Show simple item record

Cost‐effectiveness of real‐world administration of tobacco pharmacotherapy in the United States Veterans Health Administration

dc.contributor.authorBarnett, Paul G.
dc.contributor.authorIgnacio, Rosalinda V.
dc.contributor.authorKim, Hyungjin Myra
dc.contributor.authorGeraci, Mark C.
dc.contributor.authorEssenmacher, Carol A.
dc.contributor.authorHall, Stephanie V.
dc.contributor.authorSherman, Scott E.
dc.contributor.authorDuffy, Sonia A.
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-09T17:15:23Z
dc.date.availableWITHHELD_13_MONTHS
dc.date.available2019-08-09T17:15:23Z
dc.date.issued2019-08
dc.identifier.citationBarnett, Paul G.; Ignacio, Rosalinda V.; Kim, Hyungjin Myra; Geraci, Mark C.; Essenmacher, Carol A.; Hall, Stephanie V.; Sherman, Scott E.; Duffy, Sonia A. (2019). "Cost‐effectiveness of real‐world administration of tobacco pharmacotherapy in the United States Veterans Health Administration." Addiction 114(8): 1436-1445.
dc.identifier.issn0965-2140
dc.identifier.issn1360-0443
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/150598
dc.description.abstractBackground and aimsCost‐effectiveness studies in randomized clinical trials have shown that tobacco cessation pharmacotherapy is among the most cost‐effective of health‐care interventions. Clinical trial eligibility criteria and treatment protocols may not be followed in actual practice. This study aimed to determine whether tobacco cessation pharmacotherapy is cost‐effective in real‐world settings.DesignA retrospective analysis of costs and outcomes.SettingHospitals and clinics of the US Veterans Health Administration, USA.ParticipantsA total of 589 862 US veterans who screened positive for tobacco use in 2011.Intervention and comparatorTobacco users who initiated smoking cessation pharmacotherapy in the 6 months after screening were compared with those who did not use pharmacotherapy in this period. Pharmacotherapy included nicotine replacement therapy, bupropion (if prescribed at 300 mg per day or specifically for tobacco cessation) or varenicline.MeasuresEffectiveness was determined from responses to a subsequent tobacco screening conducted between 7 and 18 months after the treatment observation period. Cost of medications and prescribing health‐care encounters was determined for the period between initial and follow‐up tobacco use screening. Multivariate fixed‐effects regression was used to assess the effect of initial treatment status on cost and outcome while controlling for differences in case‐mix with propensity weighting to adjust for confounding by indication.FindingsThirteen per cent of participants received tobacco cessation pharmacotherapy within 6 months of initial screening. After an average of an additional 218.1 days’ follow‐up, those who initially received pharmacotherapy incurred $143.79 in additional treatment cost and had a 3.1% absolute increase in tobacco quit rates compared with those who were not initially treated. This represents an incremental cost‐effectiveness ratio of $4705 per quit. The upper limit of the 99.9% confidence region was $5600 per quit. Without propensity adjustment, the cost‐effectiveness ratio was $7144 per quit, with the upper limit of the 99.9% confidence region $9500/quit.ConclusionsTobacco cessation pharmacotherapy provided by the US Veterans Health Administration in 2011/12 was cost‐effective in this real‐world setting, with an incremental cost‐effectiveness ratio of $4705 per quit.
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.subject.otherveterans
dc.subject.otherAdjusted analysis
dc.subject.otherpropensity
dc.subject.othertobacco cessation
dc.subject.othertobacco pharmacotherapy
dc.subject.othercost‐effectiveness
dc.titleCost‐effectiveness of real‐world administration of tobacco pharmacotherapy in the United States Veterans Health Administration
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPsychiatry
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPublic Health
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/150598/1/add14621_am.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/150598/2/add14621.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/add.14621
dc.identifier.sourceAddiction
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAustin P. C. An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational studies. Multivar Behav Res 2011; 46: 399 – 424.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDuffy S. A., Ignacio R. V., Kim H. M., Geraci M. C., Essenmacher C. A., Hall S. V. et al. Effectiveness of tobacco cessation pharmacotherapy in the veterans health administration. Tob Control 2018; https://doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol‐2018‐054473.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBarnett P. G., Chow A., Flores N. E., Sherman S. E., Duffy S. A. Changes in veteran tobacco use identified in electronic medical records. Am J Prev Med 2017; 53: e9 – e18.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCunningham F. E., Hur K., Dong D., Miller D. R., Zhang R., Wei X. et al. A comparison of neuropsychiatric adverse events during early treatment with varenicline or a nicotine patch. Addiction 2016; 111: 1283 – 1292.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHughes J. R., Keely J. P., Niaura R. S., Ossip‐Klein D. J., Richmond R. L., Swan G. E. Measures of abstinence in clinical trials: issues and recommendations. Nicotine Tob Res 2003; 5: 13 – 25.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePierce J. P., Gilpin E. A. A minimum 6‐month prolonged abstinence should be required for evaluating smoking cessation trials. Nicotine Tob Res 2003; 5: 151 – 153.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRiley W. T., Stevens V. J., Zhu S. H., Morgan G., Grossman D. Overview of the consortium of hospitals advancing research on tobacco (CHART). Trials 2012; 13: 122.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceQuan H., Sundararajan V., Halfon P., Fong A., Burnand B., Luthi J. C. et al. Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD‐9‐CM and ICD‐10 administrative data. Med Care 2005; 43: 1130 – 1139.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceIlgen M. A., Bohnert A. S., Ignacio R. V., McCarthy J. F., Valenstein M. M., Kim H. M. et al. Psychiatric diagnoses and risk of suicide in veterans. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2010; 67: 1152 – 1158.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKimerling R., Makin‐Byrd K., Louzon S., Ignacio R. V., McCarthy J. F. Military sexual trauma and suicide mortality. Am J Prev Med 2016; 50: 684 – 691.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceConner K. R., Bohnert A. S., McCarthy J. F., Valenstein M., Bossarte R., Ignacio R. et al. Mental disorder comorbidity and suicide among 2.96 million men receiving care in the veterans health administration health system. J Abnorm Psychol 2013; 122: 256 – 263.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBohnert A. S., McCarthy J. F., Ignacio R. V., Ilgen M. A., Eisenberg A., Blow F. C. Misclassification of suicide deaths: examining the psychiatric history of overdose decedents. Inj Prev 2013; 19: 326 – 330.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceIlgen M. A., Kleinberg F., Ignacio R. V., Bohnert A. S., Valenstein M., McCarthy J. F. et al. Noncancer pain conditions and risk of suicide. JAMA Psychiat 2013; 70: 692 – 697.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMusich S., Faruzzi S. D., Lu C., McDonald T., Hirschland D., Edington D. W. Pattern of medical charges after quitting smoking among those with and without arthritis, allergies, or back pain. Am J Health Promot 2003; 18: 133 – 142.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFishman P. A., Thompson E. E., Merikle E., Curry S. J. Changes in health care costs before and after smoking cessation. Nicotine Tob Res 2006; 8: 393 – 401.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBeard E., Shahab L., Curry S. J., West R. Association between smoking cessation and short‐term health‐care use: results from an international prospective cohort study (ATTEMPT). Addiction 2013; 108: 1979 – 1988.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAustin P. C., Stuart E. A. Moving towards best practice when using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) using the propensity score to estimate causal treatment effects in observational studies. Stat Med 2015; 34: 3661 – 3679.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAustin P. C. A tutorial and case study in propensity score analysis: an application to estimating the effect of in‐hospital smoking cessation counseling on mortality. Multivar Behav Res 2011; 46: 119 – 151.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAustin P. C. The performance of different propensity score methods for estimating marginal odds ratios. Stat Med 2007; 26: 3078 – 3094.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRonckers E. T., Groot W., Ament A. J. Systematic review of economic evaluations of smoking cessation: standardizing the cost‐effectiveness. Med Decis Making 2005; 25: 437 – 448.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShearer J., Shanahan M. Cost effectiveness analysis of smoking cessation interventions. Aust NZ J Public Health 2006; 30: 428 – 434.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLasser K., Boyd J. W., Woolhandler S., Himmelstein D. U., McCormick D., Bor D. H. Smoking and mental illness: a population‐based prevalence study. JAMA 2000; 284: 2606 – 2610.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSung H. Y., Prochaska J. J., Ong M. K., Shi Y., Max W. Cigarette smoking and serious psychological distress: a population‐based study of California adults. Nicotine Tob Res 2011; 13: 1183 – 1192.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCenters for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Vital signs: current cigarette smoking among adults aged >/=18 years with mental illness—United States, 2009–2011. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2013; 62: 81 – 87.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGrant B. F., Hasin D. S., Chou S. P., Stinson F. S., Dawson D. A. Nicotine dependence and psychiatric disorders in the United States: results from the national epidemiologic survey on alcohol and related conditions. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2004; 61: 1107 – 1115.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSong F., Raftery J., Aveyard P., Hyde C., Barton P., Woolacott N. Cost‐effectiveness of pharmacological interventions for smoking cessation: a literature review and a decision analytic analysis. Med Decis Making 2002; 22: S26 – S37.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHughes J. R., Keely J., Naud S. Shape of the relapse curve and long‐term abstinence among untreated smokers. Addiction 2004; 99: 29 – 38.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHyland A., Li Q., Bauer J. E., Giovino G. A., Steger C., Cummings K. M. Predictors of cessation in a cohort of current and former smokers followed over 13 years. Nicotine Tob Res 2004; 6: S363 – S369.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAlberg A. J., Patnaik J. L., May J. W., Hoffman S. C., Gitchell J., Comstock G. W. et al. Nicotine replacement therapy use among a cohort of smokers. J Addict Dis 2005; 24: 101 – 113.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCahill K., Stevens S., Perera R., Lancaster T. Pharmacological interventions for smoking cessation: an overview and network meta‐analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; 5: CD009329.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWalsh R. A. Over‐the‐counter nicotine replacement therapy: a methodological review of the evidence supporting its effectiveness. Drug Alcohol Rev 2008; 27: 529 – 547.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSantaguida P. L., Helfand M., Raina P. Challenges in systematic reviews that evaluate drug efficacy or effectiveness. Ann Intern Med 2005; 142: 1066 – 1072.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWest R., Zhou X. Is nicotine replacement therapy for smoking cessation effective in the ‘real world’? Findings from a prospective multinational cohort study. Thorax 2007; 62: 998 – 1002.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKasza K. A., Hyland A. J., Borland R., McNeill A. D., Bansal‐Travers M., Fix B. V. et al. Effectiveness of stop‐smoking medications: findings from the international tobacco control (ITC) four country survey. Addiction 2013; 108: 193 – 202.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKotz D., Brown J., West R. ‘Real‐world’ effectiveness of smoking cessation treatments: a population study. Addiction 2014; 109: 491 – 499.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePierce J. P., Gilpin E. A. Impact of over‐the‐counter sales on effectiveness of pharmaceutical aids for smoking cessation. JAMA 2002; 288: 1260 – 1264.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAlpert H. R., Connolly G. N., Biener L. A prospective cohort study challenging the effectiveness of population‐based medical intervention for smoking cessation. Tob Control 2013; 22: 32 – 37.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHughes J. R., Peters E. N., Naud S. Effectiveness of over‐the‐counter nicotine replacement therapy: a qualitative review of nonrandomized trials. Nicotine Tob Res 2011; 13: 512 – 522.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBorland R., Partos T. R., Cummings K. M. Systematic biases in cross‐sectional community studies may underestimate the effectiveness of stop‐smoking medications. Nicotine Tob Res 2012; 14: 1483 – 1487.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHughes J. R., Cummings K. M., Foulds J., Shiffman S., West R. Effectiveness of nicotine replacement therapy‐‐a rebuttal. Addiction 2012; 107: 1527 – 1528.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWasley M. A., McNagny S. E., Phillips V. L., Ahluwalia J. S. The cost‐effectiveness of the nicotine transdermal patch for smoking cessation. Prev Med 1997; 26: 264 – 270.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRuger J. P., Lazar C. M. Economic evaluation of pharmaco‐ and behavioral therapies for smoking cessation: a critical and systematic review of empirical research. Annu Rev Public Health 2012; 33: 279 – 305.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStapleton J. A., Lowin A., Russell M. A. Prescription of transdermal nicotine patches for smoking cessation in general practice: evaluation of cost‐effectiveness. Lancet 1999; 354: 210 – 215.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWarner K. E. Cost effectiveness of smoking‐cessation therapies. Interpretation of the evidence‐and implications for coverage. Pharmacoeconomics 1997; 11: 538 – 549.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceIgnacio R. V., Barnett P. G., Kim H. M., Geraci M. C., Essenmacher C. A., Hall S. V. et al. Trends and patient characteristics associated with tobacco pharmacotherapy dispensed in the veterans health administration. Nicotine Tob Res 2018; 20: 1173 – 1181.
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.