Show simple item record

Predictors of low urinary quality of life in spinal cord injury patients on clean intermittent catheterization

dc.contributor.authorCrescenze, Iryna M.
dc.contributor.authorMyers, Jeremy B.
dc.contributor.authorLenherr, Sara M.
dc.contributor.authorElliott, Sean P.
dc.contributor.authorWelk, Blayne
dc.contributor.authorMph, Diana O’Dell
dc.contributor.authorQin, Yongmei
dc.contributor.authorPresson, Angela P.
dc.contributor.authorStoffel, John T.
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-03T19:57:37Z
dc.date.availableWITHHELD_12_MONTHS
dc.date.available2019-07-03T19:57:37Z
dc.date.issued2019-06
dc.identifier.citationCrescenze, Iryna M.; Myers, Jeremy B.; Lenherr, Sara M.; Elliott, Sean P.; Welk, Blayne; Mph, Diana O’Dell ; Qin, Yongmei; Presson, Angela P.; Stoffel, John T. (2019). "Predictors of low urinary quality of life in spinal cord injury patients on clean intermittent catheterization." Neurourology and Urodynamics 38(5): 1332-1338.
dc.identifier.issn0733-2467
dc.identifier.issn1520-6777
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/149763
dc.description.abstractObjectiveClean intermittent catheterization (CIC) is a preferred method of bladder management for many patients with spinal cord injury (SCI), but long‐term adherence is low. The aim of this study is to identify factors associated with low urinary quality of life (QoL) in SCI adults performing CIC.MethodsOver 1.5 years, 1479 adults with SCI were prospectively enrolled through the Neurogenic Bladder Research Group registry, and 753 on CIC with no prior surgeries were included. Injury characteristics, complications, hand function, and Neurogenic Bladder Symptom Score (NBSS) were analyzed. The NBSS QoL question (overall satisfaction with urinary function) was dichotomized to generate comparative groups (dissatisfied vs neutral/satisfied).ResultsThe cohort was 32.9% female with a median age of 43.2 (18‐86) years, time since the injury of 9.8 (0‐48.2) years, and 69.0% had an injury at T1 or below. Overall 36.1% were dissatisfied with urinary QoL. On multivariable analysis, female gender (odds ratio [OR], 1.63; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.15‐2.31; P = 0.016), earlier injury (OR, 0.95 per year; 95% CI, 0.93‐0.97; P < 0.001), ≥4 urinary tract infections (UTIs) per year (OR, 2.36; 95% CI, 1.47‐3.81; P = 0.001), and severe bowel dysfunction (OR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.02‐1.98; P = 0.035) predicted dissatisfaction. Level of injury, fine motor hand function, and caregiver dependence for CIC were not associated with dissatisfaction.ConclusionsIn a mature SCI cohort, physical disability does not predict dissatisfaction with urinary QoL but severe bowel dysfunction and recurrent UTIs have a significant negative impact. With time the rates of dissatisfaction decline but women continue to be highly dissatisfied on CIC and may benefit from early intervention to minimize the burden of CIC on urinary QoL.
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.subject.otherspinal cord injury
dc.subject.otherclean intermittent catheterization
dc.subject.otherneurogenic bladder
dc.subject.otherpatient‐reported outcomes
dc.titlePredictors of low urinary quality of life in spinal cord injury patients on clean intermittent catheterization
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelInternal Medicine and Specialties
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/149763/1/nau23983.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/149763/2/nau23983_am.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/nau.23983
dc.identifier.sourceNeurourology and Urodynamics
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLiu C, Huang C, Yang Y, Chen S, Weng M, Huang M. Relationship between neurogenic bowel dysfunction and health‐related quality of life in persons with spinal cord injury. J Rehabil Med. 2009; 41 ( 1 ): 35 ‐ 40. https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977‐0277
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCameron AP, Wallner LP, Tate DG, Sarma AV, Rodriguez GM, Clemens JQ. Bladder management after spinal cord injury in the United States 1972 to 2005. J Urol. 2010; 184 ( 1 ): 213 ‐ 217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2010.03.008
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWeld KJ, Dmochowski RR. Effect of bladder management on urological complications in spinal cord injured patients. J Urol. 2000; 163 ( 3 ): 768 ‐ 772. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022‐5347(05)67800‐7
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAfsar SI, Yemisci OU, Cosar SNS, Cetin N. Compliance with clean intermittent catheterization in spinal cord injury patients: a long‐term follow‐up study. Spinal Cord. 2013; 51 ( 8 ): 645 ‐ 649. https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.2013.46
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZlatev DV, Shem K, Elliott CS. Predictors of long‐term bladder management in spinal cord injury patients‐upper extremity function may matter most. Neurourol Urodyn. 2017; 35 ( 23 ): 1106 ‐ 1112. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.23430
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLane GI, Driscoll A, Tawfik K, Chrouser K. A cross sectional study of the catheter management of neurogenic bladder after traumatic spinal cord injury. Neurourol Urodyn. 2017; 36 ( 1 ): 360 ‐ 367. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.23306
dc.identifier.citedreferenceYılmaz B, Akkoç Y, Alaca R, et al. Intermittent catheterization in patients with traumatic spinal cord injury: obstacles, worries, level of satisfaction. Spinal Cord. 2014; 52 ( 11 ): 1 ‐ 5. https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.2014.134
dc.identifier.citedreferencePatel DP, Lenherr SM, Stoffel JT, et al. Study protocol: patient reported outcomes for bladder management strategies in spinal cord injury. BMC Urol. 2017; 17 ( 1 ): 1 ‐ 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894‐017‐0286‐3
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWelk B, Carlson K, Baverstock R. A pilot study of the responsiveness of the Neurogenic Bladder Symptom Score (NBSS). Can Urol Assoc J. 2017; 11 ( 12 ): 11 ‐ 13. https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.4833
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKrogh K, Christensen P, Sabroe S, Laurberg S. Neurogenic bowel dysfunction score. Spinal Cord. 2006; 44 ( 10 ): 625 ‐ 631. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.sc.3101887
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTulsky DS, Jette AM, Kisala PA, et al. Spinal cord injury‐functional index: item banks to measure physical functioning in individuals with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012; 93 ( 10 ): 1722 ‐ 1732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2012.05.007
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWare JE, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12‐item short‐form health survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care. 1996; 34 ( 3 ): 220 ‐ 233. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650‐199603000‐00003
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZlatev DV, Shem K, Elliott CS. How many spinal cord injury patients can catheterize their own bladder? The epidemiology of upper extremity function as it affects bladder management. Spinal Cord. 2016; 54 ( 4 ): 287 ‐ 291. https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.2015.169
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJette AM, Tulsky DS, Ni P, et al. Development and initial evaluation of the spinal cord injury‐functional index. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012; 93 ( 10 ): 1733 ‐ 1750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2012.05.008
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSinha R, Slavin MD, Kisala PA, Ni P, Tulsky DS, Jette AM. Functional ability level development and validation: providing clinical meaning for spinal cord injury functional index scores. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015; 96 ( 8 ): 1448 ‐ 1457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2014.11.008
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBakke A, Irgens LM, Malt UF, Hoisreter PA. Clean intermittent catheterisation performing abilities, aversive experiences and distress. Paraplegia. 1993; 31 ( 5 ): 288 ‐ 297. https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.1993.52
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCameron AP, Rodriguez GM, Gursky A, He C, Clemens JQ, Stoffel JT. The severity of bowel dysfunction in patients with neurogenic bladder. J Urol. 2015; 194 ( 5 ): 1336 ‐ 1341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2015.04.100
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWalsh K, Troxel SA, Stone AR. An assessment of the use of a continent catheterizable stoma in female tetraplegics. BJU Int. 2004; 94 ( 4 ): 595 ‐ 597. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464‐410X.2004.05007.x
dc.identifier.citedreferenceYavuzer G, Gök H, Tuncer S, Soygür T, Arikan N, Arasil T. Compliance with bladder management in spinal cord injury patients. Spinal Cord. 2000; 38 ( 12 ): 762 ‐ 765. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11175377
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLe Breton F, Guinet A, Verollet D, Jousse M, Amarenco G. Therapeutic education and intermittent self‐catheterization: recommendations for an educational program and a literature review. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2012; 55 ( 3 ): 201 ‐ 212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rehab.2012.01.006
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDijkers M. Quality of life after spinal cord injury: a meta analysis of the effects of disablement components. Spinal Cord. 1997; 35 ( 12 ): 829 ‐ 840. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.sc.3100571
dc.identifier.citedreferencePost M, Noreau L. Quality of life after spinal cord injury. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2005; 29 ( 3 ): 139 ‐ 146. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978‐0‐323‐00699‐6.10023‐1
dc.identifier.citedreferencePost MW, de Witte LP, van Asbeck FW, van Dijk a J, Schrijvers a J. Predictors of health status and life satisfaction in spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998; 79 ( 4 ): 395 ‐ 401. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003‐9993(98)90139‐3
dc.identifier.citedreferencePutzke JD, Richards JS, Hicken BL, DeVivo MJ. Interference due to pain following spinal cord injury: important predictors and impact on quality of life. Pain. 2002; 100 ( 3 ): 231 ‐ 242. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304‐3959(02)00069‐6
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNational Spinal Cord Injury Statistical Center. Spinal cord injury facts and figures at a glance. J Spinal Cord Med. 2012; 35 ( 1 ): 68 ‐ 69. https://doi.org/10.1179/204577212X13237783484262
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBolinger R, Engberg S. Barriers, complications, adherence, and self‐reported quality of life for people using clean intermittent catheterization. J Wound, Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2013; 40 ( 1 ): 83 ‐ 89. https://doi.org/10.1097/WON.0b013e3182750117
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.