F. L., B. Chernoff, R. L. Elder, J. M. Humphries, G. R. Smith and R. E. Strauss. 1985. Morphometrics in evolutionary biology. Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBookstein, F. L., R. E. Strauss, J. M. Humphries, B. Chernoff, R. L. Elder and G. R. Smith. 1982. A comment on the uses of Fourier methods in systematics. Syst. Zool. 27: 85 – 92.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBostrack, J. M. and W. F. Millington. 1962. On the determination of leaf form in an aquatic heterophyllous species. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 89: 1 – 20.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBradshaw, A. D. 1953. Human influences on hybridisation in Crataegus. In: J. E. Longley (ed.), The changing flora of Britain, pp. 181 – 183. T. Buncle for Botanical Society of the British Isles, Arbroath.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBradshaw, A. D. 1971. The significance of hawthorns. In: Standing Conference for Local History (ed.), Hedges and local history, pp. 20 – 29. National Council of Social Service.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrown, M. B. and A. B. Forsythe. 1974a. Robust tests for the equality of variances. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 69: 364 – 367.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrown, M. B. and A. B. Forsythe. 1974b. The small sample behaviour of some statistics which test the equality of several means. Technometrics 16: 129 – 132.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceByatt, J. I. 1975. Hybridization between Crataegus monogyna Jacq. and C. laevigata (Poiret) DC. in southeastern England. Watsonia 10: 253 – 264.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceByatt, J. I. 1976. The structure of some Crataegus populations in northeastern France and southeastern Belgium. Watsonia 11: 105 – 115.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCampbell, N. A. 1976. A multivariate approach to variation in microfilariae: Examination of the species Wuchereria lewisii and demes of the species W. bancrofti. Aust. J. Zool. 24: 105 – 114.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChambers, J. M. 1977. Computational methods for data analysis. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChaney, R. W. (ed.) 1944. Pliocene floras of California and Oregon. Contributions to Paleontology, Publication 553, Carnegie Inst. of Washington, Washington, DC.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChristensen, K. I. 1982. A biometric study of some hybridising Crataegus populations in Denmark. Nord. J. Bot. 2: 537 – 548.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChristensen, K. I. 1984. The morphological variation of some Crataegus populations (Rosaceae) in Greece and Yugoslavia. Nord. J. Bot. 4: 585 – 595.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceClark, G. (ed.) 1973. Staining procedures used by the Biological Staining Commission, 3rd ed. Williams and Wilkins Co., Baltimore, MD.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCooley, W. W. and P. R. Lohnes. 1971. Multivariate data analysis. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDagnelie, P. 1975. L’analyse statistique à plusieurs variables. Les Presses Agronomique de Gembloux, Gembloux (Belgique).
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDancik, B. P. and B. V. Barnes. 1974. Leaf diversity in yellow birch ( Betula alleghaniensis ). Can. J. Bot. 52: 2407 – 2414.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDancik, B. P. and B. V. Barnes. 1975. Multivariate analysis of hybrid populations. Naturaliste Canadien 102: 835 – 843.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDickinson, T. A. 1983. Crataegus crus‐galli L. sensu lato in southern Ontario: Phenotypic variation and variability in relation to reproductive behaviour. Ph.D. thesis, University of Western Ontario. [National Library of Canada Microfiche TC58716.]
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDickinson, T. A. 1985. The biology of Canadian weeds. 68. Cragaegus crus‐galli L. sensu lato. Can. J. Plant Sci. 65: 641 – 654.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDickinson, T. A. 1986. Topodeme differentiation in Ontario taxa of Crataegus L. (Rosaceae: Maloideae): Leaf morphometric evidence. Can. J. Bot. 64: in press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDickinson, T. A. and J. B. Phipps. 1984. Studies in Crataegus L. (Rosaceae: Maloideae). IX. Short shoot leaf heteroblasty in Crataegus crus‐galli L. sensu lato. Can. J. Bot. 62: 1775 – 1780.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDickinson, T. A. and J. B. Phipps. 1985. Studies in Crataegus L. (Rosaceae: Maloideae). XIII. Degree and pattern of phenotypic variation in Crataegus Section Crus‐galli in Ontario. Syst. Bot. 10: 322 – 337.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDickinson, T. A. and J. B. Phipps. 1986. Studies in Crataegus (Rosaceae: Maloideae). XIV. The breeding system of Crataegus crus‐galli sensu lato in Ontario. Amer. J. Bot. 73: 116 – 130.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEhrlich, R., R. B. Pharr, Jr. and N. Healy‐Williams. 1983. Comments on the validity of Fourier descriptors in systematics. A reply to Bookstein et al. Syst. Zool. 32: 202 – 206.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEl‐Gazzar, A. 1980. The taxonomic significance of leaf morphology in Crataegus (Rosaceae). Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 101: 457 – 469.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFerson, S., F. J. Rohlf and R. K. Koehn. 1985. Measuring shape variation of two‐dimensional outlines. Syst. Zool. 34: 59 – 68.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFrontier, S. 1976. Étude de la décroissance des valeurs propres dans une analyse en composantes principales: Comparaison avec le modèle du bâton brisé. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 25: 67 – 75.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGathy, P. 1954. Les feuilles de Larix. Étude anatomique. Cellule 56: 331 – 353.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGibson, A. R., A. J. Baker and A. Moeed. 1984. Morphometric variation in introduced populations of the common myna ( Acridotheres tristis ): An application of the jackknife to principal components analysis. Syst. Zool. 33: 408 – 421.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGittins, R. 1979. Ecological applications of canonical analysis. In: L. Orlóci, C. R. Rao and W. M. Stiteler (eds.), Multivariate methods in ecological work, pp. 309 – 535. International Co‐operative Publishing House, Fairland, MD.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGivnish, T. J. 1978. Ecological aspects of plant morphology: Leaf form in relation to environment. In: R. Sattler (ed.), Theoretical plant morphology, pp. 83 – 142. Acta Biotheoretica 27, Supplement: Folia Biotheoretica No. 7.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGostynska‐Jakuszewska, M. 1975. The use of numerical methods in the systematics of hawthorns occurring in Poland. Arbor. Kornickie 20: 113 – 129.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGreen, P. E. and J. D. Carroll. 1976. Mathematical tools for applied multivariate analysis. Academic Press, New York.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGreyson, R. I., D. B. Walden and W. J. Smith. 1982. Leaf and stem heteroblasty in Zea. Bot. Gaz. 143: 73 – 78.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHammond, D. 1941. The expression of genes for leaf shape in Gossypium hirsutum L. and Gossypium arboreum L. II. The expression of genes for leaf shape in Gossypium arboreum L. Amer. J. Bot. 28: 138 – 150.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHill, R. S. 1980. A numerical taxonomic approach to the study of angiosperm leaves. Bot. Gaz. 141: 213 – 229.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHumphries, J. M., F. L. Bookstein, B. Chernoff, G. R. Smith, R. L. Elder and G. S. Poss. 1981. Multivariate discrimination by shape in relation to size. Syst. Zool. 30: 291 – 308.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJardine, N. 1969. The observational and theoretical components of homology: A study based on the morphology of dermal skull‐roofs of rhipidistian fishes. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 1: 327 – 361.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKincaid, D. T. and R. B. Schneider. 1983. Quantification of leaf shape with microcomputer and Fourier transform. Can. J. Bot. 61: 2333 – 2342.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLegendre, L. and P. Legendre. 1983. Numerical ecology. Developments in Ecological Modelling 3. Elsevier Scientific Publishing Co., Inc., Amsterdam.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLerner, I. M. 1954. Genetic homoeostasis. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh and London.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLinnaeus, C. 1751. Philosophica botanica. Stockholm.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLove, R. and M. Feigen. 1978. Interspecific hybridization between native and naturalized Crataegus in western Oregon. Madroño 25: 211 – 217.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMarshall, H. H. 1978. Identification of Crataegus species native to Manitoba. Can. Field Nat. 92: 321 – 326.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMaze, J. 1980. A comment on Wells’ distance coefficient as a hybridization index. Taxon 29: 667.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMelville, R. 1937. The accurate definition of leaf shapes by rectangular coordinates. Ann. Bot., N.S. 1: 673 – 679.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMelville, R. 1960. A metrical study of leaf‐shape in hybrids. I. The leaf‐shape of some F 1 hybrids and their parents. Kew Bull. 14: 88 – 102.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMorrison, D. F. 1976. Multivariate statistical methods, 2nd ed. McGraw‐Hill, New York.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMuniyamma, M. and J. B. Phipps. 1979. [Studies in Crataegus L. (Rosaceae: Maloideae). II.] Studies of pollen meiosis and polyploidy with relation to Crataegus systematics in Ontario. Can. J. Genet. Cytol. 21: 231 – 241.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOrlóci, L. 1978. Multivariate analysis in vegetation research, 2nd ed. Dr. W. Junk B. V., The Hague.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOwens, J. N. and M. Molder. 1979. Bud development in Larix occidentalis. I. Growth and development of vegetative long shoot and vegetative short shoot buds. Canad. J. Bot. 57: 1557 – 1572.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePalmer, E. J. 1963. Crataegus. In: H. A. Gleason and A. Cronquist (eds.), The new Britton and Brown illustrated flora of the northeastern United States and adjacent Canada, Vol. 2, pp. 338 – 372. Hafner Publishing Co., for the New York Botanical Garden, New York.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceParker, W. H., G. E. Bradfield, J. Maze and S.‐C. Lin. 1979. Analysis of variation in leaf and twig characters of Abies lasiocarpa and A. amabilis from north‐coastal British Columbia. Canad. J. Bot. 57: 1354 – 1366.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceParker, W. H., G. E. Bradfield, J. Maze and J. Maze. 1984. Intraspecific variation in Abies lasiocarpa from British Columbia and Washington. Amer. J. Bot. 71: 1051 – 1059.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceParker, W. H., G. E. Bradfield, J. Maze and G. E. Bradfield. 1981. Implications of morphological and anatomical variation in Abies balsamea and A. lasiocarpa (Pinaceae) from western Canada. Amer. J. Bot. 68: 843 – 854.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePaxman, G. J. 1956. Differentiation and stability in the development of Nicotiana rustica. Ann. Bot. N.S. 20: 331 – 347.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePhillips, R. B. 1983. Shape characters in numerical taxonomy and problems with ratios. Taxon 32: 535 – 544.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePhipps, J. B. and M. Muniyamma. 1980. [Studies in Crataegus L. III.] A taxonomic review of Crataegus (Rosaceae) in Ontario. Can. J. Bot. 58: 1621 – 1699.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePimentel, R. A. 1979. Morphometrics—The multivariate analysis of biological data. Kendall/Hunt, Dubuque, IA.
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
tax03918.pdf
Size:
1.143MB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.