When Do States Disconnect Their Digital Networks? Regime Responses to the Political Uses of Social Media
dc.contributor.author | Hussain, Muzammil | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-09-13T04:56:44Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-09-13T04:56:44Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2011 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1071-4421 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/150688 | |
dc.description.abstract | Although there have been many studies of the different ways regimes censor the use of social media by their citizens, shut- ting off social media altogether is something that rarely happens. However, it happens at the most politically sensitive times and has widespread—if not global—consequences for political, eco- nomic and cultural life. When do states disconnect their digital networks, and why? To answer this question, the authors build an event history database of incidents in which a regime went beyond mere censorship of particular websites or users. The authors draw from multiple sources, including major news media, specialized news services, and international experts, to construct an event log database of 566 incidents. This rich, original dataset allows for a nuanced analysis of the conditions for state action, and the authors offer some assessment of the effect of such desperate action. Comparative analysis indicates that both democratic and author- itarian regimes disable social media networks for citing concerns about national security, protecting authority figures, and preserv- ing cultural and religious morals. Whereas democracies disable social media with the goal of protecting children, authoritarian regimes also attempt to eliminate what they perceive as propa- ganda on social media. The authors cover the period 1995–2011 and build a grounded typology on the basis of regime type, what states actually did to interfere with digital networks, why they did it, and who was affected. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | 14:216–232 | en_US |
dc.title | When Do States Disconnect Their Digital Networks? Regime Responses to the Political Uses of Social Media | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Communications | |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Social Sciences | |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Peer Reviewed | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampus | Ann Arbor | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/150688/1/2011 - Howard, Agarwal, Hussain (2).pdf | |
dc.identifier.source | The Communication Review | en_US |
dc.description.filedescription | Description of 2011 - Howard, Agarwal, Hussain (2).pdf : main article | |
dc.owningcollname | Communication and Media, Department of (Communication Studies) |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.