Show simple item record

Dental Hygiene Program Directors' Knowledge and Implementation of OSCE Testing

dc.contributor.authorNieto, Valerie
dc.contributor.advisorFurgeson, Danielle
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-03T14:00:44Z
dc.date.available2019-09-03T14:00:44Z
dc.date.issued2019-08-09
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/150654
dc.description.abstractObjective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCEs) have been established as a gold standard assessment for determining clinical competence. The Coalition for Dental Licensure Reform called for the acceptance of the Dental Licensure Objective Structured Clinical Examination (DLOSCE) to replace the live-patient examinations (LPE) for dental licensure, which are often viewed as biased, unreliable, and in some cases unethical. The purpose of this study was to assess dental hygiene program directors’ awareness of and attitudes toward a DLOSCE, whether their curricula included OSCEs, and perceived barriers to implementing OSCE’s. Methods: IRB Exemption was obtained (HUM00147564). A nine-question electronic survey was developed, pilot tested by five-dental hygiene program directors across three-dental hygiene institutions and was then emailed to 332 dental hygiene program directors across the United States. Results: A response rate of 36% (n=121) was achieved. Nearly 30% of respondents were unaware of the developing DLOSCE, however 80% were in favor of the decision. Nearly 75% considered OSCEs as valid assessments of clinical competence. Over half of program directors reported not currently utilizing OSCE in their curricula. Time (22%), perceived lack of best practices (21%), and lack of resources (18%) were reported as significant barriers. Program directors who currently employed OSCE’s were more likely to agree OSCEs were both valid and reliable assessments (p=.05). Conclusion: The majority of dental hygiene program directors were in favor of eliminating the single-encounter, LPE in favor of an OSCE for licensure. However, more than half do not currently utilize OSCEs for clinical assessments within their programs. Further studies should explore implementation of OSCEs in dental hygiene education, and how a potential Dental Hygiene Licensure-OSCE might impact the current educational curricula and licensure of dental hygienists in the United States.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectDental Hygiene Educationen_US
dc.subjectLicensure Examinationsen_US
dc.subjectOSCEen_US
dc.titleDental Hygiene Program Directors' Knowledge and Implementation of OSCE Testingen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.committeememberOh, Tae-Ju
dc.contributor.committeememberKorte, Dina
dc.contributor.committeememberBuchholz, Katherine
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelDentistry
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.contributor.affiliationumDentistry, School ofen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/150654/1/Valerie_Nieto_RDH_MS_Thesis_Dental_Hygiene_Program_Directors_Knowledge_and_Implementation_of_OSCE_testing.pdf
dc.description.mapping13en_US
dc.description.filedescriptionDescription of Valerie_Nieto_RDH_MS_Thesis_Dental_Hygiene_Program_Directors_Knowledge_and_Implementation_of_OSCE_testing.pdf : Dissertation
dc.owningcollnameDentistry, School of


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.