View Item 

Show simple item record

Floral Bundle Fusion And Vascular Conservatism
dc.contributor.authorSchmid, Rudolf
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-03T19:56:47Z
dc.date.available2019-07-03T19:56:47Z
dc.date.issued1972-08
dc.identifier.citationSchmid, Rudolf (1972). "Floral Bundle Fusion And Vascular Conservatism." TAXON 21(4): 429-446.
dc.identifier.issn0040-0262
dc.identifier.issn1996-8175
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/149720
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.publisherHafner Publishing Co.
dc.titleFloral Bundle Fusion And Vascular Conservatism
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelBiology
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScience
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/149720/1/tax03288.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.2307/1219105
dc.identifier.sourceTAXON
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRao, V. S. 1968 — Placentation in relation to anatomy. Bot. Notiser 121: 281 – 286.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSiegert, A., 1965 — Morphologische, entwicklungsgeschichtliche und systematische Studien an Psilotum triquetrum Sw. II. Die Verzweigung (mit einer allgemeinen Erörterung des Begriffes ‘Dichotomie’). Beitr. Biol. Pfl. 41: 209 – 230.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStebbins, G. L., Jr. 1950 — Variation and evolution in plants. New York: Columbia University Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStebbins, G. L., Jr. 1967 — Adaptive radiation and trends of evolution in higher plants. Pp. 101 – 142 in T. Dobzhansky, M. Hecht, and W. C. Steere [eds.], Evolutionary Biology, vol. 1 New York: Appleton‐Century‐Crofts, Meredith Publishing Co.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSwamy, B. G. L., and K. Periasamy 1964 — The concept of the conduplicate carpel. Phytomorphology 14: 319 – 327.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTepfer, S. S. 1953 — Floral anatomy and ontogeny in Aquilegia formosa var. truncata and Ranunculus repens. Univ. California Publ. Bot. 25: 513 – 647.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceThompson, J. McLean 1936 — On the floral morphology of Elettaria cardamomum Maton. (with special reference to the interpretation of floral structure on the evidence of ontogeny and of vascular anatomy). Univ. Liverpool, Publ. Hartley Bot. Lab. 14: 3 – 23.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceThompson, J. McLean 1937 — On the place of ontogeny in floral enquiry. Univ. Liverpool, Publ. Hartley Bot. Lab. 17: 3 – 20.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTieghem, P. van 1875 — Recherches sur la structure du pistil et sur l’anatomie comparée de la fleur. Mém. Acad. Sci. Inst. Impérial France, Sér. 2, 21: 1 – 261. (Reprinted from Mém. des Savants Étrangers à l’Institut, Sér. 2, 21:1‐261. 1871).
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTillson, A. H., and R. Bamford 1938 — The floral anatomy of the Aurantioideae. Amer. J. Bot. 25: 780 – 793.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTroll, W. 1932 — Morphologie, einschliesslich Anatomie. Fortschritte der Botanik 1: 11 – 25.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceUnruh, M. 1939 — Die morphologische Bedeutung des Karpells. Beitr. Biol. Pfl. 26: 90 – 124.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVenning, F. D. 1948 — Diversities of floral vascular anatomy in Pamburus missionis (Wight) Swingle. Q. J. Florida Acad. Sci. 10: 139 – 146.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWardlaw, C. W. 1965 — Organization and evolution in plants. London: Longmans, Green and Co.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWilson, C. L. 1950 — Vasculation of the stamen in the Melastomaceae, with some phyletic implications. Amer. J. Bot. 37: 431 – 444.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWilson, C. L., and T. Just 1939 — The morphology of the flower. Bot. Rev. 5: 97 – 131.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceArber, A. 1913 — On the structure of the androecium in Parnassia and its bearing on the affinities of the genus. Ann. Bot. 27: 491 – 510.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceArber, A. 1933a — Floral anatomy and its morphological interpretation. New Phytol. 32: 231 – 242.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceArber, A. 1933b — Morphological interpretation of floral anatomy. Nature 132: 823. (Letter.)
dc.identifier.citedreferenceArber, A. 1938 — Studies in flower structure. IV. On the gynaeceum of Papaver and related genera. Ann. Bot. 2: 649 – 664.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBailey, I. W. 1949 — Origin of the angiosperms: need for a broadened outlook. J. Arnold Arb. 30: 64 – 70.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBailey, I. W. 1951 — The use and the abuse of anatomical data in the study of phylogeny and classification. Phytomorphology 1: 67 – 69.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBailey, I. W. 1953 — The anatomical approach to the study of genera. Chronica Bot. 14: 121 – 125.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBeauverie, J., and M. Durand 1930 — L’ancienneté et la phylogénie des plantes a fleurs. Rev. Gen. Sci. Pures Appl. 41: 269 – 278.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBower, F. O. 1935 — Primitive land plants. New York: Hafner Publishing Co. (1959 reprint.)
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrown, R. 1833 — On the organs and mode of fecundation in Orchideae and Asclepiadeae. Trans. Linnean Soc. London 16: 685 – 745.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCarlquist, S. 1961 — Comparative plant anatomy. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCarlquist, S. 1969 — Toward acceptable evolutionary interpretations of floral anatomy. Phytomorphology 19: 332 – 362. (Issued 1970.)
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCheung, M., and R. Sattler 1967 — Early floral development of Lythrum salicaria. Can. J. Bot. 45: 1609 – 1618.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceConstance, L. 1955 — The systematics of the angiosperms. Pp. 405 – 483 in A century of progress in the natural sciences, 1853‐1953. San Francisco: California Academy of Sciences.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCorner, E. J. H. 1966 — Debunking the new morphology. New Phytol. 65: 398 – 404.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCroizat, L. 1960 — Principia botanica. Caracas: The Author.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCronquist, A. 1968 — The evolution and classification of flowering plants. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCrüger, H. 1865 — A few notes on the fecundation of orchids and their morphology. J. Linnean Soc. Bot. 8: 127 – 135.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCusick, F. 1966 — On phylogenetic and ontogenetic fusions. Pp. 170 – 183 in E. G. Cutter [ed.], Trends in plant morphogenesis. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDavis, P. H., and V. H. Heywood 1963 — Principles of angiosperm taxonomy. Princeton, New Jersey: D. van Nostrand Co.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDe Wet, J. M. J. 1968 — Diploid‐tetraploid‐haploid cycles and the origin of variability in Dichanthium agamospecies. Evolution 22: 394 – 397.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDouglas, G. E. 1944 — The inferior ovary. Bot. Rev. 10: 125 – 186.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDouglas, G. E. 1957 — Idem. II. Bot. Rev. 23: 1 – 46.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEames, A. J. 1929 — The rôle of flower anatomy in the determination of angiosperm phylogeny. Proc. Int. Congr. Pl. Sci., Ithaca, N. Y., Aug. 16‐23, 1926, 1: 423 – 427.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEames, A. J. 1930 — The general anatomy of the flower with special reference to the gynoecium. Fifth Int. Bot. Congr., Cambridge, Abstracts of Communications, p. 183.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEames, A. J. 1931 — The vascular anatomy of the flower with refutation of the theory of carpel polymorphism. Amer. J. Bot. 18: 147 – 188.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEames, A. J. 1951 — Again: ‘The new morphology’. New Phytol. 50: 17 – 35.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEames, A. J. 1953 — Floral anatomy as an aid in generic limitation. Chronica Bot. 14: 126 – 132.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEames, A. J. 1961 — Morphology of the angiosperms. New York: McGraw‐Hill Book Co.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEames, A. J., and L. H. MacDaniels 1925 — An introduction to plant anatomy. New York: McGraw‐Hill Book Co.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEames, A. J., and L. H. MacDaniels. 1947 — Idem. 2nd Ed. New York: McGraw‐Hill Book Co.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEggers, O. 1935 — Über die morphologische Bedeutung des Leitbündelverlaufes in den Blüten der Rhoeadalen und über das diagramm der Cruciferen und Capparidaceen. Planta 24: 14 – 58.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEgler, F. E. 1951 — The terminology of floral types. Chronica Bot. 12: 169 – 173.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEyde, R. H. 1968 — Flowers, fruits, and phylogeny of Alangiaceae. J. Arnold Arb. 49: 167 – 192.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEyde, R. H. 1971 — Evolutionary morphology: distinguishing ancestral structure from derived structure in flowering plants. Taxon 20: 63 – 73.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEyde, R. H., and C. C. Tseng 1969 — Flower of Tetraplasandra gymnocarpa: hypogyny with epigynous ancestry. Science 166: 506 – 508.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEyde, R. H., and C. C. Tseng 1971 — What is the primitive floral structure of Araliaceae? J. Arnold Arb. 52: 205 – 239.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFahn, A. 1967 — Plant anatomy. Trans. from Hebrew by S. Broido‐Altman. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFarris, J. S. 1966 — Estimation of conservatism of characters by constancy within biological populations. Evolution 20: 587 – 591.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGoebel, K. 1932–33 — Organographie der Pflanzen insbesondere der Archegoniaten und Samenpflanzen. 3. Aufl. Tl. III. Samenpflanzen. Jena: Gustav Fischer.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGrégoire, V. 1938 — La morphogénèse et l’autonomie morphologique de l’appareil floral. I. Le carpelle. Cellule 47: 285 – 452.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGrélot, P. 1897 — Recherches sur le système libéroligneux floral des gamepétales bicarpellées. Ann. Sci. Nat. Bot., Sér. 8, 5: 1 – 154.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHagemann, W. 1963 — Die morphologische Sprossdifferenzierung und die Anordnung des Leitgewebes. Ber. Deut. Bot. Gesell. 76 (Sondernummer): (113) – (120).
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHall, B. A. 1954 — Variability in the floral anatomy of Acer negundo. Amer. J. Bot. 41: 529 – 532.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHeel, W. A. van. 1966 — The synangial nature of pollen sacs on the strength of ’congeni ‐
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHeel, W. A. van. 1966 — Morphology of the androecium in Malvales. Blumea 13: 177 – 394.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHeel, W. A. van. 1969 — The synangial nature of pollen sacs on the strength of ‘congenital fusion’ and ‘conservatism of the vascular bundle system’, w. sp. ref. to some Malvales. Proc. K. Nederl. Akad. Wetenschappen, Amsterdam, Ser. C, 72: 172 – 206.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHenslow, G. 1888 — The origin of floral structures through insect and other agencies. London: Kegan Paul, Trench & Co.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHenslow, G. 1890 — On the vascular systems of floral organs, and their importance in the interpretation of the morphology of flowers. J. Linnean Soc. Bot. 28: 151 – 197.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHunt, K. W. 1937 — A study of the style and stigma, with reference to the nature of the carpel. Amer. J. Bot. 24: 288 – 295.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJayaweera, D. M. A. 1956 — The morphology of the flower of Rhodomyrtus tomentosa, Wight. Ceylon J. Sci., Sect. A, Bot. 13: 31 – 40.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJayaweera, D. M. A. 1957 — Variation in the flower of Eugenia malaccensis Linn. J. Linnean Soc. London Bot. 55: 721 – 728.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJoshi, A. C. 1933 — Morphological interpretation of floral anatomy. Nature 132: 822 – 823. (Letter.)
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJoshi, A. C. 1940 — The conservate [sic] character of the vascular system: comparative anatomy of normal and pentaphyllous bicarpellary flowers of Gagea fascicularis. Ann. Bot. 4: 664 – 669.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJoshi, A. C. 1948 — The morphology of the gynoecium. Proc. 34th Indian Sci. Congr., Delhi, 1947, Part II (Presidential Addresses), Sect. 6: 1 – 15.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKasapligil, B. 1951 — Morphological and ontogenetic studies of Umbellularia californica Nutt. and Laurus nobilis L. Univ. California Publ. Bot. 25: 115 – 239.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKozo‐Poljanski, B. 1936 — On some ‘third’ conceptions in floral morphology. New Phytol. 35: 479 – 492.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLawrence, G. H. M. 1953 — Plant genera, their nature and definition: the need for an expanded outlook. Chronica Bot. 14: 117 – 120.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcLean, R. C., and W. R. Ivimey‐Cook 1956 — Textbook of theoretical botany. Vol. II. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMajumdar, G. P. 1956 — Carpel morphology (appendicular v. axial controversy: a plea for re‐examination). J. Asiatic Soc., Sci. 22: 45 – 54.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMelville, R. 1963 — A new theory of the angiosperm flower: II. The androecium. Kew Bull. 17: 1 – 63.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMoeliono, B. M. 1970 — Cauline or carpellary placentation among dicotyledons (Axisborne versus leaf‐borne ovules). The cauline ovules of centrosperms. 2 volumes. Assen, Netherlands: Van Gorcum & Comp. N.V.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMoseley, M. F., Jr. 1961 — Morphological studies of the Nymphaeaceae. Il. The flower of Nymphaea. Bot. Gaz. 122: 233 – 259.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMoseley, M. F., Jr. 1965 — Idem. III. The floral anatomy of Nuphar. Phytomorphology 15: 54 – 84.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMoseley, M. F., Jr. 1967 — The value of the vascular system in the study of the flower. Phytomorphology 17: 159 – 164. (Issued 1968.)
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOzenda, P. 1949 — Recherches sur les Dicotylédones apocarpiques. Contribution à l’étude des Angiospermes dites primitives. Publ. Lab. École Norm. Supér., Sér. Biol., Fasc. 2, Paris. xii, 183 pp.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePuri, V. 1945 — Studies in floral anatomy. III. On the origin and orientation of placental strands. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. India, Sect. B, 15: 74 – 91.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePuri, V. 1951 — The rôle of floral anatomy in the solution of morphological problems. Bot. Rev. 17: 471 – 553.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePuri, V. 1952a — Floral anatomy and inferior ovary. Phytomorphology 2: 122 – 129.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePuri, V. 1952b — Placentation in angiosperms. Bot. Rev. 18: 603 – 651.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePuri, V. 1952c — Floral anatomy in relation to taxonomy. Agra Univ. J. Ras. (Sci.) 1: 15 – 35.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePuri, V. 1960 — On the methods of studying floral morphology. Proc. Nat. Inst. Sci. India, Part B, Suppl., 26: 97 – 108.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePuri, V. 1961 — The classical concept of angiosperm carpel: a reassessment. J. Indian Bot. Soc. 40: 511 – 524.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePuri, V. 1962 — Floral anatomy in relation to taxonomy. Bull. Bot. Surv. India 4: 161 – 165. (Issued 1963.)
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRao, V. S. 1951 — The vascular anatomy of flowers: a bibliography. J. Univ. Bombay 19 ( 5 ): 38 – 63.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRohweder, O. 1967 — Karpellbau und Synkarpie bei Ranunculaceen. Ber. Schweiz. Bot. Gesell. 77: 376 – 432.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSaunders, E. R. 1934 — Comments on ‘floral anatomy and its morphological interpretation’. New Phytol. 33: 127 – 170.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSaunders, E. R. 1937 — Floral morphology. Vol. I. Cambridge: W. Heffer & Sons Ltd.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSaunders, E. R. 1939 — Idem. Vol. II. Cambridge: W. Heffer & Sons Ltd.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchmid, R. 1971 — Floral anatomy of Eugenia sensu lato (Myrtaceae). Ph. D. Thesis. The University of Michigan. vii, 217 pp.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchmid, R. 1972a — A resolution of the Eugenia‐Syzygium controversy (Myrtaceae). Amer. J. Bot. 59: 423 – 436.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchmid, R. 1972b — Floral anatomy of Myrtaceae. I. Syzygium s. l. Bot. Jahrb. 92: (In press.)
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchmid, R. 1972c — Idem., II. Eugenia. J. Arnold Arb. 53: (In press.)
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
tax03288.pdf
Size:
863.0KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.